NP Rank:
Gang Stalking is COINTELPRO
I have been writing about and living the gang stalking phenomenon, which I believe to be the FBI's largest COINTELPRO, for years. Advances in government surveillance technology, as well as, the breaking down of traditional barriers between the military and domestic law enforcement functions through anti-terrorism legislation, have broadened COINTELPRO. The creation of DHS has also given the new COINTELPRO more muscle, the local law enforcement “intelligence units” still play a big role in the COINTELPRO game. I have written articles on Nowpublic including "FBI FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT REQUEST", and "DOJ KNOWS ABOUT GANG STALKING", in an attempt to demonstrate that the FBI and DOJ are aware of gang stalking, and, more importantly, to attempt to persuade readers to use the federal freedom of information act "FOIA" to put pressure on these agencies to reveal what they know about gang stalking.
Firstly, this is not merely conjecture that the government is involved. Perhaps breaking down the modus operandi of gang stalking vis-a-vis COINTELPRO best makes my point in chief. According to the COINTELPRO literature (which I will elaborate on later), and, the most sited book on the web on gang stalking, David Lawson's Cause Stalking, the formula as applied to groups and individuals in COINTELPRO, and, individuals in gang stalking is this:
COINTELPRO GANG STALKING
IDENTIFY IDENTIFY
DISRUPT VILIFY
DESTABILIZE NULLIFY
NEUTRALIZE DESTROY
Assuming a person had little idea of what COINTELPRO was, but, as a gang stalking victim, had a good understanding of what gang stalking is, the first place one could look for information on COINTELPRO is a Google search and a full reading of the Wikipedia page on COINTELPRO. One could further delve into the subject by doing a Google search of "political control technologies", this is what the Europeans call COINTELPRO-style tactics. Also revealing would be a search on the Royal Canadian Mounted Police "VIP" program. This series of internet searches and a couple of hours perusing the results would familiarize anyone enough to make their own determination about the haunting similarity of political policing and gang stalking. More revealing would be reading The Cointelpro Papers by Churchill and Vander Wall which uses dozens of original FBI memo's and teletypes (obtained through FOIA) to show how the government identified, disrupted, destabilized, and, finally, neutrilazed countless individuals and dozens of groups. This was conducted on most individuals and groups based on politics and not because of any actual or suspected criminality (i.e., political policing). The Cointelpro Papers analyzes non-criminal groups targeted including the Socialists, Communists, New Left, Anti-War Movement, American indian Movement, and, Black Liberation Movement. It also discusses the targeting of Martin Luther King, Jr., and other less known activists who were nullified. The book also discusses principled pushback from FBI Field Office supervisors promptly squashed by J. Edgar Hoover and the domestic Washington Consensus. The government's own version written by the Church Committe is available in paperback and is called Intelligence Activities and the Rights of Americans: 1976 U.S. Senate Report on Illegal Wiretaps and Domestic Spying by FBI, CIA and NSA (ISBN: 9781934941218). Of course, the Church Committee analyzed the COINTELPRO problem (i.e., government gang stalking) and came to the conclusion that lack of supervision was the problem. True to form, over three decades later no effective legislation has been passed to curb the problem the congress found to be illegal.
As for the FBI's claim in sworn congressional testimony of abandoning COINTELPRO tactics, true to form, they lied. In 2001, the FBI, acting on a rumor and some weak circumstantial evidence, used COINTELPRO to destroy the life and career of Dr. Steven Hatfill. This was largely based on a rumor spread by an interested colleague that Hatfill was the anthrax mailer in 2001. The trial evidence showed that the full court press FBI gang stalking campaign even included dangerous tailgaiting and assault. Hatfill had zero privacy for years. The former U.S. attorney representing Hatfill described the FBI's behavior as a McCarthy-style witch hunt. When the real anthrax mailer, another government scientist, was found to be the culprit, the FBI settled the case for $5.8 million. Another anthrax suspect, Dr. Bruce Ivins, was also subjected to a full court press by the FBI and effectively “suicided”. He was alienated by friends, family, and co-workers after the FBI made it known he was suspected in the domestic anthrax attacks.
