NP Rank:
ELCA adopts social statement on human sexuality
The Evangelical Lutheran Church in America (ELCA), currently the largest Lutheran denomination in the United States with over 4 million members adopts social statement on human sexuality, opening its ministry to partnered gay and lesbian Lutherans.
The nation's largest Lutheran denomination Friday reversed a long-standing ban on the appointment of non-celibate gays to the clergy, becoming the second major Christian group in a month to liberalize policies governing who may minister the faith.
Leaders of the 4.6-million-member Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, meeting in Minneapolis, gave local congregations the authority to choose ministers or lay leaders who may be in "lifelong, monogamous, same-gender relationships."
The decision follows a similar action last month by officers of the Episcopal Church, who lifted a de facto ban on the consecration of partnered gay bishops.
Theologians and church analysts said both votes could influence other Protestant denominations -- including Presbyterians and United Methodists -- that are struggling to reconcile conflicts over homosexuality and the Bible.
One scholar characterized the move by the two groups as a "watershed moment in American Christianity" that could further divide churches already laboring to stem the flight of traditionalists.
"Those who have been actively campaigning for a change of this sort in the other mainline denominations will see this as a sign that they should intensify their efforts," Richard Mouw, president of Fuller Theological Seminary in Pasadena, said in an e-mail. "For those of us who have opposed this on Biblical grounds, it is bound to reinforce the sense that we are no longer welcome in the mainline."
Conservatives in the Lutheran church condemned the decisions by the Churchwide Assembly in Minneapolis, saying the actions on gay and lesbian clergy run counter to Biblical teachings about marriage.
Related story on NowPublic by this author:
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States
Recommendations (47)
-
Paschen
Narita, Chiba, Japan -
jazzyzazzy
Glasgow, Scotland, United Kingdom -
generaldecay
Yorkshire, United Kingdom -
albertacowpoke
Canada
-
smkovalinsky
New York, New York, United States -
Criticom
Chicago, Illinois, United States -
Roy C
Vancouver, Washington, United States -
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada -
caj1
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (17)
at 01:44 on August 22nd, 2009
Can some one amend the bible, lol Because that's where the trouble all started...
Amen.....
at 02:02 on August 22nd, 2009
Amen, Babel-Fish!:) Thank you for reading, commenting, and for the recommendation! The up-side: progress is slow, but sure:).
at 17:15 on August 27th, 2009
Progress? What progress? These sinful beliefs, which are contrary to God's Word will bust the gates of HELL wide open! God have mercy on all of us! As the old saying goes....God made Adam and Eve....not Adam and STEVE! You can love the sinner and still HATE the SIN!
at 17:20 on August 27th, 2009
You do not love the sinner by discriminating and acting like a self-righteous bigot. You seem religious and Christ said "Love one another as yourself." Treat those around you therefore no different than you would yourself. No violence. No discrimination. No pompous self-righteousness. What did he call those people: vipers?
at 17:20 on August 27th, 2009
Progress? What Progress? These beliefs, which are contrary to God's word, will be sure to bust the gates of HELL wide open! As the old saying goes....God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve! You CAN love the sinner without condoning the sin! God have mercy on us all!
at 17:47 on August 27th, 2009
No you cannot as you must accept to love. To accept is to accept and imply condonation of all aspects of that persons character. Leave the judging to God.
at 02:24 on August 22nd, 2009
very nice and incredible post
at 02:29 on August 22nd, 2009
Cincinnati SEO, I always welcome reads, comments, and recommends. I do not, however, welcome SPAM. Therefore, when an SE is available, I am going to ask them to remove your comment.
at 02:56 on August 22nd, 2009
The bible was written by man,therefore,much room for error................Live and let live I say.
at 17:05 on August 27th, 2009
The bible was not written by man! Where do you get your information? The Bible is the HOLY WORD OF GOD. Not the holy word of man. Every word was INSPIRED by GOD himself! There is NO room for error. If you believe the Bible has room for error, then what's the point of having it in the first place...just re-write it! OH...I forgot you're already doing that!
at 17:23 on August 27th, 2009
Inspired by God yes. Figuratively written by God yes. Literally written by God no. Amended by man yes. Recorded by man yes. Do we not attribute every book to a mortal author. If every word was God's verbatem when Jesus speaks the text would not be highlighted using red font.
at 02:57 on August 22nd, 2009
The Lutheran Church of North America is split though.
The Zion Evangelical Lutheran Church has rejected this.
Only the non Zionist have endorsed this.
