Flotilla Passengers Fire Live Ammunition at IDF Soldiers

by tikun | June 2, 2010 at 03:00 am
415 views | 2 Recommendations | 26 comments

Videos

Flotilla Passengers Fire Live Ammunition at IDF Soldiers

see larger video

sourced by tikun

Flotilla Passengers Fire Live Ammunition at IDF Soldiers

Since the staff at Now Public feels that this is an opinion rather than fact. I might as well continue  and say that the unwillingness to believe the video as true just further shows how insane the world has become including the powers that be, unnamed except for the "Staff".

Clearly the ambush was real and the culprits are being freed while the world condemns Israel. In the video commandos aboard the ship can be heard shouting to one another, “It’s coming from all directions- we need to be evacuated now!” The IDF commandos, during the operation to redirect the Gaza flotilla, boarded the Mavi Marmara in the early hours of May 31st, 2010. When they attempted to board, activists, in a prepared attack, lynched the soldiers and stole two pistols.
In this footage you can hear the radio exchange between soldiers on their way to the bridge and the IDF ship. The soldiers report encountering live fire and serious violence.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
2
J L

"Clearly the ambush was real and the culprits are being freed while the world condemns Israel."Clearly you're uneducated. International waters?

3
JT Cemper

Where are the wounded commandos?  You're right though, the "humanitarians" probably did have some weapons.  But why not?  The fact is those commandos boarded the vessel in international waters.  No one can blame people for firing on men who drop out of choppers onto their boat in international waters.  Typical overreaction on Israel's part - a child throws a rock and they burn down the kids house in response.

2
NowPublic Staff

This article was marked as opinion; while the author has a right to their opinion the facts surrounding this case are still being investigated.

1
tikun

I think it real chutzpa to put opinion with out asking when there are clearly SO many pieces currently that should be opinion pieces no one cared to address. At the least first email some one and share your concern.

0
tikun

you guys have really over stepped your bounds on this one. What is going on in the video?

4
factsyettobedetermined

You don't see what happened before the video cuts in. Were the activists provoked into their response? The facts are yet to be determined, but things are rarely so one-sided andd the IDF as a supposedly professional military did mishandle. Maybe the editors should add a hasbara flag as an option to opinion LOL

0
tikun

Try this one for size.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B6sAEYpHF24&feature=player_embedded

This should do it for you.

4
factsyettobedetermined

Not really. There are allegations emerging that shots were fired from the helicopters, IDF reports claimed there were no weapons other than bars and knives just as examples of why an inquiry is needed. It is all yet hazy. One thing is sure, any competent riot trained force with a planning arm wouldn't have been pulling sidearms on deck in a panic. It was either poor planning, bad execution or some combination of both. It is also morally questionable. The same allegation can be levied on some of the activists too. Israel can't spin doctor its way out of this. It needs to answer for any crimes as o the activists.I have my own views about who is less in the wrong, but that isn't the question. When you royally screw up - you cop to it. Israel never does like the protestes killed by shots, bulldozers and tear gas fragments, the illegal op in Dubai and on and on. There is more than enough blood on Israel's hands to warrant  censure as the supposedly developed nation in the conflict.

0
tikun

You can lie all you want and make up all the nonsense non existent reports you want but the truth is not to your liking and your need to hide behind "not verified" is all everyone needs to know.

4
Karen Hatter

Former US Ambassador Edward Peck was on the Gaza aid flotilla that came under attack by Israeli forces. At least nine people were killed and dozens wounded. Peck says Israel’s explanation for the attack is "twisting the truth" and is "as full of holes as a window screen."

AMY GOODMAN: Ambassador Peck, why did you go on this mission?

