Former FBI Agent Turned Whistleblower Gangstalked for Decades

Well, I've had MY fun"batt"ing around the rat today.  Time to go have a little real fun.  Night, batty.

This tread reads likes shit..It's to bad that this always seems to turn into some pro or con argument. 

The bottom line is, anybody who hasn't experienced specific gang_stalking over an extended period of time, will not be able to comprehend or understand the activities being suggested by targeted gang_stalked individuals. Nor will those who are unaware be able the relate to any of the suggested psychological nuances of alleged street theater antics.

Also, I feel for Mr. Sosbee (if that is actually him posting here). I don't pretend to know everything that his life experiences must mean to him personally. It's unfair to think any here could walk in Geral shoes by reading somethings on the web, and understand what it must be like and mean to Geral's life. I wish him the best in any of his efforts forward specific to any injustices in his career.

As for batvette, if he chooses not to believe in gang_stalking, but chooses to believe only in the more commonly known and reported proxy stalking, I say let him ! 

The idea that arguing with batvette or anyone else about 'gang_stalking', which until now is mostly unproven and unknown about by the vast majority of the American public, is really a waste of time. There are actually millions of batvettes who don't believe or even like conspiracy theorists_that we as targeted gang_stalking victims are still considered.

Acknowledging that many still do not understand or choose to believe what gang_stalking victims allege, is actually a step forward for us as victims to also accept and understand. That without specific proof of gang_stalking activities, or anything showing that this is a specifically government run program, means we must also accept the fact that not everyone will choose to believe what we as victims say. That this specifically psychological method and cointelpro style targeted victim run program, is in it's very nature covert and seemingly being covered up by our own leading law enforcement and government agencies.

"Batvette said, while talking out of the other side of his mouth, regarding getting info posted to Wiki's stalking page.  He wrote this in Feb of 2011, I believe:   "If we want to get it in  there is only one way.............................Get a lot of TI's- like several dozen or more-  to open accounts, and establish verifiable edit histories for about 6 months on wholly irrelevant topics. They will also have to learm wiki protocol and wiki-lawyering skills.............................Then one can approach the admin who locked the page (the anome) and casually attempt to reintroduce it, we will need some good sources before that is even attempted.............................Then rally everyone and slam his ass and all the meat puppets he will bring into his blocking actions and  the resulting RFC's and higher admin actions. It's about consensus at that point and we'll have be sly but forceful.  ............................Though all will have to play the stupid game that we have no personal interest and are solely editing  with a NPOV.............................It's complete bull.............................and though I don't expect anyone to read all my ranting, this should dispel any notion I am involved with "disinfo" for the program..................................................................................Continue reading at NowPublic.com: Gang Stalking: Santa Cruz Police Lieutenant Speaks Out | NowPublic News Coverage www.nowpublic.com/world/gang-stalking-santa-cruz-police-lieutenant-speaks-out#ixzz20Q2Tvo1S   (Batvette is like an evil Eddie Haskell -- he sucks up to the Wiki folks while on Wiki and bashes them here.  I think that the Wiki folks on the stalking page should read this.)"

In the words of the "sly" batvette about one of the wiki administrators:  "Then one can approach the admin who locked the page (the anome) and casually attempt to reintroduce it, we will need some good sources before that is even attempted.............................Then rally everyone and slam his ass and all the meat puppets he will bring into his blocking actions and  the resulting RFC's and higher admin actions. It's about consensus at that point and we'll have be sly but forceful"

      DID YOU KNOW THIS BATVETTE, THE LOON WHO PUT A VIDEO ON YOUTUBE ABOUT HIS WALLS MOVING. 
Peacefraud is a pathological liar. That claim is a lie. 

