NP Rank:
Exposing the "Obama is Overexposed" Ploy
Before the U.S. presidential election on November 4, 2008, it had been suggested candidate Barack Obama may have been overexposed. Ever since President Barack Obama took office, there has been talk among media correspondents and commentators that the President is doing too much; he has too much on his plate; he's too much in the media.
Citing a belief that it may have been the President's lack of involvement and articulation, during the summer months, that may have allowed the administration's message on health care to fall behind during the media blitz coverage of the vocal and boisterous townhall meetings across the nation, The Nation's Leslie Savan writes:
* We can argue over whether Obama is doing too much TV and not enough social media, or whether it's dumb to skip Fox News this weekend. And we can, and should, argue about what he actually says on these shows. But the handwringing over the sheer frequency of his media appearances is worse than disingenuous.
For the political right and the corporate media--especially those three- or four-hour-a-day radio and cable TV hosts--whining that Obama hits the screens too much, or is in general "doing too much," is their way of telling him to be more like a Republican president than a Democratic one: To do nothing on health care, economic justice, student loans, or whatever the issue may be. Oh, they tell the president, make the occasional speech that we can hype as do-or-die, but then obey the status quo lobby's instructions: Shut up and don't annoy the scaaarrry Republicans. (Hey, Max Baucus--BOO!)
But wasn't it just last week that Obama was criticized, and rightly so, for underexposing himself during that crucial month of August when, as Frank Rich wrote the crazies were "poisoning the national discourse while the president bided his time"? And in fairness, some talking heads aren't buying the "overexposed" canard. "We live in 24-hour news cycles now," former McCain media consultant Mark McKinnon told ABC, "and if the president isn't filling the vacuum, his opponents will be."
Too much of the MSM, however, plays dumb, as if they've never heard of such a McLuhanesque notion. Similarly, they act as if this were the first time they'd ever warned Obama about the danger of being seen in public too often--when in fact they were tooting the same horn not only every other month since Inaugural Day but throughout the final months of the 2008 campaign. Remember how Obama's Berlin speech was deemed overattended? How McCain tried to equate Obama with Paris Hilton as overpopular?
* Please note I am not highlighting due to technical problems.
Click here to read, Media Overexposes 'Obama is Overexposed' Complaint.
Crowd Power
-
Karen Hatter
All Locations, Everywhere, United States -
halfo
United States
Recommendations (19)

Anonymous user
-
Patricia Turo
Switzerland (Confoederatio Helvetica) -
The_Cynic
Freddy Beach, Where the deer r, Canada -
a211423
Clearlake, California, United States -
smkovalinsky
New York, New York, United States -
Rhonda J Mangus
North Tonawanda, New York, United States






Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (4)
at 18:29 on September 20th, 2009
I do get a little pissed off at the GOPers (should we simply call them the plural "Crazies?) who insist that they, and not the official government should run the agenda - I do to get a little narked at Obama not simply turning around and using a good right-hook.
Yet, I am always ready to admit that I am wrong on that score about his domestic program - what better way than exposing the idiots by simply allowing themselves enough rope.
That must be the fighting person in me - one that is still laying pretty dormant after so many years as a young man.
That part of me wants Obama to come out fighting in such a way to silence them - but that is much-akin to driving drug dealers underground - you know they are still there, are still corrupting any that come within earshot and are still as vile as before.
Let them have their 24 hours of fame - let them gloat on small victories - let them have the space to show how foolish they really are - and, mostly - let them make enemies of their friends.
If after all that a better nation, a better country, a better people can rise then it is worth it.
at 19:20 on September 20th, 2009
TC, I've decided a lot of this belly aching may be justifiable in that since it's the President speaking, traditionally, that's meant he's gonna get all kinds of coverage.
I don't think the GOP has figured out a way to get equal time for each and every appearance the President makes so, so far, they've been scheduling some form of news conference when the President speaks.
There is also the problem of President Obama's ability to communicate, a skill that has earned him good marks most of the time. Add the charisma factor, which of course is in the eye of the beholder, depending upon who's watching but, in most cases, that's a plus for him.
So, I guess the GOP has reason not to want him communicating anywhere.
- reply
Sugarsmingle (not verified)at 19:25 on September 20th, 2009
Sugar daddies and sweet sugar babies gathered dating site...HERE=== LOoK..-------WwW. SuGarBaByMeeT.cOm.------------..where ladies wanna Be Spoiled and guys wanna seek a wonderful chat... Free to access..and BeginYou are guaranteed to be safe and find a good partner..Like to offer present..Like to hear your voice..
at 23:47 on September 20th, 2009
The GOP has no one who can compete with the President when it comes to media attention. The only way they can get attention is to cry fowl about anything and everything. Maybe they should consider getting involved in the national discussion about the things that matter in a postive way and help solve some of these critical problems and maybe they will also get some good press.