NP Rank:
Gang Stalking, Conspiracy Against Rights, and the Death Penalty
Here is, 18 U.S.C. 241, the conspiracy against [civil] rights statute in the United States Code:
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; orIf two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
Source: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/241
Needless to say, this states that a conspiracy, by two or more persons, to violate a very voluminous set of individual rights inherent in the Constitution and under federal law can be sentenced harshly, up to life imprisonment, and even including the death sentence.
The first thing that should be noted is that there is no "special status" prerequisite for either the "victim class" or the "perpetrators/conspirators". This particular law is COLOR BLIND and does not take into account race, color, creed, religion or any other limiting factor found in other similar federal laws.
Notice the terminology, if "death results", the Death Penalty is applicable. This is much broader than merely homicide resulting in a death sentence. This means, inter alia, that if the person is driven to suicide, killed by accident, etc., and, it can be related back to the conspiracy against rights, as broadly defined, then the government can strap the conspirator to a table and administer lethal injection.
What this means for ANY person involved in a gang stalking conspiracy
The predicate for conspiracy remains the same. If there is an agreement to violate civil rights, the agreement itself is enough to make liable the agreeing person to the conspiracy. The conspirator need not do anything more than agree, and, this can be proven by the totality of circumstances as presented by the evidence proffered by the government (i.e., the question of conspiracy is one of fact, to be determined by the jury, after looking at all the evidence produced).
There is ample victim testimony of a widespread civil rights conspiracy known as gang stalking. By all credited accounts, this conspiracy against rights is linked to perpetrators from a wide swathe of society. This pattern of community mobbing is as deeply rooted in the social structure as were the activities of the Ku Klux Klan. This means the government can go after a very large and diverse group of potential defendants using 18 U.S.C. 241. However, as with most federal criminal cases, the government probably has some very specific targets in mind for prosecution.
d) Statute of Limitations. -
(1) Offenses not resulting in death. - Except as provided in paragraph (2), no person shall be prosecuted, tried, or punished for any offense under this section unless the indictment for such offense is found, or the information for such offense is instituted, not later than 7 years after the date on which the offense was committed.
(2) Death resulting offenses. - An indictment or information alleging that an offense under this section resulted in death may be found or instituted at any time without limitation.
Crowd Power
Recommendations (15)

Anonymous users (15)

Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (61)
at 07:11 on June 1st, 2012
Once again, I am getting a completely different and unprofessional formatting when signed out!
at 21:17 on June 4th, 2012
Now why would you be signed out of your NowPublic account and trying to access the site? Oh yeah that must be when you are padding the comments with sock puppet posts and giving your own comments approval votes.
What other reason would you do this.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonacom (not verified)at 07:29 on June 1st, 2012
I dont. Its a shit article when I sign in and a shit article when I'm signed out :p
- Sign In or Join to post comments
ralph33 (not verified)at 09:31 on June 2nd, 2012
Thanks for the comment anono-Batvette.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
CombsNicole (not verified)at 09:57 on June 1st, 2012
as Kimberly said I didn't know that people able to make $7220 in a few weeks on the computer. have you seen this web link(Click on menu Home more information) goo.gl/PVAON
at 10:28 on June 1st, 2012
Your citation of the federal law underscores the stark fact that a fascist homeland-mil-intel-corporate junta has seized control of law enforcement nationwide, via the 72 Nazi-like "threat fusion center" network, and local law enforcement has willingly allowed its powers to be usurped by constitution-disrespecting ideologues and hate-mongers -- who are using the "war on (of?) terror" as a pretext to conduct a social cleansing, a silent, slow kill GENOCIDE of alleged "dissidents" and "undesirables." Not a single police chief, with the possible exception of the Santa Clara, CA chief, has spoken out against this American Gestapo apparatus. Shame on the police chiefs of this nation (and Canada, too).
