Truemors
is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
Extraterrestrial War of 1930’s linked to Adam and Eve clones
Share:
by agora | November 19, 2011 at 07:46 pm
193 views | 2 Recommendations | 11 comments
Were “Adam” and “Eve” genetic mimics of humans that were created to rule between an alien dimension of existence and unsuspecting human populations. Were “Adam” and “Eve” cloned human biological entities designed to “oversee“ and “control“ humans populations through a “divide, rule and conquer“ ethic?
Read more?
Internet site reference: agoracosmopolitan.com/news/ufo_extraterrestrials/2011/11/19/1757.html
Advertisement
NowPublic on Facebook
What is NowPublic?
NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (11)
at 03:30 on November 20th, 2011
I would say first lets forget about this psychopath angle for a moment and realized a more important assumption about human evolution that this article suggest..
"Could the reason that we as humans cannot seem to achieve the basic human rights that we all seem to want, be because of the (some) alien presence which is holding the evolution of our species back? The same alien presence that indigenous peoples and the ancient Pagan Gnostic scholars have warned humanity about?"
at 03:54 on November 20th, 2011
Could 'human rights' simply not be in most peoples nature? Why do people assume that altruism and tolerance are the natural state of human existence and it is some corrupting influence such as aliens or society that is to blame for all ills? It is utterly refuted by a quick glance at the people around you. The natural state of humanity is lawlessness and anarchy.
at 12:13 on November 20th, 2011
You ask that question based upon your apparent ideological assumption that 'human rights' is not in most people's nature. Lawlessness and anarchy in the world today is being perpetuated by elites that include the Iraq War, and the more reent bombing of Libya.
at 18:01 on November 20th, 2011
While pwerful elites can commit evil it can be done just as well by the man next door. Crime and violence are widespread throughout the world. You cant absolve everyones responsibility.
at 18:20 on November 20th, 2011
There has been ample evidence by investigative journalists on the instigation and perpetuation of crime and violence in the world by elites. That is how the political-military-industrial complex makes its money. World peace does not help sell guns and 'weapons of mass destruction'.
For example, do you think the Libyans bombed themselves, when they were enjoying free electricity and medical services that Ghaddafi provided them?
Elites turn people against one another, and then exploit that conflict for commercial gain and power. If you don't want to appreciate the politics of "divide, rule, and conquer", that's cool.
at 18:39 on November 20th, 2011
You are boiling this down to 'only the Iraq war and the war in Libya were crimes'. What about all the crimes that occur besides that? Are they ok? Do only this 'elite' have any responsibility whatsoever?I wasnt in favour of invading Libya either, however that doesnt mean I can commit a crime and its sombody else's fault.
at 11:56 on November 21st, 2011
I am not "boiling this down to only the Iraq War and Libya". I never made such a statement. I could name many millions of other examples. But, why should I waste my time, when you have apparently already made up your mind. I respect your opinion. You can do your own further research on the topic, at your own discretion.
at 16:25 on November 21st, 2011
I wasnt asking for more examples, I was asking you to explain the causes and nature of crime amongst the non-elite.If you cannot be bothered to explain your views dont be surprised when nobody accepts them.
at 16:33 on November 21st, 2011
Where did the article mention the phrase "non-elites"? I am not a missonary who seeks "converts". I also don't seek to be interrogated by you.
You don't like the article; that's your own opinion. Otherwise, you might consider doing more of your own research.
at 02:05 on November 22nd, 2011
You mentioned 'elites' right? So the 'non-elites' would be those people not part of the 'elites'. With me so far?I never said whether I liked the article or not, it sounds like you have an inferiority complex. I have done my own research, I was merely putting forth the suggestion of why human rights dont seem to be a very successful concept. If you consider that an "interrogation" you must have led a very sheltered life.
at 03:02 on November 21st, 2011
people who can't do anything but regurgitate media classist drivel should be enslaved. a reward for such glaring stupidity.