I put 10 gallons of gas in my pickup the other day. It cost me about $2.50 more than it did the week before.
Not a large amount. But take that amount times the nearly 200 million drivers in the United States, and it adds up to a half a billion dollars. If the cost of gas holds at that price, in four weeks, 2 Billion dollars will have been spent for gas, instead of paying bills, or making purchases, or saving for the future.
If you haven't noticed, crude oil and gasoline prices are again on the rise. According to the law of supply and demand, prices for crude oil (and by extension, gas prices) should be low, perhaps even falling. Most oil producing nations have reduced production. Millions and millions of gallons of excess crude oil sit in storage tanks and in tankers offshore. Refineries are cutting production, laying people off, and closing facilities to deal with low demand and falling profits.
So what gives? Why are gas prices rising? Is the law of supply and demand being broken? Should someone be arrested?
Actually, the law of supply and demand is in full effect - and at work - on another commodity. That other commodity is the dollar. As more money is printed by the US Government to cover spending, it's value, relative to other money, falls. Each dollar is worth slightly less and it takes more of them to exchange equally for other currencies. The more dollars are printed, the more the value of the dollar tumbles.
In reality, the dollar is worth only what people think it is worth.
The US government is printing hundreds of billions of extra greenbacks. Covering the debt of bankrupt banks, buying up broken car companies, and handing out stimulus money, takes a lot of cash. A lot. At a same time they are throwing money around, federal income tax receipts are down 34%. Other revenue is down as well, the results of a damaged economy.
Because of the growing glut of dollars, and because the people that deal in them aren't idiots, they are getting rid of American money. Gold is popular right now, and the price or that gold is increasing. Some of the increase is due to the increased demand, some to the falling value of the dollar. The Euro and the Yen are very popular as well. Large foreign banks are exchanging their holdings in dollars for those currencies, and the demand for the devalued dollar falls with the rise in demand for the more valuable euro and yen.
So, what does all that have to do with the cost of gasoline?
The oil producers trade in dollars. If however, they use the dollars earned from oil production to trade with countries that use say, the euro or yen, then it takes more dollars to do so, thus more dollars are needed to purchase oil.
Currently, 1 dollar = roughly 1.5 Euro. Oil is above $80.00 a barrel. Oil is probably undervalued at that. Both the Euro and crude oil are rising in relation to the dollar. Taking the Euro into account, crude oil should be nearer $88.00 per barrel, with gas worth close to 25ยข more per gallon.
If things stay as they are even with depressed demand and production, the cost of oil will continue to rise steadily as the dollar falls in value. Gasoline prices will rise along with the price of oil.
What happens if another factor enters the picture? Will commodity traders and investors jump into the oil market with some of the trillions of investment dollars waiting for a rising market? Could their demand drive the market upward? A lot of investors have been sitting on the sidelines since oil demand flattened. Many will be eager to get back in the mix if they smell rising prices.
Much of the rapid increase in oil prices that began in the fall of 2007 and continued through the summer of 2008, was driven by speculators looking to cash in on future demand. Most of them bailed out when the oil market collapsed - after, of course, they triggered the rapid fall of the American economy. If anything made Joe America face up to his overspending and over-borrowing, it was the sudden need for an extra $100-200.00 per month to pay for gas.
Can consumers, already overburdened with debt and falling incomes, afford even a modest increase in gas prices? Each $10.00 a barrel increase in the cost of oil adds more than 20 cents to the cost of each gallon of gas, raises the cost for almost all goods and services, and sends 100,000+ people to the unemployment line. Rising gasoline costs also dramatically depress consumer spending, sentiment, and long-range plans. We simply stop going out as much, cut back on non-essentials, reduce long term purchases, and hold on to what we have left.
Should the rising price of gas outpace the deflationary effects of our moribund economy, we will likely see it become the trigger for an inflationary spiral that could well get out of hand.
Fortunately, the advisors and brokers say that the market will take care of itself, government has inflation under control, and the economy is set to resurrect itself. Unfortunately, these very same people have been very, very wrong before.
