Funding US Foreign Policy: Bloated
Walter Pincus is a senior correspondent for the Washington Post who has the knowledge and skill to handle complex stories such as tracking the Congressional budgeting, funding, and appropriations process. If you saw models of the process, it would fill many pages even when using streamlined modeling techniques. Modeling is used to describe how the work gets done. Models are attributed by identifying who actually perform the work.
In this story, Pincus only hints that Congressional staffers are at work, guided and influenced by industry lobbyists, to advance policy and appropriations that may or may not be consistent with elected officials decisions. That is just one way the process is corrupt.
The process is hidden by activities that span time and organizational buckets such that only insiders know for certain what is happening. Even then, military executives may never know for certain what they are managing.
This is what Obama calls “systemic flaws.” No kidding. They are flaws by design and shrouded by legacy and bureaucracy.
Senator McCain is performing a good service by penetrating the veil. However, the problem is bigger than one Senator. The government enterprise is too big and complex to manage the old ways.
The Marine Corps has a theme: Semper Fi. The US Government needs one: Simplify.
“McCain takes Defense spending fight to new level
By Walter Pincus, Published: September 26
Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) is carrying his fight over Defense Department spending to a new level — the structure of Congress itself.
Last week, I wrote that his initial target was the culture of Pentagon officials who have “been inclined to lose sight of affordability as a goal and just reached for more money as a solution to most problems.”
His newest quarry: The Senate Appropriations Committee. Or as he put it Wednesday in a Senate floor speech, “a handful of senior appropriators and their unelected staffs [who] dictate the spending of hundreds of billions of dollars — often in a manner that directly contravenes the will of those committees that still authorize spending.”
There has always been tension in the archaic, two-step way Congress approves money for executive departments. House and Senate authorizing committees approve programs and set budget levels, and then the “powerful” House and Senate appropriations committees approve the actual figures, sometimes lower than that authorized.
In recent years, however, with Congress unable to pass authorizing bills on time and the advent of “omnibus” spending bills, appropriators have taken to moving funds around, including adding money for projects not specifically authorized.
McCain is the ranking Republican on the Senate Armed Services Committee, which hasn’t brought its final version of the fiscal 2012 defense authorization bill to the Senate floor. That’s because the debt-limit agreement requires an additional spending reduction in fiscal 2012, which the panel has yet to make.
Meanwhile, the Senate Appropriations Committee on Sept. 15 approved its version of the legislation.
McCain said the appropriators used “budget gimmicks totaling over $10 billion to mislead the American people about the savings the committee claims to achieve.”
According to McCain, the “core” Defense Department budget was set at $513 billion for fiscal 2012, the same figure as approved for the current year.
There is another pot of money for the Pentagon that is considered “emergency spending” and “off budget.” It funds the fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq. For fiscal 2012, that figure was set at $117 billion.
The committee’s “gimmick,” according to McCain, was to cut $10 billion from this war account, partly based on “a presumption of decreased troop strength in Iraq and Afghanistan.” McCain pointed out that assumes reductions go as planned and that there is no need to keep additional troops in Iraq after Dec. 31.
But then, the committee shifted $10 billion in programs from the “core” budget to the war account. Among the programs shifted were $4 billion for Army, Navy, Marine and Air Force service depot maintenance and $1.5 billion for procurement of unmanned aircraft for the Air Force, Army and Navy.
That shifted $10 billion made up nearly half of the $26 billion the committee claimed to have cut from President Obama’s core Defense Department request.
But, according to McCain, the committee “still found money for over $2.3 billion in additional spending not requested by the Department of Defense and for items that are far from real Defense requirements.” These included rewards to special interests and funds for members’ pet projects, McCain said.”
Most Recommended Comment
Chicago, Illinois, United States