Gang Stalking: Workplace Mobbing and the NJ Pathmark Shootings

by PeaceFrog | September 2, 2012 at 05:48 am
1568 views | 15 Recommendations | 80 comments

      Terence Tyler, 23, a former Marine, with a history of depression, went on a shooting spree at a NJ Pathmark where he had worked for only a few weeks. The murder-suicide left himself and two co-workers dead.

     Gang stalking victims are aware of workplace mobbing. This has been confirmed by the author through police records:

 Candice Nguyen from KION is doing a story ion this phenomenon called "Gang

Stalking". It has nothing to do with "gangs", rather it is a form of cyberbullying. The intent is a psychological impact and socially ostresizing the

targeted person. With tools available to track someone (Facebook, Twitter,

Linkedin, etc) it has made people more vulnerable to this. It has

implications to workplace violence, love relationships gone bad, etc. I told

Candice it is like Mean Girls or cyber-bullying on steroids.
http://www.stopos.info/lt-richard-pub-rec-request.pdf

     The fact is that workplace violence is an epidemic in this country. It affects countless thousands of gang stalking victims. It also affects an even larger population of persons who make complaints against their employers internally to the company personnel department, or, to a government agency. There is a direct causal relationship between workplace mobbing, known as a "hostile work environment" in employment litigation, and, workplace violence. For public safety reasons, some jurisdictions, including Scotland, have made workplace mobbing a criminal offense:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobbing#Mobbing_in_the_workplace

     Lets take a look at what young Terence Tyler Tweeted regarding his work experiences:
“Is it normal to want to kill ALL of ur coworkers?” Tyler wrote in one chilling 2009 tweet. “Maybe but I’m actually in a position where I can.”

“I’m starting to see why plp go on killin sprees. . . . Because these mothaf------ are reeeeeeally pushin my ‘kill everyone I see button,’ ” he wrote on Oct. 7, 2009.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/crime/pathmark-shooter-terence-tyler-tweeted-killing-spree-years-gunned-coworkers-article-1.1149573
     Was the tragedy at the the NJ Pathmark the result of a depressive loner with a lack of coping abilities? Was it a case of workplace mobbing, or, even, gang stalking? A combination of both? The issue of wokplace mobbing was ignored in the Yvonne Hiller Kraft shootings a few years back, even though all the warnings signs related to workplace mobbing were clear to see from the published facts.
     I spoke with former FBI agent Jim Abbott about my experiences with gang stalking and workplace mobbing circa 1996. A former girlfriend of mine was taking an organized crime class that he was teaching at St. John's University at the time. One thing I clearly remember him saying was that, "the FBI does not handle blacklisting cases". Of course, the FBI did take some interest in other aspects of my story at a later time,but, for their interests, certainly not mine.
     With 1 in 4 workers subjected to workplace mobbing in this country, it is not a stretch to believe that Tyler very well may have experienced it. If he was a gang stalking victim, then he certainly experienced workplace mobbing.
     There is a growing awareness of gang stalking and workplace mobbing, evidenced by a petition against workplace mobbing signed by nearly 7,700 persons:
http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/protect-us-workers/

     The public will probably never know if Tyler was a victim of workplace mobbing, or, gang stalking. This is because the media will ignore this angle, and largely re-hash the same old talking points. Law enforcement and the business community will also be complicit in the cover-up. 

Suggested reading:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/janice-harper/omar-thornton-shooting_b_917146.html

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
0
eTortureHertz

Looking forward to watching Robert Scheer - From Ramparts to Truthdig tonight

btw: a government appointed dentist drilled out all my expensive tooth colored fillings and refilled them with a dark colored material in two office visits.

0
Iwonderhow

It might be interesting for PF to put up a poll, asking each respondent how they first came to know about Now Public.

0
druggedland

Ask yourself how important you are in the scheme of things, relative to the country and the world.  Now take that idea of "importance" as a quantitative thing, and consider its measure against the fact that you are dog-tracked 24/7/365, and that almost nothing you do escapes the observations of the surveillance network.  How could a drug network operate?  How could a drug network distribute hundreds of billions of dollars worth of cocaine?  It couldn't.   Isn't it a pretty simple, logical thing to conceive?  It couldn't - there's no feasible way at all.  What it means is that the government works hand-in-hand with the drug cartels.  Doesn't it?  Think about it.

