NP Rank:
Gaza and Israel, the Frenzy and the Fury
The recent fighting in Gaza has sparked off a plethora of extremely hostile and aggressive article-writing and comment-posting on various western general-interest public news sites, some of which I have visited today.
First of all, it seems that around 70% of articles are anti-Israeli in orientation, and the comments on them appear to be a little more balanced in proportion, with many pro/anti-one-side-or-the-other ‘discussions’, for want of a better word. Fine.
What horrifies me though, is the sheer quantity and exacerbated extremity of the verbal violence and invective used in criticism levelled at Israel and Jews, as well as anyone who dares to speak up in their defence. My opinion on the Gaza issue is known, that is to say that there is blame to be laid on both sides. However, my opinion is not the subject of this post, so therefore nothing in it is designed to deny any wrongdoing on either side.
Violent anti-Muslim sentiment also exists, of course, but it is swamped by the quantity of violent Anti-Jewish rhetoric. That is why I have chosen to concentrate on that alone. I am not Jewish.
Terms commonly used abusively or incorrectly include “mass slaughter, genocide, ethnic cleansing, mass murder, facist, nazi, pogrom, third reich, holocaust, imperialist, barbarism and extermination”, to name but a few. Personal insult and invective is rife, lists of insulting qualifying adjectives instead of information are the norm, accusations of ignorance, stupidity, partiality (partiality?!), lying and sympathy with child-killers are commonplace, laughable ‘proof’ abounds of sometimes imaginary incidents, the misuse, cropping and incorrect naming of images is common, people often find their slanderous comments cut or taken off sites where that’s a policy and, finally, some writers even find themselves with their pages taken down. The atmosphere is nauseous and deleterious.
All of this is no more than intellectual facism and terrorism, and I for one want to call it by its name.
But, strangely enough, these people are the same ones who, when writing or commenting on other conflicts, are often polite, informed, balanced and cultivated in their manner of expression.
So what is it about this conflict that temporarily transforms otherwise sane people into rabid and propaganda-throwing morons?
These writers generally do not use these terms in relation to other conflicts in the world with much higher casualty figures and levels of cruelty, such as the Tamil conflict, the Congo, Somalia, Chechnya, as well as the interreligious conflicts in India and elsewhere, apart from those who, understandably, are from the regions concerned and thus directly affected. Nevertheless, what goes on in some of these conflicts could easily be compared to what is happening in the Gaza-Israel conflict in some aspects, and thus described in the same vicious terms by those writers from other world regions who so readily apply them to Israel. But they deign not to...
Moreover, much of the aggressive criticism comes from people who, according to their web profiles, are not Jewish or Muslim activists, or from Israel or Arab countries, or even Jewish or Muslim!! This is astounding. In fact I’d go as far as to say that the type of anti-semitic sentiment expression used here in the West can often be even more violent than that to be found in some predominantly Muslim countries.
I do know what does NOT constitute an explanation though. The right of Israel (or Palestine) to exist or not does not explain it, because there are many other long-standing conflicts where the phenomena of territorial rights are central to the reasons they started. Nor is the strategic importance of the Gaza conflict an issue, quite simply because those who write so aggressively rarely talk about Gaza’s middle-east impact themselves!! Nor can they say that they are ‘revolted’ by Israel’s conduct. After all, they do not express the same ‘revulsion’ when it comes to other, far more cruel, conflicts. Neither is a wish for peace the reason. I even get the impression that some of these people are going to be really fed up at having to look for someone else to hate if ever the Israel/Palestine conflict is resolved.
So what IS the reason?
I have nothing against criticism of Israel. I have criticised Israel myself, here, and elsewhere, but the purpose of this article was to ask what explains the extreme level of race/religious hatred and bigotry mentioned above. At the end of the day, it appears to me that only those who indulge in such fanatical and hysterical methods when discussing Gaza and Israel could tell us. But they won’t, because many of them do not even understand why they do it themselves, whereas others do, but don’t have the courage to say so out loud…
NowPublic on Facebook
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
Fripouille
Lyon, France
Recommendations (28)
-
Amy Judd
Vancouver, Canada -
158
St. Louis, Missouri, United States -
mtnfund
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States 
Anonymous user
-
Barry ORegan
Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada -
René
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States -
tikun
Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel -
dowdinsk
Dalston, London, United Kingdom -
Marisa Olivia
Sydney, New South Wales, Australia




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (24)
at 11:11 on February 5th, 2009
Fripouille.
