Truemors
is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
Gang Stalking F.O.I.A. Lawsuit: Judicial Injustice
Share:
by PeaceFrog | May 17, 2012 at 07:20 am
5273 views | 10 Recommendations | 329 comments
This article examines a recent F.O.I.A. case brought against the FBI and DOJ in Brooklyn Federal Court on the subject of gang stalking. The Judge in the case has a close working relationship with the FBI. The Judge has handled the bulk of high level organized crime cases brought in Brooklyn Federal Court by the FBI over the past 10 years, including the case of the first Mafia Don, "Big Joey" Massino, to testify against his crime family.
The Judge was presented with an Affidavit in support of plaintiff's request for materials the FBI maintained on the subject of gang stalking, organized stalking and flash mobbing:
http://www.randomcollection.info/keith-affidavit-11-cv-23.pdf
The affidavit presented the following evidence as Exhibits:
"A": The DOJ Stalking Report of January, 2009 stating that 13% of all stalking cases involved three or more stalking perpetrators.
"B": A F.O.I.A. request response received by plaintiff from DOJ stating that 185,050 Americans are being stalked by multiple stalkers of between "3" and "50" stalkers acting in teams and groups.
"C": Official government document stating that the FBI shares a criminal database with the very DOJ subdivision component that produced both the Stalking Report and the statistics released under the F.O.I.A. in Exhibit "B".
"D": An affidavit by Ted L. Gunderson & Associates stating that the FBI has records on gang stalking. Gunderson headed three FBI Field Offices in his 30 years with the FBI. Gunderson also had numerous contacts in the Intelligence Community as a California based licensed private investigator. Gunderson also explicitly states in the affidavit that he personally referred numerous gang stalking victims to the appropriate authorities within the FBI to document their complaints.
"E": A case in which a California Court chastised the FBI for lying to the court in a F.O.I.A. case.
"F" A news article detailing the FBI's use of secret files to hide information from F.O.I.A. requesters.
"G" & "H": News articles detailing government schemes to curtail internet "conspiracy theories", including high level support for criminalizing speech on the internet.
"I": The news report of the press conference in which Lieutenant Larry Richard of the Santa Cruz Police Dep't stated that gang stalking predates social media, and, is becoming a larger, more sophisticated criminal problem.
"J": An internal police Memo obtained by plaintiff from the Santa Cruz P.D., stating that gang stalking has "implications to workplace violence".
"K": A news report detailing gang stalking in San Antonio and stating that several felony cases related to gang stalking were active cases being investigated by both San Antonio police and the San Antonio Sheriff's Office.
"L" An internet poll in which 367 participants reported being gang stalked for time periods including as long as over 10 years. The poll resembles a variation of the normal Bell Curve indicating statistical reliability.
"M": A picture of a billboard adjacent to the L.A. Freeway advertising the problem of Organized Stalking.
"N" &"O": Two news stories about the criminal problem of flash mobs.
"P": A Press Release by the American Bar Association stating that the FBI is working with Philadelphia authorities on the problem of criminal flash mobs.
The Judicial Opinion:
In subsections (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv) of the Opinion, the Judge selectively reviews and mischaracterizes evidence from plaintiff's affidavit. The Judge concludes with the Opinion that the FBI performed an adequate search of its records systems on the subject of gang stalking, organized stalking and flash mobs and found no records.
Keep in mind that the FBI's Central Records System has over 100,000,000 records.
Simply comparing the Affidavit of plaintiff with the Judge's Opinion evinces a dishonest opinion, smacking of hyper-partisanship. This decision does not pass the smell test.
Advertisement
What is NowPublic?
NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (329)
at 07:44 on May 17th, 2012
This veteran journalist, who has exposed the electromagnetic assault regimen that accompanies government-sponsored community "policing"/neighborhood watch/secret society "gangstalking," made repeated in-person visits to the Philadelphia office of the FBI in 2008 and 2009 to recite chapter-and-verse how a fusion center- and military contractor administered program of community-based stalking, home intrusions, vandalism and electromagnetic torture has devastated my life and destroyed my earnings capacity, rendering me electromagnetically incarcerated, a hostage in my own home.
