On the eve of reform, no change for 160 + million

by Susan Marie Kovalinsky | December 24, 2009 at 06:00 pm
193 views | 24 Recommendations | 4 comments

Photos

Loading photos...

Quote

As President Obama once promised, “If you like your health plan, you can keep your health plan.” That may be true even if you don’t like your health plan.
New York Times

The Senate has now passed the sweeping healthcare reform bill,  but on the eve of change ,  things will remain the same for hundreds of millions of American workers.  

The New York Times is one of a myriad of newspapers with pieces wondering if this change will be enough...

Now that the Senate has caught up with the House by passing a sweeping health care bill, lawmakers are on the verge of extending coverage to the tens of millions of Americans who have no health insurance.

But what about the roughly 160 million workers and their dependents who already have health insurance through an employer? For many people, the result of the long, angry health care debate in Washington may be little more than more of the same.

As President Obama once promised, “If you like your health plan, you can keep your health plan.”

That may be true even if you don’t like your health plan. And no one seems to agree on whether the legislation will do much to reduce workers’ continually rising out-of-pocket costs.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
2
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

Amazingly, the article below, from the Huffington Post, doesn't think this fight is over.  In fact it calls this mornings 7am vote obsequiously triumphalist bullshit.

I must say I somewhat agree with their assessment of this so called health care reform bill.  I asked the other night, if everyone will be required to purchase health insurance, where does Medicare and Medicaid come in?  I know what those two programs are supposed to do, but I would like to know how they are relevant in a reformed health care system.

How many people will still be uninsured without a public option and for the 160,000,000 insured already, how will it be cheaper than before?  How much more will be collected in taxes to pay for this bill?  Those are all relevant points that the Senators that voted for this bill have not explained. 


For those caught up in the obsequiously triumphalist bullshit coming from the DC elite - you know the crap about the Senate allegedly passing the most important piece of progressive legislation in American history today (an analysis I completely reject) - it's important for us all to remember that the health care battle isn't over - and specifically, the battle over the public option isn't over.

Now, I know you've been told over and over and over again on television that that's not true. But that's because almost everyone on television is a card-carrying member of The Church of the Savvy. Somehow, everyone's forgotten that 60+ House Democrats have signed a letter just a few months ago saying:

Any bill that does not provide, at a minimum, for a public option with reimbursement rates based on Medicare rates - not negotiated rates - is unacceptable.


2
marianmo

lets try and be positive.......let us resolve that for the new year we will all try to see the positive, to work together, to be respectful....this may not be the bill that everyone wants or needs..but i think the question is why....why did this get to be a fear mongering spectacle..why not work together for something positive for all the people...

1
Susan Marie Kovalinsky

thanks, Pocci, for all input and information.  

My dear marianmo,  you must see this has been hell precisely because many do not WANT something "positive for all people". 

1
marianmo

why not..isnt that why we elect our senators, officials etc

 

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from