Truemors
is reporting from
Member
NP Rank:
NP Rank:
Gang Stalking: SWATing Bloggers & 18 U.S.C. 241
Share:
by PeaceFrog | June 9, 2012 at 11:20 am
1382 views | 8 Recommendations | 105 comments
Michelle Malkin, conservative political analyst and blogger, recently wrote about thugs who made false 911calls resulting in SWAT teams being deployed against bloggers whose opinions they disliked. This is domestic terrorism under the Patriot Act, as well as a violation of 18 U.S.C. 241, the "conspiracy against [civil] rights" statute in the federal criminal code.
Malkin quoted former Justice Department official J. Christian Adams pointing out, it is a federal violation of Title 18 U.S.C. Section 241 to conspire to deprive someone of his "free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States."
There are implications of the Patriot Act and certain amendments to the NDAA that could provide grounds for indefinite, Guantanamo-style detention without trial or access to counsel, as well as enhanced sentencing guidelines, for such SWATing activity. 18 U.S.C. 241 also carries the potential of life imprisonment or the death penalty if death results. The death penalty would be applicable in a case in which the police screwed up on a false 911 SWATing call such as the recent New York case of retired Marine Kenneth Chamberlain.
SWATing was something that I experienced in the Summer of 1995. I was in the midst of an employment dispute with a Wall Street securities firm (acquired the next year by one of the largest banks in Canada). While working at the firm, I had found fictitious accounts, and had reason to believe that both money laundering and micro-stock "pump and dump" schemes were being facilitated at the firm. The firm was "mobbed up" which became clearer to me when my gang stalking experience was initiated. It was later revealed in a F.O.I.A. suit that this firm was subject to a joint task force investigation including members of the FBI, NYPD, SEC, NASD and several employee informants. (Labella v. FBI, et.al, 07-cv-2330 (EDNY 2008), Defendants' Vaughn Index).
One night in that summer of 1995, at about 3 a.m., I was awoken by a SWAT team in my Whitestone, Queens apartment. A phony 911 call had been placed stating that I had been holding a hostage at gunpoint. I later settled the employment dispute with the firm for nearly six-figures. I know other gang stalking victims have had similar experiences with workplace mobbing and even SWATing.
18 U.S.C. Sect. 241 is the proper vehicle for prosecuting the human garbage involved in these gang stalking groups, and, others that conspire with them.
Advertisement
What is NowPublic?
NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.
Most Recommended Comment
Stupid is as stupid does (not verified)
Crowd Power
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (105)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Sure. (not verified)at 09:21 on June 11th, 2012
Hey, laughing @. It just goes to show that you didn't know old Yorick as well as you thought. Deluded about that, deluded about so many other things.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
laughing@Peacefrog (not verified)at 10:03 on June 11th, 2012
I bet it takes a lot of study for you to come up with those one word comment id's. Folks at home must be mighty proud seeing you confident enough to spell the word sure in public like that. Kudos to you Timmy keep swinging and one day you'll have a whole bunch of four letter words you can spell.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
always anonymous (not verified)at 05:00 on June 12th, 2012
One has to wonder about someone who would hang out here, posting with a user name of "Laughing@Peacefrog." (PeaceFrog is, of course, the author of this articles, as well as others, to which this "Laughing@" character has also posted comments. What a grand waste of time. Unless one is paid.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
special sauce (not verified)at 07:37 on June 12th, 2012
good question. how much are you being paid super secret special agent always anonymous???
- Sign In or Join to post comments
hey genius (not verified)at 07:46 on June 12th, 2012
of course the author of this article is Peacefrog wow, you are a clever boy aren't you. you should be getting your GED by the time you hit retirement age.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Bugzapper (not verified)at 13:48 on June 10th, 2012
Actually I was the one was called names and a liar after I wrote about my experience with a spoofed 911 call where two cops came to my house to investigate.
The moral of the story?
If you are a victim of SWAT-ting or community harassment then keep your mouth shut or be prepared to be ridiculed and vilified.
at 14:32 on June 10th, 2012
Thanks for speaking out Bugzapper!
