Gang Stalking: Ballot Initiatives and Direct Democracy

by PeaceFrog | July 29, 2011 at 05:51 am
1560 views | 13 Recommendations | 73 comments

Viewer caution: There are links/hyperlinks appearing in this article that were not inserted by the author and seem to be calculated to distract the viewer/reader.

     My investigations into nationwide gang stalking prove to me that ordinary routes of communication and normal mechanisms for change and correction will not be enough to effect change in the gang stalking problem. The government, victims' groups, lawyers, MSM and others are systematically ignoring the issue. This is a COINTELPRO that has gone terribly wrong with the worst kind of mission creep. Therefore, in this article and elsewhere, I recommend actions that require a nondiscretionary legal response, calculated to force a change in the situation, such as, ballot initiatives, Political Committee Officerships and lawsuits (especially open government FOIA suits).

     Recently a San Fransisco group collected over the needed 7,000 signatures for an "anti-circumcision" campaign. The group met the threshold to force the issue on the ballot for a public vote criminalizing circumcision, a practice dating back to Biblical times: See the link below:


http://www.alternet.org/rss/breaking_news/574645/push_to_ban_circumcision_in_san_francisco/



     Many in the gang stalking community are asking the same question, "what can we do to change the situation?". It seems that an FBI and law enforcement omerta on the subject, and, a related forced media blackout have been the problem. Thousands of complaints about gang stalking are reaching police, politicians, lawyers, interest groups and just about everyone else. There have been cracks developing in the wall of silence. The recent press conference on gang stalking by Lt. Larry Richard of the City of Santa Cruz Police Department is a good example.



     Another strategy that could be both cost effective and helpful in combatting the gang stalking menace is a ballot initiative. About half the states in the U.S. have an option for ballot initiatives that can put laws on the books at the state and local level. There are even firms that specialize in obtaining signatures for ballot initiatives. The article linked above states that the group of "anti-circumcision activists" paid $8,000 to professional signature gatherers and received 12,000 signatures. Once the signatures are vetted they expect their law to pass, with well over 7,000 signatures, criminalizing circumcision in San Francisco with fines of $1,000 and up to a year in prison.



     The gang stalking community has the resources and organization for this type of direct, participatory democratic activism.  Freedom From Covert Harassment and Surveillance recently put up 10 billboards in Los Angeles for a month. Some of them were directly facing the L.A. Freeway, one of the nation's busiest highways, viewable to millions of California residents who travel on the freeway daily.



      I believe ballot initiatives are a can do and must do issue to force legal measures against modern day domestic terrorists who have dogged and killed many innocent Americans with impunity. What are we waiting for?????



     For a primer on ballot initiatives here is a Wikipedia link:



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Initiatives_and_referendums_in_the_United_States


     Ballot initiatives can be held for states, counties, cities, and even town ordinances. Initiation can require anywhere from 100 petition votes (Alaska) to over a hundred thousand. Many jurisdictions use a percentage of active voters (e.g., 5% or 10% of registered voters in state, county, city, or town). Ballotpedia.com has a searchable site with a lot of useful information for prospective ballot activists. See the link below:


http://ballotpedia.com/wiki/index.php/Main_Page


 


 



 



 



 


Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
6
PeaceFrog

     I am getting a lower view count AND hyperlinks that I DID NOT INSERT when I view this article signed out.

1
PeaceFrog

I have a legal background, however, I believe group input by petition sponsors would be a good idea. Here is a very rough draft:

     A person is guilty of the crime of group stalking when he or she, in connection with one or more other person(s), knowingly follows (by electronic or other communication means) an individual, without that individual's consent, and, thereby creates a reasonable fear, annoyance, disruption, or inconvenience to said group stalking victim.

     Group stalking is a class A misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 and up to a year in prison for each violation.

 

 

 

1
The 1

PeaceFrog take a look at this post by duddits on Scrivener article..You may find it interesting.