Perhaps, the film the U.S. v. John Lennon is the most poignant illustration of politically motivated persecution. After donating $50,000 to the Black Panther Party in the late 1960's Lennon became the target of a full blown FBI COINTELPRO (i.e., government gang stalking) campaign. Of course, he never moved, fought deportation successfully, and was ironically gunned down by a mentally ill postal worker from Hawaii. Besides Lawson's book I think everyone should read Bridging the Gap, and Closing the Gap by GMB Bailey which highlight the snitch culture and informant misuse that pervades activities like gang stalking. Here is the link: http://www.gangstalkingunited.com/Bridgingthegap.pdf.
One can approximate a complete shift in paradigm in the very structure of policing on the federal, state, and local level back to the "War on Drugs" and the creation of the DEA in the Nixon Administration. The first important thing to note about the war on drugs, is that, it is an endless war. Even in police states with expedited executions, the drug trade can not be eliminated. At bottom, it is a war against the poor, but, that is another story. The paradigm shift engendered by the war on drugs was one of a basically passive policing of crimes to an active crime management system. This was accomplished through a system of dealing between authorities and snitches. The snitch, and, his close cousin, the undercover narc, became the pillars of the criminal "justice" system. The abuses of this satanic pact are well covered. What is not so well articulated is that a wider range of policing systems that were given birth by this hideous marriage of convenience. This system which rendered de facto minority control of crime syndicates to police via their immunized, operational snitches created a foundation for more widespread abuses and social engineering controls, example par excellence, the inevitable gang stalking cointelpro phenomenon. Who are the villains/cowards/derelicts? The people at the helm of the Justice system from the Attorney General to the U.S. Attorney's Offices to the directors of the federal police down to the local police chief's and county sheriffs.
Gang Stalking is an active 24/7/365 nationwide Program. Given the intensity of the harassment, the countless thousands of victim reports, the fact that it is happening not only in large cities, but, in rural towns and gated communities, the Program can only be funded by the federal government. Many gang stalking activities are carried out by criminals. An excellent example is the admission made to me by a NCVC victim advocate stating that the only confirmed cases of gang stalking are those performed by “Mafia personnel” against potential witnesses that they believe will be entering the federal Witness Protection Program. The fact that much, if not most, gang stalking is performed by criminal groups, for their own purposes, does not make gang stalking a private Program. For the reasons stated above, the totality of activities that is being referred to as gang stalking, can only be being funded by the federal government. The same logical deduction could have been made regarding the original COINTELPRO Program. The federal government has simply hijacked the already existing practice of gang stalking, and made it into a well funded federal Program, with the intention of using gang stalking targets as human bait to grease the rails for a federal civil rights conspiracy case against the traditional enemies of Washington such as organized crime.
"Gang stalking groups" have a substantially identical modus operandi to the FBI's Special Surveillance Groups or "SSG's". These SSG's were developed in the 1970's to combat Soviet espionage. Today, these tactics have been taught to criminals, through FBI channels, for domestic COINTELPRO operations against American citizens. Anyone familiar with gang stalking will immediately understand the striking similarity by reviewing the following NPR links on SSG's:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-P0UibgHIZg
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=92207687
http://www.angelfire.com/rnb/surveillance/index.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_Surveillance_Group
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Spying_on_spy_Raw_Story_interviews_0612.html
Unlike workplace mobbing which has been given some academic attention, and, is actually against the law in some places, gang stalking/community-based harassment is a crime avoided by credible sources in academia and media. The same basic principles apply. In a workplace mobbing (legally known as "constructive termination") case the office is the center of systematic harassment. Most people quit or file a lawsuit. With organized group stalking there is no escape. It is a full court press seeking to destroy the targeted individual's life. It is identical to COINTELPRO and all facets of the targets life are turned hostile to them. This is the creation of a hostile living environment. Infiltration of family, work, friends, associates, and, just about every aspect of the target's life is manipulated using advanced behavioral science. It is inconceivable that anyone with a more than cursory knowledge of COINTELPRO could believe that these similarities could be attributed to anything but the involvement of the FBI.