EDWARD PECK: Well, that’s a good question. You know, I have been an activist. I don’t consider that to be anything but a word that informs people that I’m interested and aware. And I’ve made a number of trips to Israel and all the surrounding countries and the West Bank over the—since I retired, explaining, talking, meeting people, taking groups of people over to meet and discuss. And I decided I would like to have a chance to participate in something tactile, something that you could see, you know, something—rather than just plain words. And the Americans were added to this group, as you probably know, very late in the game. It was a European thing. And at the last minute, they said, "We need some Americans," and they contacted Paul and Janet and got the Free Palestine Movement organized. And they invited me, and I said yes, because I thought it would be helpful and beneficial to Israel to let them receive the supplies, just the convoy of the boats that carried the equipment, to come in and help the people of Gaza, a humanitarian effort not directed against Israel, but intended to deal with the humanitarian situation that needed to be dealt with by people who could help from outside. Everything we brought was donated, as you may know. Everything the flotilla brought was donated by people who said, "Yeah, we’ve got to help the folks in Gaza. They are suffering."

AMY GOODMAN: Ambassador Peck, we’re going to break. When we come back, we’re going to play an interview with the deputy ambassador to the United Nations from Israel, and we’d like to get your response. Ambassador Edward Peck, on with us on the line from Chevy Chase, Maryland, where he’s just returned home. He was one of the members of the 700-strong Freedom Flotilla bringing humanitarian aid to Gaza. This is Democracy Now! We’ll be back in a minute.

[break]

AMY GOODMAN: On the line with us is Ambassador Ed Peck. He is just back from the Gaza Freedom Flotilla, one of the ships—the ships were attacked by Israeli commandos. But first, we’re going to turn to another diplomat. Sharif?

SHARIF ABDEL KOUDDOUS: Well, yesterday I had a chance to speak with Israel’s deputy ambassador to the United Nations, Daniel Carmon. I reached him on the phone and questioned him about the raid.

SHARIF ABDEL KOUDDOUS: Why did Israel attack a boat carrying more than 600 international activists in international waters?

    DANIEL CARMON: Israel did not attack a boat. Israel enforced a maritime blockade, which is a measure that is totally legal in international law, to enforce a blockade when there is a possibility of a danger emanating from some source. And this was exactly the case. There was a flotilla of so-called real, genuine humanitarian aid to Gaza. And when I’m saying "so-called," I mean some of this flotilla was not a genuine, naive humanitarian aid-only flotilla. And for this reason and for the danger that emanated from this, we—our navy enforced the blockade, as—

    SHARIF ABDEL KOUDDOUS: But this was in international waters.

    DANIEL CARMON: The international law—and I would refer you to international law—when there is a danger, when there are conditions that require this, boarding can be done on a dangerous vessel in international waters, too.

    SHARIF ABDEL KOUDDOUS: Eyewitnesses said commandos came out shooting, the Israeli commandoes came out shooting.

    DANIEL CARMON: Not at all. Not at all. The Israeli navy, after repeatedly offering a remedy and an alternative for transferring the humanitarian aid to Gaza through the port of Ashdod, the Israeli for weeks now, after updating the organizers and the relevant governments about our intentions, did exactly what we said we would do: boarded the ship—the ships, and I’m talking about there were six ships, by the way. Five ships adhered totally to what they were supposed to do and replied and reacted positively to the communications done by the Israeli navy. One particular ship, the Marmara, which had onboard not humanitarian activists only, but some activists of a very extreme organization called IHH, which had other intentions, had other plans, and the plans were to provoke. And more than this, when the Israeli navy—

    SHARIF ABDEL KOUDDOUS: What evidence do you have of those plans? IHH is an organization that works across Turkey and the world.

    DANIEL CARMON: Yes, and is also connected to terrorism and to al-Qaeda and some elements from the people of this organizations, when the Israeli naval soldiers came down to the ship in order to—to enforce the blockade, after repeated advertisement that were answered by "negative" or four-letter words, which I will not repeat here, were attacked. And I think you saw that on TV also. I hope you did.

    SHARIF ABDEL KOUDDOUS: Well, let me ask you—

    DANIEL CARMON: By knife, clubs, shooting from live ammunition. One soldier was thrown overboard. You have it all in the media. And the reaction is a very natural reaction, unfortunate result, but a natural reaction of self-defense.

    SHARIF ABDEL KOUDDOUS: Let me ask you about that video that was released by the Israeli military. Will you release an unedited video of the excerpts that have been playing on the networks?

