Executive Branch Incompetence Crisis - Obama, Delivering Obama

by Edmund Jenks | March 11, 2009 at 06:59 am
695 views | 8 Recommendations | 10 comments

Videos

In The Latest Chapter of "I Don't Care News!"

see larger video

sourced by Edmund Jenks

In The Latest Chapter of "I Don't Care News!"
 
Barack Obama administration - This map of Barack Obama administration relationships is interactive. Ctrl-Click to activate (new window), once at the mapsite, click on names to explore and expand. (Requires Java.) - Image Credit: muckety.com

Executive Branch Incompetence Crisis - Obama, Delivering Obama

In the first fifty days of this once promising run of this nation's "First Elected Black President", we are set back on our heels as to how incompetent a government administration and its parts can be.

Where is the "Card Check" process for competence in Government when we need it?

I suppose this is what we can assume to be the norm going forward when we keep voting into office ACORN promoting, Tax increase loving (now with Omnibus $18,584 per household - soon to be upped to $80,000 with the Obama budget proposal), Freedom reducing, Organized Labor supporting, Social Engineering addicted, Government enlarging, Free Enterprise punishing, Judicial Branch lawmaking, Lawyer Class zealots from primarily the Democrat Political Party, with appropriating class Republicans!

Truth is, we have only ourselves to blame ... and boy, are we stupid.

The Government is only a reflection of ourselves and what we are willing to put up with when we set in motion a steady reliance on a central power assistance in our lives without an adherence of standards.

This is what we can expect to happen when we see a mission creep of ""Corporate" (both private and public) selfishness.

An assistant shows the mock 'reset' button that US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton handed over to Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov during a meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, Friday, March 6, 2009. Clinton handed Lavrov the block with a red button marked "reset" in English and "overload" in Russian, a reference to a speech by new US Vice-President Joe Biden in January signalling that the Obama administration wanted vastly improved ties with Russia. Image Credit: Fabrice Coffrini

This excerpted and edited from Pajamas Media -

A Presidential Crisis of Competence
They (mostly) know not what they’re doing.
March 11, 2009 - by Tom Blumer - BizzyBlog.com via Pajamas Media

Less than two months into this administration, three things are clear.

First, its agenda is every bit as radical as many of us expected and feared.
----
That some Obama supporters are surprised is a “tribute” to a media elite that treated decade-plus relationships with radicals Jeremiah Wright, Bill Ayers, and others as “distractions from the real issues,” and to a McCain campaign that refused to treat Obama’s candidacy as the threat that it was, and now is.

Second, despite strong signals that he is guiding the ship of state in the wrong direction, Obama and his administration have largely refused to bow to reality.
----
While the markets continue to beg to differ, Obama has been essentially indifferent.

The third clear thing is the one that has apparently blindsided Obama fans the most, but should have been the least unexpected: He and his administration seem not to know what they’re doing. Pick almost any area and you’ll find a trail of incompetence that goes well beyond benign rookie mistakes.

The administration’s nominee vetting record has become a national joke that could take up this entire column.

Then take the economy (please). We knew before the election that Obama doesn’t understand the difference between net worth and income. His statement about “profit-to-earnings ratios” comes from that same well of ignorance.
----
Barack Obama has surrounded himself with the likes of tax cheat Tim Geithner, who scares the markets almost every time he opens his mouth. Meanwhile, the new Treasury secretary has somehow managed not to hire 14 key people he needs. Could it be that there is a shortage of qualified people standing in line to be participants in what is shaping up to be the mother of all train wrecks?

Obama, as president-elect, cheered as General Motors and Chrysler received taxpayer bailouts. Apparently neither the incoming nor outgoing administration considered the obvious problem that fewer consumers would buy from the two bailed-out companies either for philosophical or practical reasons (or both).
----
Meanwhile, in a laugh-so-you-won’t-cry story, Geithner is heading an administration delegation that will “visit GM’s technical center in Warren, Michigan, to see car and truck models and learn about the technology being developed.” Uh, don’t lenders usually see what’s going on at the borrower’s place before they cut the loan check? Even staunch Democrat Jim Cramer has been forced to conclude that “it’s amateur hour at our darkest moment.”

