Evolution and Darwinism Now Being Called Into Question
Many paradigms once fashionable have fallen by the wayside in light of better evidence, Darwin's theory of Evolution is a flawed concept that became more of an example of political narrative than science.
Who would have thought that one of the fundamental scientific theories thought to explain biological development and even the progression of man as a species could ever be called into question? The very paradigm of astute observation documented by Charles Darwin as he conducted his study on the Galapagos Islands that supposedly answers all great questions of prehistoric, post Ice Age animal and fauna development and ancestral origins of all species is now being steadily chipped away at by a culmination of independent scientific inquiries.
Federal Government Controlling Schools
Leave it to the publicly funded school districts that many of us grew up in to exercise their hidden agenda of indoctrination according to the directives of the state instead of educating according to the objective needs of human beings who have inalienable rights. Example given: Recently, one college professor gave out a very simple test handed to his entry level pupils to fill out. It was merely a simplistic questionnaire about basic political ideology.
After evaluating the results he was shocked to find that the majority in his classroom did not know the difference between socialism and a Constitutional republic, between parliamentary government, and the American form of government featuring an executive branch, congress, senate, and judicial branch. By the time most people my age were in fourth grade in elementary school, we were expected to know these things as well as the an initial introduction into the American revolution and US Constitution. Yet, these entry level college students eighteen years and older could not decipher between the political system they had been raised within and it’s diametrically opposed counterpart; socialism. Why?
There has been a progressive movement going on within US federally funded classrooms for decades that de-emphasizes objective reality, significant political history, the discussion of freedom and rights as an aspect of American exceptionalism. The difference between these and socialism, Marxism, Statism, Fascism, and Collectivism, the most oppressive forms of government in history, should present glaring discrepancies in the eyes of a well informed pupil, but not in America anymore.
The precepts of educator John Dewey, and his assertion that students should be part of a group consensus, the instructor should not be authoritative, that the state should be free to use the classroom to mold the minds of the participants, has come to fruition under the Obama administration. In a progressive classroom of humanistic teaching the teacher becomes a friend, the class is taught as a group who form a bond based upon a narrative. Students who are over achievers or very gifted are discouraged as the class is encouraged to behave under equal rules of engagement which discourages those who excel and have more talent. These individuals are frowned upon if they make the rest appear to be less talented. So much so that the exceptional student will be allowed to be ridiculed by the group for being an individual.
The Darwin Hidden Agenda
Let’s get back to Darwin now, and see how science can be indoctrinated itself by the naïve and pretentious pomposity of adopting fashionable theory over well researched work that has been thoroughly reviewed and tested objectively. Charles Darwin was a man with an agenda, a bone to pick with those who worshiped God. He not only hated them, but had stated many times that he was out to take God out of the classroom and out of science.
In his theory of evolution and survival of the fittest doctrine, Charles Darwin devises a methodology that nature uses a very long process of trial and error to achieve evolution through the development of environmental adaptation as dead end species who die off unable to effectively adapt and species that adopt successful survival strategies that take thousands if not millions of years to perfect. Therefore, the theory of evolution is a long drawn out process involving extinction of the less capable organisms and the successful domination by those plants and animals that through generation upon generation, develop better means of competition and survival.
Today science is being inundated with new discoveries that are chipping away at the old paradigms and presenting quandaries that are not being satisfied by established theories that have not been adequately put to the test by the latest discoveries. The theory of Evolution-Darwinism is the newest scientific establishment paradigm to face the chopping block.
Contradictions To The Theory of Evolution
One major contradiction to evolution as being an all encompassing form of organism development strategy is the concept of genetic mutation caused by Cosmic Rays. For decades scientists have marveled at how the intervention of an unfiltered intrusion of a single Cosmic Ray can cause instantaneous mutation through cellular damage and thus alter particular aspects of a species through one individual even if it creates a recessive trait. Each day we are bombarded by billions of Cosmic Rays a smaller percentage will get through to developmental microscopic levels and sometimes even cause chaos within the bombarded host creating an immediate outcome. This process contradicts evolutionary theory. Researchers have even watched and filmed as the inadvertent Cosmic Ray strikes upon a individual cell and the resultant mutation they arises.
Those who question the Theory of Evolution have pointed out many species of animals, organisms, and other strange entities that do not behave as animate, yet possess other traits that do indicate animal similarities. They are neither, and beyond culpable explanation. The Platypus is one example of an animal that has completely contradictory behavioral and physiological characteristics that defy the conventional evolutionary thesis. Having a duck bill instead of a mouth with teeth, webbed feet like a duck, hind legs that have poisonous spurs, and the furry body of a warm blooded mammal while behaving like an amphibian that lays eggs instead of giving birth to live babies is nothing but a contradiction to evolutionary development. An evolutionary nightmare so much so that the first scientists investigating a Platypus thought it was a hoax.
