NP Rank:
Happy Birthday America. And The Colony of Canada !
Canada is a by-product of the American Revolution.
A brief comparison of Canada with the world’s greatest democratic republic
American Revolution, the U.S. Declaration of Independence, and the U.S. Constitution, are probably history’s greatest landmarks in the political evolution of mankind from absolute tyranny to freedom and self determination.
The American and French rebels inspired each other to build the world’s first nation states on the principles of freedom and equality. While the French Revolution and the guillotine struck terror into the hearts of Europe’s tyrants, the American Revolution forced history’s biggest colonial power to temper its hold on the Britannic Majesty’s colonial subjects in North America.
Whether we like it or not, Canada is very much a by-product of the American Revolution, and economically a by-product of the powerhouse called the United States of America.
The British North America Act and the Constitution Act of 1867, which created Canada as we know it today, had a single primary motive: to prevent armed rebellion.
Denial of the right to bear arms under colonial rule has created a peaceful, obedient nation that will put up with just about any whim of a benevolent tyrant in exchange for a little bit of security.
Canada has never declared its independence from Britain except for the symbolic act of changing its flag from a variation of the Union Jack to the maple leaf.
Repatriation of the Constitution in 1982 was a charade to create the illusion that Canada is a nation determining its own destiny. Its Made-In-Britain constitution and Charter of Rights & Freedoms compare poorly with the U.S. Constitution, and it’s disputable if the Charter was actually designed to expand or to limit Canadians’ fundamental constitutional rights. It’s a juridical miracle that judges are able to infer so much from a 3-page rag.
Any right or freedom bestowed by Canada’s Charter of Rights can be suspended if it’s deemed to be “in public interest” by those that rule in the Queen’s name.
While Americans enjoy a real democracy at least on paper, and definitely at the state and local levels, Canadians’ democratic rights consist of casting one vote to help elect a dictator every four or five years. Most national and local governments come to power with a minority of the vote.
In Canada political rights are commensurate with how much power and money one has. Average citizens have no hope of access to legislation or executive decision-making even on matters that concern them personally or very closely.
In the U.S. justice is a right and the power to adjudicate springs from the people. In Canada justice is a privilege bestowed by a Lord or Lady in the Queens’s name to the best performer at the court. Most Canadians cannot afford to access the justice system, which has been reserved exclusively for the country’s financial elite.
While U.S. has always been the land of opportunity and free enterprise, Canada stifles entrepreneurship by taxing or regulating everything between heavens and earth to sustain the lifestyles of an overpaid bureaucracy, politicians and their friends. Canada’s biggest industry is selling land and passports to the world’s rich.
While the U.S. is a huge meritocracy that has integrated even visible minorities to the economy, Canada’s public service, most professions, many large corporations, and even universities are closed to the millions of qualified but non-affluent immigrants. Canada has no affirmative action programs for the PhD’s, doctors, engineers and other qualified people that must drive cabs, deliver pizzas or do other menial jobs because they were not born or raised in Canada. Even the simplest occupations or commercial activity are controlled by a government-empowered clique or bureaucracy.
Proof is in the pudding. One of the two countries that share this continent is a superpower while the other, one of the richest countries on earth, must parcel land and sell passports to remain afloat.
NowPublic on Facebook
Most Recommended Comment
Crowd Power
-
steffanileman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Recommendations (14)
-
Jordan Yerman
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada -
YankeeJim
Arlington, Virginia, United States


Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (23)
at 21:41 on July 4th, 2010
Well, Ottawa is not a typical Canadian city, and you don't live there unless you're from there or somehow managed to land a government job. I'd also hate to say, especially as a Westerner, that the nation's capital is hopelessly detached from the country's reality. The news cartel rarely reports systemic problems in order not to offend its biggest patrons. So we have a great immigration record, great democracy, there's no discrimination or injustice, and everyone's deliriously happy. I only write about my personal experiences or observations, and I wish I could make myself believe all that. Many thanks for flagging the story.
at 23:03 on July 4th, 2010
Wow. That's a broad paint bush of misunderstanding of Canadian history and Constitutional governance. Then again not everyone can be made happy by government.
And not everyone off the boat have the education standards we require for professional license to be doctors, lawyers, engineers, etc. in this country. Many from other countries have to go back to school to meet those requirements to work in Canada.