All gang stalking targets experience an updated and refined version of McCarthy era blacklisting. This involves being hired, then, soon after, being subject to a hostile work environment, resulting in actual or constructive termination. Because of the sheer number of employers involved in this nefarious practice against gang stalking targets, as well as the fact that employers ranging from small businesses to large multinationals are involved, this neo-blacklisting can only be being orchestrated by the FBI, as was the case with McCarthyism. Unlike McCarthyism, neo-blacklisting, with its use of a hostile wok environment leading to actual or constructive termination, is not subject to the inference that a blacklisted target is being subject to defamation leading to un-employability, because they are indeed hired, then promptly set up for failure. Gang stalking targets’ “employment problems” start at the same time as their gang stalking starts. Most gang stalking targets, similar to victims of workplace mobbing, are actually better than average workers in their occupations.
I think the only way to break through the conspiracy theory label planted upon us by the mainstream media, as willing lapdog to government, is to focus on the basic commonalities of gang stalking. Gang stalking is merely a street name for Cointelpro tactics being used to silence and destroy political enemies and others targeted by the government using criminal tactics. Firstly, most individuals who are gang stalked are too hung up on why they fell into the trap. This is a nationwide, programmatic system being used as an alternative to direct law enforcement Cointelpro campaigns. Both the targeted individuals and the gang stalking groups are a means to a political end. By training snitches in Cointelpro tactics the establishment distances itself from illegal activities and gets to use these social engineering techniques in a more and more arbitrary way. This is the ultimate abuse of the snitch culture. Given its history, the FBI has used these techniques on political dissidents, judges, members of Congress, etc. In all liklihood, prominent left wing professors have experienced this, as well as journalists. These people are keeping quiet, in part, not to be labeled as conspiracy nuts.
We are all in this together, subject to a well trained and organized army of interlocking goon squads from sea to shining sea. The way to bring this mainstream is to focus on the fact that gang stalking IS COINTELPRO! There is a rich historical archive, well analyzed, that reveals what Cointelpro was in an earlier phase. The National Archives in Washington, D.C. has over 50,000 pages of declassified documents from the Church Committee hearings on domestic balckbag Cointelpro-style operations by the intelligence agencies (the bulk of which was illegal FBI activities directed against domestic political "enemies"). When the FBI decided to commandeer and train a national snitch network to farm out its blackbag operations, and, to use broad social engineering techniques to ensnare its political enemies, gang stalking was born.
See: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=COINTELPRO&defid=6660861
But this theory of our government is wholly different from the practical fact. The fact is that the government, like a highwayman, says to a man: 'Your money, or your life.' And many, if not most, taxes are paid under the compulsion of that threat. The government does not, indeed, waylay a man in a lonely place, spring upon him from the roadside, and, holding a pistol to his head, proceed to rifle his pockets. But the robbery is none the less a robbery on that account; and it is far more dastardly and shameful. The highwayman takes solely upon himself the responsibility, danger, and crime of his own act. He does not pretend that he has any rightful claim to your money, or that he intends to use it for your own benefit. He does not pretend to be anything but a robber. He has not acquired impudence enough to profess to be merely a 'protector,' and that he takes men's money against their will, merely to enable him to 'protect' those infatuated travellers, who feel perfectly able to protect themselves, or do not appreciate his peculiar system of protection. He is too sensible a man to make such professions as these. Furthermore, having taken your money, he leaves you, as you wish him to do. He does not persist in following you on the road, against your will; assuming to be your rightful 'sovereign,' on account of the 'protection' he affords you. He does not keep 'protecting' you, by commanding you to bow down and serve him; by requiring you to do this, and forbidding you to do that; by robbing you of more money as often as he finds it for his interest or pleasure to do so; and by branding you as a rebel, a traitor, and an enemy to your country, and shooting you down without mercy, if you dispute his authority, or resist his demands. He is too much of a gentleman to be guilty of such impostures, and insults, and villanies as these. In short, he does not, in addition to robbing you, attempt to make you either his dupe or his slave.
