NP Rank:
DoD Op Enduring Freedom Casualty update as of 10am 14 August 2009
U.S Casualties have increased again during this past week. Here is the update of total casualties as of 10 am 14 Aug 2009. The number of Deaths has now risen to 707, which is an increase of 13 over the previous week.
OEF U.S. Military Casualties
Total Deaths KIA Non-Hostile WIA RTD ** WIA Not RTD
In and Around Afghanistan 707 533 174 1,328 2,193
Other Locations**** 69 3 66 1
OEF U.S. DoD Civilian
Casualties 1 1
Worldwide Total 777 537 240 1,328 2,194
As of Saturday, August 15, 2009, at least 707 members of the U.S. military had died in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Uzbekistan as a result of the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan in late 2001, according to the Defense Department. The department last updated its figures Friday Aug 14th at 10 a.m. EDT.
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
albertacowpoke
Canada
Recommendations (28)
-
Tina Kells
Vancouver, Canada
-
jazzyzazzy
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Rory Cripps
New Port Richey, Florida, United States -
MilanSturgis
Washington, District Of Columbia, United States -
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States





Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 07:45 on August 16th, 2009
Thanks ACP, as usual! You seem to be one of the few that are keeping this story on the front pages--where it belongs!
I'm by no means a fan of G.W. Bush, but if the KIA toll occurred under his watch, we'd hear a hue and cry. I wonder why that is? I am absolutely disgusted with the selective reporting of the news by the American media. And I'm certainly not alone in my sentiments as evidenced by the fact that many Americans, nowadays, no longer look at their Sunday papers and either throw them directly into the garbage or use them as bird-cage liner.
I've said it before and I'll say it again: American military personnel are being used (and sacrificed) as "global policeman" instead of what they signed up for. If I had a son or daughter serving in Afghanistan, I'd be pretty pissed off and I'd do everything within my power to get them out of that no-win hell-hole.
Guys like Obama (and please . . . I'm not making reference to Obama's race here) don't seem to much care about what military people and their families go through on a daily basis. It's obvious that Obama and his administration have no frame of reference in the matter--indeed it's just not part of their makeup, nor is it part of their world-view.
In spite of all W. Bush's faults and failures, at least he feigned the decency to come out from time to time and shed a tear or two for the American public to see. When it comes to the sacrifice of U.S. military personnel in Afghanistan, Obama is aloof. What's good for the pot is good for the kettle, or is it what's good for the goose is good for the gander? In other words, if you want to convict W. Bush of "war crimes", then you need to convict Obama of "war crimes" too . . . it's only fair.
America doesn't need another Vietnam. Indeed, one was enough! And the ironic thing about the Vietnam war is that American troops won virtually every battle, but for some reason, America lost the war. In my opinion, the reason why America lost the war in Vietnam is because American troops simply weren't allowed to kill as many of the enemy as they wanted to kill and had the capability of killing. I'm certainly not an expert on warfare, however it seems to me that the only way wars are won is for one side to kill more of the other side until the other side gives up.
at 12:31 on August 15th, 2009
Thanks for your comments Rory. Soldiers of any country are used as an extension of their foreign policy. They don't chose the time and place when they are used. The least we, as a society can do, is show our respect for the sacrifice they made in fulfilling their part of the contract they entered into with us.