    DANIEL CARMON: I am not—I’m not aware of what you mean by "edited" or "unedited," but I think you saw that—you saw that, and it speaks by itself.

    SHARIF ABDEL KOUDDOUS: And do you know who filmed it?

    DANIEL CARMON: No, I have no idea.

    SHARIF ABDEL KOUDDOUS: And why haven’t you released the names of the dead? At least nine were killed. First of all, do you know how—can you confirm the number of dead?

    DANIEL CARMON: As much as I know, there are nine dead in this unfortunate incident, some injured and Israeli soldiers wounded, including two gravely wounded.

    SHARIF ABDEL KOUDDOUS: Well, there are families around the world who are anxiously awaiting news. Why have the names of the dead not been released yet?

    DANIEL CARMON: We would have to check it with the local authorities.

    SHARIF ABDEL KOUDDOUS: And why is Israel continuing to hold hundreds of international activists? What is their crime?

    DANIEL CARMON: Any of the participants in this so-called protest, which is much more than just a—even much more than just a protest, those who are suspected of trespassing the law, there will be measures that would be applied. All those who don’t will be released as soon as possible. We have indicated this from the start of this operation. We have indicated this in the planning stages. We had no intention of doing anything—anything—that was problematic. The problems and the confrontation and the violence came from the other side, from those who misused the disguised—the disguise of humanitarian aid to do something else. And this something else is the lynch that we saw in this clip that—in this horrible clip that we all saw.

    SHARIF ABDEL KOUDDOUS: Well, the UN Security Council has condemned the raid. What is your response?

    DANIEL CARMON: I would—I would suggest to read exactly the text of various communications in the last few days. I haven’t seen—the condemnation is a condemnation of the act that brought this incident to be what it was, and I think that you can interpret exactly, meaning that the flotilla by itself—and we have heard it in various communications and speeches in the Security Council. If the flotilla was a genuine, innocent humanitarian aid flotilla, things would go the other way, exactly as other flotillas went and other convoys went there before. But unfortunately, this was not the case. They had other intentions. They had other connections. And they wanted to provoke. And provoke, they did.


SHARIF ABDEL KOUDDOUS: That was Israel’s deputy ambassador to the United Nations Daniel Carmon, speaking with me yesterday. Edward Peck, you’re a former US ambassador. You were on this aid flotilla. Respond to some of the comments of Daniel Carmon.

EDWARD PECK: Well, sir, you know, it’s interesting. He did what he was supposed to do, and everything he said, as far as I’m concerned, is what you find in a meadow somewhere where they keep large animals. You know, here, one of the things I find that is the twist in this thing was that these peaceful, heavily armed commandos who were in international waters to capture a ship full of men and women, who were not bothering Israel, and who took what steps they could to try to prevent these pirates from doing it, are accused of attacking them. Mr.—the deputy ambassador, they were defending the ship. The Israelis were attacking it, and the passengers didn’t want them to do it. And to see somebody using a deckchair against a heavily-armed and armored Israeli soldier, I mean, my god, that’s a dangerous weapon. It’s called twisting the story. If you come to attack me and I defend myself, you know, that’s considered legal in law.

SHARIF ABDEL KOUDDOUS: And Edward Peck, he kept saying this was not a genuine humanitarian-only flotilla. What do you say to that?

EDWARD PECK: Yeah, this is the other thing. You know, I did not expect that the government of Israel would refer to us as tree-hugging, you know, flowerchildren. Of course we’re also savage, murdering, you know, anti-Israeli, pro-Palestinian—aw, come on, get off it. But of course he has to say this. This is Israel’s position. But it’s as full of holes as a window screen. You know, if you look at the people who were there and the stuff that we were bringing, and he quotes—forgive me, I get—I’ve been talking about this since I got back yesterday morning, just about this time, I guess. The international law, he says, you know, you can do this if it’s provoking a danger, but Gaza does not belong to Israel. It is illegally occupied by international law, so you can’t really stop ships from going there. Well, you can, and they did, but if people try to resist what you’re trying to do, you cannot really accuse them of attacking your heavily armed soldiers. And they were heavily armed. On our little boat, a couple of them had paint guns attached to their submachine guns, along with stun grenades and the pepper spray and the handcuffs and the pistols, you know. So this is sort of a twisting reality, which of course I understand why they’re trying to do it. I’ve been a diplomat. But it’s laughable.

