NP Rank:
Gang Stalking and Virginia Tech Mental Health Records Cover-Up
Wednesday the Associated Press revealed that the mental health records of the Virginia Tech shooter were withheld for over two years. The psychiatric counselor never released them to authorities as part of their "investigation" into the massacre. The counselor, then head of the school's clinic, now unaffiliated with the school, is under the shadow of possible criminal charges for absconding with the records. Yahoo gives some more details at : http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090722/ap_on_re_us/us_virginia_tech_shooting The name of the Virginia Tech shooter, as well as many other shooters, (e.g. Jiverly Wong) have been mentioned by many bloggers as possibly being gang stalking victims. Could these records shed light on whether this is the case? I have tried to get the National Center for Victim's of Cime "NCVC" in Washington, D.C. to release their records on gang stalking. Ten percent of their calls are complaints from gang stalking vitims according to several hotline operators I've spoken with. They will not release them. If NCVC did release the records I requested, then the question of gang stalking's relationship with the rash of explosive shootings could be analyzed. Are there powerful enough institutional forces that need to suppress this information (FBI, DOJ, etc.) ? Is the scope of the media discussion going to be limited to protect those interests (in the manner described by Noam Chomsky in his book Necessary Illusions)? Will tactics like the suppression of records and the continuation of the FBI COINTELPRO known as gang stalking necessarily lead to more tragic results with no voice widely enough heard to stop future tragedy? One of my gang stalking articles on nowpublic has over 3700 views, when will their be a concerted effort to force the discussion of the issue to a wider mainstream audience? The only answer I can think of is when every person affected or interested in this ongoing deadly farce makes their voice be heard by any means at their disposal.
Even sibling bullying can play a role in triggering violence (ex: George Sodini mentioned a bullying brother on his blog before the L.A. Fitness shootings). It seems very much more likely that systematic community-based bullying will cause future carnage.
Seung-Hui Cho was writing hostile fiction short stories for his English class, with titles including "McGruff", that concerned his professor. Could he have been living as a gang stalking targeted individual with a hostile life environment that triggered his rage massacre?
VOTE IN A GANG STALKING VICTIMS POLL; SILENCE IS DEADLY
http://zohopolls.com/peacefrog/how-long-have-you-been-a-victim-of-gang-stalking
Crowd Power
Recommendations (5)

Anonymous users (5)

Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (16)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anon comment (not verified)at 07:31 on July 24th, 2009
Thank you for this article, PF. A quick note: I don't have the reference handy - and perhaps you've already mentioned it - but the student's records were apparently taken home by the psychiatric counselor over a year before the shootings.
Regarding the NCVC: I phoned to inquire about their services and knowledge about organized/gang stalking. The person with whom I spoke acknowledged that they have heard about "group stalking", but was not forthcoming with any additional information. She confirmed that they collect statistics, but when I politely asked her what they do with the statistics that they collect and compile, she ignored my question and said that she was sorry that I didn't feel that they could help me by supplying local communtity contact and resource information. When I again asked her (calmly and politely) what is done with the data that they collect, she hung up on me.
at 08:56 on July 24th, 2009
Thank you for calling the National Center for Victims of Crime "NCVC" and commenting on it on this blog. If everyone who called them for help commented on it or wrote their own blog about it that might put enough pressure on NCVC, or, draw enough attention to their records to expose the truth about gang stalking.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anon comment (not verified)at 07:33 on July 24th, 2009
PF asks, rhetorically, I assume: Are their powerful enough institutional forces that need to suppress this information (FBI, DOJ, etc.) ?
The answer is "yes", of course.
(Typo in the above question: "their" should be "there")
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymously Given (not verified)at 04:41 on October 16th, 2009
There is very little doubt in my mind about the artificial orchestration of all of these shootings that have occured over the past fifteen or twenty years. Before the onset of (organized stalking), there was no historical pretext for what we see. It's entirely an anomaly. Why is it being done? To what end, a reader may ask? "Madness", I reply. Nothing but madness and the need of the loonies that ride the careening oxcart of corruption to build a Raison d'ĂȘtre for the mad dash to their (and our) destruction.
at 15:32 on October 16th, 2009
School massacres have occurred in the past. The Kehoe murders and the Whitman murders being the two most notorious cases (the former dating back to the 1920's and the latter the 1960's). It must be remembered that these things happen without complex tortious government activity.