A very excellent article. One of the best I have seen on this subject. I have also run into some of the invective you mention, most directed at Israel much at the US for supporting Israel, and some accusing me of supporting Israel.
My position is much like yours. Israel has not moved to set up a Palestinian state, has done little to improve lives in Gaza, and has wrongly blocked trade into Gaza. Peace is what I want for the region and peace will require both sides to compromise.
I think some of the vitriol aimed at Israel is from Anti-Americanism. Israel is seen as a US ally and proxy in the middle east.
I think some of it is anti-Semitism, though disguised as anti Aionism, anti-colonialism or other things.
Some of it is racism, directed at European descended people, even though most Israelis are of Middle East origin.
Some of it is envy of the strongest and richest kid on the block.
Though many Israel critics say they want justice and support resistance to the oppressor, as you said, they do not get that hyper ventilated about similar and worse conflicts in the world, Rwanda and eastern Congo as an example, far bloodier than Gaza.
Thanks again for posting this.
at 11:43 on February 5th, 2009
Aha! Now here's something!!
Of course some of this comes from misplaced anti-Americanism. Absolutely right. Being anti-American is one thing, no problem, but extrapolating it to deprecate others is another.
Racism? Of course. There is anti-Muslim racism, so why shouldn't there be anti-Jewish racism? Envy too?
As for people not getting so uptight about other conflicts, I think the answer is to be found in an analysis of that theory.....
....but then we're getting into some more fundamental stuff...
Thanks for this comment, thought-provoking and balanced.
at 12:49 on February 5th, 2009
such sophomoric terms like 'conflict' and banal anti-americanism. throwing around terms when the reality is that people's entire worlds, their children are mass murdered by Israel for only being Plaestinian, imprisoning a country and crying wolf when they fire rockets vanely against the micro-hole-maing white phosphorus that the terrorists from Israel use on children in Gaza...
your post is a conceit, and simply denial in the ar of real human suffering, you would rather abstract by conflict?
tell us, now that you open yourself up with opinion, will you veto this? and hide behind another attempt to co-opt citizen journalism into trite 5 oclock news stories from cnn or something?
i cant wait till the unemployed would-be tv excuse-makers take a hike and citizen journalism doesnt have to fire rockets like this response to such inhuman distraction as your opinion. otherwise, ts all just web1.0 blabla.
at 13:51 on February 5th, 2009
This is terrorism
Hamas foreign minister Zahar... Jewish children are legitimate targets. We will kill Jewish children worldwide.
at 11:26 on February 5th, 2009
I have no idea...
at 12:05 on February 5th, 2009
Fripouille, thankyou for this, I think its courageous of you to start this discussion, and inspired by 158's contribution ( and despite my reservations of your being an ex RN officer) I'll offer up my motivations as one coming from somewhere within the (unfortunately extremely sectarian) British left:
We - of a certain age - were always aware of three main areas of 'anti-imperialist' struggle - Ireland, South Africa, and Palestine. More or less in exactly that same order of priority. We can examine progress in each of those struggles; there are residual economic problems, but in large there is an emerging civil society and a visible improvement in human rights in the first two. Palestine/Israel - in which the British state remains complicit - is where the focus has shifted. (Also we're extremely, and very sucessfully, multi-cultural here in Britain, especially in Hackney where I'm proud to live.)
The unwinding of the British Empire (in parallel with the rise of US 'influence'), leaves of course many other residual problems. Ceylon/Sri Lanka comes immediately to mind, but with the "Empire" bankrupted by WW2 many other instances of 'divide and rule' remain unresolved throughout Asia and Africa.
Britsh leftist guilt trip therefore?
(btw: having offered up this position statement, I have no intention of returning to defend it here on this thread - over and out / listening on Ch16)
at 12:14 on February 5th, 2009
Well done and honestly conveyed. I applaud your sincerity and courageous effort at asking the right questions.
at 12:24 on February 5th, 2009
Thanks Tikun. It's about time someone did.