Sir, just try one more thing. He didn’t mention this because he may not know it, but all of us—I was expelled. I was deported for having violated Israeli law. And I said to the gentleman, "What law have I violated?" He said, "You have illegally entered Israel." I said, "Well, now, wait. Our ship was taken over by armed commandos. I was brought here at gunpoint against my will, and you call that illegally entering Israel? You and I went to different law schools, guy." It’s kind of a—it’s a fiasco. It would be amusing if it weren’t so damned sad, because, unfortunately—and I speak with total sincerity here—I think Israel has done itself some serious damage. And in addition to just what they did, it was the way they did it and the way they’re presenting it. Nobody regrets what happened on the Israeli side, because those were all terrorists, you know, violating our laws. Guys, get a grip. This isn’t going to work.

5
Karen Hatter

The footage shown of IDF soldiers, lowering themselves onto and boarding a ship in the flotilla, an offensive manuever on the part of the IDF, an act conducted in international waters, lends the IDF's actions to be viewed as provocation for a defensive reaction from those aboard the ship.

1
JoshArizona

Indeed, the IDF was there to provoke.

It's like the playground bully beating up a much smaller kid, then complaining that the other kid fought back with the extremely limited amount of force he had.

1
Karen Hatter

It would seem so, Josh.

0
tikun

Karen, This is such an embarrassing spin.  Actually it really isnt worth a response because it flies in the face of the truth. Your hatred is beyond words.  At least you are consistent.

4
Karen Hatter

What is embarrassing, Tikun, are the scales in the eyes of those within the Israeli government, its spokespersons and defenders that tend to defend any and ALL of the actions of the Israeli government AND the IDF, all of whom seem to believe Israel has the right to engage in all manner of behavior, committing acts that are not acts that would be tolerated when committed by any other countries.

I would also suggest you please peruse NowPublic's Code of Conduct to familiarize yourself with what is and is NOT acceptable interaction here among contributors, to assure compliance.    

0
tikun

Karen what an immature statement. Are you going to send the man to silence me? The only scale on the eyes are yours that have a need to hate anything that Israel stands for and acts out of its interests. I wonder if you have the guts to admit your prejudice you so accuse others of having.

3
factsyettobedetermined

Thanks Karen. Also bear in mind that while Israel calls the blockade as legal entitlement for the action, the actuality of the case law is more complex.  What legally are they blockading?  Palestine is not yet a sovereign state so either, depending on legal interpretation, it is disputed territory (per Israel) or occupied lands (per Hamas and PA). If the latter, the blockade is illegal and immoral. If the former, perhaps only immoral. I do, however, stand in awe of the Israeli lobby and hasbara machine. It is cranking and many Americans are buying it. Sad

3
JoshArizona

Funny how all the video shows is IDF sailors in complete darkness yelling about guns but, there are no gunshots to be heard.

How about the fact that the IDF had to admit they found NO firearms on board!

How about the fact, that even if the activists did have firearms(which they didnt), that they are in international waters!

How about the fact that the Israeli blockade violates the Geneva Conventions?

4
Martina Meier

Israel is twisting the truth as usual. Luckily this time it won't stick, there are 670 eyewitnesses and these are not hopeless Palestinians who nobody believes. These are international humanitarians who experienced a brutal raid from Israeli troops. And they did not have any weapons, the videos seen show people defending themselves with sticks and chairs against heavily armed Israeli brutal troops. The attack started from the air and then troops came down on ropes shooting randomly As usual Israel is twisting the truth and saying that they had no choice. When Israel attacks the Gaza Strip with the excuse that they are defending themselves from terrorist the world is torn between what Israel says and what the Palestinians are saying. In this incident Israel is facing the truth told by international humanitarians.  These people are not only saying that they were brutally attacked, but also robbed by the troops. Accounts of Israeli soldiers robbing Palestinians is common, but now humanitarians have cast doubt on Israel’s version of events.  What kind of soldiers rob people?