Any claim that the FBI has no records on what is termed "gangstalking" is a BIG LIE.
http://viclivingston.blogspot.com/2012/01/thugocracy-u.html
http://viclivingston.blogspot.com/2011/12/u.html
at 07:49 on May 17th, 2012
I encourage other posters to share their testimonials of contacting the FBI with complaints of gang stalking activities. I know these people are out there, I've spoken to many TI's who have wrote and visited local FBI Field Offices only to be ignored.
It would be REALLY HELPFUL if posters started posting the NAMES and Field Offices of FBI agents they have personally complained to. This will facilitate ending the BIG LIE that the FBI has no records on the subject of gang stalking.
at 14:23 on May 17th, 2012
I guess it should have been expected that Keith Labella would not get very far into this issue without resorting to an outright lie to mislead his intended audience. It begins with his very first exhibit and continues into the second:
"A": The DOJ Stalking Report of January, 2009 stating that 13% of all stalking cases involved three or more stalking perpetrators.
"B": A F.O.I.A. request response received by plaintiff from DOJ stating that 185,050 Americans are being stalked by multiple stalkers of between "3" and "50" stalkers acting in teams and groups.
Note he uses the word "cases" when in fact it only documents CLAIMS by people believing they were stalked, with no further investigations being opened, let alone cases in the system, confirming they were actual events.
He continues the lie in the next exhibit by saying it is the DOJ's claim that 185,050 Americans ARE BEING STALKED when in fact it's the same issue, a number of people BELIEVE they are being stalked by groups with no confirmation or investigation whatsoever into this.
-----------------------------------------------
This is consistent with this person's agenda, which seems to be obfuscating a distinction between mental illness and actual crimes which may be committed against citizens. He wants the ridiculous claims of the mentally ill to be validated as factual, and the actual crimes to be conversely trivialized and covered up.
I reject this agenda as harmful to both groups and have no apologies for exposing the dishonest means he uses to forward it, the above a perfect example.
at 17:18 on May 17th, 2012
John Lucier a.k.a. Batvette, your only agenda is to be a good cyber troll lackey and keep a lid on gang stalking and discredit its victims "one by one".
Judge's Opinion
i. Documents Indicating the Breadth of Gang Stalking
First, Labella submits a number of documents indicating the breadth of the "national phenomenon of gang stalking." (See Pl. Aff., Ex. A at 5, 12 (BJS Special Report released by OJP entitled "Stalking Victimization in the United States," showing that over 25% of stalking victims reported either cyberstalking or electronic monitoring and that over 13% of stalking victims reported being stalked by three or more offenders), Ex. B (OJP response to Labella's FOIA request stating that 185,050 Americans are being stalked by three or more offenders)
at 12:30 on May 18th, 2012
and that over 13% of stalking victims reported being stalked by three or more offenders
What was so hard about putting that in the article in the first place instead of embellishing the facts?
As for this "discredit victims one by one" nonsense, first off those are NOT my words- why do you only put quotes around the one by one part? That's because I DIDN'T SAY THE REST. You think you and that glory hole lover sock puppet of yours can discredit me by implying I said something I didn't and what I DID say is wholly out of context.
In fact the whole discussion at that time was to address your accusation I was trying to discredit the "life stories" of ALL victims when I was only criticizing the stupid whiney appearance of that Larry Guzzino guy. I thus said I would discredit life stories on a "one by one" basis, meaning I was ONLY being critical of HIM and your accusation was a cheap shot to attempt to turn ALL TI's against me.
Which you continue to do by falsely claiming some agenda. You've outrageously taken my statement and try to imply exactly the opposite of what it really meant.
It didn't mean I was on a mission to discredit all TI's at all. It meant I was only talking about that one person so don't pretend I meant any more than just HIM.
