Gang Stalking: Michael Moore & Susan Sarandon Targeted!

Many/most are dismissed as "crazy", "delusional", etc. when they provide personal accounts.  We all know the broad strokes of this program, so why publish the details, at this point.  The bare bones of this program (stalking, surveillance, harassment, thefts, vandalism, defamation) are written off by most people as false, even preposterous.  We've seen where the "personal accounts" get us, so it would seem that a different approach is in order..  Even those who are targeted find the stories and accounts unbelievable, so how must they sound to someone who has no idea about GS/OS.

In the 90s, portions of phone conversations that I had were being repeated to me by total strangers. This along with other intimidating incidents around me.

I remember one incident, I was taking some classes and two female students sitting in the hallway loudly verbalized a conversation with each other as I walked by. Their conversation was repeating exactly a conversation I had on the phone that morning.

Those incidents totally freak you out. I didn't have a clue. That was before I knew anything about gang stalking.

This nationwide, underground network of pseudo-patriot brownshirts get their assignment via cellphone email.  Sounds to me like an investigative and whistleblowing job for Anonymous and Wikileaks.

The US brownshirts put bird poop in victims' cars. Yes, the Gangstalking NincomPOOPs put birdpoop on your car during the night (among other things, of course).   Just think about it. Some idiot gangstalker manager (along with managing their gangstalker-rent-a-dogs and specially loaned cellphones and vehicles),  collects bird poop, so that the gangstalking brownshirts can dribble it on your car.   Yes, this trick is at the very low end of their "plausible deniability torture" -- along with the ubiquitous "pest control" company trucks, etc. "Pest control" . . . get it?  Guffaw, guffaw.  This is the mentality of our guv-ment.  It goes without saying that these Federal Psychopaths would rather put dog shit on your car, but even the Federal NincomPOOPs  know that dogs can't fly.       This is how our taxdollars are spent -- in insanity, in endless petty ploys, along with the Lethal Genocidal Ploys of directed energy weapons and drones and attacking the victims' children.  Yes, it's Full Spectrum  Totalitarian Evil.    The Evil Feds can't catch real criminals doing real crimes, so they have to use invented crimes and entrapped criminals -- stings. And you can imagine what kind of stupid  "stings" the Federal Bird-Poop Bureaucrats come up with. (Think Florida.)

www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/26/al-franken-cries-violence-against-women-act_n_1456705.html  (In light of GS, some of the comments are interesting.  We are an incredibly violent people, and GS activities point to the sadistic nature of many of those in this country.)

You're right. They attack people like Moore and Sarandon who are, in fact, standing up for what is good about America -- the right to free speech. People who seek to "shut up" dissent are Brownshirts, KGB-type thugs who do the bidding of the Evildoers who always seem to hijack the political process in EVERY country. Wake up, you little "shooters" for the One Percent. You can't even recognize when you yourselves are being shat upon -- you NEED people like Moore and Sarandon to do your thinking for you, since you're too dumb to stand up for your own interests against the Banksters and their Hitmen..

anon com (not verified)

I couldn't agree with you more on this issue..Here's what I've seen..

First these sadist assholes are part of, as you rightly suggest, a large number of individuals carrying out a very specific, highly organized, physical as well as psychological program operation against a single individual target. That is part (1) of their strength. Usually only one target at a time involved.

Part (2) is to isolate and create a buffer zone between themselves and the target. To maintain that buffer at all times if possible.

(3) To make their actions so unassuming to others as to make the targeted individual (TI) look crazy for suggesting anything unusual is happening around them. A perfect psychological as well as physical buffer is then created around the target without the public seeing it or being aware of it's existence. This program having been well thought out and implemented through years of practice.

(4) This plays into keeping this operation covert on many levels in psychological as well as physical ways to any general public perception. Thats why when we try to bring this issue into the light, the general public can't see it, and most importantly, can't even believe it exist.

General public perception is another topic actually with all it's own motives_with which American media and the military industrial complex political machine has become experts at manipulating.