http://nowpublic.com/world/thugocracy-fed-cop-vigilante-gestapo-persecutes-citizen-targets
http://nowpublic.com/world/u-s-govt-runs-gang-stalking-vigilantism-says-ex-fbi-official
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonymous comment (not verified)at 13:01 on June 1st, 2012
actually the laws in question don't count unless the breach of that law is proven in a court of law. there is no law pertaining specifically to gang stalking and is covered by an equal number of laws from stalking to aggravated stalking. They are not dependent on the number of conspirators. Just like the quoted example applies to any individual who may be proven to have perpetuated the crimes listed. "However, as with most federal criminal cases, the government probably has some very specific targets in mind for prosecution." Yes, those who commit the crimes. Eg: TUCSON, AZ—Moses Antonio Shepard, 47, of Tucson, was found guilty last week, by a federal jury in Tucson, of two counts of interstate stalking. Shepard is scheduled to be sentenced by Judge Cindy K. Jorgenson on April 2, 2012. The investigation in this case was conducted by the Federal Bureau of Investigation with assistance from the West Hartford (Connecticut) Police Department. The prosecution was handled by Angela W. Woolridge, Assistant U.S. Attorney, District of Arizona, Tucson. Further...“President Obama has proclaimed January 2012 as National Stalking Awareness Month,” said Ann Birmingham Scheel, Acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Arizona. “Unfortunately, for a variety of reasons, many victims of stalking forego reporting the crime. This case demonstrates that victims of stalking can rest assured that the law enforcement community will vigorously pursue those who engage in stalking. I would like to thank the FBI and the West Hartford, Connecticut Police Department for their investigation of this case.”
at 18:56 on June 3rd, 2012
Please tell me when the FBI announces its files on rampant gang stalking in Tucson Arizona and probe how those groups may have driven Loughner to a mass killing. They can start by contacting the local Tucson Area gang stalking victims group. At that point I'll stop to thank the FBI for doing their jobs.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonymous comment (not verified)at 15:44 on June 4th, 2012
It's all about your uncharitable mean spirit towards the police who, while noting the exceptions, work hard with in the laws and evidence to solve the crimes that come across their desk. Fortunately for you, you are not constrained by either the law or evidence. You get to run your conspiracy of lies outside the rule of law and evidence. That hypocrisy is dumb founding coming from someone who claims to be a lawyer.
at 05:37 on June 5th, 2012
The Tucson Sheriff courageously released the arrest records for Jared Loughner on January 12, 2011. CBS reported this on their website: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/01/12/national/main7240304.shtml As can be expected in a politically charged case, CBS gave no context to the factual recital of the records release. Here are the record entries reported: Below are descriptions of arrest reports provided by the Pima County Sheriffs Department involving Loughner and his parents:
On May 27, 1994, Randy Loughner was detained for reckless driving in a "Mint Yellow Camaro. Loughner told (police) he had just had it out for the first time in six months and that he was putting it back into storage in his garage and would not be driving it again for some time."
On Dec. 21, 1996, Loughner's mom, Amy J. Loughner, called to report that her expiration tab was stolen from her license plate.
On Oct. 11, 2002, Randy Loughner called police to report that the passenger window on his 1966 Chevrolet truck had been smashed out while parked in his front yard. Nothing else was wrong with the truck.
On Sept. 23, 2004, Police were called but Loughner declined to press charges against Anthony "Tony" Kurz for stabbing him with a "pin, a stolen type needle," on his upper right arm. Loughner said he did not realize at first he had been "poked." The report goes on to say: "He stated as soon as he figured out that he was poked with a needle, he started to become pale, got dizzy, could not stand and had to be helped to a nurse's office."
The arrest report said there was some bizarre hammering needle device that Kurz claimed to have built from a pen and tried on himself, but was unsuccessful at puncturing his own skin. The report goes on to state: "(Loughner said his parents) do not want to press charges at this time; however they do want Tony tested to see if he has HIV or any other kind of disease."
On May 12, 2006, Loughner was under "Arrest for Consuming Alcohol." Police went to the emergency room at Northwest Hospital after being contacted by the assistant principal at Mountain View High School. There, they were told that Loughner "drank (about) 350 milliliters of Vodka" sometime in the afternoon. The arrest report stated: "(Loughner) advised that he drank because he was very upset as his father yelled at him. I could see his eyes were very red and he was crying and had a strong odor of intoxicants coming from his body and breath." His parents picked him up from the hospital.
