NP Rank:
e-cigarettes' No proof of Safety
After e- thought revolution now the new product that is gaining ground, of course by using the "e" to make it popular is e-cigarette. But latest claim by the Greek researchers suggests that it is not safe alternative as projected by the producers.
There is a worrying lack of safety data on electronic cigarettes, despite their growing popularity with the public, two leading Greek researchers have warned.
In the British Medical Journal, they say that without more evidence it is impossible to know if such products actually do more harm than good.
Some studies have raised safety fears, but retailers argue e-cigarettes are a healthy alternative to the real thing.
Users can inhale nicotine without tar, tobacco or carbon monoxide.
The Department of Health suggested consumers "exercise caution".
The report authors said consumers should stop using the devices until ongoing safety studies reported back within the next year.
The World Health Organisation is among those to raise concerns about the safety of these new types of cigarette substitute, which deliver a nicotine hit in a fine vapour.
And in the past year, US regulators have detained and blocked numerous shipments of e-cigarettes at borders because the devices are not approved.
In the UK, it is illegal to sell e-cigarettes as a "quit smoking" aid.
But they are widely available to buy as a "cigarette alternative" over the internet and are sold in a number of places, including some bars and clubs, the department store Harrods and even on board Ryanair flights.
Andreas Flouris and Dimitris Oikonomou, from the Institute of Human Performance and Rehabilitation in Greece, say there have been three main reports on e-cigarette safety - one by US regulators, one by a publicly-funded Greek research institute, and another by a private company in New Zealand.
"The scarce evidence indicates the existence of various toxic and carcinogenic compounds in e-cigarettes, albeit in possibly much smaller concentrations than in traditional cigarettes."
Deborah Arnott, of the charity Action on Smoking and Health, said: "We do need better data on safety and appropriate regulation for e-cigarettes, although these products are certain to be significantly less hazardous than cigarettes, which lead to premature death in half all long-term users."



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (2)
at 12:36 on February 4th, 2010
Hey, like the excerpt in the article states:"Users can inhale nicotine without tar, tobacco or carbon monoxide."Of course legislative bodies are going to make a big fuss about this new technology that cuts into the profits of 'big tobacco'. But the reality is in the quote above!I'm one of those that successfully quit smoking using this technology and I tried it for one reason: Common sense told me that without tar, tobacco, or carbon monoxide it might not be 'healthy', but it would sure as heck be better than a traditional cigarette. It worked in my favor, so I suppose I might be biased. I guess all I can say is people out there have to due their due diligence on their own and find out what works best for them. Good luck!Alex
at 21:06 on February 10th, 2010
As a user of e-cigs for all of a week... it's an absolute miracle. I never thought ANYTHING could keep me from those nasty cigarettes that long - and I say "nasty", because I am astonished to discover how bad my sense of smell was... fellow smokers smell nasty.Look, this rumbling of regulation is simple to understand - follow the money. This is a terrible threat to traditional cigarettes; cheaper, cleaner, and more safe. Who cares if it doesn't do much to mitigate nicotine dependence (although, since the user can regulate how much nicotine is consumed, it can do that too); in and of itself nicotine is no more dangerous than caffeine. But the taxes on cigs are the real target of the "ban movement" here - preserving them, that is. The government doesn't care how many lives are lost - that's what government does best, after all - kill. Oh, and oppress. Yes, government is really good at that, too.End oppression, end death, FIGHT e-cig bans at every level - because they are stupid, destructive, and, quite frankly, unAmerican.Not to mention evil.