GET POLITICAL with VIC LIVINGSTON (Opinion) Expose State-Supported Vigilante Squads Doing 'Domestic Terrorism'

by Scrivener | July 27, 2008 at 09:09 pm
6288 views | 2 Recommendations | 122 comments

Photos

GET POLITICAL with VIC LIVINGSTON (Opinion) - Expose State-Supported Vigilante Squads Doing 'Domestic Terrorism'

GET POLITICAL with VIC LIVINGSTON (Opinion) - Expose State-Supported Vigilante Squads Doing 'Domestic Terrorism'

see larger image

uploaded by Scrivener

Congress must probe unlawful targeting of American citizens by vigilantes hiding behind government-funded volunteer programs

Due process denied, the Constitution discarded by "extra-legal control mechanism" said to resemble the KKK, the Stasi and the Nazi Gestapo

A cause of the crisis in the mortgage and credit markets?

When will Chertoff, McConnell, Mukasey, Mueller, Gates and Paulson take action?

NEW IN COMMENTS...
VIC LIVINGSTON'S PRAYER FOR THE 'DO-ERS'

A virulent form of "domestic terrorism" is destroying the rule of law in America.

Victims of so-called organized "gang stalking" or "community stalking" charge that the rule of law has broken down nationwide at the hands of state-supported vigilantes -- operating under the cover of citizen "volunteer" programs and various "service" corps.

Organized groups of private citizens, funded by elements of government at multiple levels, are the backbone of an "extra legal" control mechanism that its victims say is denying citizens their constitutional right of due process under the law.  Victims of this extra-legal network maintain that these vigilantes are functioning outside the legal system as judge, jury and executioner -- meting out various forms of harassment and abuse.  Victims call it "domestic terrorism" and they allege that their human rights are being violated.

Those who have been targeted by these groups say this vigilante militia is patrolling the streets, stalking and harassing, inflicting physical harm upon people who have been targeted by this extra-legal control mechanism.  Some victims have moved to other cities and towns to escape the persecution -- but they say the vigilantism recurs in their new locale.

"It appears to be a nationwide network that attracts right-wing extremists as well as law and order types and people connected to public safety such as firefighters, police auxiliaries, retired police and military officers, and even their family members," says one victim, who says he has been "gang-stalked" for several years. "I doubt it could exist without some people in positions of power looking the other way."

Even some regular, uniformed police are reported to have been intimidated by this network of extra-legal control, using volunteer citizens as the "street muscle."

Victims say that in addition to being physically harassed, their property is being vandalized; their privacy is being invaded; their mail is intercepted, financial accounts and billing statements altered, family finances decimated; and their physical well-being has been compromised using hi-tech instruments such as "directed energy weapons" that emit silent bursts of radiation -- lasers, microwaves, x-rays, even sonic frequencies -- that can disable, main, induce illness or even kill.

"This is torture that's happening right here, in American cities and towns," says one alleged victim.  "But it's like pre- World War II Germany; people refuse to believe that such abuses could happen in a civilized society.  But it is happening.  And I'm convinced that local and federal authorities not only have knowledge of this extra-legal targeting, but are providing funding and direction.

"I know the FBI knows about it, because I've been down there several times over the past two years to report it."  He says he knows of no formal investigation, despite his offers to cooperate.

"I'm not saying they know of the worst abuses, such as using microwaves on targeted persons to degrade their health and make it impossible for them to earn a living.  But they must know that these citizen patrols are doing a lot more than just cruising around the neighborhood. "

Citizens who have reported abuses say their complaints are typically ignored -- or that authorities insinuate that their claims are figments of their imagination, or are a manifestation of a mental illness such as paranoia. 

"That appears to be part of the M-O," says one victim.  "You haven't done anything wrong, so they can't charge you with a crime.  So they attempt to make it look like you're crazy.  That's how they marginalize people who don't fit in with their world view."

This victim believes the vigilante network is a convenient way for those in power to dispense with persons they simply don't like, or whose political or social views do not hew to what they regard as the established order.