When Worlds Collide
The question of massive extinction and even massive mutation comes into the discussion as another undeniable argument against evolution as being the universal mechanism of species development. Decades ago Immanuel Velikovsky theorized that earth had been impacted by an extraterrestrial incursion that had not only delivered undeniable impact upon species that existed at the time, but had caused not only immediate genetic alteration with trauma, but even a distant primordial memory not only left in the evidence of damage and upheaval but through the effect upon species that survived as a collective primordial memory evidenced in mutation. The rise of mammals to the top of the food chain did not result from them having superior competitive skills as they were miniature compared to dinosaurs. When an asteroid struck the earth leaving a huge crater near the Yucatan peninsula millions of years ago extinction occurred due to environmental catastrophe, not the superior predatory skills of mammals who were no match for their gigantic dinosaur counterparts.
Velikovsky postulated several such celestial originated calamities that coincided with descriptions in religious texts, geological strata upheavals, and archeological remains that indicated widespread destruction. All these factors, he theorized had caused massive and instantaneous alterations in the species of man and animal as opposed to the typical evolutionary scenario.
Immanuel found himself under a ruthless attack by scientific communities everywhere denouncing his ideas and advocating his ostracization from scientific practice. Velikovsky was unprofessionally and unmercifully repudiated for daring to present his well documented paradigm to mainstream science and was eviscerated for it much as progressives continue to harass those that oppose their agenda today. Eventually however, Immanuel Velikovsky was vindicated and his work recognized as an important scientific tool to understanding our ancient past influences.
His two books “Ages In Chaos” and “Worlds in Collision” illustrated his theories of massive biosphere altering cataclysms that produced immense transformations upon species that survived while destroying those which could not immediately adapt. His work is a fascinating undoing of Darwinism from a cosmic perspective.
Intelligent design is another theory that is a thorn in the side of evolutionists. In the early 1990’s Smithsonian scientists began a number of inquiries into the nature of the universe according to the study and relationship of elements in the universe. Seeing a pattern like a building block approach to the atomic weights and composition of the basic elements and how an intelligent creator might go about establishing order in the universe, they uncovered something interesting. We tend to develop ideas, structures, standards, and even regimens of reasoning from the simplest beginnings to more complex progressions.
As the theory goes, if one was to design or create the universe would they not start out with the stars who use as their most abundant element-hydrogen which burns until it expends itself in the form of another simple element helium? Hydrogen is made up of one atom while helium has two atoms. We know that the universe is literally made up of hydrogen and helium within the nuclear furnaces of the stars while carbon, the most abundant element found in compounds and silicon being the eighth most common element are the building blocks of planets, meteors, asteroids, and moons.
An intelligently designed universe would encompass fundamental building blocks of simple substances that have few components or atoms. From hydrogen to helium and carbon to silicon a logical progression of structural protocol for the universe is formed. Stars are the redundant nurseries for solar systems while nebulas are the birthplaces of stars. These newborn clusters of stars on a larger scale then form galaxies. So the abundance and complexity of the universe begins simply like any basic intelligent design and expands. These seem to the scientists of the Smithsonian Institute to indicate logical thought based planning instead of random chance and long periods of wandering processes that accidentally collide and then begin the complex recipe for life.
Science would have us believe that billions of years ago that some simple creatures emerged from the primordial soup or waters of a forming planet earth while volcanic and atmospheric events raged, and life began as a rare chance occurrence. If life exists anywhere else than by sheer volume of numbers and millennia it manages to happen over and over again, yet outright exceptions and contradictions to this rule are abundant.
One example is the dolphin, who scientists say evolved from an aquatic creature by crawling upon the shore and then eventually developing arms, hands, and legs. For some reason though in actually reversing the order of evolution, the dolphin decided to go back to the water as its preferred habitat. Why? Scientists aren’t sure, but as proof inside the dolphins fins are the embryonic remains of five digits that serve as evidence of prior land habitation. Does this example of reverse transformation to former state of the species not point to reverse adaptation rather than evolutionary proof?
Charles Darwin in his God hating anti-Christian crusade for pseudoscience overlooked many possibilities in his obsession for creating a realm of scientific regimen that parallels many such faulty paradigms such as Global Warming, Eugeneics, and Peak Energy. As long as there are people there will be agendas based upon collectivism, prejudice, racial hatred, and reactionary reasoning that transcend the need for truth as long as they can develop a following of believers willing to embrace unfounded concepts with little or faulty proof. More often than not these erroneous theories will be incorporated into a political ideology that will be used to control people.
Politicizing Science For Population Control
This is the perpetual pattern of mankind. There are those that want to control others, who envy what others have, who will establish a questionable paradigm to justify their convoluted power grabs. This is what science can become when it is used for political purpose. Such perverse scientific theories have driven the blood thirsty and draconian emergence of fascist states like Hitler’s Thousand Year Reich. Still others will say that government can create a utopian society where all are guaranteed health, food, work, and political correctness with oppression as the tool of choice. Yet, do we not see that same pattern emerging once again as the Obama administration uses their social assault upon America to invoke a police state upon the people with promises of a government induced social utopia?