GOV'T 'FUSION CENTER' SPYING: Pretext to Harass and Censor?

Fox is playing the same game as everyone else in the news business these days - they know what to say, but won't say it because they think it would not serve their roles and interests.

Vic: you have presented yourself as a liberal-side guy in several posts, unless I am mistaken?  How did you find yourself at Fox rather than some less conservative establishment?

Probably a bit of a trite question, because despite all of the labeling, it seems that within the scope of that which is most important to Americans at this critical juncture, the "news" establishments are supporting authoritarian propaganda, and that trumps any squabble about whether they call it "left" or "right".

I see less and less meaningful difference every day.

Censorship?

You bet.

Back in the day, any attributes of anonymity or inherent resistance to censorship within the internet system were based entirely on the idea that the major network players were decentralized, and that they did not "get together", with or without government intervention, to centrally track, trace, read and/or block network traffic.

In the early days, it was often said that censorship of the internet was not possible, and that any attempt to censor any user of same would have the result that the internet would instantly "route around" (the censorship).  The ad hoc nature of the system in those days caused it to be imbued with certain inherent freedom facets that no longer exist within it.

Using the excuse of the war on terror, among other things, the internet has become both cable-vision-ized and subjected to new centralized control mechanisms.  New coordination-enabling features between major routing choke points have flattened the hierarchy of the internet, and in the name of "fighting for freedom", are strangling it. *

* Italicized comments are based entirely upon my speculation.

it is "selective" censorship that *they* aspire too.

If one looks at a set of Google search engine results for gang or organized stalking related search terms, it immediately becomes obvious that many disinformation and "lame parody" pages which are targeted towards the mockery of our cause somehow manage to be close to the top of the rankings.

We know that organized stalking operations are very well financed, and seeing (perhaps) the effect of such financing manifested in high ranking for such pages should not be surprising.  Likely it is done in an indirect manner, perhaps with officially unaffiliated advertising for back-links and so forth. 

In any case, I have found that much superior results are to be had by going to the end of the search results (last page), and working backwards.  It's not so difficult ... there are only around a hundred pages (depending upon exact search term selected) and it is easy to navigate to the end of the list.

I believe that the results will be much more to your liking ...

Stories have been published, that after the 911 terrorist attacks, that thousands of contractors were hired by certain agencies under the auspices of Homeland Security.

A percentage of these contractors were assigned to assess and eliminate so-called internal threats within the United States.

The tactics described are common to these agencies and include the fielding and or the experimentation of defense contractor's chemical, biological and electronic weapons.

These agencies are using methods that are not within accepted or the original law of the Constitution of the United States Of America.

Primarily and foremost, the denial of our fourth amendment rights as guaranteed under our Constitution have been usurped by the Patriot Act and Presidential Decrees.

These aberrations of the law have also been exploited by those who would take advantage, to take care of *personal business.*

This is also an extension of the "good'ol boy network" that includes multi-national corporations, the mafia and our government as the basis for these crimes.

Stories have been published, that after the 911 terrorist attacks, that thousands of contractors were hired by certain agencies under the auspices of Homeland Security.

A percentage of these contractors were assigned to assess and eliminate so-called internal threats within the United States.

The tactics described are common to these agencies and include the fielding and or the experimentation of defense contractor's chemical, biological and electronic weapons.

These agencies are using methods that are not within accepted or the original law of the Constitution of the United States Of America.

Primarily and foremost, the denial of our fourth amendment rights as guaranteed under our Constitution have been usurped by the Patriot Act and Presidential Decrees.

These aberrations of the law have also been exploited by those who would take advantage, to take care of *personal business.*

This is also an extension of the "good'ol boy network" that includes multi-national corporations, the mafia and our government as the basis for these crimes.

"This is also an extension of the "good'ol boy network" that includes multi-national corporations, the mafia ...  "

The determination of "who is who" and "what is what" is so extraordinarily difficult, as all persons must find more disinformation than anything else, and citizens are drenched by it from sunrise until sunset every single day of the year. 

