NP Rank:
Ethanol May Not Be the Miracle It's Made Out to Be
Here is an update to a story I did last year, that is relevent today, both on Biofuels and Food Shortages predicted to happen by going Biofuel. This is a companion piece to Robs story below.
http://www.nowpublic.com/environment/canada-worlds-third-worst-polluter
By JOHN STOSSEL and ANDREW G. SULLIVAN May 2, 2007 ABC NEWS 20/20 Gas prices are skyrocketing as the high-demand summer season rolls in, and Bloomberg News predicts that some pumps may soon hit four dollars per gallon. Along with high gas prices come the calls for Americans to diversify our energy sources and reduce our dependence on foreign oil. But be skeptical of politicians who tout ethanol as the clean-burning solution to our energy crisis. Are gas prices hitting a "record high"? Don't believe what you hear from the media about that. Reporters often forget to adjust for inflation. Gas prices were higher in the 1920s and the 1980s.
The Miracle Solution?
The idea that ethanol is the answer is a myth. Ethanol is one thing that both Republican and Democratic candidates agree on this campaign season. Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., and former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani voice their support for the corn-based fuel, and Sens. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., Barack Obama, D-Ill., and former Sen. John Edwards want the government to subsidize ethanol production. According to former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, "The economics of ethanol make more and more sense." Ethanol "makes sense" to these politicians because, they say, it's a clean and renewable energy source that will slow global warming, protect the environment and reduce our dependence on foreign oil. Plus, it just sounds good: Ethanol's made from corn, and we grow corn, so it just seems natural. But if ethanol made so much sense, we wouldn't have to subsidize it or mandate its consumption. Jerry Taylor of the Cato Institute said, "If you can make a profit in this economy by putting something on the market, the government doesn't need to put a gun to your head." But ethanol producers do need the help of government subsidies if anyone is going to buy their product, because without subsidies it would cost much more than gasoline. And critics point out that the idea that ethanol is good for America in terms of energy prices, foreign policy or the environment is a myth. The Ethanol Process As Jerry Taylor reminded us in his interview on "20/20," when ethanol is produced "it takes a lot of fossil fuels to make the fertilizer, to run the tractor, to build the silo, to get that corn to a processing plant, to run the processing plant." Then there's the energy it takes to move the ethanol around. Because ethanol degrades, it's not possible to transport it in pipelines like we do oil, so using ethanol means putting many more polluting trucks on the road to deliver it. More on this story "SOURCE" http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=3130684&page=1
This NP Reporters "Artiste7ca@yahoo.ca" Comments: Consumers should also know that Ethanol is a starch and sugar based fuel. We have all heard about the old Sugar in the tank stories. One downside of using Biofuels is that using a food for fuel will raise the price of that food. Something to think about especially when food is a scarce commodity in third world countries already. So be warned, if you must use ethanol, either do a half ethanol and half premium gas in your tank, or one tank of ethanol for every 3 tanks of regular gas. Would I use it? Well with fuel injection systems in most vehicles, I would be leery. Fuel injection servicing and overhaul for a typical low cost Hyundai costs around $1,200 dollars (Parts not included) to get the sugar and starches out of your clogged fuel injectors. If you own a BMW, Escalade, Porche or other over engineered high cost luxury car, better take out a second mortgage to repair it. Ethanol doesn't leave me with a lot of confidence. God help you if you live and drive in Northern Climes with a tank of ethanol in February at any temperature below freezing. Better have your OnStar, CAA or AAA card handy and your Local Tow Truck company on speed dial.
Will your mechanic warn you, perhaps, but then you will be most likely putting his kid through university, and if you keep using ethanol you'll most likely be paying for your mechanic's addition to his Beach Front home. Something to think about.
May 5, 2007 at 09:28 am by Barry Artiste, 843 views, 3 comments
Crowd Power
-
Barry Artiste
Vancouver, Canada





Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (3)
at 15:18 on May 5th, 2007
artiste7ca@yahoo.ca, you've convinced me you've done the work - it's authentic. I also think that you've been fair and thorough. I didn't get the sense that you were hiding your biases, or passing off other's work as your own. Or worse -- getting paid by those you cover -- so it's transparent and independent. I also think you deserve praise for being an eyewitness, and for your investigative efforts. Good stuff.
at 15:35 on May 5th, 2007
They have used 100% ethanol in Brazil for over a decade, with no ill effects on vehicles.
As for oil used in production of ethanol - this would be replaced with ethanol energy!! Even the trucks are ethanol run....
The two REAL downsides to biofuels, which were totally ignored in the ABC article are:
1. Increases in demand for corn for ethanol are placing a huge price premium on corn, even in non-USA countries, where people are suffering through lack of corn for food as it is being diverted to the US as is it worth more there. Plus the price of available corn is going up in poor cimmunities, causing inflation.
2. Any plant production for ethanol (corn/mainze, sugar cane, sugar beet, sorghum, even wheat) us ultimately unsustainable because it is tiring the soil and will require fertiliser input, just as good fod cropping does. Soil is not a bottomless pit of fertility. At best like a soon to be built ethanol plat near me, they will use the sorghum and wheat in the ethanol process and then use the processed grain for cattle feed (tho its protein in a lot lower)
Biofuels are a temporary stopgap. The real solution lay in other technologies.
at 18:26 on May 5th, 2007
My point exactly Matt, other technologies need to be found. As for Brazil, well I can bet you dollars to donuts the trucks are carburated or diesel powered and not fuel injected, though carburated engines still gum up, their loose tolerances engineering wise means they are less affected by biofuels.
As I previously mentioned it is the Northern Climes seem to have the greatest difficulty, other alternative fuels such as propane seem to be affected by cold winter startups too. I know the rage now are Hybrids, while in theory, they are a better alternative, and onlyif people outlay the cash for regular DEALER maintenance. Dealer maintenance is expensive. Local garages may not be up to snuff with hybrid technology. So people better make sure they have a well services machine before heading out to the Boonies where parts are unobtainable. It will also be interesting to see what the recycle environmental charge is for disposing of a humongous hybrid battery when it comes time to replace it as I am sure the core charge exchange will be minimal compared to the estimates 5 year replacement charge of of an average cost of upwards to eight thousand dollars for a small car, imagine a big fulle size sedan will put one into the poor house. As for me I will wait quite a few years till they iron the bugs out and all garages are knowlegable in servicing these hybrids before I buy one. For city driving I think they are ideal, but for long cross country drives I wouldn't think so.
at 03:39 on May 6th, 2007
Here is Australia the use of ethanol is in its infancy, but has government support. Theethanol is used in regaular petrol mixes - at the rate of 5% Ethanol only rising to a max of 10%
Even electric hybrid cars are not environmentally freindly - the electricity comes from (in AU) coal fired power stations that have lower energy efficiencies from coal to power outlet.
Hydrogen - good promise but again high power input dependant.
Some challenging times ahead. It will be interesting to see how long before the auto manufacturers and oil companies release some of the great technology that they have bought from inventors over the past 20 years - all of which can make huge energy efficiencies to cars and trucks.
at 07:53 on May 6th, 2007
So true Matt, a lot of people do not realise that many environmentally friendly products in themselves are environmentally friendly, but the process in which to make them is not environmentally feasiable, thereby negating it's use in the marketplace. There are engineering students making great advances in developing vehicles which get a 1,000 miles a gallon of gas, granted they are unsuitable for people at the time, but their study of areodynamics and construction and engineering techniques looks promising. Technology can increase our gas mileage dramatically, but unfortunately it will be at the expense of safety which adds a lot of weight and drag to a vehicle.