EU and USA hammer down on Iran

by YankeeJim | July 26, 2010 at 05:22 pm
115 views | 2 Recommendations | 2 comments

Photos

Sanctions

Sanctions

see larger image

uploaded by YankeeJim

Déjà vu – sounds eerily like the time before the US unleashed shock and awe against Iraq.

EU approves tougher sanctions against Iran

 

English.news.cn   2010-07-27 00:31:04

BRUSSELS, July 26 (Xinhua) -- European Union (EU) foreign ministers on Monday endorsed tougher sanctions over Iran's nuclear program, including measures to block oil and gas investment and curtail its refining and natural gas capability.

Foreign ministers from the 27 EU member states adopted a decision implementing the measures contained in UN Security Council Resolution 1929 as well as extra measures identified by EU heads of state and government at their June summit.

EU's restrictive measures, which went beyond UN sanctions imposed on June 10, followed a similar U.S. move.

The decision provides a comprehensive and robust package of sanctions in the areas of trade, financial services, energy, transport as well as additional designations for visa ban and asset freeze, in particular for Iranian banks, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and the Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines.

Meanwhile, the EU foreign ministers reaffirmed the longstanding commitment to work for a diplomatic solution of the Iranian nuclear issue, calling on Iran to seize this opportunity to allay the concerns of the international community and agree on a concrete date for talks.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague said Britain has been in recent weeks seeking an agreement in the EU on a strong package of sanctions implementing the UN Security Council resolution. London also wanted a message to Iran that it can not just walk away from negotiations and expects no further pressure.

"And I hope Iran takes the message from that that the European nations are open to negotiation about the nuclear program but if they do not respond, we will intensify the pressure," Hague said.

Swedish Foreign Minister Carl Bildt said the Americans do not have much room to tighten their sanction as they have had sanctions since 1979.

"Now we (the EU) go some what beyond. That might have an effect," he told the press. "But without emphasizing and strengthening the diplomatic track, there is a risk of ending up with a dead end, which can be dangerous."”

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
1
t k kidwai

So EU,an organisation which is as irrelevant as UNO or Security Council.EU looks after interests of Europeans,ex-colonislists but yet to shed colonial mentality,cease calonial machinations,conspiracies and manipulations.The East has yet to rid itself of slave mentality.Europe is no longer colonial power,but Asians and Africans still feel obliged to serve their erstwhile masters.When I look at this scenerio words of Aristotle which he penned in his'The Politics' echo:"...(H)e that can by his intelligence forsee things needed is by nature ruler and master,while he whose bodily strenght enables him to perform them is by nature a slave,one of those who are ruled.Thus there is a common interest uniting master and slave".

Bodily strenght is reduntant and does matter only in one-on-one fight.What I find intriguing is 'the common interest'which unites US with host of Asian and African countries.Europe is a tail waging dog.So interests of master and dog are understandable,but those of master and slaves are undigestable.Why India votes against Iran in IAEA?A ridiculous explanation by Manmohan Singh,unfortunately India's PM and an unofficial spokesperson of US administration and protector of  MNCs interests in India:"India does not want another nuclear weapon state in its neighbourhood".Non-aligned movement is dead,we need a much stronger movement to take the monster and its pet dogs head-on by hitting their economic interests.Eyes can fall on Hugo Chavez and ahmadinejad.

0
YankeeJim

Criteria for enemy states, enemies of democracy and individual freedom and liberty:

1. Undemocratic states

2. States that do not believe in disestablishment or otherwise are religious states

3. Religions and organizations that attempt to subordinate individual freedom and liberty to their beliefs

T K Kidwai, I know that this story strikes a nerve. I respect your passionate response and do believe that the purist effort toward individual freedom and life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness is often corrupted, the fact remains that what is in the US Constitution and Bill of Rights is a gold standard for humanity at the moment.


This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

t k kidwai
First Flagged at 6:44 PM, Jul 26, 2010 by t k kidwai
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (2)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from