THUGOCRACY: U.S. FED-POLICE VIGILANTES PERSECUTE CITIZEN TARGETS

pg.10 [duddits (not verified) at 21:21 on July 28th, 2011]

0
liamssoft

Same here links to Nowpublic articles that have nothing to do with the article

1
liamssoft

That fact that the mysterious links in this posting have disappeared points to human intervention rather than a bug in the system. I am finding links appearing and disappearing on some of my post, if I  refresh the page they disappear, refresh again and they come back.

1
PeaceFrog

     I agree it is intervention. Even though some links may be useful, the overall effect is distracting and confusing the reader. Somehow they must be getting through the password to log in.

0
anon comment

Great article, PeaceFrog.  Thank you for your continued constructive work in bringing the issue of gang stalking to the fore.  We also need to join ranks with other groups, such as the Bill of Rights Defense Committee, for example, to push for congressional hearings regarding civil and human rights abuses.

0
anon comment

An example of a proposed initiative would be helpful...

0
anon comment

A sample initiative might be helpful...

1
PeaceFrog

     I have a legal background, however, I believe group input by petition sponsors would be a good idea. Here is a very rough draft:

     A person is guilty of the crime of group stalking when he or she, in connection with one or more other person(s), knowingly follows (by electronic or other communication means) an individual, without that individual's consent, and, thereby creates a reasonable fear, annoyance, disruption, or inconvenience to said group stalking victim.

     Group stalking is a class A misdemeanor punishable by a fine of up to $1,000 and up to a year in prison for each violation.

0
The 1

Published by freedomfchs on Jan 02, 2010

'A Petition Against the Military and Intelligence Agencies' Use of Organized Stalking and Electronic Torture'

http://www.gopetition.com/petition/33163.html

Btw PeaceFrog what I thought you might find interesting in duddits post was..

duddits mentioned_"My Uncle is a Regional Officer for the FBI. I have sent him as much documentation as I have attained on my own and some of the info that I have gleaned" in the hopes that he may shed some light on this matter and also find out "if possible" why I am being harmed."

 

0
PeaceFrog

     There are a lot of local jurisdictions in which OS is a problem that could have had ballot inititiatives with less than the 1190 electronic signatures. This petition to Congress is discretionary, the whole idea behind ballot initiative petition is to "force" a vote, even if it is a local town ordinance.

     RE: Relatives in Law Enforcement

     I know several targets who have relatives, long-term friends, etc., in law enforcement, including the FBI. They are willing to cannabilize their own for the "greater good" (as they see it). One target has a relative who teaches at Quantico.

0
anomacom

If you didn't know that the "non-lethal" nerve agent attacks are the basis of and for everything else in these multifaceted drug, chemical and electronic attacks, well, now if you are not completely stupid, you will follow up.

Quote - "sunshine report - Most actual victims of these assaults have been neutralized by so-called non-lethal nerve agents, a *fact* that will be known if or when the *truth* is revealed.

Many other aerosol, contact and food planted chemical agents are being used against persons selected for these torture assaults.

Sunshine Report – “Another document (available here) reveals the interest of a senior US Army toxicologist in tacrine, a drug used to treat Alzheimer’s Disease. The Army is not interested in the drug, however, for helping disease victims. Rather, it is assessing use of tacrine as a weapon. In February 2002, at Aberdeen Proving Ground in Maryland, the toxicologist ordered a literature review on its potential for weaponization. Chemically, tacrine is a acetylcholinesterase inhibitor, a first cousin of the nerve gases sarin, tabun, and VX (among others).

Look at all pharmaceuticals considered for weapons research on this study, disregard the “in the field” military delivery methods, the applications in our case are very *personal* as laid out in this blog and others." end quote

0
The 1

anomacom (not verified),

Are you referring to the 'Sunshine Project' April 2002 ?

http://www.sunshine-project.org/publications/bk/bk10en.html

Interesting subject. Maybe you could elaborate alittle more on what exactly your suggesting this is all about. How specifically this relates to gang stalking victims and DEW attack victims.

