NP Rank:
Dith Pran of the "The Killing Fields" Dies
I distinctly remember watching the movie of The Killing Fields many years ago and being horrified that it was actually the truth.
I remember it so well, because even though it was almost 30 years ago, the evening had been punctuated by my boyfriend constantly wanting to make out, while I was enthralled with the movie and definitely didn't feel romantic.
NEW YORK (AP) -- Dith Pran, the Cambodian-born journalist whose harrowing tale of enslavement and eventual escape from that country's murderous Khmer Rouge revolutionaries in 1979 became the subject of the award-winning film "The Killing Fields," died Sunday, his former colleague said.The Cambodian born Pran died in New Jersey of pancreatic cancer at age 65, where up until his death he worked for The New York Times as a photographer.
He was repeatedly starved and tortured.
Born in 1942 in the town of Siem Reap, it was a time of the Cambodian occupation by the Japanese Army, which belonged to French Indochina (Cambodia; Laos; Vietnam.)
By 1960 Pran had taught himself English, which juxtapositioned itself nicely with his fluency in French. This made him an invaluable asset to the U.S. Military Assistance Command in Cambodia.
The man who never wanted us to forget the genocide of an estimated 2 million lives under the Khmer Rouge, lost 50 relatives under Pol Pot, including all of his immediate family.
During the fall of Phnom Penh, Pran risked his own life to save that of his American colleague, New York Times foreign correspondent Sydney Schanberg. Schanberg was expelled from the country; Pran was sent off to the killing fields. But he eventually escaped from Cambodia and moved to the United States, where he became a citizen in 1986
Schanberg had his life saved by Pran, where the Cambodian persuaded the Khmer Rouge that the 3 Westerners were neutral French journalists.
He eventually made his escape to Thailand and to freedom.
His second book "Children of Cambodia's Killing Fields" was written from research conducted with 29 of those children, who also wanted to let the world know what happened.
Pran called these people - "messengers" - "the real voices", because all agreed to travel and talk about the Cambodian genocide.
So they say, `Well, we get to do it,' because it's very important because the Cambodian killing field didn't have any--enough evidence to tell the world.
Pran has done much over the years, other than photographing for the New York Times:
* Photojournalist for The New York Times since 1980;Appointed Goodwill Ambassador by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in 1985;
Attended meeting of the International Red Cross in Geneva that promoted respect and international safe passage for war victims;
Testified several times before the Subcommittee on East Asian and Pacific Affairs of the Senate and House of Representatives regarding the Cambodian situation;
Member of the Asian American Journalist Association;
Board member to many non-governmental organizations
Received four honorary doctorate degrees;
1998 Ellis Island Medal of Honor recipient;
Founder & President of The Dith Pran Holocaust Awareness Project, Inc;
Compiler of Children of Cambodia’s Killing Fields: Memoirs by Survivors (Published by Yale, 1997;)
An authority on Cambodia, holding countless interviews with newspapers, magazines, wire services, major television and radio stations in the US and around the world;
Gives lectures to colleges, high schools, world affairs councils, and other interest groups;[q]"I'm a one-person crusade. I must speak for those who did not survive and for those who still suffer.
Since coming to America, I have visited Cambodia three times to evaluate the ongoing Cambodian crisis.
The problems Cambodia faces are not only political but also economical and social. The Khmer Rouge have brought Cambodia back to year zero and that's why I'm trying to bring the Khmer Rouge leaders to the World Court.
Like one of my heroes, Elie Wiesel, who alerts the world to the horrors of the Jewish holocaust, I try to awaken the world to the holocaust of Cambodia, for all tragedies have universal implications."
"Part of my life is saving life. I don't consider myself a politician or a hero. I'm a messenger. If Cambodia is to survive, she needs many voices."
Pran was well liked and respected by his peers for many reasons. Not the least of which, is that he had the fortitude, courage and knowledge to last his imprisonment, through starvation and torture and still escape to tell his horrific story.
"Pran was a true reporter, a fighter for the truth and for his people," Schanberg said. "When cancer struck, he fought for his life again. And he did it with the same Buddhist calm and courage and positive spirit that made my brother so special."
Sources:
MSNBC
MSNBC TV Dith Pran With Brian Williams (interview transcript)
Dith Pran.org
The Cambodian Killing Fields
Image Sources:
Crowd Power
-
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
Swan
Hillsboro, Oregon, United States









Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (16)
at 09:38 on March 30th, 2008
I'm adding some images of Choeng Ek (the killing fields); a horrible period in world history whose wounds are still open.
at 10:04 on March 30th, 2008
Hello Jordan,
Thank you very much for adding the photos. They both say (by Jordan) - were you ever there? If so, could you please tell us a little bit about it?
I'm uploading two videos at the moment - so readers, please check back again in about 10 minutes.
