Gay adovocate on Maine Question defends public school teaching

by smkovalinsky | October 26, 2009 at 07:16 am
281 views | 27 Recommendations | 4 comments

Photos

Gay activist John Corvino

Gay activist John Corvino

see larger image

uploaded by smkovalinsky

One of the most hotly debated topics swirling around the Question One vote in the state of Maine,  is whether the legalization of gay marriage will lead to its being taught in public schools.  

Many or most gay advocates there have insisted that voting No on Question One  -  which is the progay vote on that referendum  -  will in no way bear on its being advocated within the public school system in the state.  

But one gay advocate is taking it upon himself to admit that yes,  it will,  and goes on to argue that no one has any cause to fear that step.  Of course,  predictably,  conservative family groups are already citing his essay as a reason to vote Yes on Question One (which is the anti-gay vote).  

John Corvino,  the gay advocate speaking out on the impending November referendum vote in Maine,  argues that the teaching of diversity to US children is a good thing.  He claims that there is no way to recruit children into becoming homosexual,  and that tolerance is the only goal of the so-called "gay agenda".  Corvino further points out that there is a small chance that those opposed to gay marriage,  and vehemently against tolerance for it being taught to school children,  may be unaware that their own child is gay and stands in need of such tolerance,  if not now, then certainly in the future.  

As stated above,  Corvino's OpEd piece is already appearing on some conservative websites as proof that the "agenda"  must be stopped in its tracts.  Disbelieving his assertions,  they point to his words as further proof that something very dubious is occurring around the referendum vote.

Using Canada as their touchstone,  they go on to cite the many legal battles surrounding Canadian clergy who refuse to marry same sex couples,  and the problematic issues of religious freedom within schools.  

Gay-marriage opponents claim that we gay folk are trying to influence your children. In one sense, they are quite right.  We are not trying to “recruit” your children, if by that you mean “turn them gay.” As gay people, we understand enough about how sexual orientation works to know that you can’t turn people gay—or straight, for that matter—by some act of will.

Rather, we’re trying to do just what those scary “protect marriage” ads say we’re trying to do. We’re trying to teach them about same-sex marriage. In school.

There—I said it. The secret’s out. The gay agenda has been leaked. Call the Maine Yes-on-1 campaign and tell them there’s new material for Frank Schubert and company to quote out of context.

Meanwhile, let’s talk about that campaign—specifically, the ads warning that if Maine keeps marriage for gays and lesbians, Maine schoolchildren will be taught about homosexual marriage.

Put this way, the claim is extremely misleading. Maine (unlike California, which micromanages everything) does not dictate teaching about marriage. Maine curriculum is controlled locally, and individual schools can teach about same-sex marriage (or not) whether or not Maine has marriage equality.

To put the point another way: just because something’s legal, that doesn’t mean it must be taught in Maine schools (or vice-versa).

But whatever happens with Maine’s Question 1, I want Maine schools to teach about gays getting married. Other states’ schools, too.

Part of my reason for wanting this has nothing whatsoever to do with my support for marriage equality. I also want schools to teach about genocide, and I’m pretty staunchly anti-genocide. Schools are supposed to inform students about what’s happening in the world. For better or worse, same-sex marriage is happening in the world. Even if it is taken away in Maine, it will keep happening elsewhere. Indeed, even if it were somehow eliminated everywhere, it would remain part of our history. Students need to know this.

Of course, when we teach about genocide, we make it clear that genocide is a Very Bad Thing. By contrast, responsible teaching about same-sex marriage would have to acknowledge that it is a controversial thing, with sane and decent people on different sides of the issue.

And that is doubtless one reason why you, dear parent, fear teaching about same-sex marriage in schools. You’d rather that your children not know that there are some sane and decent people who deny that same-sex marriage is a Very Bad Thing. Indeed, that there some who think it is a Perfectly Fine Thing. You want to shelter them from such diversity. I don’t.

I want them to know that there are people with different views on marriage, and that gay people are getting legally married in parts of the United States and elsewhere. I want them to know it because any informed citizen ought to know it. But I also want them to know it because some of them might themselves be gay.

That’s right: there’s a small but statistically significant chance that your child might be gay. Ignoring the issue won’t make it go away. And isolating him from the fact of other gay people won’t make it go away, either. It will just make him…well, isolated.

Now, your child might not be gay, and if that’s so, learning about gay marriage isn’t going to make him gay. Sexual orientation doesn’t work that way. (If it did, I’d be straight.) If your child is straight, he will remain straight, regardless of what happens in Maine, California, Massachusetts and elsewhere.

recommend Add a comment
2
Babel-Fish

Well if gays adopt children the kids will learn anyway, best kids learn such things from a teacher. 

 


2
Spydermonkey

BF,  I know many gay couples that have children (male & female)

Besides,  Most kids know more about sex today at 13 then a baby boomer did when he/she graduated H.S. ..   If you don't believe me ask a teen...


1
sara star

My question is ... Why wouldn't it be discussed in school?

Maybe if it was, it would teach us not to judge, not to be prejudice, and teach us that we are OK in who were are without fear.

0
IMarriedinMass

Thanks for throwing fuel on the fire buddy. Yep, you fueled the fear. Good Job. You and your curriculum helped set us back years. Poor time for speaking to the media about Bobby has two Mommy's. Most people are regular folks with regular households and regular families yet some idiot in a rainbow wig and pants so tight he has camel toe always has to hop in front of the camera to represent the rest of us. My household is devastated. How sad we lost Maine.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
To prevent automated spam submissions leave this field empty.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Babel-Fish
First Flagged at 9:52 AM, Oct 26, 2009 by Babel-Fish
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (27)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from