However, it has been proven that at least one person who went on to become a mass murderer was the subject of a CIA MKULTRA program in humiliation and intense social stressors. That was the unabomber. This only came out in the criminal proceedings leading to his current incarceration. Most of MKULTRA records and those of operations like it (CHAOS, etc.) were destroyed before they had to be produced to the Rockefeller/Pike Committee. This may sound familiar given that CIA interrogation tapes were recently "lost" just before a judicial review.
The point is that there are likely links between the gang stalking phenomenon (which appears to be almost identical to Cointelpro) and mass violence. Some cases are probably related, others not. The truth about the governments involvement in gang stalking and a full examination of cases of mass violence that could very well have been triggered by it, must be commenced. The knowledge on the part of government that suicides and homicides are being triggered by gang stalking makes them morally and legally responsible in what amounts to catastrophic legal liability.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymously Given (not verified)at 07:11 on October 19th, 2009
"The knowledge on the part of government that suicides and homicides are being triggered by gang stalking makes them morally and legally responsible in what amounts to catastrophic legal liability." Yeah, that would ostensibly be the reason that internal documents are given the "mad dash to the shredder" treatment. It's amazing that the government keeps actual written or computerized records on it's own nefarious deeds, but it works that way because of the nearly automatic presumptions by govn't employees that lead them to feel both infallible and unaccountable for anything that they do, especially if the paperwork has an official looking stamp on it. Nonetheless, I really hate to finger government for all of this, because that assumption leaves us with only one very unpalatable recourse. Unlike the case with your collage of messages, you won't find many references to government in any of my on-line postings, but as time marches on, my own self-denial becomes something of a matter that is not digestible. Our government is corrupt at various levels, and the corruption has strings that, in many cases, lead back to the fascist influence of corrupt businesses. We could hope that some people on the inside of government are not so influenced by fascist evil, as would be the constant refrain of Mr. Vic Livingston's NP postings. We can only hope.
at 06:18 on October 21st, 2009
Its amazing that the Nazi's kept a detailed archive (much of which became open to the public in the last few years), also the Soviet's during Stalin's reign. Truth Commissions use human sources too, so I do not think a mad dash to the shredder would get them out of the woods. The documentation of governmental crime exists in all modern fascist states including America (I don't think it can be denied we are on the road and need some major overhauls to avoid becoming a fully-formed police state).
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymously Given (not verified)at 07:35 on October 19th, 2009
PF - you made a reference to Ted K. and his possible "program" influenced behaviour. Have you ever read the infamous "manifesto"? It was roundly dismissed (by the press) as being the self-written delusions of a madman, but nonetheless I took the time required to read it myself. My first impression upon doing so was that most of it presents less of a hurdle for being taken seriously than the stuff of our writings on these forums (about organized stalking, etc). Take a look at it. I do not agree with his violent aspersions, and those ideas that he acted out were in reality detrimental to his cause because *any* act of a murderer is almost without exception a rationalization for the immediate rejection of anything else associated with such a person. Murder is probably close to the most negative thing that he could have done, and perhaps that speaks to irrational thinking (brought on, perhaps, by intentionally introduced stressors). The bulk of his writing, however; speaks to the mis-use of technology to amplify the efforts of fascists. Truly, in spite of his misdirected, wrong actions to take the lives of others, in his own mind he was trying to save us all.
at 10:46 on October 19th, 2009
I have read the manifesto as published on the internet. I think that his basic ideas regarding primitivism were not much different than the attitudes of scholars like Cluade Levy- Strauss. His commenting on the centralizing effects of technology, and, the idea that individual rights in society are more affected by technology than by the formal legal/economic systems was similar in many respects to Orwell. His own untimely deceased lawyer, John Mello, described him as "cold as a lizard and ambitious as Lucifer" (same as an old description of Jefferson Davis). If he had not been exposed to MKULTRA he probably would have spent a lifetime pondering Bell's theorom or Godel's incompleteness theorom. I think there was a nexus between the induced stressors and the murders. The savior complex was probably connected to a case of PTSD/induced psychosis (did you notice the typos and repetitions in the manifesto?).