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonymously given (not verified)at 14:22 on June 9th, 2012
An excellent article, PeaceFrog.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonymously given (not verified)at 01:31 on June 10th, 2012
and don't forget tonight you have the glory hole duty, the boys haven't bathed in weeks so this is one you don't want to miss. oh and the clinic results are in, PM me when you're sitting down.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
anonymously given (not verified)at 19:34 on June 11th, 2012
The following comment, most likely by batvette (who doesn't like anonymous comments) uses the user name "anonymously given." I didn't write that particular comment.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
perp spam alert (not verified)at 05:13 on June 12th, 2012
perp spam alert
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Kevin Earl Wood (not verified)at 18:10 on June 9th, 2012
If you want to see a blatant violation of 18 U.S.C. 241 and 242 check out:glennhess.orgAnd, in particular,glennhess.org/HessLyingToMedia.htm
at 09:19 on June 11th, 2012
http://www.signon.org/create_start.html?source=homepage
Btw PeaceFrog good article ! This article pretty well spells a persons right to personal freedom and liberty. Now if we could just somehow get into the actual workings and technologies being used behind these organized stalking activities. We need someone who's been part of it to open up about it. That really is the amazing part also_that no one that we have heard of or know of, has come forward about any of these programs yet. Very bizarre unless these idiots are being killed off if they try and speak about it..who knows_shit!
at 10:20 on June 11th, 2012
That really is the amazing part also_that no one that we have heard of or know of, has come forward about any of these programs yet. Very bizarre unless these idiots are being killed off if they try and speak about it.
The general theme has always been that people participate because they are easily corrupted with money, often a small amount even. How much did they pay for those billboards? A lot more than you'd think you could get one of these "low life perps" to come forward and name some names.
Never mind the scenario "activists" "educate" TIs with (especially this one) that friends and family members are approached by people who claim to be law enforcement, show them a bogus file containing slander against the target and them go on to participate in their ruin for years.
But not ONE of these friends and family members can be found to relate this anywhere. Is this yet another large segment of society who is too fearful of the vast conspiracy to come forward and speak out?
Where I believe your logic fails is that between them speaking out and the program finding this out and killing them for doing so, you seem to have misplaced the fact they did speak out. Where did it go? And if this were the case other people in the program see them killing people and know they could be next at any time- wouldn't they thus come forward out of self preservation, figuring their chances would be better in witness protection program than being faceless in an underground program, facilitating their quiet disposal?
You have to conclude the reason we can't find any participants who will come forward to admit they participate in these tactics, is that a great number of either the alleged participants OR the described suite of tactics, has been greatly inflated and is not the case at all.
The logical mind then posits there is no reason for any program to have the liability of so many potential whistle blowers to accomplish these tactics if they can accomplish the same effects by merely convincing people they were doing it.
It's fantastic and bizarre not one of millions of perps could be found coming forward. So bizarre it's irrational to keep insisting they exist unless you believe they all have no morals or no courage- but if we were talking a few thousand, hmm, not so bizarre any more is it. Now THEY could be easily intimidated couldn't they? Not like there are a million guys who might back you up if you were the first to break from the pack, huh? Everyone who knows what you do could disappear tomorrow and it would be a blip on the radar screen, vanished.
Imagine a prison break in wartime... 3 guys don't rush the guards. 300, well they can't get us all, right? You aren't going to keep millions of participants silent out of fear for their lives because it would only take solidarity among a few dozen at a time to safely reach someone's attention with their story- and whether they did it for self preservation, a change of conscience, or to sell their story to the national enquirer, or to try to screw someone else as hard as they were getting screwed, they could easily do it. ------------------------------------------------------------------
I'll reiterate my personal belief is we have a small number of DHS affiliated private snitches in some parts of communities, that make contact with people they are told to watch. These programs are borderline legit and may have written policies authorizing them. At least one if not more technologies are used to further harass people, who get on the internet and find a wealth of misleading information meant to terrorize them, greatly inflate the human capabilities of the program without the liability of those people actually existing, as well as recruit the delusional to obfuscate the program AND cause the delusional, also deemed "undesirable", to ruin themselves so the program needn't expend any resources doing this at all.