Victims also believe that a network of government programs and agencies works in tandem with the extra-legal vigilante system to destroy their financial security. They allege that the crisis in the mortgage and credit markets may have been worsened by these programs, which they say are sapping the financial well-being of individuals and families without benefit of the right of due process.

Some victims wonder whether these extra-legal programs didn't create those financial crises in the first place.  "We haven't had these kind of widespread financial woes for sixty years," a gang-stalking victim said.  "You have to wonder if these programs weren't a blueprint for an ideologically-motivated purge."

Some of the agencies looking into the mortgage and credit market problems may have had long-standing knowledge of these programs, according to victims, who are calling on Congress to investigate.

"The issue of state-supported vigilantism and extra-legal control represents an assault on our judicial system that makes Watergate look like the third-rate burglary that it started out to be," says one gang-stalking victim.   "Since government agencies appear to be involved in funding these programs, it's up to Congress to investigate, to use its powers of oversight to ensure that democracy and the rule of law prevails -- and not the law of the jungle."

President Clinton often talked about "the politics of personal destruction." Hillary Clinton warned against the "vast right-wing conspiracy," a concern she reaffirmed, albeit in milder descriptive language, in her autobiography, "Living History."

The network of programs and policies that are allegedly circumventing the judicial system, violating constitutional rights and meting out vigilante justice, might collectively be termed the MECHANICS of personal destruction.

I wonder aloud whether Bill and Hillary Clinton weren't trying to warn the rest of us about an evil that even the power of the presidency could not keep in check.

The entire electoral process is being marginalized, relegated to little more than window dressing, as true power is stolen away by a neo-fascist element that has found a way to seize the reins of power and authority. It is analogous to what John Dean called "a cancer" -- not just on the presidency, but on the entire body politic.

Amazing as it sounds, this powerful apparatus appears to exist under the radar of most elected members of Congress. Those who should know, perhaps they believe such programs exist to target "terrorists," so-called enemies of the state. They naively refuse to believe that these programs, over time, appear to have morphed into a vast system of extra-legal vigilante control not unlike the East German Stasi, the KKK of the old South, the Gestapo of the Nazi Third Reich -- and that these programs effectively deny innocent American citizens their constitutional rights.

This appears to be nothing less than neo-fascism under the guise of "national security" and "keeping America safe." And liberals and progressives, who arguably are represented among the targets of these programs, naively insist that "it can't happen here." Only the Libertarians seem to perceive the threat.

Whoever is elected the next president will inherit these programs. That person, if he learns of such programs, is likely to be told of their necessity and propriety -- that such an extra-legal control mechanism, employing citizen vigilantes and extra-legal programs targeting financial resources, can co-exist with democracy.

In fact, this extra-legal control mechanism is destroying our democracy; much damage already has been done. Individuals and families are being slowly destroyed. Some call it a "silent holocaust" due to its clandestine nature and the use of silent, invisible "directed energy" technology.

Below are links to the articles I've written about this imminent danger to our constitutional democracy. I urge lawmakers and congressional committee staffers to do some research, and start asking some tough questions, starting with the Department of Homeland Security:

"Mr. Chertoff, are you aware that many Americans believe they have been the victims of so-called community or gang stalking, possibly perpetrated by persons equipped and trained by federally funded volunteer programs under your charge? Have you heard of such reports, and are you investigating to ensure that these programs and their resources are not being misused?"

That would be a good place to start. I believe it goes much broader and deeper; but the curative process must begin before more Americans are seriously damaged by this descent from the rule of law to the nihilist rule of the jungle.