Thxs !

1
PeaceFrog

     Several doctors have spoken out about chemtrails, one of the earliest was a physician in Arizona. Former FBI Chief Ted Gunderson made a video on chemtrails. My advice is to make complaints, get affidavits, news stories, send it to the EPA and state and local environmental departments. Get the people in government to do their job. There are a lot of powerful forces behind these things, but, the proof is there (barium in AZ water supplies). There are some evil people out there, but some good ones too.

0
Had more than enough

They need lots of people on whom to test their sneaky biological and chemical weapons. So, if anyone gets tossed into the US Official so-called Terrorist List, that person, their extended family, and their friends find themselves tossed into the "any atrocity goes" pool. This is the real face of our nazified US government.

0
Anne nony

Im not trying to aggravate anyone in the slightest, I would like to say though that government personnel are real life people and not some mysterious entity that falls from the sky. Might I suggest the following web sight:app.comtry the data universe on the far right side of the page and go to the federal employee look up part, type in names of people you know and go from there. It isn't as mysterious as you think.

0
anonymously posted

Having also seen the "real face of our nazified US government" (to use the phrase of one of the last posters), I know that I've had more than enough.

0
Peace Lizard

I wouldn't be at all surprised if there weren't such a network. They photo'd me in the shower and used cartoon version of my body in ads they placed on my hotmail.  The point was to let me know that I was under total surveillance, because lack of privacy in intimate moments is  torture. (Like the criminal video strip searches and manual patdowns at airports these days.) They then used cartoonized versions of the video in ads to lose weight that they placed on my hotmail account. I could recognize my body because of a scar on it from an operation. These people are sick, sick, sick. And they DARE to judge others.

1
anonymously given

It doesn't hurt a thing to do this ... albeit, in my opinion, the law already has been written to cover gang-stalking (the general stalking statutes are applicable - although a judge might need to make a statement about the use of electronics as a "mechanical difference").  Of course, the real problem is that law enforcement willfully ignores gang-stalking, by not taking complaints seriously when they are (certainly) fully informed of the activity.  Law enforcement rationalizes gang-stalking in the same way as everybody else.  (They say:  who cares if two percent of the population has their lives obliterated so long as we get a couple pedophiles).  Wow, freedom was cheap.  Hitler used this kind of rationalization with great effectiveness.  Now, targets are exactly like the Jews of early Nazism - they are being marginalized, kept out of jobs, and forced out of jobs.  They are tracked by cell phone stalkers who are on them like lice on a hobo - which is exactly as the Jews were treated.    But, Peacefrog's idea is a good one anyway, because it shines a bright light onto the topic and exclaims that this is not a matter of a couple pedophiles getting their "just deserts".  This is a matter of end-running the rule of law, and Peacefrog is good to make a big noise about it ... 

0
PeaceFrog

     

     Thank you for the thoughtful comment. However, stalking laws do not cover gang stalking. The difference goes beyond electronics. Just like gang rape, or, gang assault the law must be changed to recognize this specific group crime. Just call the largest victims group in Washington, D.C., the National Center for Victims of Crime- they will not help you or refer you to law enforcement:  800-394-2255.

0
anonymous comment

The "party" line it that we're all nuts. To date, it's working quite nicely for them, but that will change.

0
Scrivener

Another Peacefrog distortion (lie).  It is a federal crime, to engage in a conspiracy to deny any citizen his/her civil rights.

0
PeaceFrog

      Vic, give it  a rest, 42 U.S.C. Sect. 1983 and 18 U.S.C. 242 cover conspiracies to violate civil rights. There is NO CIVIL RIGHT TO ENGAGE IN CRIMINAL CONDUCT. You can not hide under the cover of a right to speech or assembly when you are committing crime. If your interpretation of the First and Fourth Amendments were accurate then there would be a lot of sociopathic members of the Klan and Mafia insulated by their right to organize and communicate their various crimes.