0
tikun

A confirmed terrorist leader was among the Gaza flotilla extremists aboard the Mavi Marmara on Monday, holding a Dutch passport. 

Amin Abu Rashed, 43, was among the militants arrested on the Turkish vessel following the vicious attack on Israeli Naval commandos who boarded the ship. The Palestinian Authority Arab holds a Dutch passport and operates out of Rotterdam as the leader of the Hamas terrorist network in the Netherlands. He has presented himself to Dutch media and others as a “human rights activist.”

According to a report posted Tuesday on the Global Muslim Brotherhood Daily Report, Abu Rashed – also known as Amin Abu Ibrahim – was “one of the chief organizers of the Gaza flotilla.”

The six-ship flotilla, sponsored largely by Turkey, refused to change course despite repeated Israeli requests to head for Ashdod port rather than violate an embargo on the Hamas terrorist-run Gaza region. In Ashdod, Israel promised to off-load the ships' cargo, inspect it for contraband and then deliver all legal humanitarian aid to Gaza via the land crossings – but the ships refused to comply, vowing instead to “reach Gaza or martyrdom.”

The Muslim report added that Rashed and 29-year-old Dutch anthropologist Anne de Jong were offered a fast-track deportation procedure, “but refused because they [said they] want to complete their mission.” Both refused to sign the State of Israel declaration of expulsion that would have allowed them to go free.

Abu Rashed's name has previously come up in a document presented as evidence in the United States government's prosecution of the Texas-based Holy Land Foundation charity organization – a group that was funneling money to Hamas.

Global jihadists were deeply involved in the flotilla incident in other ways. Approximately 40 of those arrested on the Mavi Marmara had no identification, and many were found to be carrying thousands of dollars in cash in their pockets – the same amount for each. Israeli officials said they appeared to be mercenaries, possibly linked to Al-Qaeda, who had received their remuneration just before boarding the vessel.

IDF video evidence shows the group splitting up into teams and sending the rest of the passengers below decks, while making preparations for the ambush of the Israeli Naval commandos.

According to the GMB Daily Report, “Previous posts have described the heavy participation of the Global Muslim Brotherhood in the Gaza flotilla, the Muslim Brotherhood background of the Al Jazeera journalist reporting from the Turkish ship involved in the confrontation, and the intent of the Global Muslim Brotherhood to send another flotilla to Gaza.”

2
JoshArizona

It's getting blatantly obvious, that you are a Mossad/Shin Bet mouthpiece. Or maybe you are actually this delusional.

0
tikun

Josh that is not going to do it. You got to do better then this. This is just a sign of your bankruptcy.

3
joshscorrect

Josh is correct. I do not think he is delusional. I do believe he is paid to do this, as many are as part of the hasbara machine. He is just always on the scripted points, and never varies off them. Nobody is buying it here and haven't for a long time. He has been outed, so is no import

2
JoshArizona

I accidentally recommended this, is their a way to withdraw it?

0
tikun

You are stuck with me..thanks LOL G-d made you do it. LOL

1
Karen Hatter
Like many of us around the world, Henochowicz, a 21-year-old Cooper Union art student, joined protests on Monday against Israel's outrageous attack on the humanitarian flotilla. But unfortunately, the protest Emily attended was in the Israeli-occupied West Bank, and like so many protests in the West Bank, it was violently attacked by the IDF. According to a report from the International Solidarity Movement, Emily was "hit in the face with a tear gas projectile fired directly at her by an Israeli soldier during the demonstration at Qalandiya checkpoint today." Sören Johanssen, a Swedish activist standing beside Henochowicz, reported that, "They fired many canisters at us in rapid succession. One landed on either side of Emily, then the third one hit her in the face."

This courageous young woman is now the wrenching embodiment of a policy that systematically targets witnesses and human rights advocates -- from Stop the Wall's Mohammad Othman, arrested on his way back from a European speaking tour, to the vicious smear campaign waged against Justice Richard Goldstone.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

JoshArizona
First Flagged at 10:50 AM, Jun 3, 2010 by JoshArizona
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (2)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from