A FINAL NOTE: My communications and my blog page are subject to persistent disruption and tampering by unknown hackers. I would appreciate it if NowPublic.com readers would forward the links below to people you know at the ALCU.org, CCRjustice.org, or any other group that could help. I can't do this alone; and I have put myself at some risk already.


http://www.nowpublic.com/world/get-political-
vic-livingston-opinion-expose-state-supported-
vigilante-squads-doing-domestic-terrorism

http://www.nowpublic.com/world/
zap-have-you-been-targeted-directed-energy-weapon-
victims-organized-gang-stalking-say-its-happening-usa-1

OR search  www.nowpublic.com/scrivener



recommend This comment thread is now closed
0
TACOM

Nothing comes through more clearly in this fantasy than the well developed paranoia of the author.   There is little to no substance to support any of his wild fears which he desperately hopes is contagious.   Where's the beef?  Give us one example!  Just one.

Microwaves, high frequency sound waves, the idiotic relationship between the home foreclosures and vigilante groups,  whoa,,, let me off this insane carousel.  Did  you slip and land on your head so that Cheney took you off the  payroll of this administration's effort  to generate and maintain fear in the populace?  Has Cheney/Bush now privatized fear-mongering?

0
Scrivener

BLOGGER'S NOTE:


Poster "TACOM" uses an acronym for a U.S. Army weapons research unit, so perhaps the poster knows about "Directed Energy Weapons" (DEW)  and their potential for misuse, a subject referenced in my opinion piece.  

Now please stand down on the field testing...









0
anonacom

Quote TACOM - "Nothing comes through more clearly in this fantasy than the well developed paranoia of the author."

Nothing comes through more clearly than the fact that you are full of shit. ;)

0
Jeff Evans

How is it that you figure the author is paranoid. He knows what is going on here and obviously you either do not know or you are in fact one of those perps who is going around with the terrorists who do this to our citizens.

0
Delta Saturn

You people are fools ! You block anything you cannot deny. You are guilty

0
Scrivener

No, I think you are the one on the payroll.  But should you be so transparent?

For my readers, I repeat a maxim that must be kept in mind when reading the "comments" section:  Name-calling is the hallmark of paid disinformation.

Have a nice day.







0
ELECTRONIC HI-TECH  HIT SQUADS

This report is about lessons learned from a very dramatic and weird amazing 4 month misadventure from 4/30/05-9/3/05 while I was almost constantly hit with hi-tech electronic harassment from what I now believe is a U.S. secret police hi-tech harassment hit squad. This hi-tech harassment hit squad identified themselves as the FBI Special Investigative Division on approx. 5/19/05. I believe they are part of the new hi-tech COINTELPRO 2005.

http://www.empowermentresources.com/cointelpro_2005.html#Report

0
concernedvictim

http://www.badexperiment.com/propaganda-and-gang-stalking-vocabulary/38/

0
Scrivener

Concerned:

Thank you.  You should know that I agree with you 100% concerning the use of the terms "target" and "perp."  You also should know that my page here on nowpublic.com is continually hacked, in real time, and that words have been altered in my articles.  I try to monitor this as best I can, but it is apparent that my channel is being "mirrored" and my IP address spoofed.  It goes without saying that changing my password does no good; my every keystroke is being monitored and recorded.

I did use the word "targeted" because this network of state-supported vigilante justice does "target" people outside of the legal system, and they do it callously, without regard for the law or the person's innocence.  But I agree -- "targeted individual" and "perp" are part of the vocabulary of those who have imposed this miscarriage of justice on our nation.

It is a constant cat-and-mouse game.  And like you, I have been contacted my people whose entreaties to me seem like an entrapment exercise.  By definition, those who can get through are those that the powers that be want to get through.  That would even apply to you.  But your narrative about vocabulary is so cogent and well written that I am inclined to accept it as the work of a true victim and not of the "perpetrators," to use their term.

Thank you again.  I am going to re-read all of my posts concerning this subject to ensure that subtle editing changes haven't been made since the last time I checked.  The utter disregard for our Constitution is breathtaking, and disconcerting.

0
David Bullivant

I appreciate your excellent writing on this issue Mr. Livingston.