Bad Canada.
at 13:13 on July 6th, 2010
Some of that may be necessary and not entirely unreasonable, but most of the so-called standards have the purpose of restricting competition to profit those that don't want to work or compete in the marketplace and live off those that do. Like licensing of car salesmen in BC, sending travel agents to jail in Ontario for failing to pay a $20,000 fee, and many others, unique Canadian institutions that exploit real or imagined insecurities to create an industry of parasitic paper pushers.. This is not really an immigration problem, except that most Canadians rarely question abuse of authority...
at 15:45 on July 6th, 2010
Licensing is very important and has nothing to do with restricting competition. Get licensed and join the competition. Follow the rules and join the competition. Every game has it's rules and a free market place is not the absents of rules or regulation.
MOST Canadians don't question regulation because we demand regulation. We like everyone to follow the rules in a peaceful and ordered manner. We don't want people coming here to change the rules to suit themselves.
at 13:03 on July 7th, 2010
You don't want to change things except for cash. You sound like Germany's ultranationalists, I'll refrain from using the correct word, but at least they're not hypocrites and not willing to sell their country and culture for money.
at 19:05 on July 7th, 2010
Thank you for equating my opinion to that of Nazism. However that says more about you than what you would like to infer in what I posted. If there is something you want to change get involved with the system and change it from with in the system. Sitting back whining like a stuck pig blaming the system is the act of an incompetent. More proof you do not deserve the profession you think you ought to have automatically because you showed up with a degree from some country who hands them out for the cost of the printing and your daddy new the printer.
My Iranian friend fled Iran during the revolution and got a civil engineering degree in the Philippines. He told me that when he went to write the examination in Toronto, Canada he didn't know half the answers because his education didn't cover them. He was angry but he didn't blame Canada.
Perhaps your anger is misplaced and you are blaming the wrong system. Perhaps you are not as 'educated' as you think you are? Perhaps it is just easier to sit back and whine than be proactive and do something constructive? Victim is not a moral imperative.
at 10:22 on July 8th, 2010
I never said I'm an immigrant PhD, doctor, engineer or other professional. If you haven't noticed, this is a site for citizen journalism where people report on issues that are important to them. You should go to school and brush up on your English comprehension.
First you said immigrants have no right to change the system, now you have a problem with the freedom of expression. I suppose the restriction should only apply to the second-class citizens and not the happy Colonials.:)
I thought you had something halfway intelligent that merited the courtesy of a reply, but I don't want to have to respond to your animal analogies. This is the end of my conversation with the representative of the Ignorant Majority.
at 16:15 on July 8th, 2010
I suppose that excuses the NAZI comment.
I never said immigrants could not or should not change the system. I said to do it from with in the system. The rest is just more of your own bias as excuse to defame this country with out having to be knowledgeable on our history or how government works for everyone with out exception to race, creed or ethnicity.
The Colonials and second class citizens comment exemplifies your own ignorance and thankfully you are a minority in this country. What ever you suppose has nothing to do with me. I am not responsible for your supposition.
at 01:36 on July 5th, 2010
Happy Birthday? For what. For robbing the land of an indigenous people who did no harm to the Anglo-Saxon or European race. Congratulations to the people who committed the most hideous form of genocide on an unsuspecting race based on cruelty, treachery and utter greed?Where are these poor people now on whose bones this 'great land' was built. 'The greening of America was built on the bones of the native American' said one famous historian. Haven't you guys read Howard Zinn's 'A People's History of the United States'? or for that matter David Stannard's 'The American Holocaust'? David Stannard mentions that at least 15-16 million Native Americans were annihilated to create homes for these English, Irish and other Europeans who forcibly settled themselves in a land that did not belong to them. The most horrific chapter in world history that is not often mentioned.In fact it seems to be glorified. Strange that everyone goes on about the Jewish holocaust on and on again.Hasn't enough compensation done for this. Israel is demanding compensation and the US has made it its pet child.Apart from all this Germany is still paying compensation in the form of financing totally the cost of all transport in Israel.Billions of dollars are paid in cast annually apart form complete military arsenal including nuclear weaponry by the United States. France provides full help in building infrastructure,roads etc.So how much is enough. Yet Israel complains.The big question now is what have the Europeans done to compensate for their crimes in Native America. Native Americans live in poverty and negligence.Their culture lost,Their history erased.God bless people like Eva Morales who is doing his best to collect the strands of history and giving a meaning to the existence of the present Native American.The only way the US and Canada can compensate for their crimes of history is to give back the land to the native Americans,give them back their culture and their respect . Why not? Israel is demanding the same the same isn't it? Why are the Jews more important than the native Americans? It is all one human race is it not?So before you guys cut the birthday cake and wish each other 'Happy Birthday' think about your guilt. Whether you deserve to celebrate this 'birthday' as you call it.