To be quite frank, I've had enough of intellectual computer bullies and I wrote this post to say so. It's time others did too.
at 13:03 on February 5th, 2009
clearly you expose your own inhumanity, couched in the usual brute anti-intellectual excuse. it is actually your number humanity that prefers abstract words like 'conflict' instead of real words like 420 children are mass-murdered by israel, and 1000s blinded, maimed and burned, lives destroyed since rockets were fired in self defence against a killer's blockade by israel . that's real and you would veto reality if you could compltetely.
the moral bankruptcy of your quip above, Fripouiile
exposes the underlying reason for financial bankruptcy. i bet yu are an unemployed mainstream mass media news junky that wishes to down down people in here, so intellect is lobotomized and inhumanity and your racist atributions are the menu of the day.
about your racism.
you mention horrible words that must be taken very seriously. Anti-Jewish, anti-Semiticism and the like. your fake study arriving at 70% is ridiculous. if you poll NowPublic you will find that all those words in almost 100% of cases are uttered by pro-Israel and trained israeli misinformation bloggers - check their sources and you will find those links - and it is they that abuse the poor Jews who died in the Holocaust like flipping the term antiJewish like a cheap coin, or the boy who cried worf. Those are the persons you are mentioning who blog aout the terms anti-Jewish and anti-Israel all over this so-called citizen journalism site NowPublic.com which it is turning out to be a half-way house or bad 5 oclock tv news journalists and israeli government misinformation 'reporters'.
your opinion is handwriting on the wall for this site in future. if you dont think so, think again. not even dries at drupal will invest in this when it is learned that you joke around with open source news. that is just to quickly let the air out of the citizen journalism bubble which has until your sort of editor gets involved had some credibility. now its like bad cnn, with your statements and the provoked humanist replies like this that waste time instead of pointing out that there is no time to lose in realizing your moral bankrupt denial and anti-intellectual laziness.
at 13:22 on February 5th, 2009
Thanks, Voiceofreason, for your comment. It gives me an excellent opportunity to show other readers of this post the very reason why I wrote it in the first place.
Could you post another comment please?
I'd be very grateful.
Thanks in advance.....
at 13:57 on February 5th, 2009
that could be a con 10t imes job.
at 14:27 on February 5th, 2009
why did you write your string of words onto public paper, in the first place?
your words are words without denotation only connotation. it is like the boy who cries wolf not the wolf who cries boy. the israeli military and government 'info' agency linked bloggers here on NowPublic,com, your resource for your so-called stats and research, are the only ones using the term anti-Jew. i can find no anti-Israel post on NowPublic.com using that term, and if i missed one, there are more than 3 dozen pro-israeli military and anti-gaza, anti.hams, and anti-arab bloggers here who casually throw out the accusation 'anti-Jewish'. that disrespects the holocaust. i ind your opinion therefore racist.
please write up your count and attribution of the horrible terms you bandy around, as though they have no denotation. it is yur citizen journalist responsibility or a revelation of your layz moral bankruptcy, which will endlessly lead to replies like this one, and kill citizen journalism.
what happens here is not so different thatn the mass-child-murderering israeli forces in gaza and the lame rocket response. i am the rocket. you blame me. but it is your bias that gives you away. you even message individuals on this site, harass them privately with threatening ominous messages.
in community, these actions of yours, under the table, and brutal, as you poo poo any intellect openly, that is character recognition on the screen like handwriting on the wall. i hope the NowPublic originals are more careful in their delegation of responsibility and hire no one who has ever had or dreamed of working for BBC, CNN, Globeandmail, AlJazera.
CJ is a tabula rasa. look that up in your funk & wagnell's. CJ is a topos for news. look that up to. and CJ is chorography, a poetic mapping of implied public narrative as news that will if care is taken really have a great and positive impact on translocal society, when the smug globalist mass media throw backs are off the docket, and wher ethey belong, out of work.
if you want to throw around terms like anti-Jewish so carelessly, you have to realize, such terms have real meaning to some familes and they dont like it when people 'use' and exploit such terms with no proof. that is racism. and your opinion i hope you can use as well as my reply for your 'other readers'. only those in denial will nod with you. no wide awake humanist would ever casually write about a horrible thing like an anti-Jewish person. be careful. i think you ought to be blocked from NowPublic for this opinion to be frank.
at 15:13 on February 5th, 2009
I should be blocked from this site? I should be careful?
Thanks very much. That's a great example of the intellectual and fascist terrorism I described in my post.
Could you send another comment please?
Can't wait....
at 15:45 on February 5th, 2009
''the mass-child-murderering israeli forces in gaza''
Thanks, much more balanced than his comments.
"and the lame rocket response"
Child--Hamas takes 14 year olds into their militia.
Murder--With out provocation. Hamas was firing from everywhere in Gaza.
''lame rocket''And if a lame Israeli rocket killed a Gaza child.
at 15:35 on February 5th, 2009
''i think you ought to be blocked from NowPublic for this opinion to be frank.''
Didn't you say earlier that Israel banned independent reports from Gaza to cover their crimes?