Although I myself, to my knowledge, have never suffered anything by way of DEW attacks, I would like to make a short post regarding one of the mechanisms of gangstalking, that being  the process that we as TIs have come to call "sensitization."  


One becomes aware of the stalking via a process known as "sensitization."  The stalkers will act strangely for a given period of time such that their target will notice their odd behaviors.  The odd behaviors may include but are not limited to odd or inappropriate facial expressions, body movements, bizarre or inappropriate utilization of various common objects (cell phones, laptop computers, pens, pencils, etc.) in such a manner so as to cause the observer of these behaviors to know that these behaviors are not normal and appropriate for the situation and are in fact done just for them.  Collectively, these behaviors are known as "street theater."  It is believed by many in the community of targeted individuals that this "sensitization" process is derived from neurolinguistic programming (NLP) practices developed by John Grinder and Richard Bandler and made famous by such people as Anthony Robbins.


Once they have sensitized a target to assorted odd behaviors, then their fun really begins.  While you are around town, they will express a toned-down version of these behaviors such that you the target can see that they are following you while those around you simply see normal everyday types of behaviors.  If you were to inform others around you as to what is happening, a likely response would be something on the order of, "you're crazy, I don't see anything, just people acting like their normal selves."


The above represents my first visible recollection of gangstalking.  No doubt I had been surveilled and monitored for a good deal of time before they (the gangstalkers) made themselves known to me, but again my first memories leading to my realization that I was indeed a targeted individual of gangstalking resulted from the mechanism described above.


Peace.


David R. Bullivant

Sacramento, California

0
anonacom

Quote D. Bullivant - "Although I myself, to my knowledge, have never suffered anything by way of DEW attacks..."

"to my knowledge" ????

If you had been a victim of directed energy assaults, you would know the validity and unquestionable, felonious, illegal impact of these attacks.

0
Scrivener

But what do you think of the post above yours stating that "targeted individual" is a linguistic invention of the abusers that has the effect of doing just what you say -- "desensitizing" the public to the sheer horror and human rights violations that this targeting represents?





0
David Bullivant

I consider the notion that some of our terms are a "linguistic invention of the abusers" as being nothing more than a theory at this point.  If you want to get into the etymology of these words and phrases, a good resource for that would be Eleanor White, as she, as far as I know, was the first one to speak out on the issue of gangstalking.

The problem is that there are a number of words that have become common to the lexicon of "targeted individuals."  To change the vocabulary now, regardless of whether they were terms originating from targets or perps, would only add more confusion to a topic that has already proven itself to be a tough sell to a generally disbelieving public.

The terms that have been used for years and years are terms that for better or worse we should probably stick with.  In an attempt to persuade people that what we as TIs have to say is true, I don't think we should be changing words, but should instead focus on presenting what we ourselves have experienced and to do so as sanely and coherently as possible.

Right now, you are telling good introductory stories as to what this evil of gangstalking is all about.  My fear is that you or any other TI will end up focusing too much on the minutiae of our situation, i.e., terminology, and not enough on the simplicity of the truth and letting the cards fall where they may. 

Peace

Dave

0
Scrivener

David:


I note that a couple of your posts use derivatives of the words "sane" and "coherent."

A basic tactic of paid disinformation specialists is to inject doubt into a narrative through the frequent usage of words and phrases intended to raise such thoughts in the subconscious mind.

I simply take note.  Perhaps it is just an interesting coincidence. Thank you for your comment.

0
David Bullivant

I stress the words "sane" and "coherent" frequently, as it is my perception that many people will conclude that we are mentally ill or unintelligent because of the problem that we say we have.

When reading my posts, please understand that I try to be as straightforward as possible, not trying to interject any subtle messages, just wanting to help everyone get a clear picture of what is going on.

Paranoia is an unfortunate effect for us as we deal with this problem.  If anything, I try to give the benefit of the doubt to people when I become suspicious of their being a perp, and I will endeavor to suspend my judgment until such a time I can make a reasonable conclusion either way.