This whole thing could easily be a private entity with a relatively small number of gov't employees misdirecting resources they command or can influence, with those resources still appearing to and believing they are engaged in legitimate activities.
What I do not believe is that hundreds of thousands or millions of perps run around playing dirty tricks on people for their own sadistic pleasure, or patriotism, at an astronomical cost. It does not make sense and you could accomplish the same effect without them with a good psy ops effort which leaves almost zero liability of human leaks.
at 10:30 on June 11th, 2012
Batvette writes,
You aren't going to keep millions of participants silent out of fear for their lives because it would only take solidarity among a few dozen at a time to safely reach someone's attention with their story- and whether they did it for self preservation, a change of conscience, or to sell their story to the national enquirer, or to try to screw someone else as hard as they were getting screwed, they could easily do it.
How many "participants" did it take to enforce the blacklisting of alleged communists during the McCarthy Era? More than dozens, hundreds, or even thousands, participated and stood silent about it under official duress.
at 10:47 on June 11th, 2012
Oh but of course the hunt for communists was a silent underground program nobody knew about. No, McCarthyism happened because the majority of America was like minded and "getting the word out" would not accomplish a damn thing.
Everyone hated commies then, not like you'd admit that because back then you'd have been one me thinks. Typical partisan fault there, same thing that allows extreme lefties OR righties think their views are centrist.
In the end the analogy undeniably fails. It's not a prison break as it's not as if there was freedom on the other side of a fence. THE WHOLE COUNTRY supported their blacklisting. Whether some were fingered wrong or not is BTW irrelevant.
Why do you post these stupid worthless arguments? Do you really believe them yourself when you do or are you so condescending you think you can slide them by.
"Gee I'm an imbecile, I don't see the flaw in that analogy!"
at 11:20 on June 11th, 2012
Batvette,
Oh but of course the hunt for communists was a silent underground program nobody knew about. No, McCarthyism happened because the majority of America was like minded and "getting the word out" would not accomplish a damn thing.
Apply that same logic and you will solve the paradox. Who do the ""silent majority of America" hate enough to continue to grease the rails for a Program like this?
at 13:47 on June 11th, 2012
You've gone so far off the discussion I'm confused, but on this singular question?
I dunno, lying sacks of s h i t trolling the internet, like you?
(We could also backtrack to what the issue was, the incredible implausibility that millions of perps could participate in this yet not a single one has come out to talk, and why arguing they could be intimidated out of speaking or all killed after they did, does not compute)
at 13:58 on June 11th, 2012
You agreed the silent majority in America kept quite about McCarthyism. The same thing is happening with gang stalking except the hate magnets aren't subversive immigrant Italians, Jews, etc., as anarchists/communists. They are Italians, Jews, South Americans in organized crime, Jewish extremists, Muslims, etc. I.E., history is not repeating itself, but it is rhyming!
at 15:32 on June 11th, 2012
LOL, my position is your analogy sucked.
I'm not going to waste the effort arguing with a pinko about McCarthyism. Whether your angle is that it was irrational to fear communism in the early1950's or that being a communist was really the right thing to do because somewhere in the imagination of another pinko communism works in its perfect form, it's going to get silly as we open the history books.
The only thing wrong with McCarthyism is that it fingered a lot of people who were guilty by association only. At its outset nobody in America cared except some liberals in Hollywood and New England, mostly because it hit close to home. Unless you forgot who really won WW2 in Europe, or that the Soviets were beating us to milestones in the space race, the majority of Americans had good reason to be afraid of the red menace, and if you weren't popping tall and waving the red white and blue you might as well be waving a hammer and sickle on red.
There was not a majority of America who would want to stop the purging of communists from America at the time. After the transgressions of McCarthy's tactics were revealed and the cold war began to ease to a period of eased tensions between us and the Soviets in the early to mid 60's, Americans who participated in the witch hunts had their regrets and felt remorseful for the whole thing. I guess the gullible might even buy somebody's revisionist history telling that "I was gonna stand up and speak out about all this when it was going on... but was afraid to!".