~ Swan
at 13:47 on March 30th, 2008
Swan, again you've given us a very thorough post on an amazing story. Thank you!
at 16:17 on March 30th, 2008
Hello Cynthia,
I'm happy you thought so! :) Most of the time I try to leave politics to Politisite and others, they're better at it anyway. ;)
I have my pet topics - most of the time I prefer to write about terrorism; human abuse; global warming; the sciences and the oppressed people of this world, hoping to shine a light so that the rest of the people on this planet will take notice.
So add China; Somalia and Dharfur to the list, et al.
But do they? Do the people on this planet take notice? Who knows? Much of the time I feel that it's hopeless, but I'll still keep writing till my last breath.
As I'm sure you will too Cynthia, my friend. Thank you for your comments and the GS flag.
~ Swan
- Sign In or Join to post comments
djermanoat 15:45 on March 30th, 2008
http://www.khmerdynasty.com/Content/pid=5.html
Lon Nol fought the Vietnamese Communists and the Khmer Rouge with the help of American finanical aid. Due to a series of American bombings in Cambodia, Lon Nol's government began to lose its popularity. This may have caused support for the growth of the Khmer Rouge. By 1975, the government could no longer fight back and on April 17, 1975 Phnon Penh fell to the Khmer Rouge.
at 16:20 on March 30th, 2008
The Khmer Rouge was Financied by China following the take over (same document http://www.khmerdynasty.com/Content/pid=5.html) Thanks for sharing this
at 16:28 on March 30th, 2008
Hello Djermano,
I do appreciate you stopping by to read the article, gruesome though it is. Thank you for the additional information - - perspective from all sides helps to round a story out a little better. :)
~ Swan
- Sign In or Join to post comments
dsfsad (not verified)at 16:26 on July 7th, 2009
Im glad this guy dies, i hope a lot more do
at 16:05 on March 30th, 2008
Swan, Good job on this story. I Posted the AP report as well. I am glad you gave him the attention he deserved. He was a great man... I rest on Sunday and read good articles!
at 16:39 on March 30th, 2008
Hello Politisite,
Thank you for the comments and the link - I'm sure our readers will be just as grateful. :)
The GS flag always makes me smile and encourages me to keep writing - thank you for that too.
~ Swan
at 16:47 on March 30th, 2008
Well, you did a great job, you deserve it. I write best when I have a passion about the subject matter.
at 17:39 on March 30th, 2008
Swan, I like this story. It's good stuff. Excellent coverage and comments. Certainly a man who has seen horrors we only imagine in horror movies and then some. A reason why the West when faced with atrocities caused by Despots must step in and stop it, granted many people at home accused the USA of being War Mongers, but in the late 1930s Hilter did the same to the jews, and the USA were hesitant to get involved and were accused of standing by and doing nothing while millions were being killed in concetration camps, thank god we came to our senses and did something by joining the war, just as we are doing now in Iraq and Afghanistan. But as History repeats itself,again the Public and Celebs alike much like the Vietnam Protestors and their predecessors in pre world war II are protesting todays wars. These Protestors much like their predecessors of old who strongly believed Chamberlain, British Prime Minister who failed to see the big picture and after meeting Hilter stating Hilter was a Good Old Chap and friend to Britian and the World, and the Cate Blanche Killing began in untold Millions.
Certainly todays horrific war news footage as it was shown on TV during the Vietnam era Today show even more vivid news stories of the Wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. And the Protests continue as they did 70 years ago.
at 18:03 on March 30th, 2008
Hello Barry,
Of course you're right. Those who would damn the government because we're involved in the war, would just as soon complain if we were not involved, calling America blinkered and dispassionate to the plights of other countries!
It's a true case of 'damned if you're right and damned if you're wrong.'
Now I can sort of understand that attitude from other countries, but from our own people? It seems like such a betrayal.
Have we learned nothing?
~ Swan
at 21:06 on March 30th, 2008
Judging by current events in Afghanistan and Iraq, we haven't had much support from our own people, hence the our Military term if "You are not behind us, you are more than welcome to stand in front of us".
- Sign In or Join to post comments
djermanoat 02:33 on March 31st, 2008
Although Cambodia had a rich and powerful past under the Hindu state of Funan and the Kingdom of Angkor, by the mid-19th century the country was on the verge of dissolution. After repeated requests for French assistance, a protectorate was established in 1863. By 1884, Cambodia was a virtual colony; soon after it was made part of the Indochina Union with Annam, Tonkin, Cochin-China, and Laos. France continued to control the country even after the start of World War II through its Vichy government. In 1945, the Japanese dissolved the colonial administration, and King Norodom Sihanouk declared an independent, anti-colonial government under Prime Minister Son Ngoc Thanh in March 1945. The Allies deposed this government in October. In January 1953, Sihanouk named his father as regent and went into self-imposed exile, refusing to return until Cambodia gained genuine independence.
