Given the definitions, are we not all bigots?

by YankeeJim | June 29, 2010 at 11:21 am
216 views | 1 Recommendation | 4 comments

I mostly think of bigotry in racial terms, but I need to broaden the consideration based on a review of these English definitions.

My views about religion cause me to have certain regard for all religions that is intolerant and disrespectful. I may be polite about it, but the fact that I hold certain beliefs inside, still mean that (whispering to self) I am a bigot.

My views about specific religions from specific parts of the world and my interpretation of them surely make me bigoted. Yet, interaction with people from this “profile” makes me more tolerant as I learn more about them (whispering lowly) I am a recovering bigot.

I am not now nor ever have been a racial bigot, thank goodness, or I could not live with myself.

Try harder not to be one, and the world will open to many new ideas and diversity that is a good thing, I believe.

“English – English translation for “bigotry

The state of mind of a bigot; obstinate and unreasoning attachment of one's own belief and opinions, with narrow-minded intolerance of beliefs opposed to them

The characteristic qualities of a bigot; intolerance or prejudice, especially religious or racial

The practice or tenets of a bigot the intolerance and prejudice of a bigot

Bigotry is the possession or expression of strong, unreasonable prejudices or opinions.

He deplored religious bigotry. Bigoted behavior or beliefs intolerance of differing ideas and beliefs, prejudice

The state of mind of a bigot; obstinate and unreasoning attachment of one's own belief and opinions, with narrow-minded intolerance of beliefs opposed to them

The characteristic qualities of a bigot; intolerance or prejudice, especially religious or racial

The intolerance and prejudice of a bigot

Bigotry is the possession or expression of strong, unreasonable prejudices or opinions. He deplored religious bigotry; bigoted behavior or beliefs”

“It's not even coded bigotry anymore

The GOP hits Elena Kagan for admiring Thurgood Marshall and hailing from "Manhattan's Upper West Side"

By Joan Walsh

I'm not entirely sold on Solicitor General Elena Kagan as our newest Supreme Court Justice. Ironically, one of my reservations has to do with her approach to leveling racial discrimination – specifically her reported role in scuttling a Clinton administration plan to do away with sentencing disparities between crack and powder cocaine (which has meant heavier punishment for African Americans than whites for dealing or using the same drug.)

That said, Republicans on the Senate Judicial Committee are trying to make the case she's outside the mainstream of American jurisprudence, by attacking her clerking for (and admiring) legal giant Thurgood Marshall, the first African American Supreme Court justice, while singling her out as a denizen of "Manhattan's Upper West Side" – you know, the neighborhood known for Zabar's and bagels and, well, Jews.

Sen. Jefferson Beauregard Sessions of Alabama, who wasn't crazy about Sonia Sotomayor, you'll recall, denounced Kagan having "associated herself with well-known activist judges who have used their power to redefine the meaning of our constitution and have the result of advancing that judge's preferred social policies," and he cited Marshall, the NAACP Legal Defense Fund leader who argued Brown vs. Board of Education. According to Talking Points Memo, Republicans mentioned Marshall an astonishing 35 times in the hearing (compared with 14 mentions of President Obama) with his son, Thurgood Marshall Jr., sitting in the audience.”

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
0
YankeeJim

Sessions, to me, is sick and sickening.

1
YankeeJim

"With Kagan's confirmation hearings expected to last most of the week, Republicans may still have time to make cases against Nelson Mandela, Mother Teresa and Gandhi."


1
BelaynehKassaWubie

YankeeJim, I share your values and beliefs. But what you observe in the country I live in is ethnic bigotry than religion. May be you are living in a country where ethnic diversity is absent or small and you may live in mental peace.

In countries where ethnic diversity is many and especially when governments orchestrate it for their lives, you will be more bigoted on ethnic discremination than relogion because you internalize religion as others dont know it.  

 

0
YankeeJim

Ethnic diversity in the USA is quite robust and in fact, our demographics are changing rapidly. Before I part this earth, I will be a minority in America.

You make an excellent point about ethnic diversity and discrimination. Without a government founded on respect for individualism and liberty regardless of race, creed, sex, or beliefs, those in power might attempt to declare and impose superiority over others. We saw that clearly with Sadaam Hussein. His tribe may have been fewer in number, but he wielded the power of the sword. That wasn't right anymore than a majority wielding the sword over a minority.

Achieving equality is a very difficult aim, isn't it?


What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Anonymous
First Flagged at 6:37 PM, Jun 29, 2010 by Anonymous (not verified)
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (1)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from