Dave

0
anomcom

The implication of repeated words or word phrases such as "sane","coherent","paranoia" etc. is obvious to those that are informed readers.

Agreeing with the original poster serves the agent of disinformation.

This is a standard part of a disinformation campaign.

0
David Bullivant

Whoever you may be, please understand that I am a targeted individual of this garbage called gangstalking.  I did not choose it.  It chose me.  Your implication that I am a disinformation agent is most distressing and unwarranted.  We as TIs need to find ways to work together rather than against each other.

I at least come out using my own name,  not anonymously like yourself.  The only thing I have to gain by being out in the open as to who I am is believing that if I somehow drop out of circulation, then hopefully other TIs who know me and know that I myself am a TI will make notice of the fact that I am gone.

Assuming that you are a TI yourself, we are allies and not enemies.

Peace.

David Bullivant

0
anonacom

Quote David Bullivant - "Paranoia is an unfortunate effect for us as we deal with this problem. If anything, I try to give the benefit of the doubt to people when I become suspicious of their being a perp, and I will endeavor to suspend my judgment until such a time I can make a reasonable conclusion either way."

Casting aspersions Dave?

Transparent?

0
anonacom

Quote D. Bullivant - "...simplicity of the truth..."

This is interesting due to the "exchange" of information among victims of this crime.

0
"Bob"

I think that this is a very good article on gang stalking. I have been a victim for many years. I have never experienced electronic harassment. I see gang stalking as a joining of law enforcement, vigilante groups, and some other kind of (hard to define) government involvement. I recommend that people read "Protectors of Privilege" by Frank Donner: http://www.ucpress.edu/books/pages/4780.php. It describes gang stalking done by police officers. The only difference between what this book describes and gs is that gs is done by large group of people and police-conducted gang stalking was done by a far smaller group of (maybe 2) police officers. People should also read "Cause Stalking" by private investigator David Lawson: http://www.causestalking.net/. He investigated gang stalking at a street level. This booklet is (in my view) the best source of information on gang stalking. It provides an accurate picture of what the stalkers actually do to victims.

I have been a victim of gs since around 1983. I became a victim of (uniformed) police harassment in November 2003. The stalkers gave police officers the (false) idea that I was gay. When I failed to "come onto" officers, they began harassing me. I also receive harassment from San Diego Police Dept RSVP (retired senior volunteer patrol) white patrol cars. The police officers and the other stalkers closely coordinate their activities. I have not been allowed to file a report.

I don't understand the connection between the housing crisis and gs. I have experienced virtually everything in the gs paradigm: 24-hour surveillance, "street theater" (staged skits designed to frighten me or make me upset), "slander campaign" (lies are spread that I am gay or a criminal), physical assault, derogatory name calling, harassing emails and phone calls, mail theft and damage, law enforcement and fire-fighter harassment, "noise campaign," etc. I have not received harassment while driving or vehicle vandalism (I do not own a vehicle), and the stalkers have not stolen anything from me/rendered me destitute; I don't kow why. Maybe because I am already low-income. They also don't enter my apt. when I am gone. I have been especially lucky in that. The stalkers, extraordinarily cold and self-righteous, constantly strive to give me the impression that they are "teaching me a lesson." I am not sure what the "lesson" is. Maybe "we can do anything we want to you."

I have notified the media in San Diego and my political representatives about gang stalking and my situation. I have received no response.

In September 2007, I sent a flyer about gang stalking to the Mayor, Fire Chief, and Police Chief of San Diego. For this, I was visited by law enforcement, placed in handcuffs, and taken, in a patrol car, to a psychiatric facility. At no time did I say or do anything hostile or threatening. I was released the next day. The psychiatrist told me that he did not think that I should have been brought there.

When David R. Bullivant uses words like "sane" and "coherent," he might partially be refering to the fact that some victims of gs are not well-educated and do not express themselves well and some victims have "far out" (paranormal/supernatural) "explanations" of gs.

0
anonacom

Quote "Bob" - "...I have never experienced electronic harassment..."