How can you be so dishonest? You don't sound like a victim of anything to me.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonymously offerered (not verified)at 12:52 on May 18th, 2012
The following is the exact text of the comment, as posted in the article "How Widespread is Gang Stalking":-------------batvette (wrote)--------- at 04:22 on November 15th, 2011-------- I'll discredit one life story at a time if need be.--------- Where is yours?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonymously offered (not verified)at 12:53 on May 18th, 2012
batvette (wrote)--------- at 04:22 on November 15th, 2011--------" I'll discredit one life story at a time if need be.--------- Where is yours?"
at 14:02 on May 18th, 2012
at 05:22 on November 15th, 2011
I'll discredit one life story at a time if need be.
Continue reading at NowPublic.com: How Widespread Is Gang Stalking? | NowPublic News Coverage, Page 3 http://my.nowpublic.com/world/how-widespread-gang-stalking#ixzz1vGGOIZ1g
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonymously posting (not verified)at 06:51 on May 19th, 2012
"I'll discredit one life story at a time if need be." (said by batvette at 04:22 on 11/15/11)
at 17:10 on May 19th, 2012
Copy and paste the whole post which contained the statement and link to the discussion if you expect any further acknowledgement on the matter.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonymousxx (not verified)at 04:26 on May 20th, 2012
The link has been provided by PeaceFrog. Anyone who wants to look your comment/s in context can certainly do so. You say, "Copy and paste the whole post which contained the statement and link to the discussion if you expect any further acknowledgement on the matter."===================== lol. I don't think that your comment has been posted because the posters "expect", need, or want any "acknowledgement." The comment speaks for itself, whether it stands alone or is read "in context."
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonymousxx (not verified)at 20:43 on May 20th, 2012
I am wrong and batvette is right. I am sorry for my worthless existence.
at 18:00 on May 20th, 2012
That was in response to Peacefrog's allegation my criticizing the life story of ONE obvious nutter was indicative of an agenda to discredit ALL TIs and gang stalking in general.
He and you wish to include the mentally ill into the ranks of real TI's which I strongly oppose as it only provides cover for whatever program is really going on.
My position, like it or not. Why are you posting this multiple times under multiple fictitious identities?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonymously posted (not verified)at 13:02 on May 18th, 2012
batvette wrote (about Attorney Labella): "You don't sound like a victim of anything to me."------Batvette also says: "It didn't mean I was on a mission to discredit all TI's at all. It meant I was only talking about that one person so don't pretend I meant any more than just HIM." --------Okay, so "HIM", referring to Lawrence Guzzino. And now, the author of this article. So that's two... Two and counting. Oh, and there's Scrivener. So that makes three. Three and counting... So the truth is to be found in batvette's own words: "I'll discredit one life story at a time if need be" Three and counting... (There are others that batvette has attempted to "discredit", but I don't have time right now to find their name or user names.)
at 17:23 on May 19th, 2012
1.You're slamming me for criticizing Scrivener?
That makes it all but certain "anonymously posting" is a program agent provocateur or a nutter wannabe. No credible legitimate TI who has ever visited his parody pages (that I can recall) ever put the stamp of approval on his nonsense. Most come right out and say he discredits us all. Haven't YOU also criticized him?
Or is it is okay to say one thing today and do another tomorrow when you are a chicken s h i t ankle biting troll posting anonymously?
2. The gist of your argument and the nature of your vicious and relentless attacks is for my criticizing people who are mentally ill but have been mislead into believing they are targets of a vast government conspiracy and the disinformation artists who mislead them.
Let's get that straight. I do not apologize for my above criticisms. I have never and will never criticize anyone who appears to be an actual target and is not spreading disinformation.
at 17:46 on May 19th, 2012
So calling Lawrence Guzzino a "whiny bitch" when he lost his home, job, and family to gang stalking was what? He is more legit than you will ever be!
at 13:40 on May 20th, 2012
The video claims "he has developed a PARANOIA"(which caused him to lose these things)
It does not claim what you say. AGAIN you have a strange problem with directly quoting your own references and distorting the information into propaganda to support your "there is no such thing as mental illness, only gang stalking victims who don't know they are targets yet" agenda.
I called Guzzino a whiny bitch because he's a grown man on the verge of blubbering like a baby at one point in the video. His claims about gang stalking are that he is "followed around" by neighbors in his complex.