Wish I see as a problem even though the decision is commendable.
at 09:15 on August 22nd, 2009
I have some close relatives who grew up Lutheran, & this is very contrary to their beliefs. I wonder if, like politicians, the church leadership here is very out-of-step with the attitudes of the congregations in general. If so, it will only result in forcing them out of fellowship to other churches -- a form of robbery, by perhaps stealing their buildings & facilities via corruption of officials. Is there a way for the congregations to vote? Why do only the officials seem to get to decide the matter? This is like in government, where politicians do unpopular things after elected to office...because they no longer need the people. then, if they later run for reelection, they can always lie or make up another story to deceieve by.
Still, if it is a church, it should be adhering to the teachings of christianity, and homosexuality is opposed in both old & new testaments of the bible, right? Therefore, if people want to condone homosexuality as a doctrine while seeking the same God as the christians, jews & muslims, they need to also form their own religion, like the muslims did. They can call it whatever they want, to differentiate it. After all, would a muslim worship in a church or synagogue or would a christian go to a mosque to attend worship services? Even in biblical times, when the jews sometimes fell away from God and worshipped Baal, they didn't pretend to be worshipping God, did they? Practising homosexuals cannot go before a God who has constantly revealed his displeasure with homosexuality, even from as long ago as evidently charring Sodom & Gomorrah, and pretend to be worshipping Him as a christian.
If people have that big of a difference in doctrine so as to so greatly depart from the authority of the bible, then they have a new religion and must call it something else. To not do so is merely a lie, and if it is a lie, then "why"? Is it a desire to deceive people? Why? Is it due to fear of nonacceptance by others ... or a feeling of guilt? Either way is bad, because if they say there is nothing wrong, then why feel secretly guilty; and, if they feel they need the acceptance of others & fear the lack of it, does that not show they have no real confidence in the way they choose to live? Decide what is right. If homosexuality is wrong, repent, ask God for help, and do right! If homosexuality is not wrong, then why keep pretending it is christian when the two are opposed to each other? Personally, I am tired of America's dishonesty. Look, say what you mean & mean what you say, so people can know where you stand. Do not get up & lie to everyone for self-gain. That is detestable.
Not only that, but to steal millions of dollars in buildings & facilities via deceitful takeovers by corrupted clergy who don't hold to the faith they preach....is also evil & detestable. The early christians rejoiced when they were ostracized and put out of the synagogues by the jews. Why then are homosexuals taking over churches by deceitfulness & underhanded ploys against the doctrines of those they profess to minister to in good faith & according to church doctrine? If you have no guts to get out & start something of your own, & only deal underhandedly with those you were hired to help in good faith according to THEIR beliefs, ...then you also are not fit to even minister to those homosexuals you now profess to support. Such "ministers" are sinister false shepherds with too little character to lead, like Judas Iscariat, the disciple who betrayed Jesus and who, beforehand, used to steal from the money that was kept in his stewardship for them all. The same God they falsely profess will judge them then, right? So repent in the church, or repent & leave false representation behind.
at 09:37 on August 22nd, 2009
Just a little help for you. We can debate all day about the Biblical authroity and the acceptance of gays and lesbians to any church. What I would like to you to do is educate yourself on how the church works. The people who have chosen to vote for this change and the people who are at the assembly voting on every other matter that came to the floor (which includes important decisions made reguarding justice for women, a malaria initiative, and world hunger...to name a few) are representatives of congregations. It wasn't "church leadership" that made this decision and it wasn't decided by people who are "out of touch with the congregations". It was voted upon by members who were chosen by congregations to attend the assembly and vote as the Spirit moves them to vote. So, lets go all day about the rest of the issues you have with this decision, but first get your facts straight and understand how the decision came to be and don't assume the statement was put forth without parishioner knowledge of approval. It is a discussion and process that began in 2001 and all parishioners of the ELCA had the chance to share their opinions and take actions reguarding what was stated. Get the facts straight.
at 17:25 on August 27th, 2009
If he so expressed his displeasre, why did Jesus (God in the flesh) not once address it? What he did express was the absoulte unwavering love he holds for everyone. Also demanded no judgement and acceptance of all. Both things Christianity never does. You should work on that otherwise your a hypocritical "brood of vipers."
at 17:29 on August 27th, 2009
Also in terms of the old testament, the Israeli law heaped homosexuality in with liars and other things most religious "authorities" now consider petty sin. The law of God was the Ten Commandments. Homosexuality not mentioned so it should not be held in debate for who is and is not a Christian.
Examine the basic doctrine of your own religion. You know that Jesus guy, most "Christians" are nothing like him and never will be. They do not emulate his teachings and are just like those he spoke out against. I bet if he came to Earth again he would be tortured and crucified all over again by the religious establishment.
at 11:13 on August 22nd, 2009
Timely and important! Excellent post.