Truemors
is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
DOJ Has Legal Documents Proving Gang Stalking Is Real
Share:
by PeaceFrog | March 31, 2010 at 06:48 pm
1584 views | 10 Recommendations | 25 comments
DOJ is aware of gang stalking and the increased sophistication of electronic stalking. This is a link to a January, 2009 DOJ Report "Stalking Victimization in the United States", read for yourself:
http://www.ncvc.org/src/AGP.Net/Components/DocumentViewer/Download.aspxnz?DocumentID=45862(You must copy and paste one of the two above links into your http:// web address to get a cached version of this report. The PIGS have discontinued a direct link).
In January 2009, DOJ issued a Special Report (See above link for full Report) entitled “Stalking Victimization in the United States”. That report revealed some information that seems responsive to my FOIA request: 11% of stalking victims have been stalked for over 5 years; 18% reported stalking by 2 stalkers; 13.1% by 3 stalkers (oddly no statistics were reported for stalking by more than 3 stalkers, however a 6.5% response was recorded for the category of victims replying "number unknown"); 34% reported use of computer spyware; 46% video surveillance; 42% audio surveillance/bugging; 11% GPS tracking. It seems that the government has legal notice of the gang stalking phenomenon that goes beyond an internet conspiracy theory. Their complicity in keeping it going, and keeping it from reputable media sources, is either rooted in a negligent law enforcement scheme, official misconduct and/or, covering up incompetence.
NOTE: THE STALKING REPORT ESTIMATES 3,398,630 STALKING VICTIMS ANNUALLY. IF THE NUMBER OF VICTIMS RESPONDING 3 OR MORE STALKERS INVOLVED (13.1%) IS ADDED TO THE NUMBER OF STALKING VICTIMS RESPONDING NUMBER UNKNOWN (6.5%) THERE IS A POSSIBLE 666,131 UPPER LIMIT FOR GANG STALKING VICTIMS ACCORDING TO THE SURVEY FINDINGS. As for "David Lawson's" book and the multitude of internet sites on gang stalking, why do they neglect the issue of GPS tracking, local broadband radio use, flash mobbing (See Urban Dictionary) etc., that so clearly is needed to enable gang stalking activities? Its because the government itself controls the flow of most of the information related to gang stalking. Concidentally, government are the only ones who have the resources and knowledge to prove that a mass movement is happening. The fact that bureaucratic bloodsuckers are letting this go on evinces that they have designs on using gang stalking for selective prosecution of the usual targets from organized crime to political dissidents. The Supplemental Victimization Survey ("SVS") used to help compile the Stalking report asked questions presupposing gang stalking. It specifically asked about stalking by "teams", "groups", "gangs", "people", "members", (note this survey form is dated 2005). Section "F" on page 2 of the SVS asks "How many different people have done any of these things[stalking activities] to you in the past twelve months? It goes on to give a box with two choices: ___________ people, or, don't know. The open ended question allowing the respondent stalking victim to guess at their number of stalkers, sent to thousands of recipients, certainly had responses larger than 3 stalkers. Why was this not reported or summarized in the Stalking Report? What is the DOJ trying to hide, or, what other unsavory reason is there for not reporting larger numbers that gang stalking victims certainly reported? read the link:
http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/content/pub/pdf/svs1_06.pdf
(You must cut and paste one of the two above links in your http:// web address to get the 11 page SVS. The PIGS have disabled the original link to their website).65,270 people were sent the Supplemental Victimization Survey with 83% responding (about 54,174 responses). See Stalking Victimization in the United States, first link above under "Methodology":
The government is aware of Gang Stalking. Their motive for not addressing it raises doubts about the whole thing being a social engineering experiment.