You're right, batvette.  You didn't put the vids on YouTube, you put them on some site called "FileFactory" and they're no longer available.  So PeaceFrog simply noted the wrong site.  You, on the other hand, are skirting the truth, to be generous, while making the claim that PF is lying.  From batvette's article:  "Update: New technology the perps are using, to terrorize us in our homes: They make the walls and doors, "breathe".  Impossible? I just know what I see, and the camera sees it too. And I can close my eyes and feel it too.--------------------- filefactory.com/file/ah2eb99/n/Picture_056_mov   ---------this is a pretty big file, about 185 mb, but download it and see for yourself, this is definately a first.---------- Watch the curvature of the door.---------- www.filefactory.com/f/cf8806ebed7aeeda/ ---------I have nine similar files,in the above folder,  showing the inside and outside at day and at night. Due to the way fiilming on camera then playing back on a small screen tends to lose dynamic scaling, it does not jump out at you with cartoon proportions, but it is quite terrifying at first when you don't know what might be causing it. Also the motion of the camera in perspective with the wall isn't much because the camera and whatever you have it sitting on are moving with the wall- this is some kind of field like magnetic attraction and repelling, but isn't limited to ferrous metals. ----------So to see what is moving, look at the curvature of the boards vertical and horizontal inside, and in some of these you can clearly see the shadow of an aluminum extrusion moving back and forth. On the outside clips, look at the metal security screen frame, it is straight then gets convex. Or watch the air conditioner tilting in motion clockwise, then counterclockwise. Look at the metal screen frame bend in a curve, but look at the wall edge at the far end of the building, always stays straight.  Update, 9/15/09 ----------I captured a better video of smaller length, a less imposing download: www.filefactory.com/file/ah28gc7/n/Picture_067_mov ----------Try holding a straight edge up to your monitor, or even placing a piece of tape across either the vertical or horizontal lines and watch the bulge increase and decrease. I can assure you the effect in reality is quite terrifying when you don't know what is causing it.-----------------------------------------Continue reading at NowPublic.com: Gangstalking TI's (targeted individual's) Manifesto | NowPublic News Coverage www.nowpublic.com/world/gangstalking-tis-targeted-individuals-manifesto#ixzz22CrDbXzp----------------- (In the world according to ratvette, he's the only "sane" target.  Now what does that tell us?)

www.aclu.org/blog/national-security-technology-and-liberty/biggest-new-spying-program-youve-probably-never-heard .........07/30/2012 .......... The Biggest New Spying Program You’ve Probably Never Heard Of .........By Chris Calabrese, Legislative Counsel, ACLU Washington Legislative Office at 2:18pm .........What if a government spy agency had power to copy and data mine information about ordinary Americans from any government database? This could include records from law enforcement investigations, health information, employment history, travel and student records. Literally anything the government collects would be fair game, and the original agency in charge of protecting the privacy of those records would have little say over whether this happened, or what the spy agency did with the information afterward. What if that spy agency could add commercial information, anything it – or any other federal agency – could buy from the huge data aggregators that are monitoring our every move? .........What if it wasn’t just collection but also sharing? Anything that was reasonably believed to be necessary to “protect the safety or security of persons, property or organizations” or “protect against or prevent a crime or threat to national security” could be shared. Imagine the dissemination was essentially unlimited, not just to federal, state, local or foreign governments but also to individuals or entities that are not part of the government. .........It has already happened. .........This full frontal assault on our privacy wasn’t passed through an Act of Congress or international treaty but through deceptively titled “guidelines” to the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC). On March 22, 2012 the Attorney General, the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and the Director of NCTC issued an update to the 2008 rules for handling information on US persons. These were radical changes (to see how different please check out redline comparison we did between the 2008 and 2012 guidelines). .........The biggest change regards the NCTC’s handling of “non-terrorism” related information on US persons. Previously, the intelligence community was barred from collecting information about ordinary Americans unless the person was a terror suspect or part of an actual investigation. When the NCTC gobbled up huge data sets it had to search for and identify any innocent US person information inadvertently collected, and discard it within 180 days. This crucial check meant that NCTC was dissuaded from collecting large databases filled with information on innocent Americans, because the data had to then be carefully screened. The 2012 guidelines eliminate this check, allowing NCTC to collect and “continually assess” information on innocent Americans for up to five years. .........Once information is acquired, the new guidelines authorize broad new search powers. As long NCTC says its search is aimed at identifying terrorism information, it may conduct queries that involve non-terrorism data points and pattern-based searches and analysis (data mining). The breadth and wrongheadedness of these changes are particularly noteworthy. Not only do they mean that anytime you interact with any government agency you essentially enter a lineup as a potential terrorist, they also rely on a technique, datamining, which has been thoroughly discredited as a useful tool for identifying terrorists. As far back as 2008 the National Academy of Sciences found that data mining for terrorism was scientifically “not feasible” as a methodology, and likely to have significant negative impacts on privacy and civil liberties. .........Perhaps most disturbing, once information is gathered (not necessarily connected to terrorism), in many cases it can be shared with “a federal, state, local, tribal, or foreign or international entity, or to an individual or entity not part of a government” – literally anyone. That sharing can happen in relation to national security and safety, drug investigations, if it’s evidence of a crime or to evaluate sources or contacts. This boundless sharing is broad enough to encompass disclosures to an employer or landlord about someone who NCTC may think is potentially a criminal, or at the request of local law enforcement for vetting an informant. .........All of this is happening with very little oversight. Controls over the NCTC are mostly internal to the DNI’s office, and important oversight bodies such as Congress and the President’s Intelligence Oversight Board aren’t notified even of “significant” failures to comply with the Guidelines. Fundamental legal protections are being sidestepped. For example, under the new guidelines, Privacy Act notices (legal requirements to describe how databases are used) must be completed by the agency that collected the information. This is in spite of the fact that those agencies have no idea what NCTC is actually doing with the information once it collects it. .........All of this amounts to a reboot of the Total Information Awareness Program that Americans rejected so vigorously right after 9/11. While some outlets like the Washington Post and New York Times and bloggers such as emptywheel have written excellent pieces about these changes, due to their complexity and obscurity they haven’t gotten nearly the attention they deserve."   (...and the article continues)

