NP Rank:
GET POLITICAL with VIC LIVINGSTON (Opinion) - The Presidential 'Psy Ops' Wars: Who's Got the Voodoo?
• Is the power of persuasion inside "the bubble"?
• Keeping your friends (and advisers) close...
While the media focus on the ad wars, Get Political calls attention to a much more covert form of political combat: the psy ops wars.
Here's the theory: Perhaps both presidential candidates are being subject to an unremitting campaign of attempted psychological manipulation; or, to use a more benign term, conditioning.
Both men have been placed in a tight bubble. This, of course, is for their personal protection, and that of their families. But the isolation also prevents each of them from receiving the full range of input; from the outside world, from the media entourage, and, arguably, from their own staffs.
Likewise, each man no doubt has been told of the dangers and threats that accompany a run for national office. So they come to rely psychologically upon those closest to them, whether it is a spouse, or a late-night poker game with a members of a security detail. It is conceivable that those in constant physical proximity to the candidates, if they so desired, could have a profound influence on their daily decision making, perhaps even on their very thought processes.
Maybe someone close to Obama is in some subtle way suggesting the notion that he stands a better chance of winning if he's wishy-washy on the issues and laid back in his responses to direct frontal assaults like John McCain's over-inflated gas gauge gambit.
And yes, I know what you're thinking: that doesn't sound like Michelle.
On the McCain side, the most significant "takeaway" from the current countretemps focusing on McCain's Britney-Paris advert and its follow-ups could be this: The McCain ads reflect the strategic take-no-prisoners hardball of the Bush team that conceptualized them. This is the stuff of the anti-McCain campaign that the Bush forces mounted against McCain in the 2000 primaries, most notably, the South Carolina contest -- the one in which McCain had to battle uphill against false rumors that he had fathered a black child by a prostitute.
McCain's defense of the Paris-Britney celebutante ad seemed half-hearted, insincere, and more than a tad defensive. Go to the videotape: even McCain's body language betrays what could be his true feelings.
And now we hear that Bushie operatives are pushing hard for Rob Portman as McCain's veepee pick. Rob Portman, former Bush budget director at a time when the economy is collapsing under the current administration. Rob Portman, the longtime Bush loyalist who's got entree into the inner family circle. Rob Portman, a handsome, articulate spokesperson for the established order, an image in stark contrast to the one-time (and who knows? perhaps the future) "maverick" who used to be John McCain.
There's got to be some heavy psy ops directed McCain's way in favor of Portman, who sounded almost as much like a presumptive "President Obama" when he appeared this past Sunday on the chat shows.
McCain endured five long years of physical and psychological torture at the hands of the North Vietnamese. But now, in his senior years and with his increasingly frequent "senior moments," could McCain resist the brand of hi-tech, 21st century psy ops that the spy novels say is practiced in some quarters of the "protectorati"?
Real life is not a spy novel (or so one might tend to assume). This observer is putting odds that it will be McCain, former POW, who proves himself the more resistant to psychologically-based entreaties. If McCain's vice presidential pick reflects the independence and daring of his maverick days, the wisdom of this bet, it might be argued, would tend to be confirmed.
As for Barack Obama, the "change" candidate seems to be the presidential hopeful most changed, even moreso than McCain. Obama looks to be the one whose recent words and manner exude the unnatural aura of a voodoo spell.
A full three days after McCain's tire gauge assault, Obama snapped out of his "Great Compromiser" trance and showed the fight that's been absent of late from his public performances. If the "change" candidate re-emerges, perhaps it will show that he's also "psy ops -resistant."
But Barack's veepee pick also may reveal whether there are external psychological forces impacting his decision-making. Will he continue to beat a path to the center-right, further disappointing his core supporters in what seems to be a misplaced effort to win over those who would never vote for this "different kind of Democrat" in the first place?
Viewed through the prism of psy ops, it's Barack Obama whose Rorschach test seems the most difficult to decipher.
