NP Rank:
Don’t walk away, Barack
I read Washington Post “Obama's disastrous path” By Katrina vanden Heuvel this morning. Like many journalists, she writes about what appears to be a one-term President, though she cautions that America cannot afford that. What we need is a leader who will defend the American middle class against absurd encroachment by the super wealth and powerful.
The American voter public is fickle and erratic, and frankly, it isn’t very bright. Yet, when the pain really strikes home, a notch worse than today, maybe they’ll get it. Maybe even a year away, Americans will realize that the Republicans are giving them the shaft and not the chaff.
“The stakes are much higher than the distant election. The president has suggested unconvincingly that he'd prefer to be a successful one-term president than a two-term president who didn't get anything done. But there are other alternatives. If the president continues on his current course, we're looking at a failed one-term presidency that the nation cannot afford.
Forget about electoral mandates or campaign promises. This president has a historic mandate. Just as Abraham Lincoln had to lead the nation from slavery and Franklin Roosevelt from the Depression, this president must lead the nation from the calamitous failures of three decades of conservative dominance. This requires beginning to reverse the perverse tax policies that have contributed to gilded-age inequality and starved the government of resources needed for vital investments. This demands correcting destabilizing global imbalances, laying a new foundation for reviving American manufacturing and shackling financial speculation. It means ensuring the United States leads rather than lags in the green industrial revolution. And it requires unwinding the self-destructive military adventures abroad. The president must strengthen America's basic social contract in a global economy, not weaken it.””



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 11:21 on December 7th, 2010
"Forget about electoral mandates or campaign promises." I think that is the root problem as far as the average citizen is concerned. The almost total rejection of the Democratic Party in the last election is a clear message. Labeling the electorate fickle and erratic, and not very bright isn't going to endear anyone to a path that continues to demonize "Republican policy" Obama is quite comfortable with maintaining. That is if you believe domestic and foreign policies are enacted for partisan purposes and can be passed by a two party Congress and maintain a clear partisanship? I know in Canada policies don't pass unless they are agreeable to the majority. And we have four different party's sitting in Parliament. Not that that stops the press from blaming everything on the Prime Minister of the day for the policies.
at 12:38 on December 7th, 2010
Another interesting comment by trans-parere. I like your thoughts !
I believe the answer for President Obama has to do with better engaging the American voter with issues he finds important. Focusing in on how Americans respond to those ideas. Following that lead in creating policy and legislation.
Without the American voter, or worse, alienating the american voter, as happen his first two years, results speak for themselves.
The healthcare bill ( The Affordable Care Act ) in particular, being ill conceived, implemented and timed, was instrumental with this last election result in alienating voters.
The economic mess, government excess spending, and job issues became a big negative then also.
1