NP Rank:
Give’em hell Barry
Republicans are strict obstructionists
Give'em hell Barry, that is the inevitable headline at this point.
Being compared with Harry Truman at this point is a good thing. Obama has a way to go, but the longer Republicans obstruct, the more apparent they become as the source of the problem.
“Obama as Truman: 'Give 'em hell, Barry'?
By Ed Hornick, CNN
September 9, 2011 10:16 a.m. EDT
Washington (CNN) -- In a passionate speech before a joint session of Congress, President Barack Obama issued a stern warning to Republicans: Compromise or I'll use it against you.
"You should pass it (his American Jobs Act economic plan). And I intend to take that message to every corner of this country," Obama said Thursday night.
Obama appears to have channeled Harry Truman, who went after what he called the Republican-controlled "do-nothing" 80th Congress in his 1948 presidential re-election campaign, traveling across the country by train, giving speeches to crowds in small towns and big cities.
Obama as Truman has emerged over the past couple of months.
On the flight from Washington to a Labor Day rally in Detroit, Democratic Sen. Carl Levin showed the president a speech Truman gave to union members in that same city on Labor Day 1948.
"And just to show that things haven't changed much, (Truman) talked about how Americans had voted in some folks into Congress who weren't very friendly to labor," Obama told the adoring crowd. "And he pointed out that some working folks and even some union members voted these folks in. And now they were learning their lesson."
John Gizzi, political editor for the conservative publication Human Events, writes that although Obama's Labor Day address was "devoid" of new policy items, he is following Truman's successful 1948 strategy in which the Missouri-born Democrat beat the decided favorite, Republican Thomas Dewey.
"Obama made it clear he was taking a page from Truman's '48 campaign handbook: He would run the kind of gloves-off, hard-punching campaign against Republicans in Congress that energized labor enough to help Truman win re-election as well as recapture control of Congress from the Republicans," Gizzi said.
The anti-do nothing strategy
The nation's 33rd president initially did not have a warm relationship with the Democratic base, which included powerful labor unions, Dixiecrats (Southerners who opposed Truman's pro-civil rights policies) and progressives.”



Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (7)
at 10:39 on September 12th, 2011
Rick Perry, the governor of Texas, has sparked a high-stakes political fight over Social Security by calling the popular retirement program a “failure” and a “Ponzi scheme” on the campaign trial..
Give'em Hell Rick ! lol
at 11:39 on September 12th, 2011
I know. First, he will have to fight his fellow Republicans. No matter who wins the internal fight, they lose.
at 12:01 on September 12th, 2011
Perry's beginning to look like a loose cannon like Bush was. Hopefully the public gets it right this time..
at 12:55 on September 12th, 2011
He's bait. I encourage to keep talking.
at 13:07 on September 12th, 2011
If liberals are comparing Obama to Truman... GW must have been the first Truman like since Obama is pretty much following GW's course of action. All Obama has done is repackage it for liberal consumption. What in the bag remains the same. Obama has given liberals a little glitter and tinsel added to the packaging and liberals have bought it all wholesale and with out question. Obama missed his calling as a used car salesman. He could make a fortune selling old Pinto's to liberals.
at 13:38 on September 12th, 2011
If thats the case .30-06, the Republicans must of hated GW since they're doing all the push back now against Obama for 'pretty much following GW's course of action'..lol
at 15:47 on September 12th, 2011
The difference is Obama only speaks to his base and ignores Congress. At best he accuses Congress of obstruction, usually when he doesn't get his own way right after demonizing them. GW was able to get both Republican and Democrats in Congress to vote in favor of his policy. All you have to do is look at the vote counts passing the bills during GW's tenure. Democrats as the majority actually passed GW's policy into law. To date that's one lesson Obama has yet to learn. Secondly, to your comment, I think Republicans are pushing back because the Tea Party wants a different course of action rather than the same old same old. The crunch is on and we can't do the same thing for twenty years and expect that things will improve by not tightening our collective belt across the board. Tax and spending didn't work under GW. It barely held off a total collapse, and it will not be any more successful under Obama. That much shouldn't be too hard for even Obama's blind partisans to see. Though I wont hold my breath.