On Sept. 9, 2007, Loughner was arrested for possession of a controlled substance and a drug paraphernalia violation after a police officer responded to a report of a suspicious vehicle. After pulling over the van driven by "Bryce Howard Tierney" which Loughner was riding in, "I then smelled a strong odor of burnt marijuana coming off of Mr. Loughner's person," one of the arresting officers said in the report. In the end, police found two glass marijuana pipes with residue, a marijuana roach and packages of Zig-Zag rolling papers. Nothing in the report indicates Loughner was uncooperative.
On Mar. 22, 2008, Loughner's dad, Randy Loughner, called police to complain about rocks being thrown through the back window of his Chevy Nova, which Loughner later drove the morning of the Tucson shooting.
On Oct. 3, 2008, Loughner called police after becoming convinced someone had used his name online against his permission. Loughner said he had Googled his name and it came up on "PeekYou.com." Someone had posted a picture of him with long, curly hair from a few years earlier, as well as a listing "from New York," and a MySpace account which he had not created. Loughner said he contacted YouPeek to do something about this false posting, and YouPeek advised him to contact the police. In the report, the officer writes: "I noted that Jared was slow to respond to my questions. He often hesitated, as if he was trying to think of an explanation."
Gang stalking is also widespread enough in Tucson that a local Gang stalking victims group has been established:
TUCSON AREA TI MEETINGS
If you live in the Tucson area and would like to attend monthly TI support and activism meetings (held the first Saturday of each month), please email Mary Mitchell at: mmitchell.az@gmail.com
Has anyone from law enforcement looked into the possibility Loughner was harassed and pushed over the edge by this rampant, nationwide activity occurring locally in Tucson?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Laughing @ Peacefraud (not verified)at 15:50 on June 5th, 2012
LOL. Loughner was harassed and pushed over the edge by this rampant, nationwide activity occurring locally in Tucson?" LOL. None of what you post holds any evidence of a "rampant, nationwide activity" or even anything locally. LOL. By the Police reports alone Loughner wasn't harassed [time frames of his behavior] he was designer of his own downfall. Loughner obviously a troubled person who couldn't mature to meet society half way. Citizenship carries responsibility. It's not a license to be an a$$hole.
at 17:17 on June 5th, 2012
This is a link to DOJ documents on group stalking showing that it affects 185,050 Americans:
http://www.multistalkervictims.org/svuslabellafoia.pdf
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Laughing @ Peacefraud (not verified)at 22:49 on June 5th, 2012
Operative word [STALKING] Does Not prove your FBI controlled nationwide GS program. FRAUD. DISINFO AGENT.
at 17:40 on June 1st, 2012
Interesting legal points and good article PeaceFrog_thanks!
I would like to somewhat try and specify a finer point of the a specific difference between perceived simple stalking, and the psychological methodology of highly coordinated and organized, program group or task force physical and psychological stalking. This also being referred to commonly today as 'gangstalking'.
Many who are unaware of the psychological and logistical methodology activity by perpetrators of gangstalking aren't aware of the differences from simple stalking victims being commonly reported today.
When a victim of simple stalking reports the crime that they are being stalked by someone, eg. ex-lover, ex-husband, another man or women etc; for whatever reason/s, is not the same as someone who is stalked by organized gangstalking group.
Gangstalking is a well funded, highly coordinated and run, (government) program operation. It involves many levels of government from local police, fire, ems, RISS, Fusion Center communication and operational oversight; public community activist, DHS, NSA, FBI, DOJ. DOD program apparatus involvement oversight and control. Other secret government and non-government organisations are also being reported as involved with these highly questionable seemingly unconstitutional government program activities.
These groups under some community policing, anti terrorism, and possible criminal neighborhood watch group program activity conduct extensive surveillance and stalking activities on anyone with almost complete immunity from any illegal action or abuses that may actually occur during these operations. Many local organisations, companies, airports, bus service, trains, and hospitals have also been reportedly involved in specific surveillance stalking actions and activities.
PeaceFrog has pointed out in some of his other articles that maybe even criminal elements may actually be employed to carry out the more questionable and inhuman, perceived illegal actions against stalked victims in some of these gangstalking program operations.
There may even be some specific religious influences in some local program operational activities.