I think gang stalking is a lot less of a hurdle than the manifesto. Call the National Center for Victims of Crime and see how many gang stalking complaint calls their getting at 800-394-2255. Or do you believe in an even more fantastic version that this is highly correlated experiences by countless thousands of people. Maybe the folks at McGill University can come up with a convincing "mass contagious psychosis theorom"? I'm sure they would get the funding for it.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymously Given (not verified)at 05:43 on October 21st, 2009
I think it was "Michael Mello", as opposed to "John". Mello died at the age of 51. I might like to know the particulars of his death, because a) fifty one is too young to die, and b) seriously nasty things seem to happen in this country to those who take on unpopular causes. Do a Google search on terms related to what happened to the "bleeding heart" lawyers who have taken the Gitmo cases. In this case, I do not use the term "Bleeding Heart" pejoratively. These people are/were idealists. The smoking guns on this are everywhere we look ...
at 06:08 on October 21st, 2009
Thanks for the correction, the attorney's name was Michael Mello.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymously Given (not verified)at 14:27 on October 19th, 2009
I think a true test for an open mind is the willingness to read the "manifesto". Most folks won't touch it for fear of reprisals associated with a perceived "like feathers" mentality. (Hear no evil, see no evil is not the road to freedom). Have you read Bill Joy's essay on Wired.com. I can send the address if you like - don't have it handy at the moment. Mr. Joy was a very high level Sun Micro-systems guy, who was known for pioneering computer-field work, although perhaps not on the level of a Gates or Jobs. Some of his Wired article prose brought some of the more reasonable portions of the "manifesto" verbiage to my mind as I read it. Mr. Joy's concerns were likewise directed towards individual rights vs. technology issues. Really, the more benign sections of the "manifesto" are quite reasonable. As for Ted K, I've not heard the "cold as a lizard" quote before.
at 06:09 on October 21st, 2009
"Cold as a lizard, ambitious as Lucifer" was a quote from Michael Mello, TJK's former appellate lawyer who described him in a phrase used to describe Jefferson Davis. This was from a book review aired on CSPAN in which Mello wrote about his experiences representing TJK. As far as "birds of a feather" I recall almost 20 years ago that a political science professor was taken aback when I paraphrased Mein Kampf. Today the majority of high school students believe that in WW11 America fought with Germany against Russia! I am a little taken aback by the lack of a willingness to probe and understand historical incidents in context and in a factually correct manner.
I do not think that TJK's ordinary genius was as significant as his untrained assessment of society in a very nuanced manifesto. I think that what lies in the manifesto I most admire is that he wrote it under the induced state of PTSD/psychosis after illegal and unethical medical experimentation by the CIA at Harvard starting at age 16. The corporatocracy considers such a 167 IQ prodigy as good meat for a highly developed technocrat. The machine prefers walking encyclopedias to thinkers who question the machine.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymously Given (not verified)at 14:36 on October 19th, 2009
h t t p : // www.wired.com/wired/archive/8.04/joy.htmlThere's the link - Mr. Joy's comments about Ted K. are on page 2.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymously Given (not verified)at 15:07 on October 19th, 2009
Let me clarify: "One time Sun Micro-systems guy, who was known for pioneering computer-field work, although perhaps not with the notoriety of a Gates or Jobs ..." Mr Joy was a force behind the best computer tech innovation ever - The BSD operating systems :-)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymously Given (not verified)at 04:35 on October 20th, 2009
Yeah - I think they tried to turn me into one of those "encyclopedias" that you have referenced - and I'm no prodigy. I've always refused IQ tests, because I knew they would revoke my citizenship when they discovered that a man with an IQ of twenty seven is smart enough to see that the machine is totally bankrupt, onerously evil, and designed mostly to distract and to waste the time of all who live under the tyranny, while allowing those who are piled at the top of the technocratic heap to live like kings. When too many times they found my intentionally tainted "against the machine" diatribe inserted into the pages of my "encyclopedia", they realized that I am, as pertains to all matters related to the machine, incorrigible. As a result, I am excised into that world wherein the exiled are forever "gang stalked" by legions of machine drones. Screw 'Em. I'd rather be gang stalked with hot pokers, ostracized by the drones of the machine, driven out of the sickness they call society, and intentionally starved to death than to be willingly subservient to their boring, ugly, dead gray machine. Long live the free mind!