NP Rank:
Global Warming Time-Out
Mojib Latif of the Leibniz Institute of Marine Sciences, in Kiel, Germany, says that there can be no argument about it, the warming has taken a break.
Jochem Marotzke, director of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg, claims that the issue is the hottest item in the scientific community right now.
The major issue is the reliability of predictive models, and the long range implications. If the models are incorrect, does it then mean that there will be no further warming?
What happens if the infamous hockey stick is broken, as indeed it may be?
Global warming appears to have stalled. Climatologists are puzzled as to why average global temperatures have stopped rising over the last 10 years. Some attribute the trend to a lack of sunspots, while others explain it through ocean currents.
At least the weather in Copenhagen is likely to be cooperating. The Danish Meteorological Institute predicts that temperatures in December, when the city will host the United Nations Climate Change Conference, will be one degree above the long-term average.
Otherwise, however, not much is happening with global warming at the moment. The Earth's average temperatures have stopped climbing since the beginning of the millennium, and it even looks as though global warming could come to a standstill this year.
Ironically, climate change appears to have stalled in the run-up to the upcoming world summit in the Danish capital, where thousands of politicians, bureaucrats, scientists, business leaders and environmental activists plan to negotiate a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions. Billions of euros are at stake in the negotiations.
Reached a Plateau
The planet's temperature curve rose sharply for almost 30 years, as global temperatures increased by an average of 0.7 degrees Celsius (1.25 degrees Fahrenheit) from the 1970s to the late 1990s. "At present, however, the warming is taking a break," confirms meteorologist Mojib Latif of the Leibniz Institute of Marine Sciences in the northern German city of Kiel. Latif, one of Germany's best-known climatologists, says that the temperature curve has reached a plateau. "There can be no argument about that," he says. "We have to face that fact."
Even though the temperature standstill probably has no effect on the long-term warming trend, it does raise doubts about the predictive value of climate models, and it is also a political issue. For months, climate change skeptics have been gloating over the findings on their Internet forums. This has prompted many a climatologist to treat the temperature data in public with a sense of shame, thereby damaging their own credibility.
"It cannot be denied that this is one of the hottest issues in the scientific community," says Jochem Marotzke, director of the Max Planck Institute for Meteorology in Hamburg. "We don't really know why this stagnation is taking place at this point."
The pair made a $10,000.00 bet with the Brit in 2005, wagering that Earth's temperature would be in a cooling phase by the year 2012.
http://www.spinwatch.org/-news-by-category-mainmenu-9/150-climate-change/1633-climate-change-sceptics-bet-10000-on-cooler-world
NowPublic on Facebook
Crowd Power
-
Hugh Askew
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Recommendations (20)
-
stejeb
United Kingdom
-
PIM of SPAIN
San Pedro de A, Malaga, Spain -
Colonel Boyle
Leeds, United Kingdom -
Simples
Caruaru, Pernambuco, Brazil -
Barbara McPherson
Nanaimo, Canada







Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (4)
at 12:51 on November 19th, 2009
one is unsure what to make of this.....much further reading required I imagine. However...if it were the case that global warming had stalled - despite all the rises in CO2 output by developing nations......would we see a fall in all the stealth taxes imposed by central government in the name of "enviromental taxes".....? lol
at 16:59 on November 19th, 2009
Perhaps we should be using terms like climate change rather than global warming. The Canadian Arctic has seen a steady rise in temps over the past few years and the sea ice is thinning and receding alarmingly. The Gulf Stream has slowed markedly which would help bring down temperatures in Europe. If we use figures like world averages, then it we could average the increase in the Arctic with the decrease in Europe and come out at nil change.
at 08:14 on December 22nd, 2009
The North Pole has been ice-free several times in the last century (this is the best summary of how and why - scroll down for pictures of submarines actually surfacing at the North Pole on various occasions).
We are given over to committing fallacies by human nature. Events of the past lose their resonance compared to what's happening today, so we overestimate how severe weather is today etc. But that is nothing compared to what happens when you enter a belief system - especially if you're very publically committed to a position. I think a lot of politicians and scientists have tied themselves to a mast and there's very little chance of them getting away from it (can you remember a politician admitted that they've been wrong?)
But at the back of the subject is this: we do not have a temperature record to work with. All we have is estimations based on proxy readings from ice cores, tree rings and so on. The uncertainties are just too great. This post shows with astounding clarity as to why you can't rely on such a record (he's from the outspoken right, socially speaking, but he's qualified on this subject)
at 08:51 on December 22nd, 2009
Global warming is due to the activity of the sun spots (gas explosion) activity instead of increased output of carbon dioxide emission, indeed from 2012 onwards those sun spot become active again and will cool the Earth. It is a complete error to state that CO2 emissions are causing global warming, statistically it never has been the case and also is not proven scientifically. To the contrary it is the other way around, CO2 changes followed global temperature changes by hundreds to thousands of years and not as the propaganda let believe that changes in CO2 levels largely caused the changes in global temperature.
The temperatures actually went down in the postwar economic boom period from 1945 to 1980 -in accordance to NASA graphs- when carbon dioxide emissions were increasing, while the sunspots were decreasing. The bet for $10,000 from Galina Mashnich and Vladimir Bashkirtsev will be won, provided it is set till after 2012!