Anyone interested can make a FOIA request and compel the documents used to compile Stalking Victimization in the United States. I would request any record, document, book, article, publication, statistic, pamphlet, tally, survey, bulletin, memo, teletype, draft, etc., as well as any other similar records/information underlying and/or used to create the report. I would also define record as being anything written, recorded, audiotaped, videotaped, visual, computer data, electronic information, etc., as well as any other informational thing existing in any form or format. I would highlight and state I was specifically interested in all records pertaining to the information in the report stating 13% of stalking victims reported being stalked by three (3) or more stalkers. I would ask for any and all copies of the Supplemental Victimization Survey (SVS) forms filled out by survey participants properly redacting any personal identifying information consistent with FOIA privacy laws, but, honoring the mandatory nonsegregability analysis, releasing any nonsegrergable portion not covered by privilege. I would attach the Stalking report itself as well as a blank form for the SVS (see two links above) and state in the request copies of both are being attached for their convenience. The correct contact information to send your FOIA request is to:Dorothy Lee
Attention: FOIA STAFFOffice of Justice Programs
810 7th Street, NW, Room 5400
Washington, D.C. 20531
Links to new DOJ F.O.I.A. documents on gang stalking:
http://www.multistalkervictims.org/svuslabellafoia.pdf
http://www.osnanaimo.org/svuslabellafoia.pdf
Advertisement
NowPublic on Facebook
What is NowPublic?
NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (25)
at 19:38 on March 31st, 2010
Hi Peacefrog - I posted a site before that I found really useful in terms of coping since we have so few resources for that: www.psychologicalharassment.com The section on psychological manipulation describes a lot of their tactics to a tee. It doesn't include resources for the physical violence (such as car tampering that almost cost my daughter's and my life) or the intimidation through surveillance... but it's the best coping resource I've seen.
I think it's also useful for describing OS to non targets and getting the public to understand the detrimental impact of immature perp behavior.
I don't know that the government as a whole is involved, but clearly there are persons in or factions of the government that are aware of our suffering and do absolutely nothing to help us get justice. I actually believe some within government or law enforcement are themselves targeted or coerced into silence.
at 13:30 on April 3rd, 2010
This is exactly the information that needs to be published. These are the facts and there are too many people suffering from this horrendous abuse. There has to be protection from this terror. It will only happen when more people demand it. Write your legislators and tell them the existing laws against these types of abuses must be enforced from the top down to the local communities. It is happening everywhere.
at 14:23 on April 3rd, 2010
Thanks for the supportive comment. My account is currently "under review" it was flagged after this story was taken down several times for politically motivated purposes. Internet cops pose as editors in our "free community". Please request that all Peacefrog fans post comments that he should not be taken off Nowpublic. On the bright side, I am currently in possession of documents that give further detail to this story. I am working on getting other documents from official sources through the FOIA and once I have substantially everything that I want I will be publishing this information.
at 15:25 on April 3rd, 2010
Thank goodness... I was hoping that someone could start getting results. I saw parts of the Don Friedman FOIA online and was looking to see how far anyone could get. I haven't heard back from the local Congressperson's office yet (they said they would copy me).
I'll give you my support when I get to an internet where I can log in. Right now I am having trouble even posting (not Now Public's fault).
at 05:11 on April 4th, 2010
PeaceFrog: If you remove comments such as the following, it might be helpful: "The PIGS have discontinued a direct link." ------------- It's not that you don't have the right to say these things, it's that they decrease your stature -- they make you look bad. There's this saying, "Never wrestle with a pig. The pig likes it and you both get dirty."-------- All TIs need to take the high road, no matter how bad it gets. And we all know how horrific it is. --- Having said this, you're doing great work, PeaceFrog, and your work should not be removed from NowPublic, in my opinion. "Organized stalking" needs to stop. We all need to work together to see that it does. ------- Keep up the great work.
at 06:40 on April 4th, 2010
Yes, it sure is difficult to turn the other cheek - and outside of Jesus Christ, I'm not sure that anyone has ever really done that. Noble gesture. Usually not practical. Nonetheless, the censors of the internet these days look for *any* excuse to dump content that they find to be repugnant or rebellious. There is a sand line that each person draws in his own mind - one that defines an upper limit to how rebellious free speech ought to be. That such a line exists at all is dangerous to a free society, but the natural inclination to "protect ourselves" drives us to draw it anyway. I prefer to draw the line at the legal boundary, as that is the best place for free men to draw it. Peacefrog's statements do not cross a legal boundary, IMHO. I usually don't wrestle with pigs, and, am not inclined to use associated labels in conversation, even though that very well might be what I am thinking.