0
druggedland

In my mind, it seems that the government must make a killing by its oversight of the drug network, and the timely "look the other way" positions it takes.   It seems it must cooperate with - if not coordinate - the drug network.  What would be the best way to save lives and interrupt this revenue stream?  Legalize cocaine.

0
eTortureHertz

Isn't it interesting that:
In the "scheme of things"
Our Creator has chosen to
Give us seperate bodies?

0
eTortureHertz

Yet one wellspring of water?

And abrasive sand and agitation for scrubbing it clean again.

0
druggedland

Why don't they legalize cocaine?  Well - one reason is that a politician probably couldn't survive the sponsorship of such a bill.  Not because the public would find his stance immoral.  No, he would be killed either by government or by the cartels - because the price of drugs would plummet - and so would the profit.  Some estimate the price would drop by fifty times for cocaine.  It would be like the stock market crash.

0
druggedland

Here's another one for you to munch on:  what are we doing in Afghanistan? You know - that little country that is the world's main source of heroine?  Hmmmm.... our "war" hasn't seemed to stem the tide .... has it?  Think about it.

0
druggedland

Those of us who are on the receiving end of the spear tips of the "Cabal of Twenty FIve" surveillance network have a very unique perspective.  We "know" just how perverse (and pervasive) the surveillance network is, and so we can formulate such logical derivations as were shown in the previous posts.  Amazingly, the people who have joined up with the cell-phone snitch network never really take the time to think about it.  Do they?  Yet - based on what they are "fed" about us, they *must* know the surveillance is end-to-end, coast-to-coast.  Or do they not comprehend?

0
eTortureHertz

I was always under the impression that the justification for "programming" uniformed soldiers in boot camp and A-school was so that, if they were required to come to the defense of the nation, they would not hesitate or "take the time to think about it".

There was always a distinction in my mind between enlisted men, special forces, and mercenaries.

Of interest: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercenary
Of interest: history.army.mil/html/faq/oaths.html

Protecting and defending the U.S. Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic puts me in mind of the war games portrayed in the film "The Dirty Dozen" where "our boys" switched arm bands.

Here is an interesting quote from the film:
imdb.com/title/tt0061578/quotes?qt0394850

0
gigijoe

" ... if they were required to come to the defense of the nation, they would not hesitate or "take the time to think about ..."  Well - that's also the reason they draft eighteen year olds.

0
observer102

Most of the people who write their comments here are psy/op trolls.  At most, ten percent of the people who frequent these pages are legit in any manner.  Regardless of that, it's possible to pay close attention to our senses and to get some feeling for who comes here, based on the writing.   Generally - we're an older crowd.   This comes through in references to service tours, and the citing of historical information that the youngins are simply not taught anymore.  So, who are we?  We're the incorrigible old guys who don't buy the brainwash, because we still have the free spirit of the middle of the last century in our bloodstreams.  Maybe we are, in addition to "free spirits," a little more immune to the effects of sodium fluoride and whatever else they are using to control the masses.  We are a serious minority, and an aging one.  Really, if 75 percent of the country has voted for eternal slavery, maybe that's what they should have.  We should all pick up and re-retire to another country.  For a sense of what we feel in our bloodstreams, I direct the youngins to a song from 1969.  Look it up, the lyrics are online.  It's one by Steppenwolf, and it's called "Monster"  

0
eTortureHertz

If an "audience" is "viewing" some "behavior"

Let's take an activity that involves some level of athleticism

It could be sports, dancing, horse racing, whatever

The "gamblers" in the audience do not know that their "horse" is on drugs

The "officials" in the audience do not know that the "horse" has been drugged

Only the "horse", the "trainer", and the spiritual realm know about it

"Naturally", the "enhanced" horse wins the race (but not too big)

The track officials, the trainer (and staff), and some "lucky" gamblers get paid

Eventually, some gamblers and officials get wise to the fix

But instead of using the intelligence report to help the horse

They use their new found leverage to get an even bigger pay day

Imagine if you could shoot the Quarterback with an invisible beam?