Are you now copying Israeli tactics?
If you want censorship go to Gaza and publish an anti Hamas comment.
They shoot critics in both knees.
at 15:49 on February 5th, 2009
This person is already known on this site under another, page suspended, name.
at 18:30 on February 5th, 2009
I am one of those "pro-Israel and trained Israeli misinformation bloggers" (I'm not trained but I am educated)
Please check my sources. The New York Times, AP, Reuters, and a plethora of books and peer reviewed articles and monographs that are written by scholars. Scholars who reference their statements with primary sources.
Please tell me more about the "boy who cried worf" (Is that a Star Wars character ?). Also, please translate your last paragraph into English.
at 12:18 on February 5th, 2009
Hello Downdisk, and thank you very much for contributing some very useful historical perspectives.
I just happen to agree with your analysis, for what my humble opinion is worth. And, yes, there is a certain amount of guilt here (but not only on the left, if I may venture as much). I think I know why you highlighted the focus and that has a lot do do with the current situation.
I also appreciate you saying that you do not need to return here to defend your point of view.
(Incidentally, I was not an RN officer, but just a senior rating, and would sign up again if was twenty years old now. There are more fascists in pubs than in warships in my opinion, but that's another story...)
Please drink a pint for me!! I miss english beer....
Thanks.
at 13:09 on February 5th, 2009
Thanks Fripouille, I'm returning only very briefly to suggest the way of getting the fascists in the pubs is to remind them of the actions of those such as the 43-Group (and I'm drinking Merlot from Lidl).
at 13:36 on February 5th, 2009
Oh, sorry about your drinks options this evening :)
Yeah, I clearly remember being shocked by what I heard in civilian life concerning wars when I was in the navy. We (on warships) all agreed that the only people who want war are those who are not obliged to fight it. That's well known in military circles, and is even relevant to this post, and to this day.
(Merlot? I'll write you elsewhere with a couple of alternatives...)
Thank you!
at 12:41 on February 5th, 2009
Fripouille,
there is not a shred of would in any way point to a bias of anti-Israel versus anti-Gaza opinions, posts and replies.
NowPublic is a hotbed of trained anti-Gazan bloggers, far more bias and namecalling of people like you do as Jew-haters etc. that is not in any way justifiable or grounded in knowledge, and only disrespect the seriousness of racism, which wonderful people who happened to be Jewish suffered, and Gazan who are wonderful peaceful people now suffer by the massacres that Israel adds to their imprisonment for no logical or rational reason.
There is also what is known as passive aggression, and trained IDF military bloggers posting on NowPublic - just follow their source links to identify these propagandists, who slip around and bring up more than anyone else the term, as you do, like anti-Israel, anti-Jewish, anti-Semitic.
Do do a word count on those terms you falsely claim to be used by racists, and you will find that almost 100% of the time they enter the discussion as accusation by pro-Gaza-War and anti-Hamas writers in NowPublic. How do you explain that the terms you mention with horror - anti-Israel, anti-Jew, anti-Semitic - are used almost exclusively by those who claim to be the victim of such horror, and nobody else on NowPublic? Explain that?
at 12:59 on February 5th, 2009
Thank you, Voiceofreason, for commenting.
Of course there is propaganda going on on the net with respect to this issue. On both sides. It's called conflict and the war to win minds. Ok.
I did not say there was bias either way. I just said that the proportion of anti-Israel posts, articles and comments was high. I didn't invent that, it's there to see, and I do not have any problem with it. People have the right to xpress their opinions!!!!
This post, however, is about the excessive use of violent rhetoric used to discuss this issue, and the fact that I do not find it conducive to finding an issue to it.
Moreover, I do not appreciate, at all, being asked, in summary terms, to "explain" anything at all. If you have something to say, join this site, do not write anonymously, and then we'll talk about it. If not, have a nice day.
Thanks
at 15:32 on February 5th, 2009
I think that con10nt would be, or, more probably is, content to read this post.
Can't he (you) get a life?
at 09:56 on April 7th, 2009
I totally agree with the original poster on most points. I haven't seen too many people (especially muslims) protesting about the atrocities being committed in Darfur recently. Why are they not protesting outside the Sudanese embassy if human rights are so important to them? It is total hypocricy that betrays their true agenda.
Steve also makes a great point about the legitimacy of New World countries never being questioned so why Israel? This ridiculous notion that Israel could have been established anywhere needs to be seen for what it is. Israel is the original Jewish homeland not a region picked arbitrarily.