Full Independence
Sihanouk's actions hastened the French Government's July 4, 1953 announcement of its readiness to grant independence, which came on November 9, 1953. The situation remained uncertain until a 1954 conference was held in Geneva to settle the French-Indochina war. All participants, except the United States and the State of Vietnam, associated themselves (by voice) with the final declaration. The Cambodian delegation agreed to the neutrality of the three Indochinese states but insisted on a provision in the cease-fire agreement that left the Cambodian Government free to call for outside military assistance should the Viet Minh or others threaten its territory.
Neutral Cambodia
Neutrality was the central element of Cambodian foreign policy during the 1950s and 1960s. By the mid-1960s, parts of Cambodia's eastern provinces were serving as bases for North Vietnamese Army and Viet Cong (NVA/VC) forces operating against South Vietnam, and the port of Sihanoukville was being used to supply them. As NVA/VC activity grew, the United States and South Vietnam became concerned, and in 1969, the United States began a series of air raids against NVA/VC base areas inside Cambodia.
Throughout the 1960s, domestic politics polarized. Opposition grew within the middle class and among leftists, including Paris-educated leaders such as Son Sen, Ieng Sary, and Saloth Sar (later known as Pol Pot), who led an insurgency under the clandestine Communist Party of Kampuchea (CPK).
The Khmer Republic and the War
In March 1970, Gen. Lon Nol deposed Prince Sihanouk and assumed power. On October 9, the Cambodian monarchy was abolished, and the country was renamed the Khmer Republic. Hanoi rejected the new republic's request for the withdrawal of NVA/VC troops and began to reinfiltrate some of the 2,000-4,000 Cambodians who had gone to North Vietnam in 1954. They became a cadre in the insurgency. The United States moved to provide material assistance to the new government's armed forces, which were engaged against both the Khmer Rouge insurgents and NVA/VC forces. In April 1970, U.S. and South Vietnamese forces entered Cambodia in a campaign aimed at destroying NVA/VC base areas. Although a considerable quantity of equipment was seized or destroyed, NVA/VC forces proved elusive and moved deeper into Cambodia. NVA/VC units overran many Cambodian Army positions while the Khmer Rouge expanded their smallscale attacks on lines of communication.
The Khmer Republic's leadership was plagued by disunity among its members, the problems of transforming a 30,000-man army into a national combat force of more than 200,000 men, and spreading corruption. The insurgency continued to grow, with supplies and military support provided by North Vietnam. But inside Cambodia, Pol Pot and Ieng Sary asserted their dominance over the Vietnamese-trained communists, many of whom were purged. At the same time, the Khmer Rouge forces became stronger and more independent of their Vietnamese patrons. By 1974, Lon Nol's control was reduced to small enclaves around the cities and main transportation routes. More than 2 million refugees from the war lived in Phnom Penh and other cities.
On New Year's Day 1975, communist troops launched an offensive that, in 117 days of the hardest fighting of the war, destroyed the Khmer Republic. Simultaneous attacks around the perimeter of Phnom Penh pinned down Republican forces, while other Khmer Rouge units overran fire bases controlling the vital lower Mekong resupply route. A U.S.-funded airlift of ammunition and rice ended when Congress refused additional aid for Cambodia. Phnom Penh surrendered on April 17, 1975--5 days after the U.S. mission evacuated Cambodia. http://www.historyofnations.net/asia/cambodia.html
Seems to me there must be more than one type of communist involved here. China is said to be supporting them from the above comment, but clearly here Pol-Pot communists were fighting China.
Our failure in the world is not doing and talking more about Nonviolence in solving issues. Those who contend the military provides such security are without reason to sane conclusions. One would think after WWII; war would be on the brink of extinction. But we have seen time and time again an American empire who promotes war, promotes weapons sales, promotes independence, and conflict in foreign lands, while at home they carress the tax payers income by selling the military complex and its defense contracting industry. Whatever you want to believe 911 was truly about, it sure has nothing to do with Nonviolence, but has everything to do with making us believe while cramming it down our throats that the military is our divine Godhead on this planet and we better well accept it. My resolve is the complete rejection of this, because the sick cycle it has created will eventually escalate to total world annhilation. Damned if you do; damned if you don't, is not to difficult to understand when you know who is doing the damning. Using the military God will damn you, not using it the devil damns you. I would rather have the devil damning me, than God. Does Japan like the US for dropping 2 Atomic Bombs on it, when they know it wasn't necessary? Do we really believe Japan holds dear fond feelings of thanks for the USA? Not on your life. In fact they want the US out of Japan even to this day. War ends when we seek to resolve issues without violence. They fester when people are made to believe the military is their answer to national and world peace. Clearly it is the opposite.
at 13:35 on March 31st, 2008
Thank you Djermano, for that factual, almost encyclopaedic comment!
~ Swan