Ethnic Make Up of ‘Palestinians

by tikun | October 7, 2009 at 11:31 am
238 views | 9 Recommendations | 15 comments

 Lots of work on this one. Thanks to our friends and supporters this information was compiled. I hope it helps.

Ethnic Make Up of ‘Palestinians’.

Extracts from: “Bosnia – Motherland of “Palestinians” by Manfred R. Lehmann and “Palestinians ‘Peoplehood’ Based on a Big Lie” by Eli E. Hertz.

Arab Palestinian nationality (which was officially forged in 1964) is an entity defined by its opposition to Zionism (the Jewish national liberation movement) and not by its national aspirations.

Like a mantra, Arabs repeatedly claim that the Palestinians are a native people of Israel. The concept of a ‘Stateless Palestinian people’ is not based on fact. It is a fabrication! The following is a chronology of an ethnic make up of so-called Palestinians and their origin.

During Ottoman Empire.

Until the Jews began returning to the Land of Israel in increasing numbers from the late 19th century, the area called Palestine was a God-forsaken backwash that was controlled by the Ottoman Empire.

1880-84 Turkish government settles Muslim Circassian refugees in the Golan to ward off Bedouin robbers. Other settlers in the area include Sudanese, Algerians, Kurds…

In 1878, an Ottoman law granted lands in Palestine to the Moslem refugees from Bosnia and Herzegovina in the Carmel region, in the Galilee and in the Plain of Sharon and in Caesarea. The refugees were further attracted by l2-year tax exemptions and exemption from military service.

The same colonization policy was also directed toward Moslem refugees from Russia – particularly from the Crimea and the Caucasus. They were Circassians, Cherkesians and Turkmenians – leading to their settling in Abu Gosh, near Jerusalem and in the Golan Heights. Refugees from Algeria and Egypt were also settled in Jaffa, Gaza, Jericho and the Golan.

British Mandate: 1917-1947.

1923 Having discovered the Golan lacks oil but that the Mosul area in northern Syria is rich in oil, the British cede the Golan to France in exchange for Mosul. At the same time the Trans-Jordan was ceded from Palestinian mandate as well and Egypt was given control of Sinai, British and France gain control of Suetz canal. (82% of Jewish land was sacrificed in the process!)

In 1934 alone, 30,000 Syrian Arabs from the Hauran moved across the northern frontier into Mandate Palestine, attracted by work in and around the newly built British port and the construction of other infrastructure projects. They even dubbed Haifa Um el-Amal (‘the city of work’).

The Ottoman Turks’ census (1882) recorded only 141,000 Muslims in the Palestinian. The British census in 1922 reported 650,000 Muslims.

The Palestine Mandate. In July 1922, the League of Nations entrusted the Great Britain with The Palestine Mandate, recognizing “the historical connection of the Jewish people with Palestine,” Great Britain was called upon to facilitate the establishment of a Jewish national home in Palestine – Eretz Israel (Land of Israel). Three months later, in order to obtain full control over Suez canal, the Great Britain made a deal with Hashemite Kingdom, Egypt and France. The trans-Jordan (77% of the Mandate) was given to the king’s brother in exchange for the Sinai, which was given to Egypt. Golan Heights (5% of the Palestinian Mandate) was ceded to the French controlled Syrian Mandate. This robbery was legalized immediately by, the puppet of the Great Britain and France – the League of Nations! http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/Palestine_Mandate.html

General Assembly resolution 181, of Nov. 29, 1947: It calls for the partition of Palestine into Jewish and Arab states, with Jerusalem to be controlled by a “special international regime” to protect its holy places. The Zionist movement seeking to establish a Jewish state accepted the partition, the Arabs rejected it. The resolution was not carried out: After Israel declared its independence on May 14, 1948, war broke out pitting the embryonic state against surrounding 7 Arab states. Israel gained more land than it would have had under the partition resolution. Neither Israel nor Jordan, which controlled the divided parts of Jerusalem after the war, accepted control of the holy city by an international body.

Security Council resolution 242, Nov. 22, 1967: It calls for “withdrawal of Israel armed forces from territories occupied” in the 1967 Six Day War and for “respect for and acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area and their right to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries free from threats or acts of force.” The resolution was not carried out because the Arab side did not recognize Israel, and Israel refused to withdraw.

recommend Add a comment
1
Roy C

Invented category to make a country out of what had been Jordan with a nationality/ethnicity that is essentially meaningless.

Not to say that I am happy with the settlements, but if the "Palestinians" are poor, blame it on their own corruption and the stingy fingers of OPEC billionaires.


2
Barry Artiste

The Jews are a peculiar people: things permitted to other nations are forbidden to the Jews.  Other nations drive out thousands, even millions of people and there is no refugee problem. Russia did it,  Poland and Czechoslovakia did it. Turkey threw out a million Greeks, and  Algeria a million Frenchman.

Indonesia threw out heaven knows how many Chinese and no one says a word about refugees. But in the case of  Israel , the displaced Arabs have become eternal refugees. Everyone insists that  Israel must take back every single one.

Arnold Toynbee calls the displacement of the Arabs an atrocity greater than any committed by the Nazis. Other nations when victorious on the battlefield dictate peace terms. But when  Israel is victorious, it must sue for peace.

