NP Rank:
Good Life for All = Private Sector + Public Sector
A Good Life for All
http://politisite.com/2011/10/23/a-good-life-for-all/
"As a liberal I believe “a good life for all” is an individual right. You could say having an equal opportunity to pursue a good life is sufficient, but there are circumstances that preclude a person from achieving the minimum goal that are not their fault."
Good Life for All = Private Sector + Public Sector
There is a great debate in the United States today about the role of government and about wealth distribution. These debates are about the larger scheme of the economic model to which we subscribe.
Capitalism as it is known is about an individual working to earn and accumulate wealth with minimal impediment. Throughout American history, there have been times when capitalists (business owners) have run amuck with greed and corruption at the expense of workers. At the demand of voters, Government intervened to correct misbehavior.
Some workers lobbied government and organized into unions. Others used their votes to get representatives to enact laws to protect workers and to ensure fairness and benefits.
Government serves business owners, management, and labor as a mediator at times.
Business lobbyists convinced some representatives and eventually convinced the courts that corporations should be treated like people. Corporations created political action committees and various ways to channel money to the campaigns of elected officials to the extent of undermining individual voters. This circumstance has yet to be reconciled and that is one reason why initiatives like Occupy Wall Street have appeared.
Now, wealth in America has skewed into the hands of a privileged few. At a time when the needs of the people are deficiently met by the American economic system, people want the wealthy to share more of the burden. Therein lays conflict.
Here is a story that provides more grist for thought about our economic system.
“Public-sector cuts drag down job growth
The unemployment rate fell slightly to 9 percent — but it would have been 8.7 percent had state and local governments not contracted the past two years.
(By Neil Irwin) “
There has been discussion and debate about basing the cost of government as a function of Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the goods and services produced by the private sector.
Public Sector Employment = f (GDP) = % of GDP
Public Sector Employment is a function of GDP that can be expressed as a percent of GDP.
Public Sector Employment = f (GDP) = % of Private Sector Employment
Public Sector Employment may also be expressed as a % of Private Sector Employment.
Therefore, if Private Sector Employment is down, then Public Sector Employment must go down.
President Obama, following the types of actions taken by FDR to stem the Great Depression, wants to increase Public Sector Employment to pump more dollars into the economy with the notion of jump starting the private sector.
The trouble is that Government has already squandered its borrowing power on wars and foreign policy as well as tax reduction polices that it could not afford. Therefore, Republicans argue that this option is not available.
Is GDP a f (Private Sector Employment)?
Is GDP a function of private sector employment? There may be a positive influence of private sector employment on GDP in good times, but in bad times like these, the cost simply exacerbates the debt problem.
Therefore, other solutions are needed. This is why I argue that a new economic model is needed, beyond capitalism because capitalism is not addressing the need of providing a good life for all.





Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (14)
at 05:25 on November 5th, 2011
I wish you liberals would hurry up and get my good life the government owes me on track. I've been scrimping and saving and doing with out a lot of things so my children can get through university and my wife and I can enjoy our retirement. It's time the government saw to my expectations. We'd like a better house in a better neighborhood, new vehicles for us all, the furniture is getting on, there's university tuition to be paid, and my wife and I want to retire with everything paid for and a minimum income of $3,000/mth. Snap, snap.
at 06:16 on November 5th, 2011
We could have side by side Airsteams -- ego and alter ego.
at 09:46 on November 5th, 2011
If living in an Airstream is your idea of a good life, I want someone other than you seeing after the good life I'm owed by government.
at 11:36 on November 5th, 2011
I live within my means and am not a politician. Got any beer over there?
at 12:20 on November 5th, 2011
You wouldn't like the beer. It's crafted by small independent American brewers who produce a original beer that is contrary to the watered-down tastes manufactured for the swilling mob. :-)
at 13:09 on November 5th, 2011
I make mine in the bathtub too.
at 16:29 on November 5th, 2011
Ya. What do you call it? YJ's Minimum Good lager. LOL.
at 17:30 on November 5th, 2011
Rustytuberfest
at 17:51 on November 5th, 2011
LOL. Sounds like something warm served at a blotched viagra users outreach program.
at 02:53 on November 6th, 2011
My Blue Heaven
at 08:43 on November 6th, 2011
This is a completely false and counterproductive depiction of what Jim wants from government/democracy. No one is claiming the "government owes" us something. That frame is absurd and simplistic. You have not said anything important or new. It is not some groundbreaking insight - that somehow liberals are blind to - that the government can't just redistribute all private sector income without limits. There are limits to what the public sector should be involved in. There is a moral hazard to handouts. We get it.
at 06:59 on November 5th, 2011
Where's The 1, he could referee?
at 15:03 on November 5th, 2011
Hey you're doing good here YJ..Also save alittle of that beer for me ! lol
at 02:58 on November 7th, 2011
We're multiplying.