Sounds a lot like buying the claims of the leaders of Japan who sat on their hands after receiving the Potsdam declaration, and did not take it seriously-you leftists eat that up too. "We wuz gonna surrender, we wuz thinkin' about it, we woulda!"
Well you didn't, and hundreds of thousands of your people got vaporized because of your stubbornness. No surprise after the fact you make excuses to cover your ass.
It's expected they'd say that. It's silly to think it's the truth, but remorse for past sins is stronger even than remorse for mistakes. Perhaps that drives the belief McCarthyism's participants and onlookers pretend it didn't have to happen or it could have been stopped.
Even Eisenhower wrote in his memoirs a revision of the history behind the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. As if he was in a confessional praying for forgiveness before he met his maker. In a tale not widely told, it's said that on that battleship in the harbor in Tokyo, when Hirohito sat down to sign the official surrender document, before putting pen to paper he pushed away from the table and gestured he couldn't bring himself to such disgrace to do it.
The story describes Gen. Douglas MacArthur was in formation just steps away at parade rest, and coldly strode over and drew his service .45 from its holster and cocked it and put it to the Emperor's head.
I don't know how true that is but we can document that while the Emperor was signing the surrender order, Japanese officers took the last 16 US officer pilots held as POW's in Tokyo and even brought few of their girlfriends to watch, and had a party as they beheaded them one by one with samurai swords. All of therm laughing. This is a portal to some links, one of which is where I read the story of the beheadings:
http://home.comcast.net/~winjerd/POWCamp1.htm
One link there has detailed accounts of the vivisection experiments at fukuoka, if you haven't heard of them your leftist brainwashing is probably complete. POWs' were cut to pieces, alive, conscious, strapped to metal tables, even watching in anticipation as it was about to happen to them. The blood drained and replaced with seawater. The tops sawed off their skulls, and a stick used to poke at their brains while doctors laughed at the reactions. Organs removed just to see how long they lasted before dying. It was pointless, there was no medical benefit. War crimes beyond comprehension, yet immediately after the war, treaties were signed granting amnesty to all participants of Japanese war crimes.
Yes I'm going somewhere with this. Despite countless atrocities that made it quite evident the Japanese were many times more the monster we fought with Germany, Americans had to forget about all of it, even the men who'd been there and were brutally mistreated, and virtually overnight, become allies with Japan.
Against Communism. It was that big a deal.
Joseph Stalin was alive, the USSR swallowed half of Europe and with China, most of Asia. The nukes they would soon be testing were bigger than ours. Google "Tsar bomb". 63 megatons detuned, 100+ as deployed.
So please do not try and sell anyone that this country was anything but galvanized and unified in their resolve to fight communism when Joseph McCarthy began his crusade. In the comfort of decades of peace we have the hindsight to have regret, even posit it was wrong, just as some will regret Hiroshima. They were a handful of years past total, nation against nation war and knew it was serious business and collateral damage, i.e; locking up some good with the bad, was part of the game. I guess it's the leftist in you that can only see the sins of people who in one way or another were instrumental in winning our wars, and ignore potential outcome had we lost. You've got to thank Joseph McCarthy for decades of freedom as surely as FDR, JFK, Eisenhower, or any of the more popular heroes. Maybe more so- his job got him a lot dirtier and took more political risk to confront.
at 17:08 on June 11th, 2012
Batvette,
McCarthyism was an intense form of COINTELPRO. Communists were one of many groups that faced COINTELPRO. The enemies of Washington face the same tactics whether they are communists in the 1950's, Native Americans and blacks in the 1960's and 1970's, or the ant-war movement today.
The main problem I have with the FBI is that once they identify an enemy, whether it be a Southern Klan or East Coast organized crime, they have no parameters. The history of COINTELPRO, up to the current day with gang stalking, is one of excess. The FBI is willing to sacrifice you, me, our families, our children's children, etc., to fulfill its agenda. No amount of blood or human misery is excessive if they have a target in their sights. Collateral damage is not even an afterthought.
