Gang Stalking: Workplace Mobbing and the NJ Pathmark Shootings

The saddest part is that there are those in government who do not want to go along with the nazis.  They are a minority, because if eighty percent of the public goes along, then so does eighty percent of the government.  These people are in a terrible situation.  They get vitrium from us by the boatload for being in the government, and they get stomped on by their superiors for not giving a salute with a convincing enough stiff arm.  They end up leaving under the pressure, which ultimately will make the government 100 percent nazi.  It reminds me of the book "Gestapo," (written in 1956) wherein the Gestapo slowly purged the old Wiemar cops, who were described as "climbing up the back stairs of their precinct offices with their backs to the walls, and their guns out, always looking up and down the stairwell shaft for muzzles pointed over the bannister at them."  That's how it is for any of the good people remaining in government.  About all we can do is pray.

I'm sure there are competing "visions" of the concept of the New World Order.  One is just as bogus as the next.  The "Western" version of NWO seems to be centered around the "Cabal of Twenty Five," as (potentially) indicated by wiki-leaks intercepts. The Chinese ordinarily would be expected to have their own vision (communistic), excepting that their society has morphed into something with many fascist-like tentacles due to their massive industrialization and the attendant rise of pseudo-business power forms inside the context of Chinese communism.  As the west turns towards a more overt form of fascism - China tags along - as a matter of business self-interest.  It is unsurprising then, to find them on the list of "Twenty Five."   Russia may very well have its own "vision" for this, and there may be other minor designs.  They are all bogus visions - every one.  The concept of an NWO global society is bogus and it doesn't matter who runs it.  The only thing that keeps us free in this world is the concept of the nation state, and the existence of enough of those so as to always have "somewhere to run to."  No single governmental body will ever remain benevolent,  and the rise of singleton power will absolutely guarantee oppression  from which it is impossible to escape.  The NWO people are brained washed into a communal mental fantasy, sitting in circles and chanting "Ulmmmmmm Ulmmmmmm Oneness ... We are the oneness."  They are so manipulated in this realm, that it seems the will-kill drug absolutely must be in most public water supplies.     The nation state does provide the precept for war, which the NWO visions claim will be eliminated.  It is not war that is the necessary alignment of the nation state with freedom.  It is simply the potential for it.   Peace is possible under the rubric of cooperating nation states - and true freedom is impossible under the banner of any vision of the NWO.

I look to several key areas when I think about what defines "totalitarianism" or "authoritarianism" or "dictatorship" or "fascism".  One question that I ask myself is "Does the government of country X respect the sanctity of the home?"  I ask myself, "In country X, does the government of country X consider the home to be the individual's castle and rightful refuge from the outside world, or instead a livestock bin fully open to inspection and interogation at any time?"  Then I ask, "Does country X have a noble sounding constitution that is regularly disregarded?"  And, "Do they have noble sounding clauses in said constitution that supposedly protect all individuals from government harassment, but that are effectively nullified by the use of a disingenuous tactic that involves inducting eight out of ten people into an unofficial arm of the government?"  Further, I ask myself,  "Do they deny this connection in order to sidestep *any* protection of an individual's rights by the implementation of such a deceitful manuever?"   I have barely touched the surface, but I don't really think it's necessary to go much further.  I have answer most of these questions already, for country X.  It's time to leave people.  Save yourselves.  Save your families. 

Really concerned about PF here.  Does anyone know him well enough to check on him? Pretty out of character for him not to post for nine days.  Even on vacation - he would be posting, I think.

Frogman! Welcome Back!

Are you familiar with this theory about "crowd psychology"?

"The main idea of Sigmund Freud's crowd behavior theory is that people who are in a crowd act differently towards people from those who are thinking individually. The minds of the group would merge to form a way of thinking. Each member's enthusiasm would be increased as a result, and one becomes less aware of the true nature of one's actions."

Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crowd_psychology#Classical_theories

Might such a theory tend to suggest that flash mobsters comprise the segment of the population who are susceptible to psychic driving?

Of interest: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychic_driving

Also of interest:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink

I've enjoyed reading yours and others posts on the subject of gangstalking.

What is the psychological profile of a gangstalker?

Is it a person who has a problem but they don't want to talk about it?

Is such a person even able to see that they have a problem?

Is it an unwillingness or inability to acknowledge truth?