Another one?

Quote "Bob" - "When David R. Bullivant uses words like "sane" and "coherent," he might partially be refering to the fact that some victims of gs are not well-educated and do not express themselves well and some victims have "far out" (paranormal/supernatural) "explanations" of gs."

Why do you have to explain something that you have not experienced???

0
anonacom

Quote "Bob" - "I have never experienced electronic harassment."

It is an assault, a physical assault. It is not "harassment", that is bullshit.

0
Scrivener

My experience tells me that people who are targeted by gang stalkers also tend to be targeted by secret extra-legal programs that slowly and silently sap their financial resources and their ability to earn a living, without benefit of due process of law. 

Some of those who are being victimized in this way may not realize it until they are drained and destitute. There appears to be a "nexus" (to borrow a bureaucratic term) between those who are gang-stalked and those who are targeted by extra-legal government programs that, in effect, confiscate their property and rob them of their financial security without due process of law (and may zap them with damaging directed energy weapons to degrade their very lives).

Because liberals and "progressives" are so naive, they refuse to believe that such extra-legal programs are being used against American citizens, or that innocent people are being unjustly targeted and persecuted.  With more than a million American citizens on the "terrorist watch list," I cannot understand how they cannot perceive what is happening.  The rule of law and the right to due process have been discarded in the name of authoritarianism.  I would call it creeping fascism.

I would not be surprised at all if the "Gang of 16" in Congress have been "read in" to some of these secret programs, having been assured that these measures are aimed at "terrorists" and are not being used as a fascist tool of social engineering (if indeed they ever bothered to read the legislation they passed in the first place). 

Because they are sworn to secrecy, these lawmakers refuse to disclose what they may know, or even to dare to "connect the dots" to reports such as my personal account.  They also may be the subject of certain "psychological operations" or "psy ops" that keep them in line without a realization that their behavior is being shaped by external forces.  I wonder aloud if Barack Obama's recent flip-flops and issue "nuances" aren't a byproduct of such subtle but effective behavior modification techniques.  As I said, the naivete among liberals is breathtaking, even among some self-described crusaders in the media.  This must cause the authoritarians much sadistic mirth.

The lawmakers who equivocate on civil liberties issues -- or limit their concerns to Guantanamo detainees and ignore the pleas of targeted American citizens -- are the weak, childlike "Eloi" and the architects of these programs are the Neanderthal-like  "Morlocks" (to employ an analogy from H.G. Welles' "The Time Machine"). 

Only when the Eloi learned to fight back were the Morlocks driven back into their caves, allowing the children of daylight to again live their lives in freedom, and without fear.







0
"Bob"

I do think/agree that many gang stalking victims do not understand what is happening to them and why, that "creeping fascism" is what is going on, and that liberals (even though I am a liberal) ara naive and unwilling to act. Two of the major problems with gang stalking is that people do not want to question authority or people who say that they are operating with the permission of authority and that there is no effective oversight of law enforcement. It does seem that gang stalking is partially being used to punish nonconformists and to frighten other people into staying in a state of conformity.

0
deb Newhook

Vic

This is Debbie from Nanaimo BC, Canada. Last Thursday an article made the front page of our local newspaper and it is about a man who has filed a suit for 2 Billion dollars with claims that many organizations are involved in the attacks to his body. The story does seem to make a mockery of him but it did make front page which surprised me. I have taken the liberty to pass on links to your 3 articles about this crime to the journalist that wrote this article for the Nanaimo Daily News.

Here is the link to the article in the Nanaimo Daily News

http://www.canada.com/nanaimodailynews/news/story.html?id=b962b811-4230-4aef-8176-7c54a0e28ccc

Could you please respond to this so that I know you have read this.

I pray that those that are fighting to expose this are successful.

Keep up the good work and stay safe.

Debbie Newhook

Nanaimo, BC

0
Scrivener

Thanks, Deb.  I responded to your other post within the "Vigilante Injustice" article.