Most RecentMost Recommended Comments (15)
at 14:15 on October 24th, 2009
It's the same in Vancouver, the gas has gone way up
at 17:10 on October 24th, 2009
Hey Amy, anthing to do with the tornado warning in Texas that you reported on? Nothing even has to happen, just the whiff of it...
at 17:22 on October 24th, 2009
Oh maybe, I never thought of that - I don't know for sure, they go up and down here pretty often but I'm not sure what triggered the last rise.
at 22:45 on October 24th, 2009
Your lucky a UK citizen pays more than double for his/her fuel.
at 01:40 on October 25th, 2009
Hugh,
I see you missed my story from earlier yesterday: Should we be worried about inflation right now? For a closer look at what is going on with Oil, the currency and other factors, take a look if you are so inclined.
China is playing a much bigger role in the currency issue than most realize.
Gas here has gone up by about 20 cents a gallon in the past week. Isn't it amazing how all of the independent gas stations all seem to raise prices in tandem? They watch the daily change in the price on unleaded on the commodity markets, and raise prices according to current pricing. Not what they paid for the gas in storage or in their tanks at the station. When the price on the market declines,decreases at the pump don't go down as quickly as when rising.
Maybe if the price gets too high, Obama can release some of the strategic reserve to ease pricing. But then, critics would just say it's another example of the socialist agenda. The economy is in near free fall, and the government is just supposed to sit by and watch the action.
at 03:19 on October 25th, 2009
No, I read the article. Agree with the China equation. China is playing the dollar to their advantage. Their trade with other countries is either roughly equal, or they run a deficit, as with S. Korea, Japan. The US is where the big money is at for them. They tie the yuan to the dollar for that reason. Protects their market. ("their market" sounds ugly, doesn't it?)
From your article: "The price of oil on 9/15/09 was around $65.00. That's an increase of about 23% in a bit over a month."
In reality, oil - based only on supply - should be nearer $50.00 a barrel. It isn't.
Reportedly, over 2 Trillion dollars in investment and speculative money is sitting on the sideline, waiting for oil demand, and thus prices, to show signs of rebounding. A good chunk of that is foreign money, which makes the oil market more attractive as the dollar falls. Speculator money (those trading for profit only, and don't actually buy oil), makes up close to half of the money in the oil futures market. If/when they start driving the process - like they did during the last peak - the only limit is what they say it is.
Ever notice that when oil futures, or the stock market is bullish, all the analysts chant the same "fundamentals are strong, demand is...blah, blah, blah" mantra? That is for their benefit, for their market (the investors). Gotta sell them pots and pans!
Of course, i do remember them chanting that right up till the banks went belly-up last year.
I'm expecting $3.00+ gas by Christmas. If early Christmas retail sales are better than expected, it will be "proof" that a recovery is underway, and gas could be even higher. Until the dollar hits bottom, speculators are going to continue to buy oil futures.
Time will tell. Honestly hope i'm wrong.
at 04:02 on October 25th, 2009
The US is where the big money is at for them.They tie the yuan to the dollar for that reason....
The bigger part of that statement is that China doesn't allow the yuan to float in the currency markets. The effect is that they are able to manipulate their own currency to the point where the value is declining, when the reality of their economy indicates it should be increasing in value. This would have the "undesirable" effect (from China's point of view), of making their exports more expensive. The US is in no position to criticize China monetary policy? Or is that not the case? What happens if China decides to stop purchasing dollars? Krugman says they''ll be doing us a favor. It will in fact devalue the dollar further, but it will make our exports cheaper in foreign markets and have a positive impact on our trade imbalance. The problem is that politically the US monetary policy cannot advocate for a weaker dollar.
Will a weaker dollar add to the cost for imported oil. More than likely, which is part of the recent run up in pricing. As you noted though, it seems like more speculation than demand side pricing at play here. Once gas goes above the retail average nationwide of $3.00 per gallon you'll see consumers start to cut back on consumption. They've already experienced $4.00 per gallon gas, and are in no mood to see it again. Especially under current economic conditions.
at 04:49 on October 25th, 2009
The problem with cutting consumption of gas, is that it effects almost everything else as well.