Lysander Spooner, American Philosopher
Suggested Reading:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/78272631/The-Cointelpro-Papers
www.aarclibrary.org/publib/.../contents_church_reports_book2.htm

Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (450)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
could be anyone (not verified)at 07:08 on July 10th, 2012
Your stated agenda is that of discrediting victims........................................... And you, too, have the perfect right to post anonymously. .........................................Unfair advantage, you say? How so?posted anonymously (not verified)---------------------------- at 17:32 on June 18th, 2012............................................. Batvette's comments on the How Widespread is Gang Stalking? article:my.nowpublic.com/world/how-widespread-gang-stalking--Batvette wrote at 04:22 on November 15th, 2011--I'll discredit one life story at a time if need be.--Where is yours?--------Batvette is here to discredit.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anon com (not verified)at 07:58 on July 2nd, 2012
MONDAY, JUL 2, 2012 09:19 AM EDT, "Dianne Feinstein targets press freedom, The California Democrat, long a prime defender of the Surveillance State, renews her assault on the First Amendment"-----------------BY GLENN GREENWALd-------------"The Morning Herald article also reported that ”the US Justice Department has also confirmed WikiLeaks remains the target of an ongoing criminal investigation, calling into question Australian government claims that the US has no interest in extraditing Mr Assange.” In other venues, the Obama DOJ has repeatedly confirmed the existence of an ongoing investigation, including just last week. Moreover, recently obtained diplomatic cables published by the Morning Herald revealed in late May that “WikiLeaks publisher Julian Assange remains the target of a major US government criminal investigation and the subject of continuing US-Australian intelligence exchanges.” The U.S. Army’s Criminal Division issued a letter last month expressly confirming that there is an ongoing investigation aimed at WikiLeaks.--------------------------Given all of that, it looks like the Observer‘s British neocon warcheerleading columnist, Nick Cohen, picked a really bad week to write an entire column mocking concerns that the U.S. would seek to prosecute and extradite Assange as “paranoia.” Only wilful ignorance would lead someone to claim that such evidence is nonexistent. Indeed, the evidence has long been overwhelmingthat the U.S. is eager to prosecute him and is actively seeking to do so. That’s because it’s filled with people like Dianne Feinstein, whose supreme loyalty is to the National Security State which enriches them, and who are plagued by a demonstrated willingness to trample on basic Constitutional protections in order to protect it."-------------------------------------------- (In my opinion, the US. Army (see reference above) has had a large role in GS.)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymous Always (not verified)at 08:23 on July 2nd, 2012
www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=JCbKv9yiLiQ (Substitute Gang Stalking for Scientology. It's just a matter of time.)
at 08:49 on July 2nd, 2012
what are you talking about you utter cretin, the author of that video was clearly a jumped up little shit, however he was also clearly talking about scientology. What has that got to do with gangstalking? Why substitute one for the other? Are you really that desperate for attention you will post about anything and just cram the word "gangstalking" in there?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymous Always (not verified)at 09:01 on July 2nd, 2012
"You utter cretin?" Oh, the sound of not-so-"sweet nothings"... Well, "Faithless"... to you I would respond, "Oh, ye of little faith." (I evoked a response from you, so I guess I must be doing something right.) If you don't see some parallels between the good squads of Scientology and the goon squads of GS, then not only are you "faithless", you're clueless, as well. Have a nice day, "Faithless."
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymous Always (not verified)at 09:03 on July 2nd, 2012
Oh, and "Faithless?" As I said, it's just a matter of time.
at 09:19 on July 2nd, 2012
Its just a matter of time before you get locked up in the nut house, i think.