What I'm seeing is a total lack of specific clarity and constitutional guidance to what should of been, strictly speaking, a public awareness program for public safety and security.
What seems to have happened is these programs grew out of control with specific oversight into many separate fringe operations allowing specific stalking of anyone for any reason by those in control who may deem them (victim) subversive.
That constitutional factors, legal considerations, specific control and oversite weren't being applied as abusive and/or sadistic elements gained control over aspects of these originally designed surveillance and security operations, activities, and functions.
Funding of such a highly organized program operation, with the apparent necessary logistical support structure, indicated a substantial size and exposure only some government backed infrastructure program could support.
This leads to the question of why are these apparent unconstitutional and seemingly highly illegal human rights and privacy abuses are happening against our own citizens by our own government? Why hasn't these issues been exposed by victims, legal, or media attention? Why does this government allow such activities to occur? Why are these activities so hard to expose and prove. Is the government actually allowing then covering up any abuses of these legally questionable government backed and funded possible national security protected program operations and activities?
at 17:42 on June 1st, 2012
Excellent comment 1. I believe that the cover-up has a lot to do with self-interested bureaucrats with dirty hands. A good example of how this has happened is Sibel Edmond's case. She concluded that the media was on a government leash, everyone outside the FBI and federal law enforcement was disinterested, misled or compromised (e.g., Congress, federal courts). The situation was so bad that the "whistleblower groups" she turned to were useless shills funded and directed by the government.
at 17:51 on June 1st, 2012
From what I've seen PeaceFrog, I would agree with your analogy and also what Sibel Edmonds states.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anno2012 (not verified)at 14:32 on June 2nd, 2012
{Gangstalking is a well funded, highly coordinated and run, (government) program operation. It involves many levels of government from local police, fire, ems, RISS, Fusion Center communication and operational oversight; public community activist, DHS, NSA, FBI, DOJ. DOD program apparatus involvement oversight and control. Other secret government and non-government organisations are also being reported as involved with these highly questionable seemingly unconstitutional government program activities.} My. My. My. You left out the Treasury Dept. as the funding apparatus and the SEIU as the civilian recruitment center and propaganda machine inside government. Otherwise I think you have managed to cover the entire government. Now if only you had one shred of proof. I mean with out calling up the names of MKUltra and COINTELPRO. LOL. The conspiracy to get you and Peacefrog is certainly an all inclusive program. All that money and machinery and you are both walking free unharmed when by rights anyone would think that by now you'd have gone the way of Osama or at least be interned in Gitmo. But no. Here you are free as a bird screaming conspiracy. LOL.
at 16:08 on June 2nd, 2012
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/gang-stalking-new-doj-foia-documents-prove-doj-knows-truth
at 18:36 on June 2nd, 2012
Of interest:
Intelligence Oversight Board: FOIA Documents Detailing Legal Violations
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anon 2012 (not verified)at 20:16 on June 2nd, 2012
Yes. The DOJ knows about stalking. That article doesn't prove your conspiracy crap that ever facet of government is out to get you genius. LOL.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anon2012 (not verified)at 20:23 on June 2nd, 2012
OMG!!! The FBI released evidence that they caught some of their own exceeding the authority granted under the Patriot Act and released that data they reported to the IOB. Your proof they are running a nation wide gangstalking program . Some conspiracy. LOL. Hilfuckenlarious.
at 05:06 on June 3rd, 2012
anon2012,
Yes.OMG you're right! For the first time in the history of the FBI they are aware of widespread conspiracy and federal rights violations, and, their silence in the face of the issue means that they are not scheming to use it to destroy their historical enemies (using gang stalking targets as literal "human bait" in the process). OMG, The FBI has gotten religion! This is quite a unique theory Batvette (I'm sorry was it anon2012?).