Last this operating isn't just these boots on the ground assholes stalking victims. It's some vast operational agency complex from street level up through local community and law enforcement agencies_through state and federal control agencies apparatus/structure.

All the nuances that you, Peacefrog and some others here have brought to light about this operational stalking program in how it works; it's physical as well as psychological factors that drives it means there must be an almost satanic, nazi type cult hidden government structure in place running it. I don't believe many public politicians are even aware of the totality of it's existence. Being told it's some "anti-terrorism surveillance program" as it's cover. Being some secret government agency probably under some DOD/NSA/CIA control.

How many gang stalking victims are certain that their phones are tapped?-----www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2133940/Susan-Sarandon-Ive-phone-tapped.html-----At the Tribeca discussion, Moore went on to suggest that the phone hacking scandal that has rocked British newspapers could spread to the United States.------'I’ll make a prediction about something,' he said. 'I think the phone hacking thing [Rupert ]Murdoch is involved in is going to be investigated, and it will be found that it’s been going on here too.----'I just have a gut feeling,' he said, mentioning Fox News as a possible culprit.

www.brookings.edu/papers/2011/1214_digital_storage_villasenor.aspx====== Recording Everything: Digital Storage as an Enabler of Authoritarian Governments------------ John Villasenor, Nonresident Senior Fellow, Governance Studies, Center for Technology Innovation-------- The Brookings Institution--------- December 14, 2011 —------------- Executive Summary----------------- "Within the next few years an important threshold will be crossed: For the first time ever, it will become technologically and financially feasible for authoritarian governments to record nearly everything that is said or done within their borders—every phone conversation, electronic message, social media interaction, the movements of nearly every person and vehicle, and video from every street corner. Governments with a history of using all of the tools at their disposal to track and monitor their citizens will undoubtedly make full use of this capability once it becomes available."

The FBI DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL (Elaine N. Lammert, JD ’85)  is questioned by Jacob Appelbaum.  Watch the video.   Her body language and eye movements are telling, IMO.=======www.democracynow.org/2012/4/26/targeted_hacker_jacob_appelbaum_on_cispa======================AMY GOODMAN: Last week, Laura Poitras, the filmmaker, and you, Jacob Appelbaum, and the NSA former official, William Binney, were on the show, and we played that clip from the Open Society meeting that you attended two Mondays ago. Can you introduce this clip for us? Who is this?========== JACOB APPELBAUM: So, my understanding is that this is the deputy general counsel of the FBI.========== AMY GOODMAN: And you questioned her.========== JACOB APPELBAUM: I did.========== JACOB APPELBAUM: Are you including national security letters in your comment about believing that there is judicial oversight with the FBI’s actions?========== FBI DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL: National security letters and administrative subpoenas have the ability to have judicial oversight, yes.========== JACOB APPELBAUM: How many of those actually do have judicial oversight, in percentage?========== FBI DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL: What do you mean by that? How many have—========== JACOB APPELBAUM: I mean, every time you get a national security letter, you have to go to a judge? Or—========== FBI DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL: No, as you well know, national security letters, just like administrative subpoenas, you don’t have to go to a judge. The statute does allow for the person on whom those are served to seek judicial review. And people have done so.========== JACOB APPELBAUM: And in the case of the third parties, such as, say, the 2703(d) orders that were served on my — according to the Wall Street Journal — my Gmail account, my Twitter account, and my internet service provider account, the third parties were prohibited from telling me about it, so how am I supposed to go to a judge, if the third party is gagged from telling me that I’m targeted by you?========== FBI DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL: There are times when we have to have those things in place. So, at some point, obviously, you became aware. So at some point, the person does become aware. But yes, the statute does allow us to do that. The statute allows us.========== AMY GOODMAN: Now, again, that’s the deputy general counsel for the FBI talking to you, who was just in the audience, Jacob Appelbaum. She said, "as you know," so she must know you sounded like you had a national security letter, one of, what, hundreds of thousands given by the FBI, and if you even reveal that you have one, you could face five years in jail. Have you been handed an NSL?========== JACOB APPELBAUM: So, to the best of my knowledge, no, though there’s some speculation that perhaps she was hinting at the national security letter which Google is trying to unseal right now in the Fourth Circuit, I believe. So it could be that she just accidentally disclosed that there is a national security letter about me, and "as I well know" could be some kind of allusion to that, which, if that’s the case, then I hope that they hold her accountable for that kind of disclosure, since that seems to be something like they like to do to lots of people. So we’ll see if they hold their own accountable, if that’s true. And otherwise, maybe she was just suggesting I know quite a lot about this.========== AMY GOODMAN: But then the content of what she said and how this fits in with this legislation?========== JACOB APPELBAUM: I mean, it sounds to me like they are trying to expand that power to include all facets of the government, including the military, over civilian life with regard to surveillance and essentially to make it impossible for anyone to resist or to have judicial oversight. And that is a serious problem, in my opinion.

