Gay marriage opponents seek 5-month delay in Calif.

by Rob Peters | May 22, 2008 at 06:11 pm | 217 views | 2 comments | 10 recommendations

The recent California Supreme Court decision to allow gay marriage has already hit a speed bump. A conservative legal group is asking the court to delay its decision until an upcoming vote on the state constitution.

SAN FRANCISCO - A conservative legal group asked the California Supreme Court on Thursday to put off finalization of its decision legalizing same-sex marriage until voters got a chance to weigh in.

The Arizona-based Alliance Defense Fund wants the ruling stayed until November, when voters will probably encounter a ballot measure that would amend the state constitution to ban gay marriage. That amendment would overturn the justices' ruling.

In court papers submitted late Thursday, the group warned that the state would suffer "great public harm and mischief" if it began allowing same-sex marriages on June 16, when the court's decision would ordinarily become final.

Defense Fund attorneys also said implementing the ruling in the meantime would be an unnecessary expense for the state and cause unneeded confusion for couples.

"Permitting this decision to take effect immediately — in light of the realistic possibility that the people of California might amend their constitution to reaffirm marriage as the union of one man and one woman — risks legal havoc and uncertainty of immeasurable magnitude," the attorneys wrote in the petition.

Many couples started planning weddings and making appointments to secure marriage licenses immediately after the justices overturned the state's gay marriage ban on May 15.

A cloud of uncertainty lingers over the pending unions, however. A coalition of religious and social conservative groups is in the process of putting a measure on the November ballot that would write a gay marriage ban into the state constitution.

Pizer, who is planning an October wedding, said that even if the stay request results in delays, gay and lesbian couples should be heartened by the Supreme Court victory.

"What's critical in all of this is, society generally and those of us who are affected most urgently have to recognize that we have momentous, joyous moments of breakthrough, but the process of social and legal change proceeds step by step," she said.

recommend Add a comment
Rhonda J Mangus
Rhonda J Mangus
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 18:24 on May 22nd, 2008

Rob Peters, I like this story. It's good stuff.

Barry Artiste
Barry Artiste
flagged this story as Good Stuff

at 19:03 on May 22nd, 2008

Rob Peters, I like this story. It's good stuff. You know Rob, I don't see why Law Makers would be opposed to Gay marriage, I mean these guys are lawyers and will make a killing in divorces of gay couples.  As far as I am concerned Gays have every right to be as miserable as any other married couple.

Add a comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

May 22, 2008 at 06:11 pm by Rob Peters, 217 views, 2 comments

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from