Gang Stalking: Wikipedia's Agent Provocateurs & Cyber trolls

Previous comment was posted in error.  Sorry

Some government agencies appear to be moving documents to private contractors in order "to avoid disclosure under FOIA."  Not a surprise....www.democracynow.org/2012/7/17/spying_on_scientists_how_the_fda ......."And we think that that—that the agency used this contractor because we have this FOIA lawsuit, and we fear that they were moving documents into the possession of a contractor to avoid disclosure under FOIA. They could claim, "Oh, we don’t have the documents.""  --Attorney Stephen KohnSpying on Scientists: How the FDA Monitored Whistleblowers Who Raised Concerns over Radiation----------------AMY GOODMAN: Found by one of the scientists just looking for whether the reputations of scientists had been—he was just googling names of people he knew, and he found this massive database?------------------ STEPHEN KOHN: Well, what actually—yeah, what actually happened, this scientist was looking at him or herself. They were in the process of a major job interview and just wanted to know, if their prospective employer was looking them up online, what would they find. And voilà, this scientist found all those documents. And believe me, he or she nearly had a heart attack. It’s like, "Oh, my god! Look what’s out there about me." It’s all the private emails.------------------- AMY GOODMAN: And the FDA says it was a contractor that was working for the FDA that posted these, what, 80,000 documents that show how an agency monitors, spies on, launches a massive surveillance campaign on its employees, and then took it down.--------------------------- STEPHEN KOHN: Yeah. And we think that that—that the agency used this contractor because we have this FOIA lawsuit, and we fear that they were moving documents into the possession of a contractor to avoid disclosure under FOIA. They could claim, "Oh, we don’t have the documents." They’ve been fighting us for two years on the production of some of these materials. So I don’t think the movement of these thousands of pages from government possession to a private contractor—it was not accidental, and it was not done with a good intent.------------------- AMY GOODMAN: Stephen Kohn, I want to thank you for being with us, attorney for the FDA whistleblowers and executive director of the National Whistleblowers Center. Of course, we will continue to follow this case

GS is a slow-kill, torture program that's operational right here in the US of A.  Some of the program's activities are taking place in plain sight, but beneath the radar of anyone who might be in a position to help.

Tim Shorrock's "America under surveillance" from Aug. 2007: " Granted new power to spy inside the U.S.,  the Bush administration may be doing more than eavesdropping on phone  calls -- it could be watching suspects' every move."  www.salon.com/2007/08/09/domestic_surveillance/

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0in; mso-para-margin-right:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0in; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;}  IMHO, the gov, after Virginia Tech, decided to target, en masse, those that they want to paint as "crazy" and therefore, in the eyes of the gov, capable of violence -- anyone that they believe could "snap", given the right circumstances.  (I think that many of those who have been deemed "unstable" have been on the government's radar for decades.)  After Virginia Tech, the gov went nuts, targeting anyone and everyone who fit a certain profile, which conveniently includes whistleblowers and anyone else that the government wants to marginalize and/or destroy -- perhaps someone who is simply disliked by someone with a little power/clout.  They're able to coerce neighbors, and others who normally wouldn't participate, by telling them that victims need to be watched because they are potentially violent and need treatment for mental illness.  One of the goals, is to get people into the mental health system so that they can be forcibly medicated, officially monitored, and completely marginalized.  GS gives the gov a mechanism to put people out-of-circulation, so to speak, and provides the constant monitoring that is required (in the view of the architects of this program) to keep America safe from "the nuts", as well as anyone else that they want people to think is "nuts."  But the trouble is, they need people to continue to act out violently from time to time "to keep fear alive" and provide ongoing justification for their "program" -- the one that victims call GS.  So the program does double-duty:  It radicalizes and creates people who may "act out" violently, while at the same time, trying to identify people who may be violent --  it's quite the ugly game.  The mentally ill are largely "of no consequence whatsoever" in America.  "Better off without them" is the feeling of many.  And they're the perfect victims because they're not to be believed.

Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0in; mso-para-margin-right:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0in; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} Normal 0 false false false EN-US X-NONE X-NONE /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0in; mso-para-margin-right:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0in; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} IMO, the government, in the aftermath of Virginia Tech, decided to target, en masse, those who are "crazy" (and those it wants to simply paint as "crazy), and therefore, in the eyes of the gov, those who are capable of violence.  The government is targeting anyone that they believe could "snap", given the right circumstances.  (I think that many of those who have been deemed "unstable" and/or undesirable have been on the government's radar for decades.)  After Virginia Tech, the gov went nuts, targeting anyone and everyone who fit a certain profile, which conveniently includes whistleblowers, “undesirables”, and anyone else that the government wants to marginalize and/or destroy.  They're able to coerce neighbors, and others who normally wouldn't participate, by telling them that victims need to be watched because they are potentially violent and need treatment for mental illness.  One of the goals of “the program”, is to get people into the mental health system, so that they can be forcibly medicated, monitored, and completely marginalized.  GS gives the gov a mechanism to put people out-of-circulation, so-to-speak, and provides the constant monitoring that is required to keep America safe from "the nuts", as well as anyone else that they want people to think is "nuts."  But the trouble is, they need people to continue to act out violently because, then, they will be able to further justify their "program" -- the one that victims call GS.  So the program does double-duty:  It radicalizes and creates people who may "act out" violently, while at the same time, tries to identify people who are hard-wired for violence (in their eyes) -- it's quite the ugly game.  The mentally ill are largely "of no consequence whatsoever" in America.  "Better off without them" is the feeling of many.  And they're the perfect victims because they're not to be believed, and most of them are vulnerable.  (The thugs, goons, and criminals “employed” by the program are “put to good use”, in the eyes of those who designed this program – they also need to be watched and controlled.  What better way to do it?  Make them think that they have a purpose, as the eyes, ears, and hands of the state.   In doing so, the government is able to keep some of them occupied and out of trouble (or so they believe).)