"Totalitarian Evil.  The Evil Feds can't catch real criminals doing real crimes, so they have to use invented crimes and entrapped criminals -- stings".  --Captain America.=====Truth.

"We are an incredibly violent people, and GS activities point to the sadistic nature of many of those in this country."
..specifically those sadist who are involved in organized activist stalking activities (gang_stalking); and also those using non-lethal electromagnetic spectrum no-touch torture weapons technologies_"non-lethal weapons" (NLW's).. 

www.cbsnews.com/8601-31749_162-57419139-0.html?assetTypeId=41&blogId=10391698   ---------  The following comment (regarding Sarandan's security clearance) was posted to the CBS article (link above).  These are exactly the kind of folks who are participating in what some are calling "gang stalking."  The commenter says something that we hear a lot (and it was heard frequently in comments made to another one of PeaceFrog's articles).  She said:  "I don't believe they did tap her phone, she's not that important."  This is very common.  Victims who are targeted for surveillance and harassment are often told that they aren't "important" enough.------------

by kahree46 April 24, 2012 2:03 AM EDT--------

"If they denied her, here is why: --------1. She is a bleeding heart communist liberal who has made it abundantly clear she had nothing but disdain for this country.----------2. ANYONE who hangs out with homegrown terrorist Michael Moore should expect nothing less.--------------I don't believe they did tap her phone, she's not that important. She's just another hollywood gas bag who has NO idea what it's like to live in the REAL America!"========Welcome to America, 2012.

Gang Stalking: Conversation with Sheriff Mack=====   by PeaceFrog | March 29, 2012 at 05:41 am======Continue reading at NowPublic.com: Gang Stalking: Conversation with Sheriff Mack | NowPublic News Coverage www.nowpublic.com/world/gang-stalking-conversation-sheriff-mack#ixzz1t4698lOX

1)  www.usatoday.com/news/washington/story/2012-04-19/vanden-brook-locker-propaganda/54419654/1?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter&dlvrit=206567  (Misinformation campaign targets USA TODAY reporter, editor....... By Gregory Korte, USA TODAY)........2)  www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/post/usa-today-alleges-harassment-scheme/2012/04/20/gIQAaRjCVT_blog.html   (..... Posted at 06:56 AM ET, 04/20/2012..... USA Today alleges harassment scheme.... By Erik Wemple....)

An excellent link, PeaceFrog.  I'm repeating it with the title and author -- it's a great resource.  Thanks for your ongoing efforts to get GS out in the open.======The Signs And Techniques of Online COINTELPRO By Stephen DeVoy=======www.indybay.org/olduploads/introtoonlinecointelprofree.pdf

"Tapped phones",   Thanks for your comment.  This is terribly ugly business, and it's deep and pervasive.  There are days when I wonder if we'll ever see an end to it.

Captain America wrote: This nationwide, underground network of pseudo-patriot brownshirts get their assignment via cellphone email.  Sounds to me like an investigative and whistleblowing job for Anonymous and Wikileaks.=====  The phrase "pseudo-patriot brownshirt" describes these sadists well.  I see them on their cell phones all the time, so I'm guessing that not all of the communication is by e-mail but, if some of it is, there's a trail to be sure.  I, too, hope to see this blown out of the water by a group like Anonymous or Wikileaks.

