Gang Stalkers on Former VP Candidate John Edward's Jury Trial?

articles.boston.com/2012-05-26/nation/31851269_1_halts-deliberations-alternate-juror-juror-issue  "Misinformed by courthouse personnel that someone had tried to sneak in wearing a wire — it was ABC’s Bob Woodruff, who had just forgotten to take off his earpiece after doing his stand-up — she made him explain himself in open court, and declared, “The courtroom is not a circus!”............  Two of the non-alternates (the two primary jurors -- also dressed in red) were reportedly gesturing at the alternate jurors, on Friday, I believe.  They all eat lunch together.  The openly flirtatious juror was reportedly smiling and nodding during closing by the defense attorneys.  How can this judge do anything but declare a mistrial on Tuesday?

The jurors have asked for the handwritten note in which Mellon scrawled in meandering script that she wanted to pay for campaign expenses “without government restrictions,” a missive she sent off in a rage after Edwards was ridiculed for spending $400 of campaign money for a haircut. And the jurors also have asked for another look at the handwritten note from Mellon’s interior designer, Bryan Huffman, saying that a check he was forwarding from the heiress was, “As Bunny says, ‘For the rescue of America.’ ”  -from the following article at www.washingtonpost.com/politics/john-edwards-trial-jurors-seek-information-on-bunny-mellons-role/2012/05/23/gJQAtiFzkU_story.html ******  I don't know much, but I know this:  America needs to be rescued.  Gang stalking is real and pervasive -- it runs counter to the rule of law and is clearly unconstitutional.  If it's found its way into America's courts and judicial system, as it would appear, may God help us all.

Those who are being targeted know the score -- the color "red" figures prominently in the machinations of these sadists.  sites.google.com/site/freedomfromoppresion/pys-ops-against-american-citizens

It's about "odds", as is highlighted in this article.  The former federal prosecutor observed that "he has never seen such unusual behavior as the color-coordinated clothing."  Is he crazy?  Of course not.  The judge saw what he saw -- he was correct.  Almost everyone who's "on the ball" noticed it.  Are they crazy?  Delusional? Of course not.  Well, neither are those who are reporting the use of the color red in "this program" known as gang stalking.  Imagine being lucid and sane -- like the judge quoted above.  Imagine telling the truth about something that sounds not only implausible, but ridiculous.  Imagine seeing a fascistic program that's operational in the U.S..  Then imagine telling the truth about it and not being believed.

www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/05/29/john-edwards-trial-watch-a-damning-twitter-trail.html    "That there has been dissent among the eight men and four women tasked with reaching a decision has been evident. The panel appears in court twice each day: once to be officially dismissed for lunch and again at the end of the day. Affable juror No. 2, widely believed to be the foreman, often smiles broadly at Judge Catherine Eagles as he answers her questions. His occupation is listed as “financial adviser.” But Nos. 7 and 11 frequently enter the jury box with their arms defiantly crossed across their chests and sour looks on their faces. No. 10, a retired fire andpolice department employee, often covers most of his face with a large white handkerchief as if afraid of catching or spreading germs. Female juror No. 9 looks completely exhausted by the five-week trial."

deathby1000papercuts.com/2012/05/john-edwards-mistrial-juror-matching-shirts-shenanigans-flirty-alternative-juror/

www.ajc.com/news/nation-world/john-edwards-jury-resumes-1448274.html  Jury deliberations have resumed.  When the flirtation between Edwards and the alternate began, the alternate should have been dismissed.  What in the hell is this judge thinking?  With all of the jury shenanigans, a mistrial was in order.  That the circus has continued would seem to be, in an of itself, a miscarriage of justice.

batvette on batvette:   www.nowpublic.com/world/gangstalking-tis-targeted-individuals-manifesto     (You decide.)**"Gangstalking TI's (targeted individual's) Manifesto" by batvette **

Edwards jury shows no signs of nearing verdict By Manuel Roig-Franzia, Updated: Tuesday, May 29, 2:31 PM www.washingtonpost.com/politics/hints-of-tension-among-edwards-jurors/2012/05/29/gJQAJWyPzU_story.htmlGREENSBORO, N.C. — Those color-coordinated alternate jurors in the John Edwards corruption case are at it again.    "The four alternates — three women and one man — each wore gray or black tops Tuesday. Last week, they were even more in sync, each wearing red tops Friday and yellow Thursday.    The curious behavior of the alternates lends a bit of a sideshow atmosphere to deliberations now deep into their seventh day and showing every sign of continuing.One of the alternates, a 20-something woman, has frequently smiled at Edwards, sometimes flipping her hair or eyeing him in a manner that some have interpreted as flirtatious. But on Tuesday, the woman — dubbed “the Lady in Red” over the weekend by some commentators — was much more reserved."

"Those color-coordinated alternate jurors in the John Edwards corruption case are at it again.    "The four alternates — three women and one man — each wore gray or black tops Tuesday"  -see previous comment "anonymous comment"

"During the week of deliberations, at least one juror has gestured across the room at alternates in the courtroom during breaks. The jury and the alternates have had an unusual level of interaction during the deliberations. Some judges don’t allow alternates to mingle with jurors, but Eagles has grouped them together in the same room for lunch."   “That’s very unusual,” said Kieran Shanahan, a defense attorney. Federal prosecutors agreed."  www.washingtonpost.com/politics/hints-of-tension-among-edwards-jurors/2012/05/29/gJQAJWyPzU_story.html

Given what's transpired, the judge had a responsibility to call a mistrial.

The brief moment of levity contrasted with a much darker mood earlier today when Eagles appeared to scold jurors, slightly delaying their ongoing deliberations.   Following the long weekend jurors returned today for a closed-door meeting with the judge. It is unclear what jurors did that Judge Catherine Eagles felt compelled to hold a closed door session with them, the second such hearing since Friday. When the court reconvened, Eagles gave a longer than normal speech to the jurors, reminding them to carefully choose their words, and not to discuss the trial in small groups or outside the jury room. It raises the possibility that juror behavior could later be grounds for an appeal. ( abcnews.go.com/Politics/john-edwards-judge-quips-lawyer-laugh/story?id=16452055#.T8VTklLkZ8E )

"The brief moment of levity contrasted with a much darker mood earlier today when Eagles appeared to scold jurors, slightly delaying their ongoing deliberations.   Following the long weekend jurors returned today for a closed-door meeting with the judge. It is unclear what jurors did that Judge Catherine Eagles felt compelled to hold a closed door session with them, the second such hearing since Friday. When the court reconvened, Eagles gave a longer than normal speech to the jurors, reminding them to carefully choose their words, and not to discuss the trial in small groups or outside the jury room. It raises the possibility that juror behavior could later be grounds for an appeal." ( abcnews.go.com/Politics/john-edwards-judge-quips-lawyer-laugh/story?id=16452055#.T8VTklLkZ8E )

abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2012/05/john-edwards-trial-furor-over-alternate-juror/ The two comments are the most important part of the story.

flash mobbing.  noise campaigns.  psychological sensitization of targets.   the involvement of a large number of people in gang stalking groups.  


Of all these things and others he insists amount to "gang stalking" which of them would Peacefrog be willing to testify under oath as having actually happened to him, with places, dates, times, etc? 
Why is someone so relentlessly proliferating the internet with claims an unbelievable phenomenon is happening everywhere, perpetrated by government agencies- yet cannot say he has ever seen ANY of it himself firsthand?