The High Price Paid for Freedom of Speech

by Karen Hatter | April 8, 2009 at 07:46 am
1100 views | 101 Recommendations | 9 comments

Videos

Rep_ Michele Bachmann "U_S_ Starting Youth Re-Education Camps"

see larger video

sourced by Karen Hatter

Rep_ Michele Bachmann "U_S_ Starting Youth Re-Education Camps"

It is always parroted that the exercise of freedom of speech and the constitutional guarantee protected and accorded those who reside in the United States of America, protects all speech, including speech that may not be agreeable or appealing to all whose ears may find some of these expressions loathsome and hateful.

But, what of responsibility? Can responsibility be weighed, expected and legislated as a component to bring those who would be guilty of the equivalent of that careless, thoughtless person shouting 'Fire!' in that crowded building, forcing some form of accountability?

When Senator Barack Obama entered the race for President of the United States in February 2008, his campaign was more or less forced to request Secret Service protection for their candidate, earlier than any other presidential candidate since the Secret Service began extending their protection to presidential candidates in 1968.

After his election, President Obama has received an ever increasing number of death threats, sadly, with each level of his successful bid for the presidency, his candidacy, the election and the inauguration adding yet another record amount of threats all along the way. Several alleged plots/threats have been thwarted.

The Secret Service has pointed out that, although some of this rancor may be due to the President's racial composition, there are other elements that have some individuals alarmed and angered at the fall 2008 presidential outcome. Among the elements of concern for most Americans during these trying times, at the top of the list, are the economy and issues that hit home for so many dissatisfied Americans, effecting them on a very personal level: job worries, that is, possible loss of job or having lost their job, bleak prospects for regaining employment and their understanding, or lack thereof, of policy issues that they feel will directly impact them and their lifestyles.

Adding to these concerns and fears, currently, there is misinformation flooding the airwaves and the internet that the Obama administration is knee deep in a plan to take people's guns away from them, an untruth being touted loudly and maniacally by those who have proclaimed themselves 'voices for the voiceless'. Second amendment gun rights groups are touting their 'understanding' that this fear is a real concern, one that should not be taken lightly by those who are desirous of a continuation of their constitutional right to bear arms.

Guns and ammunition began flying off the shelves the day after the election of President Obama on November 5, 2008.

All so called proponents of one ideology or the other 'spin' facts to reflect their articulated position, pro or con, depending upon which side of the issue they wish to plant themselves. However, since the 2008 presidential election cycle and campaign began, the tendency to offer clearly incendiary, downright dangerous rhetoric has gotten far out of hand, with talking heads of the Right now calling for citizens to arm themselves and rise up to take back their country.

Not all who may hear that call are capable of distinguishing or understanding rhetorical flourish, assuming that is what was the intent by those issuing those commanding statements. Self professed crusaders, all donning a cape to save America from 'liberals', with the word 'liberals' uttered through clenched, disapproving teeth, tick off one by one the horrors of the new world being ushered in, with actual visuals of Nazi Germany displayed in the background, ranting of the coming fascism and calling for the overthrow of the current administration, elected by the majority of Americans in the United States of America on November 4, 2008.

One representative in the United States' Congress, representing Minnesota, has proclaimed that Americorp, who has had members, in the past, work with local and national organizations like Habitat for Humanity, with Americorp meant to be a conduit through which young people can become engaged in the process of voluntary service to their country, that's is to the United States of America, with this representative claiming the service is mandatory, which it is not, this representative states that she fears, in reality, Americorp is a 're-education' camp, that will brainwash the youth of America.

Self described conservatives and right wingers rail day after day, night after night, on television, in print and most definitely all over the internet, that the life many Americans have come to love is being destroyed, to be replaced with an ominous, evil empire, meant to dominate all of America. Fear. Fear. Fear.

No matter how wild eyed or far fetched many Americans may view some of these individuals promoting their form of fear of the current administration, bear in mind that fear is most often an unreasonable emotion. If fear can cause many, who might normally be calm and level headed individuals, to transform into mindless, heedless actors on a stage, set against a backdrop of less than fully developed, often obscured and flawed scenery, what might fear cause the 'less grounded' among us to do?

This is not a reworking of the 'Twinkie' defense, 'Too much sugar made me/him/her/them do it!' At what point does American society step up and acknowledge that, as has always been in difficult times, those that would exercise their freedom of speech, need to be aware that many individuals are looking for a target upon which to focus their anger? When caught up in a whirlpool of fear and confusion, no one can think straight.