Funny, he had the police and the media come out and he couldn't identify anyone in his building who was doing this? The news people would have gone right over and said, "your neighbor says you are following him and ruining his life, how do you respond to this allegation?"
He said at one point "they even got up on his roof" but he didn't get a camera out and film it? He's being followed around and can't carry a` camera and film that either? That would be perfectly legal and you shouldn't even think about going public with allegations you can't document.
I documented something and put it on my youtube channel before telling friends what I thought might be going on.
It's to be expected my opinions are being fiercely attacked by the same self claimed "TI's" and anonymous sock and meat puppets who refuse to share a bit of detail about how "gang stalking" is experienced by them. (I have conversely published said details long ago here and in other forums.)
You're part of the problem, which is that whatever program is REALLY going on is forever going to be obscured by all of you nutters who have been convinced your detached perceptions of reality is "gang stalking".
- Sign In or Join to post comments
posted anonymously (not verified)at 13:51 on May 20th, 2012
What you cannot abide, batvette, is that, once upon a time, you were misled/duped, and now you're on a misguided mission to discredit indiscriminately. So the guy cried (batvette's translation: blubbered). Big flippin' deal.---- We have no idea how that story was edited. None. -------And at least Guzzino didn't claim that his walls were moving. My god, what WOULD you have said about him then. Oh, I forgot, it was you who said that your walls were moving.
at 14:23 on May 20th, 2012
So your response is to ridicule the published story of a TI.
This is why I think you are a perp or a nutter.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Ridicule (not verified)at 19:08 on May 20th, 2012
That's hilarious, batvette. You're given a taste of your own medicine, as an example of what you do to others and your response? Your words: "This is why I think you are a perp or a nutter." Well, there you have it. Batvette on batvette. My opinion? You're both.
at 20:35 on May 20th, 2012
Joke. I'm pointing out YOUR hypocrisy.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonymously posted (not verified)at 04:20 on May 20th, 2012
Batvette asks, "You're slamming me for criticizing Scrivener?"======= Yes, because of what I perceive to be your "steamroller approach", I am. Your approach, it would seem, is to discredit everyone (and so I included Scrivener in the list.) Having said this, I'm not one of Scrivener's fans, but I don't have the time or energy to bother with him, at the moment, so back to you and your attacks on victims. As your comment reflects, like Dubbya, you've decided that "you're the decider." And once you've decided, well, we've seen what you do. Which takes us to another visible target/victim, Lawrence Guzzino (you call him "Larry", it would seem, to further diminish him). It would seem that Lawrence Guzzino has pretty much had his life ruined by this program. ========You said. "I have never and will never criticize anyone who appears to be an actual target and is not spreading disinformation." So you don't believe that Lawrence Guzzino was/is a target? Is that correct?
at 13:41 on May 20th, 2012
Hypocrite.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonymousxx (not verified)at 14:22 on May 20th, 2012
Whatever you say, batvette. lol
at 14:25 on May 20th, 2012
Weak.
You slammed me for criticizing Scrivener yet you regularly criticize Scrivener.
Hypocrite.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonymousxx (not verified)at 19:24 on May 20th, 2012
batvete, you indiscriminately, it seems, criticize everyone. are you missing any other points?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonymousxx (not verified)at 20:46 on May 20th, 2012
I fail at life. please tell me why?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonymousxx (not verified)at 03:54 on May 21st, 2012
Because you are, after all, you, batvette
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonymousxx (not verified)at 17:02 on May 21st, 2012
And the doctors at the institute says when my treatment is complete I will be released so you can deposit your seed in me and I will bear your love child!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
posted anonymously (not verified)at 14:31 on May 20th, 2012
posted anonymously (not verified) at 13:51 on May 20th, 2012 What you cannot abide, batvette, is that, once upon a time, you were misled/duped, and now you're on a misguided mission to discredit indiscriminately. So the guy cried (batvette's translation: blubbered). Big flippin' deal.---- We have no idea how that story was edited. None. -------And at least Guzzino didn't claim that his walls were moving. My god, what WOULD you have said about him then. Oh, I forgot, it was you who said that your walls were moving.