Gang Stalking and Virginia Tech Mental Health Records Cover-Up

by PeaceFrog | July 23, 2009 at 07:26 am
930 views | 5 Recommendations | 16 comments

     Wednesday the Associated Press revealed that the mental health records of the Virginia Tech shooter were withheld for over two years. The psychiatric counselor never released them to authorities as part of their "investigation" into the massacre. The counselor, then head of the school's clinic, now unaffiliated with the school, is under the shadow of possible criminal charges for absconding with the records. Yahoo gives some more details at : http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090722/ap_on_re_us/us_virginia_tech_shooting                               The  name of the Virginia Tech shooter, as well as many other shooters, (e.g. Jiverly Wong) have been mentioned by many bloggers as possibly being gang stalking victims. Could these records shed light on whether this is the case? I have tried to get the National Center for Victim's of Cime "NCVC" in Washington, D.C. to release their records on gang stalking. Ten percent of their calls are complaints from gang stalking vitims according to several hotline operators I've spoken with. They will not release them. If NCVC did release the records I requested, then the question of gang stalking's relationship with the rash of explosive shootings could be analyzed. Are there powerful enough institutional forces that need to suppress this information (FBI, DOJ, etc.) ? Is the scope of the media discussion going to be limited to protect those interests (in the manner described by Noam Chomsky in his book Necessary Illusions)? Will tactics like the suppression of records and the continuation of the FBI COINTELPRO known as gang stalking necessarily lead to more tragic results with no voice widely enough heard to stop future tragedy? One of my gang stalking articles on nowpublic has over 3700 views, when will their be a concerted effort to force the discussion of the issue to a wider mainstream audience? The only answer I can think of is when every person affected or interested in this ongoing deadly farce makes their voice be heard by any means at their disposal.


     Even sibling bullying can play a role in triggering violence (ex: George Sodini mentioned a bullying brother on his blog before the L.A. Fitness shootings). It seems very much more likely that systematic community-based bullying will cause future carnage.


     Seung-Hui Cho was writing hostile fiction short stories for his English class, with titles including "McGruff",  that concerned his professor. Could he have been living as a gang stalking targeted individual with a hostile life environment that triggered his rage massacre?


VOTE IN A GANG STALKING VICTIMS POLL; SILENCE IS DEADLY


http://zohopolls.com/peacefrog/how-long-have-you-been-a-victim-of-gang-stalking


 

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
0
anon comment

Thank you for this article, PF.  A quick note:  I don't have the reference handy - and perhaps you've already mentioned it - but the student's records were apparently taken home by the psychiatric counselor over a year before the shootings.

Regarding the NCVC:  I phoned to inquire about their services and knowledge about organized/gang stalking.  The person with whom I spoke acknowledged that they have heard about "group stalking", but was not forthcoming with any additional information.  She confirmed that they collect statistics, but when I politely asked her what they do with the statistics that they collect and compile, she ignored my question and said that she was sorry that I didn't feel that they could help me by supplying local communtity contact and resource information.  When I again asked her (calmly and politely) what is done with the data that they collect, she hung up on me.

0
PeaceFrog

     Thank you for calling the National Center for Victims of Crime "NCVC" and commenting on it on this blog. If everyone who called them for help commented on it or wrote their own blog about it that might put enough pressure on NCVC, or, draw enough attention to their records to expose the truth about gang stalking.

0
anon comment

PF asks, rhetorically, I assume:  Are their powerful enough institutional forces that need to suppress this information (FBI, DOJ, etc.) ?

The answer is "yes", of course.

(Typo in the above question:  "their" should be "there")

 

0
Anonymously Given

There is very little doubt in my mind about the artificial  orchestration of all of these shootings that have occured over the  past fifteen or twenty years.  Before the onset of (organized  stalking), there was no historical pretext for what we see.  It's  entirely an anomaly.  Why is it being done?  To what end, a reader  may ask?  "Madness", I reply.  Nothing but madness and the need  of  the loonies that ride the careening oxcart of corruption to build  a Raison d'ĂȘtre for the mad dash to their (and our) destruction.

0
PeaceFrog

     School massacres have occurred in the past. The Kehoe murders and the Whitman murders being the two most notorious cases (the former dating back to the 1920's and the latter the 1960's). It must be remembered that these things happen without complex tortious government activity.