at 06:45 on April 4th, 2010
Well, PeaceFrog, we know this. Someone has a huge stake in keeping "organized group/gang stalking" under wraps. There are many, as we know, who want to squelch any and all reasonable, cogent dialogue about this topic. Well, word is getting out. In spite of them.
at 06:46 on April 4th, 2010
Well, PeaceFrog, we know this. Someone has a huge stake in keeping "organized group/gang stalking" under wraps. There are many, as we know, who want to squelch any and all reasonable, cogent dialogue about this topic. Well, word is getting out. In spite of them.
at 06:48 on April 4th, 2010
Well, PeaceFrog, we know this. Someone has a huge stake in keeping "organized group/gang stalking" under wraps. There are many, as we know, who want to squelch any and all reasonable, cogent dialogue about this topic. Well, word is getting out. In spite of them.
at 07:39 on April 4th, 2010
I can not even sign in to edit any of the articles. What bothers me most is that the most active editors also write thousands of stories and have millions of views. Most of them do this part time and are graduate students and the like They also have the time and perspicacity to selectively flag stories within minutes of their being published. They all seem to have similar topics: gay rights, global warming, etc. I.e., there are accounts set up for internet police. Its more subtle here than in China or Iran. There they use a blunderbuss censorship. Here, we complain about their censorship, but our political police are so much better at targeting speech that counts. Perhaps, they can learn Western "democratic" political control technologies. Then, they could be both highly repressive and have great PR, just like US.
at 17:19 on April 4th, 2010
If things don't work out here, I hope that you can find a way to single-host your web site and to be free of the censors. I was not able to get free of them - even after successive tries in five different countries - so in my eyes the censorship regimen is not quite so subtle as you say. Typically it takes only two or three days for the "system" to squash any sites that I try to set up in the U.S., and maybe three weeks or a month in other "foreign" countries. Theoretically, I could stay "out of the box" by continually moving my sites to different foreign countries at the rate of one per month - but the hassle, time, and money considerations would be ridiculous. Eventually, I would run out of countries. Is interpol involved with this?
at 14:58 on April 4th, 2010
Scrivener can post his garbage, but your account is under review?? Did anyone from NP send you an e-mail with any indication as to why they are reviewing it? ------ Scrivener is written off by most who read him for any length of time -- it's hard to know what his angle is. You, on the other hand, are pushing to get this information out in a reasonable way. Someone might just believe you. And the human garbage engaged in OS certainly wouldn't want that.
at 16:36 on April 4th, 2010
There are suicides and murders occurring because of OS. DOJ Office of Justice Programs pulls the Stalking Report and Supplemental Victimization Survey from their website. The first time this story got pulled it had almost over 4000 hits. Other versions got pulled with hundreds of more views. Nothing totally disappears from the net, and that is good. This is a real story. The editor who pulled an earlier version, e-mailed me that I used "all caps" in the headline and that was against community standards. She writes about paranormal ghost stories. Maybe she should try to contact some of the OS suicides that are ultimately victims of government inaction and manipulation. The good news is also that I'm in the process of getting more documents clarifying OS from several government agencies. I will post this information all over the net and will start my own website in due time. I would like to publish some materials I've gotten through FOIA that elaborate on this article, but, I'm waiting till I have all the materials I need for a real journalistic piece. If you like this and other articles complain about my account being suspended. All of the people leaving positive comments should, this website is supposed to be crowd powered media. I think I connected meaningfully with a lot of viewers.
at 07:20 on April 5th, 2010
Yep, "paranormal ghost stories" are critically important, as we know. Lives will be saved. Seriously, though, you are absolutely correct about the homicides and suicides. We know of examples. ---- OS is growing and those involved must seriously believe that they're going to be able to keep it under wraps. And trying to eliminate your stories would be a good way to try to do so. We'll get this story out one way or another. Hubris will bring these stalking operations to their knees, eventually. -------- How do we make complaints on NP? Could you quickly tell your readers? ------- Thank you for all you've done. Your good work isn't in vain. Word is getting out.