www.aclu.org/blog/national-security-technology-and-liberty/biggest-new-spying-program-youve-probably-never-heard .........07/30/2012 .......... The Biggest New Spying Program You’ve Probably Never Heard Of .........By Chris Calabrese, Legislative Counsel, ACLU Washington Legislative Office at 2:18pm .........What if a government spy agency had power to copy and data mine information about ordinary Americans from any government database? This could include records from law enforcement investigations, health information, employment history, travel and student records. Literally anything the government collects would be fair game, and the original agency in charge of protecting the privacy of those records would have little say over whether this happened, or what the spy agency did with the information afterward. What if that spy agency could add commercial information, anything it – or any other federal agency – could buy from the huge data aggregators that are monitoring our every move? .........What if it wasn’t just collection but also sharing? Anything that was reasonably believed to be necessary to “protect the safety or security of persons, property or organizations” or “protect against or prevent a crime or threat to national security” could be shared. Imagine the dissemination was essentially unlimited, not just to federal, state, local or foreign governments but also to individuals or entities that are not part of the government. .........It has already happened. .........This full frontal assault on our privacy wasn’t passed through an Act of Congress or international treaty but through deceptively titled “guidelines” to the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC). On March 22, 2012 the Attorney General, the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and the Director of NCTC issued an update to the 2008 rules for handling information on US persons. These were radical changes (to see how different please check out redline comparison we did between the 2008 and 2012 guidelines). .........The biggest change regards the NCTC’s handling of “non-terrorism” related information on US persons. Previously, the intelligence community was barred from collecting information about ordinary Americans unless the person was a terror suspect or part of an actual investigation. When the NCTC gobbled up huge data sets it had to search for and identify any innocent US person information inadvertently collected, and discard it within 180 days. This crucial check meant that NCTC was dissuaded from collecting large databases filled with information on innocent Americans, because the data had to then be carefully screened. The 2012 guidelines eliminate this check, allowing NCTC to collect and “continually assess” information on innocent Americans for up to five years. .........Once information is acquired, the new guidelines authorize broad new search powers. As long NCTC says its search is aimed at identifying terrorism information, it may conduct queries that involve non-terrorism data points and pattern-based searches and analysis (data mining). The breadth and wrongheadedness of these changes are particularly noteworthy. Not only do they mean that anytime you interact with any government agency you essentially enter a lineup as a potential terrorist, they also rely on a technique, datamining, which has been thoroughly discredited as a useful tool for identifying terrorists. As far back as 2008 the National Academy of Sciences found that data mining for terrorism was scientifically “not feasible” as a methodology, and likely to have significant negative impacts on privacy and civil liberties. .........Perhaps most disturbing, once information is gathered (not necessarily connected to terrorism), in many cases it can be shared with “a federal, state, local, tribal, or foreign or international entity, or to an individual or entity not part of a government” – literally anyone. That sharing can happen in relation to national security and safety, drug investigations, if it’s evidence of a crime or to evaluate sources or contacts. This boundless sharing is broad enough to encompass disclosures to an employer or landlord about someone who NCTC may think is potentially a criminal, or at the request of local law enforcement for vetting an informant. .........All of this is happening with very little oversight. Controls over the NCTC are mostly internal to the DNI’s office, and important oversight bodies such as Congress and the President’s Intelligence Oversight Board aren’t notified even of “significant” failures to comply with the Guidelines. Fundamental legal protections are being sidestepped. For example, under the new guidelines, Privacy Act notices (legal requirements to describe how databases are used) must be completed by the agency that collected the information. This is in spite of the fact that those agencies have no idea what NCTC is actually doing with the information once it collects it. .........All of this amounts to a reboot of the Total Information Awareness Program that Americans rejected so vigorously right after 9/11. While some outlets like the Washington Post and New York Times and bloggers such as emptywheel have written excellent pieces about these changes, due to their complexity and obscurity they haven’t gotten nearly the attention they deserve."   (...and the article continues)