Why dont you ask the author of the vid if he was talking about gangstalking or not? You know you'd get laughed at.
at 09:31 on July 2nd, 2012
Scientology has a checkered history with its ex-members by employ gang stalking methods:
1. The video is authentic ANONYMOUS:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_(group)#Scientology
2. Scientology has used gang stalking in the past:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Freakout
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Snow_White
3. Scientology is now using gang stalking on Katie Holmes:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9369610/Scientologist-spies-allegedly-deployed-against-Katie-Holmes.html
Rupert Murdoch has taken a brave stand by calling out Scientology for its thug-like methods with Holmes.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymous Always (not verified)at 09:32 on July 2nd, 2012
As I said, "Oh, ye of little faith." Your name is apt.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymous Always (not verified)at 09:41 on July 2nd, 2012
The following question was asked by FT (Faithless Templar): "Why dont you ask the author of the vid if he was talking about gangstalking or not?"----------------> As I said, you're both faithless and clueless.
at 09:45 on July 2nd, 2012
LOL! very convincing argument there, you asked me a question I cant answer so I will repeat myself.
Thanks for the links peacefrog it really cleared things up for me. It was something that happened and appeared in mainstream media so obviously you tried to link it with gangstalking just like your dozens of previously failed attempts. You are getting rather scriv-like these days, old bean
at 09:51 on July 2nd, 2012
aND i'M WONDERING WHETHER yOUR A fAITHLESS mASON OR sCIENTOLOGIST?
at 10:15 on July 2nd, 2012
uuuum, I am faithless, as in without any kind of religious faith.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymous Always (not verified)at 10:33 on July 2nd, 2012
Regarding "Faithless": Yeah. I think we got that.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymous Always (not verified)at 09:31 on July 2nd, 2012
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg8bQfulOnQ--------Anonymous - Operation INDECT - 07.28.2012--------Text: ----------Dear activists for the protection of privacy, dear people from all over the European Union, dear mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, sons and daughters.--------Since 2009, the EU has been subsidizing the INDECT project with millions of Euros.Even though several media outlets have already reported about this networked surveillance technology, only few EU citizens know what it is supposed to be.---------The application of INDECT aims to analyze conspicuous behavior to prevent crimes, in virtual life as well as in real life, before they actually happen. Not only does this sound crazy, it is cutting deeply into our basic right to privacy, because those cameras will be able to replicate scanned personal biometrical features with existing digital files about persons in databases such as social networks. Hence, every person could be retraced and supervised, anybody who says or does anything "abnormal" or anything which the system considers to be "threatening" both on the internet and in real life, is potentially suspicious.------------We have been accepting the claims of disclosure of our private data for too long in order to prevent acts of terrorism. People started to accept being treated as potential terrorists or criminals, being more and more deprived of their basic rights, and allowing the surveillance society to gain increased control over them.------------Basic rights weren't given to us as a matter of course, but many generations kept fighting for them. Don't let those rights be taken away from us now!--------These days, we see the situation in Spain where calls for protests are criminalized by the government. Though the right to protest is an essential part of free speech, we should not tolerate the increasingly upcoming undemocratic features in the EU which mostly hide under the cloak of suppression of terrorism.