at 09:16 on April 5th, 2010
Normal 0 Thank you for your supportive comment. It is highly unfortunate that members and viewers on Nowpublic cannot voice their opinions and criticisms in “Letters to the Editor” as they can with established press. However, it is not difficult to find editors amongst the Nowpublic members, who are searchable, and I implore any of my supporters to e-mail letters supporting my articles.
at 09:53 on April 5th, 2010
PF: Could you give us the name of the NP staff members who flagged your stories and/or emailed you about them? Aren't there certain individuals from whom you've heard?-------------------------------------------- To all: Here's an interesting blog "article":------------------------------ "Obama's National Cybersecurity Initiative Puts NSA in the Driver's Seat" ------------------------------- (www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=1831516114336983238&postID=8372105594356984077)
at 11:35 on April 5th, 2010
Tina Kells is the last member/editor to flag my story on DOJ and gang stalking for "headlines in caps" and other such deviations from Nowpublic norms.
at 10:05 on April 5th, 2010
“A Practical Guide to Internet Technology for Political Activists in Repressive RegimesEFF Releases ‘Surveillance Self-Defense International’ for Iranian Dissidents and Other Protestors-------- SAN FRANCISCO – July 21 – The Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) released “Surveillance Self-Defense International” (SSDI) today, a practical guide to help activists from around the world use the Internet safely under repressive regimes. It is available at: www.eff.org/wp/surveillance-self-defense-international.”----------- www.commondreams.org/newswire/2009/07/21-16
at 10:30 on April 5th, 2010
I think it's important for us not to talk down about the contents of other people's articles - rather we should impart the life and death nature of our problem... how it gets trivialized, how we can't get justice for it, how mainstream media rarely will address it and when it does it does so in a way that portrays us as possible loonies, how it involves so many segments of society, how it will be the non-TI's problem tomorrow if we don't fix this today.
We shouldn't insult the editors, we should let them know that this kind of censorship is part of why alternative news agencies are created.
Our harassment is quite expensive, especially for those of us who have the EH problem in addition to OS. I found another good tactic to find out who might be behind this is to follow the money. When I have had harassing wrong numbers for three years from the same company - what company was it and who gives them their contracts? When I have had constant problems with a phone company - what company was it and who owned it at the time? What controversies or public scandals have they had? When I am sure I can link the hacking of my cell phone internet to the poster - well can a cell phone internet be hacked? If not, then what company am I using and what clandestine activities have they been unsucessfully sued for before? (see how I get around naming names).
While an employee of one company can be involved in poor workmanship or lies, when the problems I've had have been consistent, I find that those companies have something in common. This even works for the connections to those who have given me the most grief in the past. Who has slandered me at school/work in the past and who are they connected to? Even the Brazilian patsy that gave a face to my harassment apparently worked for a very famous multinational corporation that has something in common with some of the above.
If we ever got to the point of really being able to organize we might find not so much that we have a lot in common in why we were picked, but we might have a lot in common in the corporate background of some of our harassment.
Well good luck to us in this McCarthy-era without communists (or "war on terror" waged on innocents by the real terrorists) or whatever it is.
at 11:36 on April 5th, 2010
Tina Kells flagged this article for "headline in caps"!
at 11:38 on April 5th, 2010
Tina Kells flagged this story for headline in caps!
at 11:41 on April 5th, 2010
Tina Kells flagged this story for headlines in caps.
at 04:57 on April 8th, 2010
PeaceFrog:I am trying to follow your logic relative to the report ... proving DOJ has evidence of gang stalking. I have downloaded the report. Could you point me to the pages and paragraphs that you think are most supportive of your case? (the case being that the DOJ understands "our version" of gang stalking as opposed to jealous boyfriends and lone crazies)
at 13:30 on April 10th, 2010
at 09:57 on April 28th, 2010
Hey PeaceFrog! Nice hat.