U.S. RADIATION WEAPON ATTACK UPDATE Tue Jul 31 @2:35pm

LOCKHEED MARTIN OPERATIVES IN ANOTHER CONSCIOUSNESS LOSS/FORCED SLEEP ATTACK ON JOURNALIST EXPOSING THEIR SERIAL CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY W/U.S. CELL TOWER RADIO FREQUENCY WEAPON SYSTEM (U.S. Patent 7629918, Raytheon)

For MORE THAN AN HOUR, literally knocked unconscious by RF neuromodulation attack tuned to brain frequencies -- causing forced sleep.  Struggled to stay conscious for more than a half-hour, in and out of consciousness, then put into deep sleep state.  Awoke to severe ear-ringing, overwhelming fatigue -- NO SENSE OF PASSAGE OF TIME.  THIS IS HOW THE U.S. GOVT HAS STOLEN MY LIFE AND DESTROYED MY EARNINGS CAPACITY.
Earlier:

U.S. RADIATION WEAPON ATTACK/PSYCHOPATHIC MILITARY CONTRACTOR PSYOPS REPORT Tue Jul 31 @ 11:33am

U.S. GOVT FAILS TO STOP LOCKHEED MARTIN-USG AGENCIES/COMMANDS FROM SILENTLY ASSAULTING, IMPAIRING, SLOW-KILLING EXTRAJUDICIALLY TARGETED AMERICANS W/U.S. CELL TOWER RADIO FREQUENCY WEAPON SYSTEM (U.S. Patent 7629918, Raytheon).

Just awoke at computer, ears ringing, extreme fatigue, vertigo, after more than 1/2 hr. consciousness loss/forced sleep via RF neuromodulation attack precision-turned to brain frequencies harvested from medical report -- TORTURE, IMPAIRMENT, SUBJUGATION, ENSLAVEMENT, DENIAL OF FREE WILL -- HOW U.S. GOVT OPERATIVES HAVE DESTROYED MY LIFE AND CAREER FOR MORE THAN EIGHT YEARS.  Last night, similar forced sleep attacks on myself and my wife while trying to watch TV.   THESE PSYCHOPATHS USE APERATURE RADAR AUDIO/VIDEO SURVEILLANCE TO SPY ON EVERYTHING THAT OCCURS ON OUR PREMISES, AND DELIGHT IN PUPPETMASTERING OUR LIVES VIA ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPON TORTUROUS ASSAULT.

Goons insinuated into neighborhood by community "policing" team leaders keep up sadistic "hoo-hoo" cupped hand bird call psyop each time I approach an open window, apparently cued by Lockheed surveillance operatives.  More stories about twin infants inserted into Facebook Newsfeed (my daughter pregnant with twins and operatives know via their illicit surveillance of my concern for her well-being).  This weekend, Lockheed- coordinated stalkers parade by my house, and during visit to Princeton, NJ with double stroller holding twin infants -- HUMAN PROPS IN A SICK, SADISTIC, ILLEGAL PSYOP.

More signs of apparent home intrusion while we are "kept under" via radio frequency weapon attack. Lower Makefield Twp. police, under Chief Ken Coluzzi, REFUSE TO INVESTIGATE HATE CRIME COMPLAINTS DESPITE IN-PERSON APPEAL.  I AM A VIRTUAL PRISONER TO HOME-INTRUDING GOONS IN MY OWN HOME, AND STALKED VIA VEHICLE AND ON FOOT WHEREVER I GO.  See "U.S. Silently Tortures..." and "Gestapo USA" at:
http://viclivingston.blogspot.com/2011/12/u.html
http://viclivingston.blogspot.com/2012/01/thugocracy-u.html

