Gap factory danger to African children, Capitalism unabridged

by The_Cynic | August 1, 2009 at 07:32 pm
237 views | 24 Recommendations | 5 comments

Following on from my: Capitalism isn't such a nice thing we have this story.

A factory that makes jeans for Gap and Levi Strauss is illegally dumping chemical waste in a river and two unsecured tips where it poses a hazard to children.

The scandal was uncovered by a Sunday Times investigation into pollution caused by a plant in Lesotho, southern Africa, which supplies denim to the two companies


Now we see that even the most ardent advocate of the capitalist system will have a say about how capitalism promotes wealth - but at what expense?

It does, as we see, give wealth to those who are abjectively poor, the pay for those who work in these factories must be immense - in comparison to living off of an income which is zero.

Yet we see - again, the pursuit of profit is the motivator of the capitalist - and the gigantic companies that Gap and Levi Strauss - plus many more.

The move away from China has begun - American and those of other nations need to the poor to produce - yet those companies do not care who they harm in their incessant pursuit of profit. This is the worst kind of out-sourcing, and yet we ask for a product to be as cheap as possible.

Is human life and human health worth our cheapness?

Seems it is so.

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
1
Uwe Paschen

Good posting. Do not Buy name brands!! 

2
Uwe Paschen

At least it would be a start and help.

3
Rory Cripps

Anything to make a buck! And unfortunately there are many that see nothing wrong with that . . . .

0
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

Maybe many forget that the Communist regime in the former Soviet Union produced products for the sake of producing them.  Fertilizer comes to mind, which the peasants used to dump in the river, because nobody needed it.

The fact that companies are greedy and consumers look for cheap products is the problem not capitalism.  That's why companies like Walmart do well.  They were the first with a foot on the ground in China.  We ignored for decades what Walmart did to market cheap products. 

Would you agree that the countries that allow these companies to exploit their population have to take some of the blame as well?  I would suggest that this exploitation happens because the governments that allow those companies in, without decent standards, have to carry some of the burden.

I still maintain a mix of socialism and capitalism is the best balance.  Each system  on its own exploits populations.  Each of those societies will have elites that will ignore the masses.

2
The_Cynic

We can go around and around the same may pole, ACP, but what the world knows is that the USSR wasn't a communist country.

Totalitarian, evil even, but not communist.

My highlighting this is to, broadly, agree with you, countries need to take some, if not a lot of the blame. IF this and these actions were not allowed then there would still be a lot more manufacturing jobs in the US etc.

Yet I disagree with you that it isn't capitalisms fault, capitalism has created this market and wants to keep generating the profit from it.

This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from