1
Scrivener

You twist my words so badly that you make no sense.  Is that your intent?  Let me turn your point against you.  If there is probable cause to impute criminal conduct, then law enforcement can use existing laws to take action.  Absent probable cause, restrictions on the use of telecommunications are unconstitutional.  You and your ilk are using "flash mobbing" as a justification for prior restraint on instant communications via internet and by extension, telephone -- for the purpose of ideologically motivated censorship.  It's another false flag op, and you are a lame footsoldier in that psyop.  Good thing I'm not your supervisor, because I'd sh!tcan you in a New York minute for being so transparent.  Your entire operation is anal-retentive; if you fratboys had any smarts, you'd let some real comments into these sections from real people, just to mix it up and keep it semi-real.  But you Eddie Haskells are little Hitlers (or Goebbels) so you have to maintain absolute control.

THAT'S the reason the USG is seeking a new prime supplier for its psyops, from what I can fathom...

0
PeaceFrog

      Again, let me clarify my opinion:

     The London riots included flash mobs illegally conspiring to coordinate felonious activity such as arson, assaults, looting, etc. This was so blatently violative of the rights of civilians and business owners that they formed vigilant groups to protect themselves and their property. Therefore, due to this very highly unlawful assembly, the British government prudently sought countermeasures, including prospective restrictions on the use of social media and texting by criminals.

     Contrarily, a protest in the Bay Area over a police killing of an unarmed man in the BART system, had no indicia of being violent. Therefore, the shutting down of social media in the BART system to squash peaceful protest activity was both imprudent and probably unlawful.

Get it Vic?

1
Scrivener

Notice how these comments slander the unjustly persecuted by including phrases like "one or two pedophiles."  These programs are used to neutralize opinion leaders for reasons of ideology and/or hate, and many are slandered to their local LEOs as suspected criminals, perverts or mentally disturbed -- and the psyops agents posting here as "T.I.s" know it.  But those with a conscience (assuming there are a few) rationalize their dirty work any way they can, because the money and benefits are good.  And maybe they're closet sadists who like to torment with words. 

That's why I am trying to hard to put the whole lot in federal prison, operatives and overlords, corporate and government.  Do you have it in you, good people on the inside, or will you allow cowardice and expedience to own your soul?

0
batvette

TRYING HARD? How's that? By doing your best to look like a lying, abrasive, clueless drama queening little girl?

You, a self claimed investigative reporter, haven't lifted a finger in 3 years to collect a single piece of physical evidence despite virtually dozens of detailed ways you could have done so.

You're a fraud and you intend that to be obvious.

BTW you just posted in your article that the people after YOU were Vigilantes.

So what is it you've supposedly done to make vigilantes come after you and why does this contradict the above post?

All your "accounts" are filled with contradictions because you tell so many lies you cannot remember which story you told to whom and where.

3
They're not targeting pedophiles because they ARE pedophiles

Children are also targets of the Directors of the Torture Matrix. When the Torture Meisters go go after one victim, they target the victim's whole family. They microwave, financially sabotage, and slander (to employers and neighbors) the WHOLE EXTENDED FAMILY.       My dying mother was targeted in her hospice by an ugly woman "worker" who tormented her final days. The Torturers target the victim's friends as well -- on the spurious reasoning that "the victims' friends are all in on IT" (whatever the Evildoers mistakenly assume IT is).   The US Torturers gleefully torture the victim's friends.  The US Torturers  are abnormal; they are psychopaths; they are WORSE than common murderers and thieves, because the Official US Torturers have been given official permission to kill with impunity and under cover of the "get out of jail  free card" of so-called national security. 

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Anonymous
First Flagged at 5:53 AM, Jul 29, 2011 by Anonymous (not verified)

Related Stories

Recommendations (13)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from