NP Rank:
FIGHT CENSORSHIP! POST THIS to: blog.washingtonpost.com/thefix
GET POLITICAL w/ VIC LIVINGSTON
Censorship of political blogs appears to be alive and doing ill -- destroying freedom of speech in America.
NowPublic.com columnist Vic Livingston is not being permitted to post the message below to The Washington Post's influential political blog, "The Fix."
He's getting a full-screen message saying the post is "being held for approval by the blog owner." Vic will bet the farm that this is a "spoofed page" being inserted into his data stream by over-zealous government spies who are unjustly tampering with his telecommunications -- part of what he believes is an unconstitutional campaign of extrajudicial targeting, punishment, and TORTURE using radiation weapons and devices.
For the full story, read Vic's articles at http://my.NowPublic.com/scrivener
In the meanwhile, let's not let the censors get away with it. Please post the following to the URL in the headline -- AND TO EVERY POLITICAL BLOG YOU CAN THINK OF!
Let's make freedom of speech VIRAL!
HOW WILL THE DEMS CONFRONT THE ISSUE OF DOMESTIC TORTURE VIA RADIATION WEAPONRY. . .
Now that the Department of Justice has confirmed to New Scientist magazine that local cops are getting 'PAIN BEAM' WEAPONS?
http://newscientist.com/article/dn16339-us-police-could-get-pain-beam-weapons.html
Actually, the weapons are already out there, doing grave harm -- as discussed in the first-hand NowPublic.com story by longtime mainstream media journalist Vic Livingston.
Here is a cached link to the version of the expose that was taken down from Politico.com last Friday morning (Jan. 2, 2009):
http://74.125.45.132/search?q=cache:9hH4AVa0XrgJ:www.politico.com/news/stories/
1208/16832_Page2.html+domestic+torture+via+radiation+weaponry
(NOTE: Links are not active due to constant apparent sabotage.)
Did Politico really take it down "due to inappropriate content," as an email stated (along with more that 20 of Vic's other Politico.com posts!) -- or was this the work of a third-party hacker with an ideological agenda? Maybe someone with the nickname of "Uncle Sam"?
Or was it another chilling possibility: Was Politico pressured to take it down -- along with every other recent post from this writer?
Vic awaits a phone call from Politico.com editor John Harris for the real story... and also to find out why the author can no longer gain access to Politico.com.
FOR THE ORIGINAL STORY, with full comments section:
http://www.nowpublic.com/world/domestic-torture-radiation-weaponry-americas-horrific-shame
OR (if link mysteriously becomes disabled): My.NowPublic.com/scrivener RE: "Domestic Torture..."



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (1)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Will2BFree (not verified)at 09:09 on January 16th, 2009
Hello:
You might consider whether or not a third party is responsible for the sabotage of your communications. As far as the Washington Post goes, my memory (even though it's getting a little old, and doesn't work quite as well as when I was young) seems to hold memories of a large number of Washington Post originated expose' works, done on a wide range of "against the grain" subjects, both by "inside" and "outside" journalists.
If mainstream media is folded tightly into the "iron fist", I think that the Washington Post may occasionally get something to slip through between it's colossal fingers.
Communications sabotage really is becoming rampant ... and it's not just the spammers/pharmers/exploiters doing it. I have sent at least a dozen emails in the past six months to others who have voiced opinions (that often have quite a lot in common with the opinions expressed by the owner of this blog) on various other public forums.
The result? No answers. Zilch. Nada.
This result led me to wonder whether the emails were:
The first possibility matches up to the idea of a giant "router-attached" database which prohibits one party (listed in the database) from communicating with another party who happens to also be listed in the database. (Militaristic theme to destroy the "enemy's" ability to communicate)
The second possibility stems from the fact that targets are outnumbered twenty to one. It could very well be the case that only one in twenty "support" sites is legit.
The third possibility: No way! Everybody likes me.
- Will2BFree