I have to agree with the critics of the FBI in this respect. John Gotti said that he was o.k. with law enforcement as long as they played by the rules, "we do our jobs, they do their jobs". Ward Churchill said he supports law and order, as long as the FBI is bound by it as well.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
laughing@Peacefraud (not verified)at 17:30 on June 11th, 2012
John Gotti said he was ok with the law as long as it was the law playing by those rules. Not that he or the mafia would reciprocate. Obviously Peacefrog appreciates the double standard. It excludes him from the expectations he has placed on others to meet. Personally I believe in the old proverbial, set a thief to catch a thief. It balances the old German proverb -When the thief is seen stealing, he says he is joking; but when the thief is not seen, he steals. Having police who are equally proficient in such matters I'm afraid is a necessary evil. To think otherwise is an idealism nose diving into the earth from 10,000 feet. Crime and the criminal are syndicated, and far too sophisticated to hold any romantic notion of fair play in stopping their constant egress.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
commenting anonymously (not verified)at 03:48 on June 12th, 2012
The world according to batvette: "we have a small number of DHS affiliated private snitches in some parts of communities, that make contact with people they are told to watch." >>>>> It all started long before there ever was a Department of Homeland Security. And no. And the numbers and entities involved don't comport with your limited, personal observation. Unless you have another agenda.............. More of batvette's "wisdom": "It does not make sense and you could accomplish the same effect without them with a good psy ops effort which leaves almost zero liability of human leaks.">>>>>Psst, buddy. There's already a "good psy ops effort" in play all across this county... without any leaks. Anyone who tries to leak this dirty business is smeared and marginalized. Anyone who is a target and reports to the police is labelled "delusional."
- Sign In or Join to post comments
What???? (not verified)at 09:16 on June 11th, 2012
What in the hell are you talking about laughing@whomever? You're quite the loon! (And no, I'm not PeaceFrog. Nor am I a sock puppet. But keep on spouting your nonsense.) By the by, Michael Tippett thinks enough of some of PeaceFrog's stories that he's following and posting about them.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
laughing@Peacefrog (not verified)at 09:58 on June 11th, 2012
wow. Good for you Peacefrog. getting all that attention from Tippett, public praise, money, for selling out stalking victims and insuring that their credibility now hangs as a pawn to your anti- government conspiracy. yep, the victims of stalking will go home tonight and celebrate knowing the greatness of Peacefrogs conspiracy agenda has them covered and justice is imminent. LOL.
at 10:23 on June 11th, 2012
laughing_fool
Yeah. Publishing FOIA documents, getting a former FBI Section Chief on the record in federal court, having the founder of NowPublic friendfeed 3 of my articles-I'm really trying to keep a lid on this one!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
at 10:36 on June 11th, 2012
you can fool some of the people.... you know the rest.
if anyone of import is currently promoting your swirling s h i t storm of contradictory disinfo, it's because like you'd expect of important people, they only had time to glance at the cover of your book.
Won't take long till someone reads it and shows them its errors.
As for this:
getting a former FBI Section Chief on the record in federal court,
And the record stated by the federal court is that you are a f u c k ing idiot for thinking you had something there. What kind of attorney trumpets the cases he's lost spectacularly? It only appears like your agenda is egotistical self promotion and NOT progress for TIs. "Hey' TI community, I'm your messiah, look at all I've done for you!".
It's sad so many are so gullible or crazy they only hear what they want to hear. Or maybe this corner of the internet IS that isolated and a meat puppet makes you look like you have droves of supporters...
at 10:46 on June 11th, 2012
Batvette, (August 16, 2009)
This is a message to the perps in their pickup trucks who like to bright my house, to the neighbors who joined gov't snitch programs, to the members of community steering groups we believe finger us for a slow death sentance, and the architects of this whole concept.
You're haters. It's that simple. You are the enemy of America, and will only cause terrorism against the country to increase, because the world always looked up to us for one fundamental reason: The US Constitution, and the Bill of Rights. In fact when I enlisted in the military, the first line of the oath states "I swear to defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic". By denying people due process, by committing acts of punishment clearly cruel and unusual, and picking individuals who are feared for their history of speaking out against abuses of authority, YOU endanger that document and what it stands for.