From the article: Rising gasoline costs also dramatically depress consumer spending, sentiment, and long-range plans. We simply stop going out as much, cut back on non-essentials, reduce long term purchases, and hold on to what we have left.
That happened last year. We are still living with the effects.
at 05:13 on October 25th, 2009
No easy answers or solutions here HA. We need to increase our savings rate, and our economy is so dependent on consumer spending. Upwards of 70% of GDP, with approximately 18% of that cost being health care. Current trends suggest that health care cost will double from 2007 levels by 2018, without any changes to the system. Think about that! 34% of GDP. And you think gas is expensive? lol
at 05:43 on October 25th, 2009
At least with health care, the money stays at home. With oil, much of it goes overseas.
We won't be able to increase savings if gas costs rise. Money spent for gas is money not put elsewhere.
at 07:49 on October 25th, 2009
First my compliments to HA, for his sharp analysis. In explaining the background of this symptom: don't look further than the Fed. Banks speculate on gold, oil and stocks, along with everyone else. In other words the feds' bailout and stimulus money pushed all these speculative trades into profit and lifting share values. The sucker - the consumer taxpayer - is paying the price of the sins made by B&B. The impression is that the economy is out of the doldrums, because the banks make profit again... but this is just squeezing the market that already is in dire straits, further devaluing the US Dollar in the process, which is another force to lift the price of fuel at the pump. As long people don't recognize the government is lying, there won't be any turn for the better. In the far end a public revolt may happen. Lets hope it won't come that far.
at 16:09 on October 25th, 2009
PIM, i am saddened to say that you may be correct in stating "a public revolt may happen".
There is a lot of anger over the direction Obama is trying to take the country, and the manner in which he is doing it. To be fair, that anger began under Bush in his last term.
There is also a great amount of apprehension and fear over the economy, and the seeming lack of leadership from Washington.
I could imagine a dozen different scenarios that could cause a deterioration in life here. To the point where folks would say, "enough is enough", and take to the streets.
Not a pretty thought, but government in general gets blamed for many of our ills. If the economy gets really bad, we will see the level of anger rise rapidly.
at 08:46 on October 27th, 2009
HA: Any kind of monetary intervention in a market economy is bad. And leads to discrepancies of the market system, inviting the crooks to play the roulette in the casino with taxpares' money, instead of their own! Interventions on a massive scale as happens at present are the worst enemy of the economy only temporarily intervention on a limited scale sometimes is helpful. This started already under Reagan as I recall correctly. All the governments after Ike are to blame. Nixon by abolishing the gold backing of the dollar as a reserve currency was the first in my opinion.
at 09:59 on October 27th, 2009
Yep, under Nixon we had a decade of "stagflation" following Viet Nam. That was fun. Then the Opec embargo, and Jimmy Carter (seemingly clueless). Then the gas spike with the Iranian hostage mess, followed by the recession than didn't want to end, with massive government spending - much of it for defense. Then the bubbles started, following the first Iraq war. Finally, the "froth".
That "froth" must of contained some kind of deadly gas - seems to have killed the economy.
I can match up many things from the 1920's to the things that led to this latest bust. I haven't ever checked to see how the prior decades line up with the 50-70 years prior to the Great Depression. You are vastly more schooled than i on these matters, PIM, what do you say?
at 12:17 on October 27th, 2009
Historical facts are at this moment beyond my personal memory record. What I can tell you is that the governments' debt and deficit is calculated on a cash basis. This means that deficit accounting does not take into account the cost of future promises until the payment is due. According to shadowstats.com, if the federal government counted the cost of its future promises, the 2008 deficit was over $5 trillion and total obligations are over $60 trillion. And that was before the crisis. Not much of imagination is needed to understand that at present this will much higher and worse.
In the nearer-term the deficit on a cash basis is about $1.6 trillion or 11% of GDP. President Obama forecasts $1.4 trillion next year, and with an optimistic economic outlook, $9 trillion over the next decade. In other words the State's balance sheet is in a deplorable state at least, to be polite for the moment. Such a situation could be the basis for a future hyperinflation it not immediately a U-turn is made by B&B. And that is not very likely, reading the media. It is going to image the economic environment that lead to GP 1.0 in the 30s.