The sadistic cyberNazi censors of the Lockheed Martin/USG real-time censorship regime apparently have "disappeared" my comment on the YouTube release of the new Beach Boys song, as well as comments on the song to other websites. It is glaringly obvious that a full-bore psychological operation (psyop) has been waged against me for years, acts intended to marginalize and isolate me from others, a "full lid" on my ability to communicate and connect with others. This is sick, twisted, perverse and illegal. This is a campaign of criminal psychological destruction. It is accompanied by intensified electromagnetic assault from the cell tower radio frequency weapon system that this Lockheed Martin operation is using to degrade and impair my health and my ability to function. I intend to have much more to say on this tomorrow. But in a way I am glad these military contractor psyop agents are so ham-fisted and obvious. It makes it much more likely that I will help TAKE THEM DOWN -- under the rule of law, and under the laws of humanity and decency, that they so flagrantly defy, and defile.

LOCKHEED MARTIN RUNS DRACONIAN CENSORSHIP REGIME FOR U.S. AGENCIES/COMMANDS -- INTERCEPTS, CENSORS, TAMPERS WITH TELECOMMUNICATIONS OF EXTRAJUDICIALLY 'TARGETED' AMERICANS, LEAVING THEM VULNERABLE TO I.D. THEFT, FRAUD, SAYS VETERAN JOURNALIST:
http://nowpublic.com/world/u-s-govt-censors-internet-political-speech-fraud-deception

http://nowpublic.com/world/u-s-govt-uses-spoofed-web-pages-and-urls-censor-internet

http://viclivingston.blogspot.com/

This is exactly what I was talking about in one of my earlier posts in which I think people should put out their personal accounts of gang stalking in order for others to come forward. Unfortunately, there is always a possibility of copycat claims pertaining to GS. But I have no reason to believe that this is a copycat claim.

The WAR CRIMINAL FELONS of the Lockheed Martin real-time telecom/internet censorship regime -- which this journalist has thoroughly exposed as a constitution-violating warrantless surveillance outrage -- have DISAPPEARED the comments section/boxes on the Philly.com article on the arrest of the alleged Mayfair (Phila.) tire slasher -- a NEIGHBORHOOD WATCH member.

http://www.philly.com/philly/news/local/20120426_In_Mayfair__outrage_over_tire-slashing_arrest.html

Is it because I would point out in my comment that these federally-funded, police-supported untrained vigilante posses attract a rogue element of power-abusing thugs and criminals? 

AMONG THE WORST CRIMINALS ARE THE MILITARY CONTRACTOR OPERATIVES, SUPERVISORS AND GOVERNMENT OVERLORDS WHO DEVISE AND ADMINISTER THESE GESTAPO-LIKE PROGRAMS -- AND THEN CENSOR JOURNALISTS WHO EXPOSE THEIR CRIMES AGAINST AMERICANS AND THE U.S. CONSTITUTION. See "Gestapo USA" at http://VicLivingston.blogspot.com/
http://viclivingston.blogspot.com/2012/01/thugocracy-u.html

Thanks for the "tire slasher" link, Scrivener.  Those who are being targeted/victimized by OS/GS know, only too well, how these folks work.