www.aclu.org/blog/national-security-technology-and-liberty/biggest-new-spying-program-youve-probably-never-heard .........07/30/2012 .......... The Biggest New Spying Program You’ve Probably Never Heard Of .........By Chris Calabrese, Legislative Counsel, ACLU Washington Legislative Office at 2:18pm .........What if a government spy agency had power to copy and data mine information about ordinary Americans from any government database? This could include records from law enforcement investigations, health information, employment history, travel and student records. Literally anything the government collects would be fair game, and the original agency in charge of protecting the privacy of those records would have little say over whether this happened, or what the spy agency did with the information afterward. What if that spy agency could add commercial information, anything it – or any other federal agency – could buy from the huge data aggregators that are monitoring our every move? .........What if it wasn’t just collection but also sharing? Anything that was reasonably believed to be necessary to “protect the safety or security of persons, property or organizations” or “protect against or prevent a crime or threat to national security” could be shared. Imagine the dissemination was essentially unlimited, not just to federal, state, local or foreign governments but also to individuals or entities that are not part of the government. .........It has already happened. .........This full frontal assault on our privacy wasn’t passed through an Act of Congress or international treaty but through deceptively titled “guidelines” to the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC). On March 22, 2012 the Attorney General, the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) and the Director of NCTC issued an update to the 2008 rules for handling information on US persons. These were radical changes (to see how different please check out redline comparison we did between the 2008 and 2012 guidelines). .........The biggest change regards the NCTC’s handling of “non-terrorism” related information on US persons. Previously, the intelligence community was barred from collecting information about ordinary Americans unless the person was a terror suspect or part of an actual investigation. When the NCTC gobbled up huge data sets it had to search for and identify any innocent US person information inadvertently collected, and discard it within 180 days. This crucial check meant that NCTC was dissuaded from collecting large databases filled with information on innocent Americans, because the data had to then be carefully screened. The 2012 guidelines eliminate this check, allowing NCTC to collect and “continually assess” information on innocent Americans for up to five years. .........Once information is acquired, the new guidelines authorize broad new search powers. As long NCTC says its search is aimed at identifying terrorism information, it may conduct queries that involve non-terrorism data points and pattern-based searches and analysis (data mining). The breadth and wrongheadedness of these changes are particularly noteworthy. Not only do they mean that anytime you interact with any government agency you essentially enter a lineup as a potential terrorist, they also rely on a technique, datamining, which has been thoroughly discredited as a useful tool for identifying terrorists. As far back as 2008 the National Academy of Sciences found that data mining for terrorism was scientifically “not feasible” as a methodology, and likely to have significant negative impacts on privacy and civil liberties. .........Perhaps most disturbing, once information is gathered (not necessarily connected to terrorism), in many cases it can be shared with “a federal, state, local, tribal, or foreign or international entity, or to an individual or entity not part of a government” – literally anyone. That sharing can happen in relation to national security and safety, drug investigations, if it’s evidence of a crime or to evaluate sources or contacts. This boundless sharing is broad enough to encompass disclosures to an employer or landlord about someone who NCTC may think is potentially a criminal, or at the request of local law enforcement for vetting an informant. .........All of this is happening with very little oversight. Controls over the NCTC are mostly internal to the DNI’s office, and important oversight bodies such as Congress and the President’s Intelligence Oversight Board aren’t notified even of “significant” failures to comply with the Guidelines. Fundamental legal protections are being sidestepped. For example, under the new guidelines, Privacy Act notices (legal requirements to describe how databases are used) must be completed by the agency that collected the information. This is in spite of the fact that those agencies have no idea what NCTC is actually doing with the information once it collects it. .........All of this amounts to a reboot of the Total Information Awareness Program that Americans rejected so vigorously right after 9/11. While some outlets like the Washington Post and New York Times and bloggers such as emptywheel have written excellent pieces about these changes, due to their complexity and obscurity they haven’t gotten nearly the attention they deserve."   (...and the article continues)

I have a question for batvette. And batvette you don't need to worry about what you say answering this question with me. So if you don't mind, please clarify if you remember, exactly what you were feeling mentally and physically while you were seeing these walls moving.

There is a possibility you were being subjected to electronic attack. 

Those here who who know what gang_stalking is but not electronic attack, you can believe what electronic attack is or not. As with gang_stalking, if you haven't experienced it, you won't understand or be able to comprehend what it is..But at least you as victims of gang_stalking can try and understand the covert nature of it. There are similarities between electronic attack and gangstalking in making the victim sound insane trying to describe what it is and the covert, nearly impossible to prove methods used. 

Thxs! 1 

Btw, for any wondering about what gang_stalking really is_'you can't know what gangstalking isn't, until you know what gangstalking is'. It's that simple..