at 04:30 on July 5th, 2010
lets all feel guilty for what happened 200 years ago and 300 years from now that generation can feel as bad for something they have no connection to. jackass.
at 13:41 on July 7th, 2010
please address your illiterate lack of knowledge before tripping over your own selfish stubborn opinion...educate the masses and pay it forward! In view of President Barack Obama's belief, it would be honourable and proper for him to seek justice for the Indigenous Peoples of the United States, and all the Indigenous Peoples of the Americas, who have been, against impossible odds, and without much success, fighting for justice for themselves for centuries. Tommy Douglas on Fascism: “Once more let me remind you what fascism is. It need not wear a brown shirt or a green shirt it may even wear a dress shirt. Fascism begins the moment a ruling class, fearing the people may use their political democracy to gain economic democracy, begins to destroy political democracy in order to retain its power of exploitation and special privilege.” (Thomas Clement "Tommy" Douglas, PC, CC, SOM (20 October 1904 – 24 February 1986) was a Scottish-born Baptist minister who became a prominent Canadian social democratic politician. As leader of the Saskatchewan Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) from 1942 and the seventh Premier of Saskatchewan from 1944 to 1961, he led the first socialist government in North America and introduced universal public healthcare to Canada. When the CCF united with the Canadian Labour Congress to form the New Democratic Party, he was elected as its first federal leader and served in that post from 1961 to 1971.) The cruel mistreatment of the First Nations Peoples of the Americas by the invaders from Europe was related to the evolutionary societal development of the European Continent. Greed, over the ages, became its top societal value, and its keystone motivator. Under the system, the accumulation and protection of personal power and wealth by any means became top priority for individuals. Over time, the ruling class and wealthy that were created from such endeavours, to protect their privileged lifestyles, began the practice of using horrific terrorist methods to brutally force their own citizens to submit to their collective wills. I.e., the rack, burning at the stake, drawing and quartering, were some of the horrific devices and methods liberally employed. Harsh forms of government and religion were imposed upon their people, human and civil rights were not a consideration. It was not a Thus, when an opportunity arose for Europe's oppressed to escape from their oppressors by emigrating to the America's, they left by the tens of thousands. Over a very short period of time they became the oppressors of the Indigenous Peoples of the two Continents. There is an old saying, "God help the oppressed when the oppressed become the oppressor." The ensuing barbaric conduct of the oppressed European invaders, which had no limits in the cruelty dispensed, proves the credence of the old proverb. Within a few centuries, tens of millions of Indigenous Peoples were dead, and not one Indigenous civilization of the Americas was left unharmed. In fact, several became extinct. History relates, resulting from this ingrained desire to dominate by terror, and trying to accomodate their insatible desire to accumulate wealth and power, that British, Spanish, Canadian, and American Governments have, over the centuries, when mistreating North America's First Nations Peoples, violated every provision mentioned in Article 2 of the Genocide Convention. The same applies to the conduct of such countries as Spain and Portugal in South America, and the European dominated countries they created there. The Convention on the Prevention and Punishment for the Crime of Genocide was adopted by the United Nations on December 9, 1948. Article 2 of the Convention defines Genocide: Genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (A) Killing members of the group:(B) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group:(C) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part:(D) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group:(E) Forcefully transferring children of the group to another group: good life for the oppressed citizens.
at 19:25 on July 8th, 2010
please address your illiterate lack of knowledge before tripping over your own selfish stubborn opinion....every tribe has been victim of some other tribe. first tribes to america where pushed south by new tribes. wiped out by other tribes and incorporated by other tribes. english scotish french irish chinese whatever just more tribes. Can't recall genocide in canada by white but can recall genocide of huron by iroquois and the ojibwae take their land. maybe that ok with relativist like you who has limited knowledge and understanding. all mankind behave the same pick one to make blame is only for the hider of truth.man is man is man. ghengis khan made genocide many times assyrians romans goths celts han chin all down through history. sadly american indian was nomad people in a country conquered by unified organised society. all fault not white when red unable to adapt to change to grow beyond old ways. takes two to fight, can't blame victor or blame looser. that is life and you live comfortable in that result if not it's your fault. no place for 1400 in 2010.