      However, it has been proven that at least one person who went on to become a mass murderer was the subject of a CIA MKULTRA program in humiliation and intense social stressors. That was the unabomber. This only came out in the criminal proceedings leading to his current incarceration. Most of MKULTRA records and those of operations like it (CHAOS, etc.) were destroyed before they had to be produced to the Rockefeller/Pike Committee. This may sound familiar given that CIA interrogation tapes were recently "lost" just before a judicial review.

       The point is that there are likely links between the gang stalking phenomenon (which appears to be almost identical to Cointelpro) and mass violence. Some cases are probably related, others not. The truth about the governments involvement in gang stalking and a full examination of cases of mass violence that could very well have been triggered by it, must be commenced. The knowledge on the part of government that suicides and homicides are being triggered by gang stalking makes them morally and legally responsible in what amounts to catastrophic legal liability.

0
Anonymously Given

"The knowledge on the part of government that suicides and  homicides are being triggered by gang stalking makes them morally  and legally responsible in what amounts to catastrophic legal  liability."  Yeah, that would ostensibly be the reason that internal  documents are given the "mad dash to the shredder" treatment.  It's  amazing that the government keeps actual written or computerized  records on it's own nefarious deeds, but it works that way because  of  the nearly automatic presumptions by govn't employees that lead  them to feel both infallible and unaccountable for anything that they  do, especially if the paperwork has an official looking stamp on it.   Nonetheless, I really hate to finger government for all of this,  because that assumption leaves us with only one very unpalatable  recourse.  Unlike the case with your collage of messages, you won't  find many references to government in any of my on-line postings,  but  as time marches on, my own self-denial becomes something of a  matter that is not digestible.   Our government is corrupt at various  levels, and the corruption has strings that, in many cases, lead back  to  the fascist influence of corrupt businesses.  We could hope that  some people on the inside of government are not so influenced by  fascist evil, as would be the constant refrain of Mr. Vic Livingston's  NP postings.  We can only hope. 

0
PeaceFrog

     Its amazing that the Nazi's kept a detailed archive (much of which became open to the public in the last few years), also the Soviet's during Stalin's reign. Truth Commissions use human sources too, so I do not think a mad dash to the shredder would get them out of the woods. The documentation of governmental crime exists in all modern fascist states including America (I don't think it can be denied we are on the road and need some major overhauls to avoid becoming a fully-formed police state).

0
Anonymously Given

PF - you made a reference to Ted K. and his possible "program"  influenced behaviour.  Have you ever read the infamous "manifesto"?  It was roundly dismissed (by the press) as being the self-written  delusions of a madman, but nonetheless I took the time required to  read it myself.  My first impression upon doing so was that most of it    presents less of a hurdle for being taken seriously than the stuff of  our writings on these forums (about organized stalking, etc).    Take  a look at it.  I do not agree with his violent aspersions, and those  ideas that he acted out were in reality detrimental to his cause  because *any* act of a murderer is almost without exception a  rationalization for the immediate rejection of anything else  associated with such a person.   Murder is probably close to the  most  negative thing that he could have done, and perhaps that  speaks to  irrational thinking (brought on, perhaps, by intentionally  introduced stressors).    The bulk of his writing, however; speaks to  the mis-use of technology to amplify the efforts of fascists.  Truly, in  spite of his misdirected, wrong actions to take the lives of others, in  his own mind he was trying to save us all.

0
PeaceFrog

    I have read the manifesto as published on the internet. I think that his basic ideas regarding primitivism were not much different than the attitudes of scholars like Cluade Levy- Strauss. His commenting on the centralizing effects of technology, and, the idea that individual rights in society are more affected by technology than by the formal legal/economic systems was similar in many respects to Orwell. His own untimely deceased lawyer, John Mello, described him as "cold as a lizard and ambitious as Lucifer" (same as an old description of Jefferson Davis). If he had not been exposed to MKULTRA he probably would have spent a lifetime pondering Bell's theorom or Godel's incompleteness theorom. I think there was a nexus between the induced stressors and the murders. The savior complex was probably connected to a case of PTSD/induced psychosis (did you notice the typos and repetitions in the manifesto?).