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anon2012 (not verified)at 14:47 on June 3rd, 2012
WTF!!! Now your saying the FBI has never done an internal report before or submitted it's internal findings to Congress and the DOJ. LOL. What a mushroom. Come on out of the horseshit conspiracy bunker and get some sunlight and fresh air. Ya I'm Batvette. Jack ass. I guess I have to be Batvette in your brain dead conspiracy just like the FBI is out to get you. How many years has it been now that the FBI has been conspiring against you. And you still free. Some bad ass conspiracy you got going there Peacefraud. LOL. You should have gotten a brain scan after that last alien probing. I'm guessing that the aliens at that time literally fvched your brains out.
at 18:51 on June 3rd, 2012
The modus operandi of the FBI in conspiracy cases has always been to parlay them into grander conspiracy cases. This involves greasing the rails, "massaging" the conspiracy. This is central to COINTELPRO, it's not law enforcement, it's social engineering. Look at the invention of domestic terrorism, the growth of the terror-industrial complex. Much of what federal courts handle by way of terrorism cases is patsies set up by the FBI. Obscene cases in which an FBI informant is a central "conspirator" and commits an act of terrorism with a fake bomb provided by the FBI, it's a farce! Not to speak of the live government bombs used by patsies set up to pass the terrorism laws AEDPA and Patriot Acts. And no, I'm not aware of the FBI telling Congress of its involvement in the 1993 WTC bombing, the Oklahoma City bombing or 9/11.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anno2012 (not verified)at 23:14 on June 3rd, 2012
It is the General Services Administration behind it all. I followed the money trail and found that the GSA has some 446,000 buildings with a replacement cost of some 775 billion dollars. The cost associated with insurance, staffing and up keep are probably six times that amount. The GSA's clandestine destructive property "accidents" go back much further than '93. Actually it goes back to day one of the founding of the USA with the great NYC fire of 1776. The great New Orleans fire of 1788. Just before the US Louisiana Purchase.[ wink wink.] In 1804 series of devastating fires struck the port city of Portsmouth, New Hampshire, It's always been the governments way to get rid of a problem by bringing it down in a most public fashion. It never hurts of course when hundreds of civilians are caught up in the game and die or are hurt. It makes the government's story of accident all the more plausible and helps keep the population in check. 1871 Chicago fire. 1906 California fire, All those big devastating city destroying fires back then were government jobs. Today thanks to Nobel we got TNT. I mean it was pure genius getting those Arabs to fly into the Twin Towers while the boys in DC hit the switches on a couple structure bombs. But to call what has been going on for near 240 years a conspiracy is laughable. It's like saying humans conspire to breath. And if the government can get a little more funding to fight terrorism at the same time, well good for them I say. Financial procurement is a bitch. Especially for paying off all those T. McVeigh's and Arabs, Egyptians, Pakistani's. Now if American Jews and Christians got down with the whole jihad thingy. Well, fvck. We wouldn't have to out source it to foreigners. I mean it's not like there aren't enough Mormons in the FBI wishing they could push a few Jews and Christians through St. Peter's Gate. 9/11 was the first real chance. If you don't count the forties and the US's association with NAZIism. None of this aint no conspiracy dude. It couldn't be anymore in your face.
at 18:43 on June 4th, 2012
Now this is blatant disinformation. There is an old Latin expression Que Bono? The GSA is a small dog in terms of funding in Washington. Their biggest monetary scandal was an excessive Las Vegas bill of $833,000. The Pentagon announced on September 10, 2001, through Herr Rumsfeld, that it had a missing $2,300,000,000,000. That discrepancy literally vanished when the missile (or plane if your credulous enough) hit the very part of the Pentagon where the computers kept this financial data. Placing the blame for this on GSA is like blaming the poodle and not the owner for violating the litter laws.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonymouse (not verified)at 20:18 on June 4th, 2012
Kinds like you blaming the FBI only not as far fetched.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anno2012 (not verified)at 21:19 on June 4th, 2012
Peacefraud likes to call everyone else a disinfo agent while declaring himself the great truth teller of his government FBI controlled GS / 9/11 conspiracy.
at 05:30 on June 5th, 2012
Others claiming 9/11 is an inside job:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_Truth_movement#Organizations
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3lgEpaLVjgo
http://www.militaryofficersfor911truth.org/
http://911blogger.com/news/2010-09-12/dennis-kucinich-calls-911-truth-and-reconciliation
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonymous comment (not verified)at 16:43 on June 5th, 2012
Peacefraud says,"hey, I'm not the only one championing 9/11 conspiracies", and that's his proof. LOL.