-------And therefore we should move NOW and tell the citizens of the European Union about this project, which has been kept as a secret for so many years. We must create a public awareness and get the people on the streets and fight for their rights.----------It is for these reasons that we ask you to call up all organizations, which campaign for data privacy protection in your country, to join the protest. Create flyers and other media which provide information about INDECT and organize Paperstorms.--------Translate the message of this video into your mother tongue and spread it!---------Let's protest against INDECT like we did and are still doing against ACTA at the beginning of this year.-----------Let's go for big protests again in Europe on the 28th of July, 2012! We are Anonymous We are Legion We do not fight for slavery, we fight for liberty In the name of democracy, Let us all unite! Expect usSource:- www.stopp-indect.info/
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymous Always (not verified)at 09:51 on July 2nd, 2012
www.stopp-indect.info/?p=318 The INDECT-Taskforce wants YOU! )))We are always looking for more passionated colleagues who are helping us to create and want to take part in campaigns against INDECT as well as spreading information over our website, in social networks, Twitter. etc.It is up to you how you want to participate, according to your motivation, your knowledge and your skills.We have many interesting projects for you in which you can take part:- writing texts for blogs or in social networks- investigating the progress of INDECT- creating graphics for flyers, blogs, etc.- developing, executing or taking part in campaigns- spreading the information via your own ways of communication- commenting, improving and bringing in your own ideasAs long as you do not just want to nag about INDECT and you want to be a part of the movement against it, we would like to ask you to register in our mailing list [1] which is our main tool of internal communication.We are looking forward towards you!See you soon,Your Taskforce INDECT
at 10:16 on July 2nd, 2012
U.S. RADIATION WEAPON/INTEL-ENGINEERED COMMUNITY PSYOPS HATE CRIME ATTACK REPORT Mon Jul 2 (Reporting from Lower Makefield Twp, Bucks County, PA)
HELP – LOCKHEED MARTIN PSYCHOPATHS WON’T STOP HEINOUS E-TORTURE
UPDATE: 11:32am -- ANOTHER CONSCIOUSNESS LOSS/FORCED SLEEP ATTACK VIA U.S.CELL TOWER ELECTROMANGETIC WEAPON RF NEUROMODULATION ATTACK. Awoke, ears ringing, extreme fatigue, vertigo, after more than ½ hour oF RF TORTURE/ENSLAVEMENT. 10:45am -- SHARP PULSED BURST ELECTROMAGNETIC WEAPON ATTACK PRECISION-TARGETED TO RIGHT FRONT TEMPLE – inducing sharp, piercing brain pain, vertigo, inability to focus.
U.S. GOV’T FAILS TO STOP LOCKHEED MARTIN/USG HEINOUS ELECTROMAGNETIC ASSAULTS W/U.S. CELL TOWER RADIO FREQUENCY WEAPON SYSTEM (U.S. Patent 7629918, Raytheon), MALICIOUS, ILLEGAL PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS TARGETING ALLEGED ‘DISSIDENTS,’ UNDESIRABLES – A CRIMINAL MILITARY/ INTEL AGENCY COVERT SILENT SLOW-KILL GENOCIDE MOTIVATED BY IDEOLOGY AND HATE.
Awoke this morning to severe ear-ringing, overwhelming fatigue, signs of overnight RF weapon attack, providing cover for Lockheed- coordinated black ops community goons who home invade, vandalize, poison, terrorize. Upon opening front door, greeted by sadistic “hoo hoo” cupped hand bird call psyop, calling card of pathological mil intel psyops, executed by community goons insinuated into neighborhood, some apparently rent-subsidized, some gullible citizen vigilantes. Neighborhood goons obviously fed fusion center high-tech aperture radar surveillance data via instant text message. This journalist HELD HOSTAGE IN HIS OWN HOME TO NEIGHBORHOOD GOONS WHO HOME INVADE, VANDALIZE, TERRORIZE UNDER PROTECTION OF LOWER MAKEFIELD TWP POLICE, WHO REFUSE TO OPEN HATE CRIMES INVESTIGATION. SOME POLICE APPARENTLY ARE TEAM LEADERS OF THESE GOON SQUADS.