The article makes this fellow sound daft, so I can't judge the credibility of his claims.  In my situation, it seems rather simple, along the lines I describe in this current piece.  When I first posted the story about "Vigilante Injustice," the number of pickups and SUVs trailing me dropped off sharply.  That tells me there is command and control and it is highly organized.  I don't buy the cover story that various corporations are doing this.  They don't have to; there seems to be a much more centralized network, a "one stop shopping" for domestic terrorism aimed at American citizens (and from what I've read, it may extend internationally).

Appealing to the press is useless; my hope is that conscientious, religious people on the inside will realize that crimes against humanity are being committed, and they will take steps to stop these extra-legal programs.  Or at least, stop the high-tech torture.  As yet, they have not done so.  My concern is that the more I protest, the more likely it is that they will move against me and try to marginalize me, Gulag-style.  If you can help, you know what to do -- spread the word far and wide and, like Diogenes, perhaps we will find the honest man or woman who has the power and the will to fight this.


0
anonacom

This NowPublic "on-line" news source is far from a major player in main stream news.

My advise is to appeal to the sources you know.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/linkset/2006/07/18/LI2006071800574.html

0
Scrivener

Anonacom:


I have tried repeatedly to reach the individual you reference.  My email is being interfered with; I receive very few emails, not even the "spam" one would expect, and I have emailed most of the top names.  I also have emailed recently the national ACLU, Center for Constitutional Rights, ACLU of PA., and other similar organizations.  I have gotten no response.  I visited the New York office of the Center for Constitutional Rights in person earlier this year; the young woman with whom I spoke looked and sounded like someone had contacted her just prior to my arrival; I got the cold shoulder.  I believe I am the subject of a major slander campaign; although I have recovered my writing skills after four years of constant assault by DEW, this slander campaign has effectively prevented me from restoring my very successful career (although I am still trying and I won't give up until I breathe my last breath).  My health is not good.

May I ask you to please forward the link to this story to the referenced individual?  I just tried to do it myself, and now my email program will not display the outgoing email form.  My constitutional rights continue to be abridged and since I have written these articles, the DEW assaults have gotten worse.  I fear they are going to incapacitate me again.  This is as bad as Nazi Germany.  They don't need the ovens -- they've got silent, invisible and potentially lethal DEW.

I repeat:  crimes against humanity are happening.  My ability to communicate has been circumscribed.  I believe I am still able to post to the internet because my tormentors believe that they have discredited me and that no one will believe me.  I know they are wrong -- if I can get the truth out to the right people.  This extends far beyond just one individual such as I.  Just look at the million-plus "terrorist" watch list. 

I believe forces within other agencies that may not be as close to, ah, let's say, the true, unelected centers of power in this country, have preserved my very life, and want me to get the word out.  If you can help in any way, you will not just be helping me; you will be helping to preserve the Constitution, the right of due process under the law, and the American way of life.  Thank you.



0
anonacom

You need to diversify your e-mail accounts into the "cloud". But first you must secure your operating system so your movements cannot be tracked.

You might have, or could have spyware on your box. Reloading is the only answer for "Windows" operating systems.

If you can contact me at one of two e-mail addresses that you already know, I can lead you to total independence from these arsholes.

0
Scrivener

Anon:  I don't know who you are and I don't know that I have an email address, but there is no way to secure your computer or mine or anyone else's when you're dealing with someone or some entity with the right expertise and equipment.  "Google" "remote computing."  Your computer doesn't even have to be connected to the internet for wireless hackers to get in. 

And yes, it is something of a mystery as to why they'd bother.  Maybe they think I'd be a good patsy, who knows.

I do know that the watchers are being watched.

Have a nice day.


This story was created over 3 months ago, the comment thread is now closed.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Anonymous
First Flagged at 10:25 PM, Nov 23, 2008 by Anonymous (not verified)
These members have powered this story:

Most Recommended Stories in World

Recommendations (2)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from