Any person with low observational acumen or sensitivity is consumed into it's totalitarian contrived "fairy land" false-reality in a fairly short time.  Some of the less sophisticated "brown shirt" types probably fit into that category.

I've notice for a long time that a lot of noise seems to be coming from groups claiming to be "freedom fighter" oriented, or "privacy activists", and who are providing a slightly altered expression of what we espouse as our reality on these forums day after day.  

An example of such a person is the prolific privacy rights  personality  Katherine  Albrecht, who has the major commentary on sites such as www.katherinealbrecht.com and spychips.com.  Mrs. Albrecht seems to concern herself primarily with the negative connotations related to the use of RFID tags.  I share some of her concerns, as RFID tag technology can be used in exactly the same way as GPS tracking technology, if it is spread to all corners far and wide.

There are other personalities that come to mind (not to imply that all of these folks may be lumped together into one basket).

A right-wing leaning group may be found at infowars.com.

The one thing that is lacking in the commentary produced by *all* of these groups is any mention of "organized stalking".  As self proclaimed activists set against such things as RFID tags and similar other (potentially) totalitarian technology, one would think that the "totalitarians" would be pouncing upon them like cats on catnip.

Thoughts?

Immediately after I posted the last message,  I turned off  the computer and went outside to do a little yard work. 

A neighbor (whom I have never met) yelled across to me that "Alex Jones is not a right winger".  

I think that this particular neighbor that I referenced is somewhat new to our neighborhood, but I am not sure, as there seems to be a lot of movement (pun intended) into and out of this neighborhood.

I believe that our family is one of the few remaining ones whose residence dates from the time we moved into this neighborhood eight and a half years ago.

Perhaps the comment made by "reposter", indicating that my internet connection is "owned" is accurate.

In any case, I digress.  Is the neighbor's statement about Mr. Jones "on the mark"?

Vic:

I surfed to the Alex Jones site and stumbled across your article (by accident).  I did notice that he gave you full attribution -- that is some consolation, I suppose ...  :-)

I wonder about the real agendas held by the operators of any UTV victim-oriented web sites.  The reason I make such a statement has a basis in a message that I recently posted to another UTV (I think) who authors official news pages on this site.  The message follows:

Which ISP do you use?

Really, due to my discovery that the websites of activists and dissidents are routinely tossed into the Internet's "black hole", I find it very difficult to believe that your site is, in any way, "for real".

The propaganda machine doesn't like competition, and so (naturally) any dissenting point of view is blocked.  This is the way that all mainstream (as well as other) press operations have been muzzled in this country (U.S.) and around the world. Tokyo Rose is all that remains for the eyes and ears of all the submissive drones worldwide.

The so-called "open" internet was never any such thing.  The military folks designed it, for crissakes.  They had control of all the major traffic control nodes (choke points) back then, and they still do (indirectly) have control of them now.

Bigger sites (such as NPR) allow the posting of messages from people such as myself, but such a thing is tolerated by the "system" only because messages posted to boards such as this one are easily "buried" by the myriad spam messages submitted by roving legions of "gang stalkers".

My sites have been buried for seven years:  nada, nyet, nicht -- zero real traffic ever allowed through!  I have tried a dozen different ISP operators in five different countries.  No dice - it's all controlled to the hilt.  At one point I considered putting the sites in China, for crying out loud, but the Chinese make that almost impossible for (obvious) reasons.  You must have a "sponsor" in the Chinese government to get it done - yeah, right.

Our "internet" however; is not much different than theirs.  They are just more truthful about the censorship.

It is true that one of my sites might be deemed politically controversial, another is "family oriented", and another is "tech oriented".  It really doesn't matter at all what the content of your site is if at any point in time your number is punched into the central control databases.  At such a juncture, you are the "invisible man" and always will be.

At this point I have a total lack of  understanding as to why it can be that your site(s) are visible on the internet.  Please tell me  which "magical" ISP you are using .....