'FACEBOOK' EVIDENCE OF SNEAKY U.S. GOV'T NET CENSORSHIP

"ANYONE WHO CALLS THIS 'HARASSMENT' IS AN APOLOGIST FOR TORTURE AND SLOW-KILL MURDER."

It's readily appearent to me that harassment, shame and humiliation are included as psychological components of the "silent torture and impairment and slow-kill homicide business".

It's a psyops included to appeal to right-wingish conservative elements; people who were beaten by authority figures as children, and apparently may still harbor intense animosity due to their childhood beatings.

A NEW M.O. DEPLOYED BY A ROGUE GOV'T OP TO CENSOR FACEBOOK?

Tried to post a sharp rejoinder to comment from an apparent psy ops troll, posted in response to a comment I had made to the Facebook.com/topsecretamerica page from The Washington Post.  Basically, the troll said that no one in our government cares enough about what I have to say to stalk or persecute me.  My riposte:

@MarileeCunningham -- Ah yes, the old psy ops meme: ""Nobody cares about about what this guy has to say" -- and yet, the cyber units hardly ever fail to respond to my postings, at least the ones that aren't intercepted and deep-sixed by the "program."  As Spock might say, "It's not logical."  Marilee, were you in on THIS WaPo "op?"
http://nowpublic.com/world/true-tales-lame-u-s-govt-psy-ops-censors

When I hit the "submit" button, at first nothing happened -- the usual sign that the real-time censors who monitor my every keystroke do not approve and won't let the posting through.  Then, the copy turned gray, and I thought the comment was going to be posted (to the "real" WaPo Facebook page, or to a "spoofed" or faked page, enabling censorship?  I can never be sure).

But then, something new!  In a blue box resembling "official" Facebook messages, I got this: 

"Oops. Something went wrong.  We're working on getting it fixed as soon as we can."

This never-before-seen message reminded me of another "oops" message I got on a Facebook page a couple of months ago.  That one claimed that I was being "banned" for making "inappropriate" comments that other users might consider to be "offensive." 

Actually, I said nothing that could be construed as "offensive" -- but I did express my political views, in this case, a condemnation of Bush-Cheney policies that have been allowed to persist under Obama.

That odd-looking comment box claimed that my "banning" might last "a few hours, or a few days," and cautioned me to "be more careful."  Could this sound any more phony?

That one was a total fake -- and after I wrote about it on my blog site, the "ban" suddenly was lifted and I never saw the obviously "spoofed" or faked "ban box" again.

But now, this variation -- the "oops.  Something went wrong.  We're working on getting it fixed as soon as we can" canard.

Sure you are -- you censoring bastards!

UPDATE:  After I wrote this screed, I went back to the "oops" item and tried to re-post.  And guess what?  It APPEARS as if it has been posted... but is it posted to a "spoofed" page visible only to me, or did it go up for all to see?  And will the rogue censors delete my comment after some time elapses -- perhaps, after I sign off for the night?

It is my experience that these rogue contractor censors will not cease and desist; they will not stand down.  To them, it's all a big cat-and-mouse game, and to hell with the notion of "constitutional rights."  The only way this will stop is for the operatives, and their color of law violating overlords in U.S. security, intel and military agencies, to be stripped of their jobs and SENT TO FEDERAL PRISON FOR THEIR SERIAL VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF EXTRAJUDICIALLY TARGETED AMERICANS.

There is no doubt some program is being utilized to marginalize and ruin people deemed "undesirable" by some entity. It is likely some technology is being used for harassment or in the words of those with little tolerance for pain or discomfort, "torture".

However what better way to continue to obfuscate the truth behind these activities then to plant people on the internet spreading disinformation asserted as truth? Portray themselves as abrasive, dishonest lunatics so that anyone who also shares a part of their complaints can be dismissed with them by mere loose association? Sound just credible enough so that new TI's will start to add the disinfo to their own accounts when there are so few answers to their questions?

When you think some form of technology is affecting you and you know little about technology, you will grasp onto something that seems to fit the void. Like telling people it comes from cell phone towers, which are owned by private companies on leased private and gov't property sites, which allows for many avenues of legal inspections of the equipment within.

Thus the claims can be easily be disproven and discredited. Which is why they probably  put Vic here to spread them.

This might be humorous if I didn't spend most of this morning and all of the late afternoon and all of the evening being severely TORTURED, weakened, fatigued, ears ringing, head pounding, body sweating, by relentless radio frequency attack.

Apparently my references to Lockheed-Martin have struck a deep nerve -- and now I am getting it back. 

I will deal with the "information systems" war criminals and their war criminal bureaucrat overlords tomorrow, assuming there is a tomorrow.  If not, Team America already is stood up to complete the mission.  Ready the vans with the grated windows.

As for "Aaron 2010," cheap NLP allusions to murdered film makers only steel me, and do not scare me.  The bastards will soon get theirs -- maybe from the next cubicle.  You just NEVER know -- because this is America.