Frank Rich: 'The night they drove the Tea Partiers down'

by smkovalinsky | November 8, 2009 at 03:36 pm
60 views | 0 Recommendations | 1 comment

Photos

Tea Party upset?

Tea Party upset?

see larger image

uploaded by smkovalinsky

FOR all cable news’s efforts to inflate Election 2009 into a cliffhanger as riveting as Balloon Boy, ratings at MSNBC and CNN were flat Tuesday night. But not at Fox News, where the audience nearly doubled its usual prime-time average. That’s what happens when you have a thrilling story to tell, and what could be more thrilling than a revolution playing out in real time?  ~Frank Rich,  OpEd columnist,  New York Times 


Frank Rich makes his shrewd and quasi-satirical commentary on the fiasco of the New York Congressional race and elections.  Within his OpEd piece, he sounds a cautionary note for the  Democrats,  and takes the Tea Party set down a notch:  


The GOP,  Rich warns,  can stave off self-destruction by containing this lunatic fringe.  




This race was a damaging setback for the hard right. Hoffman had the energetic support of Sarah Palin, Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh and Fox as well as big bucks from their political auxiliaries. Furthermore, Hoffman was running not only in a district that Rove himself described as “very Republican” but one that fits the demographics of the incredibly shrinking G.O.P. The 23rd is far whiter than America as a whole — 93 percent versus 74 — with tiny sprinklings of blacks, Hispanics and Asians. It has few immigrants. It’s rural. Its income and education levels are below the norm. Only if the district were situated in Dixie — or Utah — could it be a more perfect fit for the narrow American demographic where the McCain-Palin ticket had its sole romps last year.

If the tea party right can’t win there, imagine how it might fare in the nation where most Americans live. Some G.O.P. leaders have started to notice. Mitt Romney didn’t endorse Hoffman despite right-wing badgering to do so. On Wednesday, Michael Steele dismissed the right’s mantra that somehow Hoffman’s loss could be called a victory and instead talked up the newly elected Republican governors who won by appealing to independents and moderates. Chris Christie and Bob McDonnell are plenty conservative, but both had rejected Palin’s offers to campaign for them. They also avoided the tea party zanies, the fear-mongering National Organization for Marriage and the anti-abortion-rights zealots Hoffman embraced. They positioned themselves as respectful Obama critics, not haters likening him to Hitler.

In the aftermath of this clear-cut demonstration of how Republicans can win, the revolutionaries are still pledging to purge the party’s moderates by rallying behind more Hoffmans in G.O.P. primaries from Florida to California. And they may get some scalps. But Tuesday’s loss revealed that they’re better at luring freak-show gawkers into Fox’s tent than voters into the G.O.P.’s. As if to prove the point, protesters hoisted a sign likening health care reform to Dachau at the raucous tea party rally convened by Michele Bachmann on Capitol Hill on Thursday.

recommend Add a comment
1
Hugh Askew

That would be interesting, coming from Mr. Rich, if he had added some facts about the fact that Obama had carried the district a year ago.

or that Hoffman was a third party candidate.....not the easy way to win an election in America.

or that Scozzafava was still on the ballot - and won 6% of the votes.

Nice positive spin tho, for an abject liberal.

For a "fringe" group, most would agree that 45.5% is impressive.  Could well be an omen of things to come. 

The path to self-destruction for the Republicans would be found in containing this lunatic fringe, instead of embracing it.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from