at 08:23 on July 5th, 2010
I as a canadian am extremely offended by this article, it's implications, and the hidden truth of it's attitude. Americans have long implied that they are superior to every other nation even while their dirty laundry flaps and stinks in the breeze. Canada is a proud nation with a strong history of her own which includes, thank you very much, thrashing America the only time we ever engaged in war. We burnt your White House! Enough with the lies and propaganda, Canada declared her independance peacefully the way a child leaves a loving home as an adult, and keeps connection to the parents and family, so too do we stay connected to the British Commonwealth and Her Majesty The Queen. It's a wonderful relationship and we're not going to let the malcontented runaway street kid shame us over it. If you really need to try and make everyone else inferior, best figure out what is wrong that you are so ashamed and fix it.
I'll give you some places to start: The education system. The social safety net. Racism. Arms Race. Capitalism as an institution rather than a tool for personal satisfaction. Good luck, and get out of my history books, mmkay?
at 13:20 on July 6th, 2010
It's good to see some Canadian nationalism for a change instead of lethargy, anarkissed.:) What is "the hidden truth of its attitude" ?
at 08:22 on July 8th, 2010
I stated it in the very next breath, "Americans have long implied that they are superior to every other nation even while their dirty laundry flaps and stinks in the breeze."I suppose it's not so hidden but if you pin anyone of them down about it they'll first deny that they think they're superior by merely being that particular country, then if pressed try to defend it. It's not hard to disprove, however, by pointing to war mongering, poverty, pollution, poor social structures, and generally poor care of it's own less abled. They'll still insist that their military might makes them superior though. They're proud of that, that they can kill more efficiently than most other countries.Fortunately, on a personal level most Americans are just people and as ordinary and real as anyone else. It's just this unsufferable form of patriotism with which they're indoctrinated. Like heresy in the church, any deviation from the status quo results in heavy social punishment.
at 07:38 on July 6th, 2010
this guy proof you don't have to like country to take advantage of all it has to offer or why he still live there? me i move to a different country long time ago. or go back home where everything so much better.
at 13:49 on July 29th, 2010
The American Declaration of independence was neither the first document of its type, nor overly original at that. The Scottish Declaration of Arbroath, written in 1320, declared the independence of THAT nation, from the same aggressive world power as that which the Americans, more than four centuries later, rose up against, not out of principle,as was the case with Arbroath, but because they did not want to pay their taxes! Moreover, the declaration of independence is widely accepted as being based, and in some cases plagiarised, from the Declaration of Arbroath. And is it any wonder? After all, who were the so called ‘founding fathers” of this egotistical entity known as the <?xml:namespace prefix = st1 />United States? Members of the Masons, an organisation started generations earlier, in Scotland. They even sought, as is documented in the annals of history, to have the Stuart kings, who had been ousted from the throne in England, to be the monarch of their new country. Apparently, Jacobite kings were not of a mind with Satan, and would rather not rule hell than serve heaven.