0
anonb

I have no doubt that the entire arena of "wagering" is "fixed" wordwide.  This is for reasons of the technology and other reasons.  I think the same of state lotteries.  

2
Guppie

I truly believe that the government is trying to start a small scale revolt that it can squash with ease.  The surveillance system would be cause for an almost total obliteration of any such rebellion, and while a revolt would normally be crushed almost instantaneously by the surveillance -- it would be allowed to go on for awhile (for show).

  • Our founders warned us against the accumulation of such power.  
  • They fought for a relatively free Republic, handed it to us, and said, "keep it, if you can."  The "if you can" part was Jefferson's - because he probably foresaw that the "take it for granted folks" who would almost surely come down-the-way would lose the freedom.
  • One significant thing they are doing follows the "divide-and-conquer" mechanism  (the setting of one part of society against the other).  These days, the "powers that be" are splitting the country into two halves (those with college and without), intentionally creating a sort of caste system.   It's about a sixty-forty split now,  in favor of the "no college" group.   While there is no law that prevents those in the "no college" group from owning businesses (outside of law and medicine), they have set the controlled cell-phone-drone network against people without college who try to attempt to start businesses. 
  • They make some small accommodation for the "handyman" class of work.
  • Today, Steve Jobs and Bill Gates and Larry Eliot wound have no chance at all.  We would not have Apple, nor Microsoft, nor Oracle.  The cell-phone stalkers would see to that. 
0
PeaceFrog

http://www.propagandamatrix.com/diocletian.html










0
Guppie

Actually, Ellison attended a semester or two, and so did Jobs and Gates.  Regardless --  If they were starting out today - they would be on this forum posting messages.

0
Guppie

So, I have no record, no parking ticket, and I look fairly benign - in my opinion.  I'm certainly not a pedophile.

  • As I took my walk, some miles from my home, I followed the curves of a busy street, brightly lit by the mid-day sunshine,  A thirteen year old girl  (IMHO she was about thirteen, plus or minus a little)  approached me on the walk, coming from the opposite direction.  There were others nearby, so the street seemed pretty safe, including for her.
  • She smiled at me and waved as she approached.  In addition to that, she held her cell phone camera out in front, pointing it at my face as the distance closed between us.
  • She passed, walked a few paces more, and turned.  "Long live the People's Court!" she exclaimed, and then proceeded on down the street, throwing a childish laugh over her shoulder as she went.
0
WowPublic

Human trafficking is not a business model, it is a crime...

A global movement was sparked, with the Trafficking Victims Protection Act -- signed by President Clinton and carried on by President Bush.

But for all the progress that we’ve made, the bitter truth is that trafficking also goes on right here, in the United States.

First, we’re going to do more to spot it and stop it. We’ll prepare a new assessment of human trafficking in the United States so we better understand the scope and scale of the problem. We’ll strengthen training, so investigators and law enforcement are even better equipped to take action -- and treat victims as victims, not as criminals.

whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/09/25/remarks-president-clinton-global-initiative

0
batvette

LOL, and if you'd have pulled out your own camera and filmed it you could  have either uploaded it to youtube  (look how easy it is! 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=retSkKYZ8KM   )


Or gone home and watched it and realized it was nothing and she was just being goofy. 

But it does seem like freaking ourselves out is far more appealing than calming down and rationalizing things. You have no idea what she meant by that and are only projecting a profoundness based upon a scenario of your own fabrtication- that wherever you are there are people with nothing better to do than persecute you for things they have been falsely told you have done. 

Hell of a way to destroy yourself. You're so consumed with apprehension it seems you're doing just that:

throwing a childish laugh over her shoulder as she went.

She's a 13 year old girl for heaven's sake. You were expecting a laugh like Andre the Giant? 



What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Anonymous
First Flagged at 5:52 AM, Sep 2, 2012 by Anonymous (not verified)

Related Stories

Recommendations (15)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from