MILITARY INTEL OPERATIVES HAVE USURPED AND INTIMIDATED LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS, TURNING THEM INTO THEIR GROUND FORCE STORMTROOPERS. U.S. MILITARY/INTEL AGENCIES APPARENTLY CALLING THE SHOTS AT MAGLOCLEN-RISS MID-ATLANTIC STATES FUSION CENTER, A REGIONAL GESTAPO-LIKE APPARATUS CONDUCTING AN EXTREMIST RIGHT WING SOCIAL CLEANSING UNDER THE FALSE FLAG OF THE WARS ON TERROR AND CRIME. See “U.S. Silently Tortures…” and “Gestapo USA” --
http://viclivingston.blogspot.com/2011/12/u.html
http://viclivingston.blogspot.com/2012/01/thugocracy-u.html
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymous Always (not verified)at 10:35 on July 2nd, 2012
www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=JCbKv9yiLiQ (Substitute Gang Stalking for Scientology. It's just a matter of time.)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymous Always (not verified)at 10:36 on July 2nd, 2012
www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg8bQfulOnQ--------Anonymous - Operation INDECT - 07.28.2012--------Text: ----------Dear activists for the protection of privacy, dear people from all over the European Union, dear mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, sons and daughters.--------Since 2009, the EU has been subsidizing the INDECT project with millions of Euros.Even though several media outlets have already reported about this networked surveillance technology, only few EU citizens know what it is supposed to be.---------The application of INDECT aims to analyze conspicuous behavior to prevent crimes, in virtual life as well as in real life, before they actually happen. Not only does this sound crazy, it is cutting deeply into our basic right to privacy, because those cameras will be able to replicate scanned personal biometrical features with existing digital files about persons in databases such as social networks. Hence, every person could be retraced and supervised, anybody who says or does anything "abnormal" or anything which the system considers to be "threatening" both on the internet and in real life, is potentially suspicious.------------We have been accepting the claims of disclosure of our private data for too long in order to prevent acts of terrorism. People started to accept being treated as potential terrorists or criminals, being more and more deprived of their basic rights, and allowing the surveillance society to gain increased control over them.------------Basic rights weren't given to us as a matter of course, but many generations kept fighting for them. Don't let those rights be taken away from us now!--------These days, we see the situation in Spain where calls for protests are criminalized by the government. Though the right to protest is an essential part of free speech, we should not tolerate the increasingly upcoming undemocratic features in the EU which mostly hide under the cloak of suppression of terrorism.-------And therefore we should move NOW and tell the citizens of the European Union about this project, which has been kept as a secret for so many years. We must create a public awareness and get the people on the streets and fight for their rights.----------It is for these reasons that we ask you to call up all organizations, which campaign for data privacy protection in your country, to join the protest. Create flyers and other media which provide information about INDECT and organize Paperstorms.--------Translate the message of this video into your mother tongue and spread it!---------Let's protest against INDECT like we did and are still doing against ACTA at the beginning of this year.-----------Let's go for big protests again in Europe on the 28th of July, 2012! We are Anonymous We are Legion We do not fight for slavery, we fight for liberty In the name of democracy, Let us all unite! Expect usSource:- www.stopp-indect.info/
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymous Always (not verified)at 06:55 on July 4th, 2012
www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=JCbKv9yiLiQ (Substitute Gang Stalking for Scientology. It's just a matter of time.)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Whit Rabbit (not verified)at 06:58 on July 4th, 2012
Outing myself as a long-long-ago Scientologist (I was taken in as a young'un) to say that I would be shocked if they were NOT following her. This is their standard M.O., and their formal statement to the contrary is worth less than the paper it's printed on. I hope she wasn't completely snookered, and that she actually has some idea of the invasive monitoring and harassment she will surely endure. And major props to the lady if the marriage was legit and it only took her five years to suss out that the Church is corrupt and dangerous - most people who get enmeshed that deeply get fully assimilated and never see the light.As an aside, I cringe when all Scientologists are painted with the same sinister brushstroke, as many of the individuals at the lower levels are some of the kindest, most hard-working, well-meaning, and justice-oriented people you'll ever meet. My theory is that most of them got sold the bill of goods when they were particularly vulnerable (the Church's recruitment tactics are designed around identifying and targeting a person's current vulnerability), and once they were in, the indoctrination process fortified them against any opposing viewpoints. It's very sad, really.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