If we're dirtbags, if we're scum you need to put down... what does that make you for having no greater purpose in life but to spend time watching us? A step beneath us, that's for sure. You probably wanted to do this because you see America's future, your hopes, your dreams, slipping away, and wanted to contribute something to your community after 9/11. Fight them terrorists, huh Sparky?
Well there aren't any homegrown terrorists, unless you count yourselves. The DHS filed over 800,000 criminal cases from 2004-2007, and just 12 of them, or .0015% were related to terrorism. It's all a big scam, you're a participant in a command and control scheme, the architects of which are the same corporate elite who sold off America's patents, copyrights and financial assets (including factories) in the '90's and live behind the walls of gated communities, and need you to be their secret police to prevent wide spread civil unrest as it gets much worse economically.
That's right, you aren't saving America from terrorists, you're the last nails in the coffin. You aren't better than us, it's quite the opposite- you could be counted on to follow orders and not question whether they were right or wrong. You aren't the type to take it all in and see the big picture that isn't usually shown to the people. You do your job well because you lack a solid moral compass, are of below average intelligence, and easily fall for faulty ideological mantras.
Above all, you are too timid to stand up and challenge authority when it needs to be challenged. You need to join a group of other like minded twits to indulge your desire to bully and control people, need "empowerment and adventure" (Thanks, Mark Rich) because you can't get it on your own initiative, or need the numbers of a gang to intimidate others. A complete morally decrepit, dimwitted, cowardly pathetic wretch. It takes what, 50, 100 of you to keep one TI down? I'd call that a mismatch. In our favor.
Better than us? Hardly, fact is you are a sociopath. A psychopath, even. What other kind of person would sit in his pickup like you do, in a dark, cold parking lot at night, hoping the target might pop out so you might have the opportunity to drive at him and intimidate him with your headlights? One could even theorize all of this wasn't designed to get rid of us, but use us to keep you busy and focused in life- otherwise you might be torturing small animals, cruising the playgrounds looking for five year olds, and if you weren't parked out there waiting for me it might be outside of your ex wife, girlfriend, or the loan officer who repo'd your ice cream truck.
You may cause my demise, I can't seem to stop that. I've made my situation worse with defiance but I have no regrets as I feel an obligation to obstruct and occupy you as much as humanly possible like a prisoner of war must try to be a pain in the ass to his enemy captors. This delays you introducing your evil activities to the next target, or an existing one will have less of you to apply to their life that day. I will defy you to the end, even as your fascist jackboot crushes my skull to the ground, as it will have my teeth marks in it.
And you and yours, despite your feigned attitudes of disgust as you rid your neighborhoods of another "undesirable" from your midst, will be too dense to recognize the subconscious feelings of envy that you'd been born with as much courage, intestinal fortitude and love for humanity in your whole body as each of us has in a finger. You deserve to live in the world you are creating, one of hatred, conformity, suspicion, and mediocrity, if you are indicative of it maybe it's best to leave it.
I just have one thing left- when they trained you people to do this, which of these came first in the program- was it the castration... or the lobotomy?
http://my.nowpublic.com/world/gangstalking-tis-targeted-individuals-manifesto#ixzz1xUXeCE1N
THERE ARE TWO POSSIBILITIES FOR YOUR "CHANGE OF HEART" (1) YOU CAVED IN AND JOINED THE PERPS, OR, (2) YOU ARE WORKING FOR THE GOVERNMENT.
I ASK ANY READER TO READ WHAT YOU WERE WRITING AND COMMENTING IN 2009 AND COMPARE IT TO TODAY, AND IF HE OR SHE HAS HALF OF A BRAIN THEY WILL COME TO THE SAME CONCLUSION.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
laughing@Peacefrog (not verified)at 11:21 on June 11th, 2012
How come it always has to be those same two possibilities. How come your philosophy never allows for personal growth. Reconsideration. Maturity. The weight of evidence. It's always either people must be a perp or your sockpuppet bitch. Certainly leaves a lot of people at the mercy of both perps and anti-government conspiracy theorists.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
laughing@thecoverup (not verified)at 11:45 on June 11th, 2012
re: batvette's "CHANGE OF HEART".
All part of the plan, Peacefrog. All part of the plan.