     I think gang stalking is a lot less of a hurdle than the manifesto. Call the National Center for Victims of Crime and see how many gang stalking complaint calls their getting at 800-394-2255. Or do you believe in an even more fantastic version that this is  highly correlated experiences by countless thousands of people. Maybe the folks at McGill University can come up with a convincing "mass contagious psychosis theorom"? I'm sure they would get the funding for it.

0
Anonymously Given

I think it was "Michael Mello", as opposed to "John".  Mello died at the  age of 51.  I might like to know the particulars of his death, because a)  fifty one is too young to die, and b) seriously nasty things seem to  happen in this country to those who take on unpopular causes.  Do a   Google search on terms related to what happened to the "bleeding  heart" lawyers who have taken the Gitmo cases.  In this case, I do not  use the term "Bleeding Heart" pejoratively.   These people are/were  idealists.  The smoking guns on this are everywhere we look ...  

0
PeaceFrog

      Thanks for the correction, the attorney's name was Michael Mello.

0
Anonymously Given

I think a true test for an open mind is the willingness to read the  "manifesto".  Most folks won't touch it for fear of reprisals  associated  with a perceived "like feathers" mentality.  (Hear no evil,  see no evil is not the road to freedom).  Have you read Bill Joy's  essay  on Wired.com.  I can send the address if you like - don't have  it  handy at the moment.  Mr. Joy was a very high level Sun  Micro-systems guy, who was known for pioneering computer-field  work, although perhaps not on the level of a Gates or Jobs.  Some of  his Wired article prose brought some of the more reasonable  portions  of the  "manifesto" verbiage to my mind as I read it.  Mr.  Joy's concerns were likewise directed towards individual rights  vs.  technology issues.  Really,  the more benign sections of the  "manifesto" are  quite  reasonable.  As for Ted K, I've not heard the  "cold as a lizard"  quote  before.

0
PeaceFrog

"Cold as a lizard, ambitious as Lucifer" was a quote from Michael Mello, TJK's former appellate lawyer who described him in a phrase used to describe Jefferson Davis. This was from a book review aired on CSPAN in which Mello wrote about his experiences representing TJK. As far as "birds of a feather" I recall almost 20 years ago that a political science professor was taken aback when I paraphrased Mein Kampf. Today the majority of high school students believe that in WW11 America fought with Germany against Russia! I am a little taken aback by the lack of a willingness to probe and understand historical incidents in context and in a factually correct manner.

     I do not think that TJK's ordinary genius was as significant as his untrained assessment of society in a very nuanced manifesto. I think that what lies in the manifesto I most admire is that he wrote it under the induced state of PTSD/psychosis after illegal and unethical medical experimentation by the CIA at Harvard starting at age 16. The corporatocracy considers such a 167 IQ prodigy as good meat for a highly developed technocrat. The machine prefers walking encyclopedias to thinkers who question the machine.

0
Anonymously Given

h t t p : // www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.htmlThere's the link - Mr. Joy's comments about Ted K. are on page 2.

0
Anonymously Given

Let me clarify:  "One time Sun Micro-systems guy, who was known for pioneering  computer-field  work, although perhaps not with the notoriety of a  Gates or Jobs ..."  Mr Joy was a force behind the best computer tech  innovation ever - The BSD operating systems  :-)   

0
Anonymously Given

Yeah - I think they tried to turn me into one of those "encyclopedias"  that you have referenced - and I'm no prodigy.  I've always refused  IQ  tests, because I knew they would revoke my citizenship when  they  discovered that a man with an IQ of twenty seven is smart  enough to see that the machine is totally bankrupt, onerously evil,  and designed mostly to distract and to waste the time of all who live  under the tyranny, while allowing those who are piled at the top of  the technocratic heap to live like kings.   When too many times they  found my intentionally tainted "against the machine" diatribe  inserted  into the pages of my "encyclopedia", they realized that I am,  as pertains to all matters related to the machine, incorrigible.  As a  result, I am excised into that world wherein the exiled are forever  "gang stalked" by legions of machine drones.  Screw 'Em.  I'd rather  be gang stalked with hot pokers, ostracized by the drones of the  machine, driven out of the sickness they call society, and  intentionally  starved to death than to be willingly subservient to  their  boring, ugly, dead gray machine.  Long live the free mind!

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Anonymous
First Flagged at 7:22 AM, Jul 24, 2009 by Anonymous (not verified)

Related Stories

Recommendations (5)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from