Harper aims to crush Liberals, says former adviser

OPINION

This is brilliant political strategy.  Not that I really want to see the Grits totally gone but I had to live through the Trudeau era and a little payback from the West is in order.  I think the Grits are morally bankrupt and need a little cleansing by fire!  Where do I send my cheque?

 

[ url="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20080827.welectionwhy0827/BNStory/National/home"]

Harper aims to crush Liberals, says former adviser

 

The Canadian Press

August 27, 2008 at 3:47 PM EDT

OTTAWA — Conventional wisdom suggests Stephen Harper must be mad to thrust the country into an election at a time when he has little hope of winning a majority.

The Prime Minister himself has acknowledged that public opinion polls “aren't particularly wonderful” and has predicted that another minority — either Conservative or Liberal — is the likely result.

But a former chief of staff to Mr. Harper suggests there's method to the Prime Minister's apparent madness.

Tom Flanagan, a political scientist at the University of Calgary, believes Mr. Harper would be satisfied to return with a strengthened minority — a result that would throw the Liberals into chaos, thereby advancing the prime minister's long-term strategy of destroying Canada's so-called natural governing party.

Tom Flanagan

Related Articles

Recent

• Election clue: Jean asked to cancel trip 
• Harper ups ante on election ultimatum 
• Ottawa boosts mapping program for Arctic resources 
• PM offers condolences over listeriosis 
• Face the Commons before an election 

“I don't think Harper has to be thinking about a majority at all,” Mr. Flanagan said in an interview.

“Strategically, this is sort of a prolonged war of attrition.”

As Mr. Flanagan sees it, the first major battle in this incremental war occurred in 2004, when Mr. Harper managed to reduce Paul Martin's Liberals to a minority. In the second clash in 2006, Mr. Harper won his own Conservative minority.

The third skirmish, which Mr. Harper appears set to launch next week, likely won't kill what Mr. Flanagan jokingly refers to as “the evil empire.” But, if the Tories can win a few more seats at the Liberals' expense — an outcome Mr. Flanagan considers realistic given Mr. Harper's superior campaign skills and the Tories' fatter war chest — he predicted that would be enough to throw the Grits into a long-term tailspin that could eventually lead to their demise.

“You can fight a war with some objective less than total victory,” he said of the coming campaign.

If the Liberals lose even a handful of seats, Mr. Flanagan predicted they'll immediately dump Leader Stéphane Dion, a forecast echoed privately by plenty of Grits. The party would have to embark on a costly leadership campaign before most contenders from the last contest, including Mr. Dion, have paid off their leadership debts.

Moreover, a reduction in popular vote would mean the already cash-strapped Liberal party would get less money in election expenses rebates and in its annual public subsidy. Mr. Flanagan said that could make it difficult for the Liberals to pay off any debts from the coming election campaign and harder to secure bank loans for a future campaign.

Hence, he concluded, another Tory minority “would be enough to throw the Liberals into turmoil and give Harper . . . a virtually free hand in Parliament for quite a while and really handicap his main opponent.”

Not surprisingly, Mr. Dion and other opposition leaders have a different assessment of Mr. Harper's strategy.

They contend the Prime Minister is inventing excuses for an early election strictly because he fears Tory fortunes will plummet over the fall as the government is hit with further bad news about the sluggish economy and various alleged ethical lapses.

They charge that Mr. Harper wants to pre-empt parliamentary committee hearings into the so-called Cadman affair and Tory party spending irregularities in the 2006 campaign.

And, they say, he wants to get the vote out of the way before Julie Couillard releases her tell-all book on Oct. 14, which promises more juicy details about her biker gang past and how her former relationship with Maxime Bernier ended in his resignation as foreign affairs minister.

Mr. Flanagan doubted such potential landmines — which he believes could be easily defused — are directly influencing Mr. Harper's decision to pull the plug on his government.

However, he said Mr. Harper would rather call the election himself, on his own timing and terms, than wait for the combined opposition parties to topple the government later this fall over some trumped up scandal.

“He doesn't like being at the mercy of others. He likes to be in control of what he's doing.”

As plausible as the various theories on what's motivating Mr. Harper may be, Tory insider Bob Plamondon suspects only one thing would push Mr. Harper “over the edge” into an election: the prospect of winning a majority.

“I suspect that there's some pretty strong or in-depth party polls that are riding by riding, that are persuading him that his chances are pretty good right now,” said Mr. Plamondon, author of a soon-to-be-released book chronicling the successes and failures of the Conservative party since Confederation.

“There may be some inner confidence that they can move those numbers closer to a majority.”

[/q]