IMO, the government, in the aftermath of Virginia Tech, decided to target, en masse, those who are "crazy" (and those it wants to simply paint as "crazy), and therefore, in the eyes of the gov, those who are capable of violence.  The government is targeting anyone that they believe could "snap", given the right circumstances.  (I think that many of those who have been deemed "unstable" and/or undesirable have been on the government's radar for decades.)  After Virginia Tech, the gov went nuts, targeting anyone and everyone who fit a certain profile, which conveniently includes whistleblowers, “undesirables”, and anyone else that the government wants to marginalize and/or destroy.  They're able to coerce neighbors, and others who normally wouldn't participate, by telling them that victims need to be watched because they are potentially violent and need treatment for mental illness.  One of the goals of “the program”, is to get people into the mental health system, so that they can be forcibly medicated, monitored, and completely marginalized.  GS gives the gov a mechanism to put people out-of-circulation, so-to-speak, and provides the constant monitoring that is required to keep America safe from "the nuts", as well as anyone else that they want people to think is "nuts."  But the trouble is, they need people to continue to act out violently because, then, they will be able to further justify their "program" -- the one that victims call GS.  So the program does double-duty:  It radicalizes and creates people who may "act out" violently, while at the same time, tries to identify people who are hard-wired for violence (in their eyes) -- it's quite the ugly game.  The mentally ill are largely "of no consequence whatsoever" in America.  "Better off without them" is the feeling of many.  And they're the perfect victims because they're not to be believed, and most of them are vulnerable.  (The thugs, goons, and criminals “employed” by the program are “put to good use”, in the eyes of those who designed this program – they also need to be watched and controlled.  What better way to do it?  Make them think that they have a purpose, as the eyes, ears, and hands of the state.   In doing so, the government is able to keep some of them occupied and out of trouble (or so they believe).)  (Sorry about the repetition.)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Batvette#Deletion_review_for_Gang_Stalking  (Read it all and you'll get a pretty good idea what this guy "batvette" is all about.)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Batvette#Deletion_review_for_Gang_Stalking  (Take a good look at the batvette "makeover" -- he was for inclusion of GS on the stalking page before he "saw the light" and decided that its inclusion (even in what was a benign way) was not for the greater good.  He's the decider.  And he's "right", by god.  (He also has no problem discrediting victims, if it suits his purpose.  Let me find that quote that's been posted again and again.  It shows batvette's true colors so very well.)

Gang-stalking 101,

One thing that one must first try and realize is with some gang stalking victims reported examples such as.."jangling keys, wearing red shirts, or leaving lawn mowers on their lawns"  how that might possibly have been in someway playing into a victims thoughts and psyche making them believe that because of those suggested examples, that they are indeed being harassed and gangstalked. That this would come only after repeated and long term exposure to specific signature gangstalking psychological sensitization methods. That's why the actual 'psychological sensitization component' within gangstalking is such an important factor and method used and implemented; to manipulate and effect gangstalking victims minds, logic, and emotional spirit. To amplify it psychological effect and control over targeted victims.

As a possible example, let me suggest what one 'gangstalking victim' might have experienced from actual gangstalking technics that would lead to them to believe in the examples you've suggested.

Lets take the red shirt for example..

Specific gangstalking directed towards a victim can be very similar to this..

On lets say specific days of the week a targeted individual might be exposed to repeated individuals walking by them in an unusual large numbers all wearing red shirts. This may only seem a bit odd if it happens once, but lets say the victim is exposed to this activity every monday, wed, friday, for three months straight wherever they might be or go. This is specifically to cause and create the victims attention, and more importantly purposely'sensitize' the gangstalked victim to this activity. Now let us say this activity suddenly stops, but a week later this gangstalked victim sees three people together wearing red shirts. Because of the sensitization to this victim, the victim may assume whether correctly or not that these individuals might be perpetrators purposely there to stalk, annoy, or actually psychologically effect and demean the victim. This type of situation is purposely repeated hundreds of times on victims until the victim knows or realizes they are being targeted; even though any casual observer specifically won't notice anything odd or out or the ordinary. This is of course by design to keep the gangstalking going on without being noticed by anyone else. Yet the victim would be fully and quite purposely aware that they are being stalked and continually followed and harassed. In the end you could substitute multiple people jiggling keys specifically in some other similar gangstalking example, or understand after some repeated scenario with lawn movers how and why this type of 'repeated method sensitization' is so important and purposely used to create in victims minds and psyche the illusion, whether real, accurate or not in each perceived incidence, that the victim is being gangstalked. This of course is by design. Gangstalking technics work when victims have become so sensitized to these street theater events that they believe, whether real or not, that each continued event or incidence is happening to them, and that they are being gangstalked.

Gang-stalking can be and is as much a psychological disturbing experience, as much as it is some physical (street theater) event_to victims of it. If exposed, gang-stalking would be considered a malicious and human rights attack on victims with multiple constitutional violations. It would be considered illegal on multiple levels of physical, emotional and mental cruelity laws, including specific constitutional freedom, privacy, and hate crime law violations. I'm sure PeaceFrog could clarify, elaborate, and define illegal aspects to these activities.