The administration’s foreign policy crackups may not be as obvious just yet.
----
Start with the Russia-Iran missile defense saga. Step one was the overture: “Obama ‘ready to drop shield plans for Russian help on Iran.’” Step two, the backhanded dismissal, followed shortly: “Medvedev rejects Obama missile defense deal.” Step three was the blowback, as noted by Charles Krauthammer: “The Russians have dismissed it. We end up being humiliated. We look weak in front of the Iranians, and we have left the Poles and Czechs out to dry in return for nothing.”

While supposedly making a point that this administration will “reset” relationships throughout the world, the secretary of state’s entourage botched a Russian translation. (Those who cite the alleged decline in goodwill towards the U.S. have yet to explain why France, Canada, Germany, and other countries moved significantly to the right under Bush’s watch.)

Obama recently told the New York Times that the U.S. is not winning the war in Afghanistan and was considering (in the Times’ paraphrase) “reach[ing] out to moderate elements of the Taliban.”
----
Obama infuriated the UK last week in more ways than can be counted here. Now we’re supposed to believe that the UK snubs occurred because the poor guy was “too tired,” the same lame excuse that was used to explain away his 10,000-died-in-Kansas gaffe during the presidential campaign.
----
Obama, with no previous executive experience, appears to be falling into the same trap as Democrats Clinton and Carter before him: too obsessed with detail and failing to sufficiently delegate.

Incompetents often try to cover up their failures by attacking others and denying the obvious. This explanation would be consistent with the White House’s thin-skinned blasts at CNBC’s Cramer and Rick Santelli, and the president’s stubborn refusal to characterize his “spread the wealth” policies as what they are: socialist.
----
One thing we do know: Obama and his peeps [heads should roll] want to be totally in charge of health care. Feeling better now?
Reference Here>>

With the passage of the "Omnibus" spending bill yesterday and the soon to be considered and passed Obama Administration $3.6 Trillion dollar budget proposal ... we may have created a one-party Government that has become - "To Big To Succeed!"

This 44th Presidency is shaping up to become one hell of a Carter's Second Term!

Photos

Executive Branch Incompetence Crisis - Obama, Delivering Obama

Executive Branch Incompetence Crisis - Obama, Delivering Obama

see larger image

uploaded by Edmund Jenks

recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
djsblack

Obama--Oh what a disaster!

1
Art_By_Alida

Obama inherited a disaster. I admire him for taking on such a daunting responsibility.

(Excuse me, but why is this in tech and biz?)

0
Edmund Jenks

Okay, so when does he own the problems he ran on and brought into this Executive Branch process.

The Omnibus spending bill is today's money today and going forward. It contained 8,400 EARMARKS the likes of which this President stated he would manage and NOT ALLOW!

Admit it, fiscally Barack Obama is just George W. Bush (and Jimmy Carter) on steroids! He even placed in his cabinet, the very same key people to administrate and advise the TARP funding process as Dub-Ya!

Thanks for your vote for Hope and Change.

0
Blue Crush

CNN has a good writeup today, on earmarks.  Earmarks:  Myth & Reality

0
Edmund Jenks

Thanks Blue!

... and a pledge is a pledge, I suppose it only matters when there is real money on the line.

1
Art_By_Alida

Earmarks..that's a relatively new term.

What IS an earmark, pray tell?

Part of the job of state politicians is to get funding for projects, like building roads and bridges and other projects.

Earmarks were sometimes referred to as "pork projects" when some people didn't think the projects were justified.

I know I am glad that money is going to the states to help them fend off bankruptcy, which would stop their bond payments, which would make the economy slide further into disarray.

Obama has no other alternative.

And the past eight years under the Bush dynasty have put us into the economic mess we are in by spending BILLIONS and BILLIONS of dollars in Iraq with guns economics. 

