Don't Ask, Don't Tell Policy To Be Revised With Leniency: Gates

by Yuliya Talmazan | February 2, 2010 at 09:40 am
280 views | 2 Recommendations | 3 comments

The controversial "Don't ask, Don't tell" (a.k.a. DADT) policy that bans openly gay, lesbian, and bisexual individuals from serving in the U.S. Army will be reconsidered with leniency according to Defense Secretary Robert Gates. The "Don't ask, Don't tell" policy prohibits any homosexual or bisexual person from disclosing his or her sexual orientation or from speaking about any homosexual relationships while serving in the United States army. Heading into today's press briefing with Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Joint Chiefs Chairman Adm. Mike Mullen, it was rumoured that Pentagon would make the DADT rules significantly less stringent. U.S. President Barack Obama has previously called for the DADT policy to be eliminated.

It is alleged the following two key points of the DADT policy are likely to be changed:

No longer will a “third party,’’ such as a spouse or informant outside the military, be able to prompt investigations of service members by saying they are gay; and only generals and admirals will be authorized to decide whether someone should be discharged for being gay.


A more lenient policy will become an interim step before the elimination of the DADT policy. Pentagon is expected to take a year to study how to revise the DADT policy effectively and create a gradual transition to a more gay friendly policy. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said, "we have a degree of latitude within the existing law," but said he expects sharp divisions within U.S. government over DADT policy changes.

Videos

Gates Wants Review of Ban on Gays in Military

see larger video

sourced by Sudha Krishna

Gates Wants Review of Ban on Gays in Military
Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
158

I think in two years it will be fully ended.

0
Concerned airman

First of all admitting or accepting homosexuality in the military shouldn't even be a question.  It is morally wrong and not conducive in our military.  I believe it is more of a nuisance, a distraction, a politician tool to get their votes. And frankly, in my line of work (aircraft maintenance), most woman can not carry their own weight or perform as well as men.  Now if we accept homosexuals in our military, what will be next?  Homosexual bathrooms and dormitories?  I thought our government is trying to save money here?

0
?????

Oh yeah this coming from a fucking Air jocky/Grease Monkey.Please it's nice and safe in you little base/and or Carrier.Try going into the field and saying you don't want homosexuals.Man this is the thinking in life that gets men killed.So your saying a bullet from a Homosexuals gun is going to be non-Leathal?The more Soldiers we have to fight our wars,the better.We might get out of the middle east if we get who ever the fuck we can to do the work.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

158
First Flagged at 1:19 PM, Feb 2, 2010 by 158
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (2)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from