NP Rank:
Dublin: 120,000 marched in protest organised by the unions
According the the Irish Times: "Up to 120,000 people have marched in Dublin in protest at how the Government is handling the economic crisis. The march, which was organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions (Ictu), took nearly one and a half hours to make its way from Parnell Square to Merrion Square"
ICTU Demonstration 19/2/09
Statement by Declan Kelleher, INTO President, ICTU Demonstration
19 February 2009
INTO President urges workers to put shoe leather on streets of Dublin.
The president of the Irish National Teachers’ Organisation said today that this Saturday’s demonstration organised by the Irish Congress of Trade Unions is an opportunity for all fair minded citizens to stand up and be counted and demand a fairer way of tackling the country’s economic difficulties. He said although all trade unionists will want to vent their anger and frustration at the government’s unfair handling of the crisis, Saturday’s demonstration is not for trade unionists only.
“Every citizen who wants to see a fair resolution to the country’s economic problems should put shoe leather on the streets of the capital,” said Mr Kelleher.
He said the disclosures over the past few weeks concerning the behaviour of senior personnel in Ireland’s banking and financial world have been a source of shock and outrage to all citizens. “Next Saturday is an opportunity for everyone to voice their disgust at this behaviour. Those who have brought the country into disrepute cannot be allowed to escape while others pay for their recklessness and worse.”
Mr Kelleher said that many of these figures were behind what he called the recent IBEC driven agenda to try and divide public and private sector workers. “This will not succeed,” said Mr Kelleher. “Saturday’s demonstration will prove that.” Mr Kelleher was speaking in schools in north Dublin where he urged teachers to turn out in force on Saturday.
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
infomatique
Dublin, Ireland -
J P. Ireland Photoline
Dublin, Ireland -
decsramble
Ireland -
Dublin Sonja
Ireland -
williamm
Dublin, Ireland -
turgidson
Ireland -
macmalk70
Ireland -
Dec EOS
Ireland -
mkm photography
Ireland
Recommendations (64)
-
aelusive
Kapaa, Hawaii, United States -
mike_yvr
Canada -
Karen Hatter
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States -
lefty_liberated
New York, New York, United States
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States -
Uwe Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada -
mtammas
Vancouver, Canada














Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (8)
at 11:35 on February 22nd, 2009
good story.
at 13:24 on February 22nd, 2009
Thank you so much for this story. I've been following events like this throughout the UK and the rest of the EU, as well as around the world.
I believe that marches and rallies and protests are incredibly important as they show that people are paying attention. And they garner attention, although rarely to the extend they should.
In the absence of public displays, many politicians, other decision makers and those who have access to influence, would be able to guide plans the way they want, without challenge and without scrutiny. Those decisions are not necessarily for the common good or in the public -- meaning the peoples' -- interest.
Regarding public sectors workers giving it up. They frequently already have been before the general population realizes there's a problem and before the private sector is asked or required to. The public sector is an easy target and the first place politicians turn to when 'times get tough'. It's easy to complain about public services but those who do that work last much longer than most politicians do. And the services and programs they implement and maintain mean more to the average person than a political pronouncement.
In regards to who is organizing the marches? It makes sense that trade unions would do this. They already have the capacity to mobilize many people, and they speak from a collective frame. Labour organizations often are able to provide a vehicle from which many can speak -- especially non-profit groups that represent women, the poor, and others who are not as well resourced.
In my opinion, trade unions are a legitimate vehicle through which wealth is distributed more equitably across society and throughout population. However, because they represent workers - some well paid but many who are not - they bring a different perspective to the table.
Those is power, those with wealth and influence, don't need to rally and march and protest because the already have the aforementioned power and influence. Those without the same access use different mechanisms - like demonstrations, and yes, strikes.
at 13:24 on February 22nd, 2009
Here's a related story about the International Labour Organization's (ILO) projection of 50 million jobs to be lost worldwide in 2009 posted to NowPublic last week. Reason enough for me that labour is on the move.
at 13:33 on February 22nd, 2009
Hi Roy C,
In my opinion the protests will not contribute to a resolution of the problem but on the other hand the purpose of a union is to defend the terms and conditions of it members therefore we are going to see many protests and actions going forward.
If the unions representing public workers do achieve any gains it is most likely that such gains will have an negative impact on me and others in the private sector because the Government needs to find money very quickly.
You have asked about "There Is a Better, Fairer Way" here is the link
Here are some of their suggestions regarding tax;
at 15:00 on February 22nd, 2009
I agree Roy C, protest for its own sake is of no value, in my opinion.
Sometimes demonstrations, and even strikes, are a way to become part of the conversation and so part of the solution. And sometimes, in the backroom, those who do protest are encouraged to do so by those who don't, in order to create movement.
In Canada, there are several examples over the years of public sector workers taking cuts beforehand and then have wages rolled back or frozen when politicians are under their constituents' microscopes. Or simply losing decent jobs in favour of an ideology.
If the Canadian examples would help further this discussion, I will look them up and add them to this stream. But that may be a diversion.
In some circumstances, public sector workers are responsible for regulation and enforcement. However, I think it's too easy to say that they helped create the current economic meltdown.
Government bureaucrats often do their jobs complete with due diligence and recommendations/warnings. That's at the lower and middle ranks. If those higher up the food chain choose to stifle, dilute or omit critical pieces of information, that's not the fault of those who provided it. Among some in the top levels of bureaucracy, and with some of their political bosses, folks have learned that 'telling it like it is' is unwelcome, and career limiting.
Lots of room for post-evaluation. Back to the solutions.
I believe that any solution process will benefit from the input and energy of many. The public sector can contribute to the solution rather than have a 'solution' imposed upon them, especially one as uncreative as wage cuts. Perhaps some positions could weather a wage cut; others cannot because they are already low-waged.
On another note, I do think that lots of people can contribute to solutions. I disagree that everyone needs to sacrifice or share the pain. Some people, usually the most marginalized and vulnerable among us, have been overlooked in good times and were already struggling. Now they are struggling even more. I don't want them to sacrifice more. I want the rest of us to step up.
It's to simple to say that 'everyone has skin in the game'. Everyone has an interest, true. Again, should everyone sacrifice? Not convinced of that.
at 15:22 on February 22nd, 2009
Thanks for this piece and for the photos.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Dublin Sonjaat 00:51 on February 23rd, 2009
Roy C - you suggest that it is fair that workers, who already live on very little, are asked to pay a levy on their pensions because in the current economic climate we need to cut back. You wonder why we demonstrated rather than give our share. I am not sure how much you really know about the Irish situation, but the fact is that the Irish government has granted € 7 billion to the Irish banks, bailing out financiers, builders and other fat cats. Where is this money coming from? You guess... And now tell me you think it is fair that we should pay a levy to finance those who have a) got enough anyway and b) haven proven that they don't know how to deal with money properly??????????????
- Sign In or Join to post comments
paul king (not verified)at 08:52 on February 23rd, 2009
If i get a good news photo i will send ASPP
paul king Reading Berkshire England