NP Rank:
Ground Zero Imam Issues Threat To New Yorkers ... et al!
Ground Zero Imam Issues Threat To New Yorkers ... et al!
Or, about 70% of all Americans are RADICALS ... and RACISTS!
In what has to be a classic example of how the religion of perpetual outrage, Islam, takes a "finger in everyone's eye" approach to dealing with propriety, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, the religious leader behind the proposed Islamic Center near Ground Zero - spoke to CNN about the Mosque placement controversy and issues a threat to New Yorkers ... and the rest of the free world.
Said Rauf, "If this is not handled correctly, this crisis could become much bigger than the Danish cartoon crisis, which resulted in attacks on Danish embassies in various parts of the Muslim world,” Rauf said later. “…. If we don't handle this crisis correctly it could become something which could really become very, very, very dangerous indeed.”
Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf says the reason he can’t move the Islamic center now is because of national security concerns, saying parts of the Muslim world would be violently inflamed at the news of the center’s relocation.
“The headlines in the Muslim world will be that Islam is under attack… (there’s) the danger of the radicals in the Muslim world to our national security, to the national security of our troops,” he said.
“If we do move,” Rauf continued, “it will strengthen the argument of the radicals to recruit, their ability to recruit, and their increasing aggression and violence ... .”
"If we move from that location, the story will be the radicals have taken over the discourse," the imam told CNN in his first televised interview since returning from a two-week State Department-sponsored cooperation tour of the Middle East.
So he characterizes anyone who believes that Muslims have the right to build but object because of the context that Islam attacked us already by flying planes into the World Trade Center towers and killed thousands of innocent people not related to their outrage and grievance against freedom of thought of the free world ... as RADICALS.
We, at MAXINE, have to ask - Isn't flying hijacked commercial planes into buildings and killing thousands of people while destroying massive amounts of property ... RADICAL?
The truth is this mosque project, its location, its naming, and timing of its celebration of launch of September 11, 2011 ... exactly 10 years after radical Islams attack on the United States ... is the definition of RADICAL and it should not be allowed to stand.
Take this and all other Imam's threats of violence and throw them back into their face.
UPDATE - Additional Thought:
The highest level of threat that the Ground Zero Imam stated in his responses to Soledad O'Brian in the CNN interview-based article (Ground Zero Imam Issues Threat To New Yorkers ... et al!) is to label all of the people who do not think a Mosque should be placed at "Ground Zero" - named Cordoba, set to be launched exactly 10 years to the date of the attacks on the World Trade Center (about 70% of most American's asked) - RADICALS.
On ABC's Good Morning America, Meredith Vieira let a CAIR spokesman label these same Americans as Racists. When will the illegitimate name calling from Muslim-Haters end?
This excerpted and edited from NewsBusters -
Vieira let Council on American-Islamic Relations' (CAIR) Zead Ramadan go on, uninterrupted, as he proceeded to compare the protest surrounding the Ground Zero mosque to some of America's worst moments of intolerance as he went on to say:
"The issue with the public sentiment is that when an issue is related to bigotry, unfortunately our history has shown that sometimes we're on the wrong side. For example we interred Japanese during World War II, we segregated our military, our schools, and it took on Executive Order to undo that. And we also enslaved our fellow Americans. So I mean when it comes to bigotry we've got to be careful about the public sentiment."
Reference Here>>
This Ground Zero Mosque issue over principles is probably the clearest example that we are in a culturally-based Values War with Muslims and they are the ones looking for the fight. The Muslim culture would like to erase American culture and the freedoms it once guaranteed through the Bill Of Rights and the Constitution.
(ht: quotes excerpted and edited from CNN, Washington Post, & ABC News)
Crowd Power
-
Edmund Jenks
Los Angeles, California, United States







Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (38)
at 18:06 on September 13th, 2010
Xenophobia so entrenched, the Right seeks to transform President Obama into a spirit medium, channeling a Kenyan tribesman, a sentiment immediately embraced by Newt Gingrich, former Republican Speaker of the House and desired U.S. presidential hopeful, the architect of Contract for America during the 90s, who is now involved as an elder statesman in advising his party today.
Source: forbes.com
at 09:22 on September 23rd, 2010
Edmund, I read the article and there is no doubt to the intent of D'Souza's piece and his attempt to help along the foolish and bizarre narrative surrounding President Obama's Kenyan heritage. His spin? The President has been possessed by the spirit of his dead father, a Kenyan tribesman.
Since Newt Gingrich has embraced this latest nonsense, I guess we should be able to predict the Right Wing nutcases will be altering their 'Obama was born in Kenya' litany to add, or substitute, the latest nonsense.