Canada being shown as a docile follower of Tyranny? This surely is a joke? Who, after all, won the war of 1812? And burnt down the Whitehouse? Granted it was the British Army, in those days, but colonial regiments were there, doing their part. And in 1914, Canadian boys rushed to join up and fight against German expansionism and tyranny. By the time the Americans joined in, the war was almost won. What great battles were fought by the rugged, tough American Expeditionary Force? Do any names leap to mind? Ypres, The Somme, Amiens, Festubert, Vimy, Arras, Paschendaele, Canal du Norde, Valenciennes, the capture of Mons. This is certainly not the complete list. However, it is a good cross section of four years horror, experienced by Canadians, fighting against tyranny. Where was this mighty super-power, the United States, at this time? Selling weapons and arms to both sides, war profiteering. When it became clear which side would win, and most of the heavy fighting was done, that is when they decided to join the fight. And when war again broke out, in 1939, this time against one of the most evil tyrants in recorded history, where were they? When Germany marched into Poland, where were our glorious neighbours, the world police? It was not their concern, until three years later, due to a lack of communication, they allowed Japan to sink a few of their ship, and destroy a few planes. Until the mid-twentieth Century, they were far from a world Super power. Indeed, between the First and Second World Wars, Canada was thought to be as much of a world power as was the United States, the difference being Canada was the less isolationist, and elected a mad-man as Prime Minister. Also, for the record, it was not John A MacDonald who led Canada to Nationhood in 1867. It was Arthur Currie, in April of 1917, at Vimy Ridge. Let’s face it, a Nation, dominions are not. However, through the afore mentioned battles, Canada won the right to stand as an independent nation. That is also why, in 1939, our nation had the right to choose to stand up against Hitler and his dark hoards. And again, young men (French and English both, despite what current Quebec politicians and historians may tell you) flooded the recruiting centres. No sheep here, Canada has a proud military history… one that, sadly, had been forgotten by many, for a time. The previous paragraphs aside, I have a great deal of respect for Americans, and their sense of patriotism. I find the majority of Americans to be delightful. While travelling, those who admit to being American, however, tend to be the ones who give our neighbours to the south such a bad name, but the great majority, many of whom through the freedom and opportunity they are enjoying, are unable to afford the luxury of world travel. To claim, though, that our nation is inferior, cowardly, or more attune to being run by tyrants, is both illogical, and clearly in correct, both historically and practically. Moreover, is it not equally the case that the electoral system in the USA elects a tyrant for four to eight years… that is, if all the ballots even make it to be counted prior to the naming of the next president. However, if one is so opposed to the culture and dignity we hold dear, and so many of our ancestors bled the grounds red for around the world, by all means, move to a country where you find the attitudes more to your liking. If, however, you think that country is the USA, where your democratic rights will be better protected and respected… just don’t move to Florida!at 21:36 on July 29th, 2010
You don't have to persuade me, I still cry when I watch Braveheart. Unfortunately the Scots failed, Americans succeeded.
I wouldn't downplay the enduring power of Soviet Russia, and others contributed too, but if it weren't for the United States, Europeans would now be polishing German boots.
Just as I thought this was becoming a nation of frozen stiffs, it's so gratifying to see rumblings of fervent Canadian nationalism activated not by beer, but the words of a disobedient heretic.:) Keep up the good work!
at 11:27 on July 30th, 2010
I have to disagree that the Americans saved the world from German might. Definately they sped the fall of the Nazi's in the Second World War. However, Hitler's bipolar leadership did much the same thing. Britain could have been knocked out of the war at Dunkirk. But his hesitation allowed the British to survive, to fight again. After that, and later, the invasion of the Soviet Union, it was only a matter of time before the Nazis were overthrown. Thankfully, America did stand up, speed the fall, and reduce thereby the number of innocent people who, for no crime other than being Jewish, Polish, or some other "lesser" race, or who had differing politics, would be shot on sight, or worked to death.
To say, however, that Scotland failed at its inependance is a misreading of the facts. Indeed, the act of union linked Scotland to England. However, Scotland remained a soveriegn state, even through this, and continues to this day to have its own currency, legal code, and culture. Indeed, the Scottish people still, legally, retain the right to chose a monarch as they see fit. It was through an act of the Scottish Parliament that the nation was unified to England. And the act of union only succeeded, because Scotland had all but bankrupted itself in the decades leading up to it, in failed attempts at colonial endeavours. If you travel to the UK, be careful who you say Scotland failed at independance to... they can be a little... rough... over such things.
I am glad to see, though, that you are content to see people take on your statements, and attempt to argue against them. I have always felt that it is the greatest compliment to have someone debate your beliefs intelligently, rather than dismiss them out of hand.
at 11:28 on August 2nd, 2010
Stefan, where did you learn about US history & civics? Schoolhouse Rock? I'm very proud of my country, but I also comprehend that our government and that of Canada are way more similar in practice than you seem to understand. What, you think we control Washington between election years? Heh. If only.
at 12:27 on August 2nd, 2010
It may not be perfect, but mid-term congressional elections is more than what we've got here, you have an elected senate with equal representation for each state, and your senators and congressmen don't always follow the party line and are more responsive to feedback from their constituents when they vote, which is unheard of in this country except when they are prepared to be kicked out of the party. I learned about it at an American university from American professors, but then our educational system is said to be superior to yours, and your American degree may not even be recognised up here and has to be subjected to an equivalency test.
at 11:31 on August 2nd, 2010
I assumed that this was a case of Steffan being tongue in cheek.
ETA: and I misspelled your name at first. I'm keepin' it classy.
at 11:35 on August 2nd, 2010
Recommending this mainly for the comment thread.