 
Everyone expects the Jews to be the only real Christians in this world. Other nations, when they are defeated, survive and recover but should  Israel be defeated it would be destroyed. Had  Nasser triumphed last June [1967], he would have wiped Israel off the map, and no one would have lifted a finger to save the Jews.

No commitment to the Jews by any government, including our own, is worth the paper it is written on. There is a cry of outrage all over the world when people die in  Vietnam or when two Blacks are executed in  Rhodesia . But, when Hitler slaughtered Jews no one remonstrated with him.
 
The Swedes, who are ready to break off diplomatic relations with  America because of what we do in  Vietnam , did not let out a peep when Hitler was slaughtering Jews. They sent Hitler choice iron ore, and ball bearings, and serviced his troop trains to Norway.
The Jews are alone in the world. If  Israel survives, it will be solely because of Jewish efforts. And Jewish resources. Yet at this moment,  Israel is our only reliable and unconditional ally. We can rely more on  Israel than  Israel can rely on us. And one has only to imagine what would have happened last summer [1967] had the Arabs and their Russian backers won the war, to realize how vital the survival of  Israel is to  America and the West in general.

 
I have a premonition that will not leave me; as it goes with  Israel so will it go with all of us. Should  Israel perish, the Holocaust will be upon us all.

Eric Hoffer 1968

9
Sputnic

Several months ago you published a story saying that the Palestinians were descended from Christians and Jews that were forced to embrace Islam by the sword ! Which one of your stories is true, both or neither ?

7
tikun

Both of them are mutually exclusive and make different points.

9
Sputnic

How can two completly opposing explanations for the same event be "mutually exclusive" . You are a liar, its as simple as that

2
generaldecay

Sputnic, personal attacks are not permitted on NP. Please address the argument and do not attack the member. http://my.nowpublic.com/newsroom/guidelines/code_of_conduct

0
nanute

Now that's funny!

2
Barry Artiste

Genetic if done in the middle east would find all middle easterners are of the same region, peoples, culture and religion is the only thing that separates them as far as I am concerned. Any really, why should this make a difference because one lives one way and the other another., no need to go to war because a people believe their imaginary friend is more powerful and righteous over the other. I am sure if these gods were alive today, they would agree and tell you all to give your heads a shake. You all live in the same neighbourhood, and have since historical time began

1
tikun

Barry,

You are right on. That as been the real issue and the thorn in the side of peace. No recognition of Israel as a Jewish State and therefore no willingness to live together. It really is so simple. But emotional and fanatical religious beliefs run deep in some Muslim quarters that choke on the possibility of recognizing Israel's existence. Any resistance to a two State solution by forces in Israel would evaporate at this recognition.


Sput,

No need for the nasty reply. Have some patience. This information just refers to the actual historical reality of the region and the Jewish presence. The other article referring to the possibility of Jewish "blood" flowing through the veins of some of the Arab population in the region in no way takes away from the article above.

If anything it only shows that in reality we are all so connected that the need to attack Jews/Israel for wanting to live in peace with its neighbors is a bit disappointing.


1
nanute

Any resistance to a two State solution by forces in Israel would evaporate at this recognition.  You are there and I'm not. I wish I could share your optimism. Expansion of the settlement areas will be a contentious issue for hard liners in Israel, regardless of the recognition issue. No?

The biggest problem I have with the Arab/Israeli issue is that whenever critics point out issues that show shortcomings in Israeli policies, the anti-Semitic rhetoric starts flying.

1
tikun

Nanute,

The very minority but vocal group in Israel that resists a solution only has a voice because there is NO willingness by the Palestinian Authority, Hamas, Hizbullah, Syria to accept a Jewish State in the region. This is the problem. You can not have a two state solution when the other side has no real interest in actually making peace. The Palestinian leadership really wants all of this region and that is the sticking point. Why should they make peace when the EU and others throw money at them and support their efforts at Israeli capitulation. My belief is that this is guilt money and blood money for all of their vested interests in the Arab countries.

"Settlements" only occupies about 3%(?) not entirely sure of the exact %, but close, of the entire land mass called the West Bank. This not not a sticking point. Most of the areas where these communities reside are in fact contiguous to the 67 borders. So this is a bit of a red herring. When Israel got out of Gaza she closed down many settlements and all of them were destroyed by the P.A or they asked Israel to do it because they did not want them. Go figure.

I find it hard that anyone could cry anti-Semitism over different viewpoints in Israeli policies. I usually think it appears when the rhetoric gets heated with inflammatory accusations of "genocide, apartheid", etc. But point well taken.

0
nanute

See this piece by Glenn Greenwald for a better take on what I'm saying.Jeffrey Goldberg's gasping, dying smear tactics - Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com.

3
Sputnic

If a group of people stole land from my friends and family and called themselves a nation I wouldn't recognise them either.

0
Hugh Askew

Sputnic, that is a very, very interesting statement!

One is left to presume that you do not recognize Algeria, Egypt, Libya, Morocco, The Sudan, Tunisia, Mauritania, Western Sahara, Syria, Turkey, Albania, Iran, Lebanon, Iraq, Pakistan, Afghanistan, or Kuwait?

Or does your statement apply only to those whom the muslim nations have failed to conquer?

0
Sputnic

Funny, I thought the people in these places reverted to Islam ! Even if not 900 years was a very long time ago 60 is not !

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Hugh Askew
First Flagged at 11:34 AM, Oct 7, 2009 by Hugh Askew

Related Stories

Recommendations (9)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from