WILL THE ELECTION EVEN MATTER? NOT WHEN
GOVT.-SUPPORTED 'VIGILANTE JUSTICE SQUADS'
ARE TARGETING AMERICAN CITIZENS
http://www.nowpublic.com/world/get-political-vic-livingston-opinion-expose-state-supported-vigilante-squads-doing-domestic-terrorism
http://www.nowpublic.com/world/zap-have-you-been-targeted-directed-energy-weapon-victims-organized-gang-stalking-say-its-happening-usa-1
Crowd Power
-
Scrivener
Philadelphia suburbs, Pennsylvania, United States




Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (6)
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Tolly (not verified)at 07:18 on August 7th, 2008
Vic:
Sometimes I think that our cycle of two and four year political rituals are really thematically connected operas.
The actors and actresses all know what is expected of them, as they follow the director that has been assigned to their group, and the whole lot of them work for the same producer.
But how is it then, that they look so darned earnest, straight-faced, and they never let through a Freudian slip?
Are they just very, very good actors and actresses? Perhaps the fascist's machine has become so refined such that it has the capacity to "mentor through the process" a person who really is a non-initiate of their system. In fact, maybe this indirection is necessary in order that the "Curtain of Oz" remain hanging safely in place.
Perhaps this plot line is what you have referenced with your statement about the "protectorati".
Consider our ridiculous energy policy. Our dependence upon fossil fuels has not changed one iota in the intervening years since the 73' embargo. Nessun risultato. Keine Ergebnisse. (No results, no change). Who the hell convinced every other American to purchase a 14 MPG fossil fuel SUV, for Christ's sake? Talk about your mind control topic! Yet we have a steady stream of politicians, each promising to fix the problem.
Maybe the producer doesn't want that act written into his play?
- Regards,
Tolly
at 09:40 on August 7th, 2008
I don't buy into your "fascist" machine thesis at all, nor into your suggested "plot line." Please look for boogeymen somewhere else.
Last time I checked, we were still a democracy -- although there have been and continue to be unconstitutional abuses of power that must be checked. Need I mention Watergate and associated illegality? Thanks to a conscientious officer of the FBI, our democracy was saved in that instance. I leave it up to you to decide if a Watergate-type unconstitutional power grab by one branch of government at the expense of our democratic system of checks and balances is anti-American.
And by "protectorati" I was just trying to find an entertaining way of saying "those who protect." Kind of like saying "literati" to describe authors.
- Sign In or Join to post comments
David Bullivant (not verified)at 11:19 on August 7th, 2008
Hi again Vic, just have to make one correction here.
When you say, "Last time I checked, we were still a democracy," actually, we are a republic. This is why we have elected representatives, i.e., congressman and senators, who are supposed to represent We The People, only problem is they tend to ignore us in favor of corporate lobbyists, foreign governments, and special interests.
Dave Bullivant
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Tolly (not verified)at 12:09 on August 7th, 2008
Vic:
Optimism is a good thing. Sometimes late at night, after a couple beers, I can for a short time fancy that the fascists have not progressed so far downstream as many of my postings insinuate.
I've been chided for my negativity by others in the ti community, and I know I've jumped a little further "over the top" than my contemporaries.
My problem is that common phraseology that always ends with "tip of the iceberg". I know I'm not that unique or special such that I deserve all of this attention, so I reason that if I see so much of it, then it's more likely to be worse rather than better than I imagine.
I raise a cup to make a toast that your optimism remains in eleven years.
I remember when I was "four years out", as you are (that would be about eleven years ago). My views at that time probably synced with yours almost perfectly. The optimism that I then exhibited has been leached away to some extent.
I still get a kick out of life, however. There are things that I really enjoy doing, even now.
You can get burned out by this stuff. Sometimes it helps to have religion. The fellow at http://www.badexperiment.com uses religion well in this regard.
Let us hope that the fascist make themselves seem much bigger than they really are, and in some future happy days they are revealed for being little more than "smoke and mirrors".
Regards,
- Tolly
at 19:07 on August 8th, 2008
Who's paying for this Kabuki theatre?
- Sign In or Join to post comments
Target (not verified)at 13:38 on August 9th, 2008
here is the story of another journalist going through the same thing.
http://quantrille.com/
if the link does not work try quantrille dot com