I personally know someone who was George Jr.'s economics tutor while he was in college.

He told me that he would go to the Bush home and Bush would always have a glass of scotch in his hand. And he further told me that no matter how hard he tried,  Bush could just never fathom economics. Well, it looks like Bush was good at delegating economic practices and where did that get us?

Maybe we need someone who is smart and is going to pay attention to detail and actually KNOW what he is signing.

0
Edmund Jenks

Defend Barack Obama's pledge!

Typical radical response to a direct request to get an honest response ... divert attention by interjecting and throwing the discussion on a different topic.

This is really a dis-honet attempt to defend the overtly incompetent executive leadership of the Obama Administration to this very early point.

This leadership has saddled every household (this includes yours) with over $18,000 in additional debt in just six and a half weeks!

Again I say - Thanks for your vote for Hope and Change.

[it is in Tech & Biz because this administration is in the middle of a WAR ON FREE ENTERPRISE (market down by 18% in just 50 days of the 44th Presidency) ... this is just one dispatch from the field that has a relationship to the US Economy]

1
Art_By_Alida

I don't know what you are referring to when you tell me you didn't get, "a direct request to get an honest response".

I gave you a direct honest response.

We were not in economic debt until the Bush's came into office.

Bush put all those charges on the nation's "credit card" in the form of Treasury Bills sold to China and Japan and other countries to fund his war games in Iraq and Afghanistan and to give huge contracts to Haliburton...(Cheney's lovechild).

I am not giving any type of radical response, lol...only facts.

And honey, if you can't see the changes taking place, then you need to replace those glasses of yours.

And free enterprise isn't threatened...what do you define as free enterprise?

Is there free enterprise in Denmark, or the Netherlands?

What is social democracy?

Obama is making changes...does pledging change mean he has to change EVERYTHING?

And if you think that free enterprise is being threatened, well that could be a change in itself from the white collar corruption surrounding Darwinian capitalism.

(I coined that term myself some years ago...)

0
Edmund Jenks

I personally know someone who was George Jr.'s economics tutor while he was in college.

He told me that he would go to the Bush home and Bush would always have a glass of scotch in his hand. And he further told me that no matter how hard he tried,  Bush could just never fathom economics. Well, it looks like Bush was good at delegating economic practices and where did that get us?

Maybe we need someone who is smart and is going to pay attention to detail and actually KNOW what he is signing.

Not on subject and not necessarily fact. Bush and Bush's drinking habits are not the issue of this post and it still has to be proven a fact that BHO knew what he actually signed into law when the Senators who passed the Stimulus bill admit to not having the time to read the 1,100 page (up from 700) appropriation package.

1
Art_By_Alida

I believe my professor friend. The drinking part was just a description of what Bush was doing when he went there..the point was that Bush could never fathom economics, so he HAD to depend on his cabinet. Wouldn't it have been nice if Bush had SOME inkling about economics? Perhaps if he had a brain in his head, he would have read up more and not depended on his advisors, like the men at the Pentagon whose jobs are war...lots of war, lots of jobs.

And it doesn't take that long to read 1100 pages, even if you skim it and can highlight areas of concern.

I am not confident of many of the Senators being competent reading a Dr. Suess book, much less the bill. For example, Senator Bunning, whose claim-to-fame is playing sports.

Maybe my writing is just not hitting the mark for you to understand my points.

I was referring to Obama taking the time to read what HE signs.

Just like at the inauguration, when he was repeating the oath of office and the presenter said the wrong words and Obama stopped, knowing he was being told to say something else, instead of the exact oath. The man pays attention to detail. You may think that's a bad thing...micro-managment and all...but maybe that's part of the change and just maybe paying attention to detail is a GOOD thing.

(Just like Reagan was ignorant of the details of the Iran-Contra affair...many presidents can be in danger of being mislead by their advisors.)


This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

djsblack
First Flagged at 7:27 AM, Mar 11, 2009 by djsblack
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (8)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from