The FBI DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL (Elaine N. Lammert, JD ’85)  is questioned by Jacob Appelbaum.  Watch the video.   Her body language and eye movements are telling, IMO.=======www.democracynow.org/2012/4/26/targeted_hacker_jacob_appelbaum_on_cispa======================AMY GOODMAN: Last week, Laura Poitras, the filmmaker, and you, Jacob Appelbaum, and the NSA former official, William Binney, were on the show, and we played that clip from the Open Society meeting that you attended two Mondays ago. Can you introduce this clip for us? Who is this?========== JACOB APPELBAUM: So, my understanding is that this is the deputy general counsel of the FBI.========== AMY GOODMAN: And you questioned her.========== JACOB APPELBAUM: I did.========== JACOB APPELBAUM: Are you including national security letters in your comment about believing that there is judicial oversight with the FBI’s actions?========== FBI DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL: National security letters and administrative subpoenas have the ability to have judicial oversight, yes.========== JACOB APPELBAUM: How many of those actually do have judicial oversight, in percentage?========== FBI DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL: What do you mean by that? How many have—========== JACOB APPELBAUM: I mean, every time you get a national security letter, you have to go to a judge? Or—========== FBI DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL: No, as you well know, national security letters, just like administrative subpoenas, you don’t have to go to a judge. The statute does allow for the person on whom those are served to seek judicial review. And people have done so.========== JACOB APPELBAUM: And in the case of the third parties, such as, say, the 2703(d) orders that were served on my — according to the Wall Street Journal — my Gmail account, my Twitter account, and my internet service provider account, the third parties were prohibited from telling me about it, so how am I supposed to go to a judge, if the third party is gagged from telling me that I’m targeted by you?========== FBI DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL: There are times when we have to have those things in place. So, at some point, obviously, you became aware. So at some point, the person does become aware. But yes, the statute does allow us to do that. The statute allows us.========== AMY GOODMAN: Now, again, that’s the deputy general counsel for the FBI talking to you, who was just in the audience, Jacob Appelbaum. She said, "as you know," so she must know you sounded like you had a national security letter, one of, what, hundreds of thousands given by the FBI, and if you even reveal that you have one, you could face five years in jail. Have you been handed an NSL?========== JACOB APPELBAUM: So, to the best of my knowledge, no, though there’s some speculation that perhaps she was hinting at the national security letter which Google is trying to unseal right now in the Fourth Circuit, I believe. So it could be that she just accidentally disclosed that there is a national security letter about me, and "as I well know" could be some kind of allusion to that, which, if that’s the case, then I hope that they hold her accountable for that kind of disclosure, since that seems to be something like they like to do to lots of people. So we’ll see if they hold their own accountable, if that’s true. And otherwise, maybe she was just suggesting I know quite a lot about this.========== AMY GOODMAN: But then the content of what she said and how this fits in with this legislation?========== JACOB APPELBAUM: I mean, it sounds to me like they are trying to expand that power to include all facets of the government, including the military, over civilian life with regard to surveillance and essentially to make it impossible for anyone to resist or to have judicial oversight. And that is a serious problem, in my opinion.

"Totalitarian Evil.  The Evil Feds can't catch real criminals doing real crimes, so they have to use invented crimes and entrapped criminals -- stings".  --Captain America.=====Truth.

I honestly think that if personal accounts of gang stalking were published, then it would expose the tactics of what these people are doing. Others could corroborate them, and eventually gang stalking would be put out of business. 

Many accounts have already been published.  The tactics are dismissed because some of the tactics, quite frankly, sound unbelievable, even to other targets.  I've read a number of published accounts and if some of those who are aware of GS have difficulty believing them, imagine how they will sound to those who are completely unaware of GS.

The 1,  I so wish that there were a way to get this out in the open.  Some of it is going on in plain sight and there are large numbers of people participating.  I'm at a loss.  Naively, I never imagined that Americans would do this to other Americans.

Regarding, "the Banksters and their Hitmen", have you by any chance read "Confessions of an Economic Hit Man" by John Perkins?  (It might be worth the read.  It was recommended to me, though I haven't read it, yet.)

Many/most are dismissed as "crazy", "delusional", etc. when they provide personal accounts. We all know the broad strokes of this program, so why publish the details, at this point. The bare bones of this program (stalking, surveillance, harassment, thefts, vandalism, defamation) are written off by most people as false, even preposterous. We've seen where the "personal accounts" get us, so it would seem that a different approach is in order.. Even those who are targeted find the stories and accounts unbelievable, so how must they sound to someone who has no idea about GS/OS.