White Rabbit (not verified)at 06:59 on July 4th, 2012
Outing myself as a long-long-ago Scientologist (I was taken in as a young'un) to say that I would be shocked if they were NOT following her. This is their standard M.O., and their formal statement to the contrary is worth less than the paper it's printed on. I hope she wasn't completely snookered, and that she actually has some idea of the invasive monitoring and harassment she will surely endure. And major props to the lady if the marriage was legit and it only took her five years to suss out that the Church is corrupt and dangerous - most people who get enmeshed that deeply get fully assimilated and never see the light.As an aside, I cringe when all Scientologists are painted with the same sinister brushstroke, as many of the individuals at the lower levels are some of the kindest, most hard-working, well-meaning, and justice-oriented people you'll ever meet. My theory is that most of them got sold the bill of goods when they were particularly vulnerable (the Church's recruitment tactics are designed around identifying and targeting a person's current vulnerability), and once they were in, the indoctrination process fortified them against any opposing viewpoints. It's very sad, really.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymous Always (not verified)at 07:38 on July 4th, 2012
..."that she actually has some idea of the invasive monitoring and harassment she will surely endure."-------Would you elaborate? (Thanks for your insightful comment.)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Anonymous Always (not verified)at 02:48 on July 5th, 2012
www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=JCbKv9yiLiQ (Substitute Gang Stalking for Scientology. It's just a matter of time.)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anon com (not verified)at 12:18 on July 5th, 2012
www.presstv.ir/usdetail/249313.html "White House trying to jail torture whistleblower" “They are going after someone who blew the whistle on torture and waterboarding,” said Jesselyn Radack, national security and human rights director at the Government Accountability Project, which represents whistleblowers, “while at the same time, the people who wrote the memos and issued the orders and carried out the torture are being covered up, and get a pass.” Huffington Post
at 14:44 on July 5th, 2012
Thanks for your comment and article reference anon com (not verified) at 13:18 on July 5th, 2012
It's hard to believe President Obama, Sec of State Hillary Clinton not to mention AG Eric Holder could be pursuing these actions when they actually were some of the strongest proponents against 'enhanced interrogation tactics' when idiot Bush was President.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anon com (not verified)at 15:07 on July 5th, 2012
Here's another excellent piece, The 1, in case you missed it: www.salon.com/2012/07/01/challenging_the_surveillance_state/ "Challenging the Surveillance State" by Glenn Greenwald
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anon com (not verified)at 15:13 on July 5th, 2012
... and another: www.salon.com/2012/07/04/two_tiered_justice/ "Two-tiered justice" by Glenn Greenwald, which includes some excellent segments with Alyona of rt.com, Eliot Spitzer (Current), and another with Juan Gonzalez of Democracy Now!.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anon com (not verified)at 15:24 on July 5th, 2012
www.boilingfrogspost.com/2012/07/05/barack-obama-his-mother-and-the-cia/#comments (Sibel Edmonds site)
at 17:47 on July 5th, 2012
@anon com (not verified) It's good to know there are still professional journalist in the world who can understand sensitive issues and pursuit of the truth. Some who call themselves a 'professional' journalist here on NowPublic, surprisingly produce nothing but gibberish and nonsense hurting victims of G/S and EA issues.
Of interest:
Glenn Greenwald
I might politely further suggest if compelled, or if he hasn't already, Peacefrog initiate professional contact with Mr. Greenwald, as Mr. Greenwald may exhibit interest with an open ear to the specific issues PeaceFrog and most of us pursue.
Glenn Greenwald (email: GGreenwald@salon.com) is an American lawyer, columnist, blogger, and author. Greenwald worked as a constitutional and civil rights litigator before becoming a contributor to Salon.com, where he focuses on political and legal topics.
Glenn Greenwald is the author of three New York Times Bestselling books: two on the Bush administration's executive power and foreign policy abuses, and his latest book, With Liberty and Justice for Some, an indictment of America's two-tiered system of justice. Greenwald was named by The Atlantic as one of the 25 most influential political commentators in the nation. He is the recipient of the first annual I.F. Stone Award for Independent Journalism, and is the winner of the 2010 Online Journalism Association Award for his investigative work on the arrest and oppressive detention of Bradley Manning.