Neither candidate Senator Barack Obama nor later, as President Barack Obama, has he ever issued or proclaimed any leftist agenda, contrary to the disinformation propaganda campaign ceaselessly promoted and parroted by the Right Wing of the Republican Party.
The GOP and the TEA Party have fallen prey to their own disinformation campaign, made real during the wanderings inside their own created propaganda.
It may be your ears, Edmund, if not your head, that has/have already been eaten off or severely damaged.
Smoke and Mirrors: The Role of the TEA Party in American Politics
at 16:08 on September 28th, 2010
Do, do, do, do, do, do, do, do, ....
at 11:11 on September 23rd, 2010
It seems that a certain percentage of the population has succumbed to the "we create our own reality" mindset as believed by former President Bush, his aides, and advisers. From Ron Suskind's NY Times profile of Bush:
In the summer of 2002, after I had written an article in Esquire that the White House didn't like about Bush's former communications director, Karen Hughes, I had a meeting with a senior adviser to Bush. He expressed the White House's displeasure, and then he told me something that at the time I didn't fully comprehend -- but which I now believe gets to the very heart of the Bush presidency.
The aide said that guys like me were ''in what we call the reality-based community,'' which he defined as people who ''believe that solutions emerge from your judicious study of discernible reality.'' I nodded and murmured something about enlightenment principles and empiricism. He cut me off. ''That's not the way the world really works anymore,'' he continued. ''We're an empire now, and when we act, we create our own reality. And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again, creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out. We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.'' The New York Times > Magazine > In the Magazine: Faith, Certainty and the Presidency of George W. Bush
at 22:28 on September 12th, 2010
If all that isn't bad enough another tactic they are openly pursuing toward securing themselves as the dominant faith is through overpopulation...they had a website a couple of years ago, probably still do, with a "birth ticker" counting the muslim babies they were bringing into the world, and showing the falling figures of the Christian and Judaism populations. The site went on to extensive rhetoric encouraging all muslims to have as many children as they could to promote the "world's fastest growing religion".
It's childish and destructive, and I wonder since global warming is a common leftist cause, as is opposing those who oppose his mosque, what they would say about the obvious contradiction? (not that I am right OR left)
at 13:12 on September 12th, 2010
Edmund, The West is at a crossroads. It is possible that radical elements in the West will be able to de-claw America. The EU countries are currently sitting ducks in a barrel watching their countries unravel piece by piece as it is being held hostage by hostile Islamic culture that is totally integrated with Koranic writings making clear that at every opportunity one must ,lie,cheat, and make alliances with the infidel in order to overcome and over power their culture and restore Islam back into world dominance.
Not all Muslims buy into this "truth" but in fact very few have the strength and courage to scream at the top of their lungs, "the emperor has no clothes" and deceit is the checkmate to the pawns that we are regarding the real intent of radical Islam.
at 20:20 on September 15th, 2010
Thank you for injecting some valuable information into this that I did not know.
Here is something all of Islam must face however. Remember the extremist Christians who were bombing abortion clinics in the '80s? That only really ended because of pressure within the congregations and faith itself, convincing the minority their actions were not consistent with their faith.
However mainstream Islam seemed to take a stance that "it's not us, it just some extremists doing things in our name" and getting overly defensive to critics- while at the same time polls in the middle east were revealing that (the majority of) muslims as a whole, while disagreeing with the violent tactics being used, still tended to agree with the philosophies and goals of Al Qaeda against the west.
While I agree the "war on terrorism" has been hyped up for other agendas I still tend to resent the feeling I perceive that Islam or any other religion wants t dominate the world. I don't think all Muslims are terrorists but if people are committing violent acts in your name promoting your agenda you can't get too defensive when these acts are attached to your shared faith. It's up to them to police their own and if they can't do it we will have to and that's going to be pretty ugly.
As for the mosque I think another NowPublic user said it best:
"They should have the right to build it and the wisdom not to"
at 06:52 on September 18th, 2010
What you are quoting from Forbes is actually from the jacket of a book by Dinesh D'Souza about Barack Obama's father. D'Souza is a man with an interesting perspective and experience. Being born in India, raised a Catholic and later became more focused on an Evangelical approach to Christianity - he is well aware of the history and of the oppressive CONTROL of imperialism. It is this point of order that Barack Obama has to be judged from.
He lied by presenting himself as a left-centrist wanting to bring transparency to the processes of Government.We are now all suffering under a CONTROL freak who appoints people to positions of power over lives without the Constitutional assured review and over-cite of the members of Congress.
Karen, please pull your head out of the sand before the ants eat it off!