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection :Psychological projection or projection bias is a psychological defense mechanism where a person subconsciously denies his or her own attributes, thoughts, and emotions, which are then ascribed to the outside world, usually to other people. Thus, projection involves imagining or projecting the belief that others originate those feelings.[1]  Projection reduces anxiety by allowing the expression of the unwanted unconscious impulses or desires without letting the conscious mind recognize them.  An example of this behavior might be blaming another for self failure. The mind may avoid the discomfort of consciously admitting personal faults by keeping those feelings unconscious, and by redirecting libidinal satisfaction by attaching, or "projecting," those same faults onto another person or object.  (He does it a lot.)

www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2012/04/06/teachers-facing-death-threats-online_n_1407873.html   (with first comment by Geral Sosbee)   One of these days, we'll reach a tipping point and the ugly truth about group stalking will spill out.)

www.nationofchange.org/where-s-outrage-nobody-seems-care-america-s-becomes-police-state-1343829287  (The 1, If you'd post the link, I'd appreaciate it.  Thanks.)

Related to the noise campaigns reported by victims of OS/group/team stalking and their use by the U.S. military:  www.tapping.org/    "Catherine the Great, czarina of Russia, was one of the first heads of state to abuse psychiatry to intimidate and harass her enemies. During the Cold War many articles and several books appeared in the West about the political abuses of psychiatry practiced in the USSR. One Soviet general officer was hospitalized there for "paranoia," but later he was proven sane after he defected to the West. The USSR was for a time excluded from the World Psychiatric Association for its abuses." -  Dr. Rosemary F. Rodgers (M.D.)  (Book:  "Noise (The Story of Dr. Rosemary Rodgers" by Aurelia Nelson)

my.firedoglake.com/shahidbuttar/2011/05/23/out-of-the-frying-pan-and-into-the-fire-why-the-fbi-needs-new-leadership/  ("The last ten years have witnessed an assault on the constitutional rights of law-abiding Americans, led largely by the FBI. Appointed mere days before the 9/11 attacks, Director Robert S. Mueller III has guided the bureau through the resurrection of many long discredited practices from its COINTELPRO era. Yet, the Obama administration has proposed extending Mueller’s term as FBI director. Congress should reject the proposal and insist on a nominee from outside the bureau to restore accountability, law and order. Just ask Nick Merrill in New York, Joe Iosbaker in Chicago or Ahmadullah Niazi in Los Angeles: three law-abiding Americans whose constitutional rights are among the casualties of the last decade. The last time Congress extended the term of FBI director was in 1972, to keep J. Edgar Hoover in office. Years later, when the Church and Pike committees finally exposed the notorious counterintelligence program (aka COINTELPRO), Congress discovered that Hoover presided over severe abuses for decades. During the era of Hoover and COINTELPRO, the FBI’s most famous target was Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., who the bureau targeted with a smear campaign aiming to split up his marriage and drive him to suicide. The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People was accused—without evidence—of subverting the state, as were activists promoting Puerto Rican independence, an end to the war in Vietnam, women’s rights and civil rights for racial minorities including Native Americans and African-Americans. According to the US Senate: Many of the techniques used would be intolerable in a democratic society even if all of the targets had been involved in violent activity, but COINTELPRO went far beyond that … the bureau conducted a sophisticated vigilante operation aimed squarely at preventing the exercise of First Amendment rights of speech and association."  (Refer to link for remainder of article.)........................................................Continue reading at NowPublic.com: Gang Stalking is COINTELPRO | NowPublic News Coverage, Page 10 my.nowpublic.com/world/gang-stalking-cointelpro#ixzz22PSN9Zgu

Yes, and the so-called cointel program used by the fbi is mainstream, now corruptly  manifesting itself throughout the law and society; this means that secret agents & operatives, using low and *high tech torture tools, operate with the approval of courts and executive agencies of gov to silence, imprison, or kill (sometimes by forced suicide) dissidents or troublemakers who are targeted by fbi/cia, etc. for termination/neutralization. About me: hearingvoices-is-voicetoskull.com/GeralSosbee.htm I certify that all statements on this thread that are signed by me, or bear my name as author to date, are in fact my posts and that all of my statements are true and correct. geral sosbee (956)622-0768, P O Box 3374, Harlingen, Texas 78551   *For More background on a current high tech torture tool used against me and others see: www.buergerwelle.de/d/doc/gesund/munzert-directed-energy-weapons.htm