The most recent incident that occurred in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, on Saturday, April 4, 2009, with a 23 year old man killing three police officers that came to his mother's home, at her request, to get him out of the house, had his friends describing his fear that his guns would be taken from him by the current administration.

In July 2008, a distressed man walked into a church in Tennessee, opening fire, killing two people and injuring others, before he was wrestled to the floor by parishioners in the church, wrote what was meant to be a suicide note.

From his handwritten, four page note: .... The only way we can rid ourselves of this evil is kill them in the streets. Kill them where they gather. I'd like to encourage other like minded people to do what I've done. If life aint worth living anymore don't just Kill yourself. Do something for your Country before you go. Go Kill Liberals!

This note was found by law enforcement, who were searching the man's home for a motive.

They also found copies of Liberalism is a Mental Disorder by Michael Savage, Let Freedom Ring by Sean Hannity and The O'Reilly Factor by Bill O'Reilly.

No truer statement was made by one of the church members, John Bohsted, that tackled Jim Adkisson, the man in Tennessee.

An excerpt from Glenn Beck and the Rise of Fox News' Militia Media : “ There are a lot of people who hate liberals and if we stir that around in the pot and on the airways, eventually there will be people (like Adkisson) ... who get infected by the violent rhetoric and put it into violent action,” Bohsted said. He remained worried about future violence:Do you think there are other Jim Adkissons out there listening to hate speech? I do.” Me too. So do I.  

Also at NowPublic: Playing with Fire

The 'Right Wing' Conspiracy

Advertisement
recommend This comment thread is now closed
5
Amy Judd

Considering this is an opinion piece, please remember to discuss the issues presented, and not accuse the author of having an agenda (it's an opinion piece).

4
A. Tran

Good points, Karen.  I think, there ought be a modicum of responsibility in the exercise of freedom of speech. 

Far too often, people have used words irresponsibly just to provoke or to malign others or to spew intolerant and hateful words without a thought about the consequences of their words. The representative from Minnesota is among the examples of those who utter irresponsible and divisive statements with, apparent impunity.

1
aurealeus

"Adding to these concerns and fears, currently, there is misinformation flooding the airwaves and the internet that the Obama administration is knee deep in a plan to take people's guns away from them, an untruth being touted loudly and maniacally by those who have proclaimed themselves 'voices for the voiceless'.

Second amendment gun rights groups are touting their 'understanding' that this fear is a real concern, one that should not be taken lightly by those who are desirous of a continuation of their constitutional right to bear arms."


Actually, there WAS a provision within the original Recovery Act that was designed to impose new Federal Regulations on the sale of guns and amunition, thereby effectively transferring these regulatory powers from the States to the Federal Government. Included was language to allow citizens to own no more than one or two guns (unless they were registered as a gun-dealer) and that all private gun sales must be contracted through a gun dealer.  The provision also planned to impose extrodinary high fees on licensing thereby increasing the price of guns so that only wealthy persons would be able to afford firearms and amunition in addition to the licensing fees so I can understand these "gun rights groups" fears. Fortunately for our right to bear arms and Constitution, President Obama found it unwise to sign that version of "The Act" into law.

I read the original bill and this provision was indeed made part thereto.  After reading this article, I downloaded the bill that the President did sign and the provision was no longer there.

6
Emezie

I wondered what happen to "you do not criticize the president during war time" and if you do you are unpatriotic. Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh, should be happy they live in a country where you are free to say your mind without real consequences. In some other countries, they would have being locked up, and put on trial for high treason. 

These folks are dangerous, and their rhetoric should be a concern to all Americans. They do not realized the damage they are doing to their country's stability in the name of partisanship. Congratulation Karen for a well written and timely article.


2
aurealeus

Presidents have always been criticized whether in peacetime or wartime and I suppose depends upon which side of the fence you sit, whether you might be considered patriotic or not. That's the beauty of the First Amendment giving us the right to free speech. Our elected officials should be criticized for things that the people find wrong or flawed otherwise how would the public know the truth or be able to decide what is truth and what is not ?  In the same respect, they should praised and recognized for a job well done.

The only unfortunate aspect of  "free-speech" is where some have more access to mass-media outlets than others... i.e., Hannity, Limbaugh, etc., where one has the ability for more free exercising thereof in promoting their biased and personal agendas.  Fair and Balanced? Ha, I think not.

0
duo

I am having a major freedom of speech and freedom of press issue right now.  I am trying to publish an article about Eric Holder firing the Internal Ethics Leader at USDOJ, but my cyberstalkers don't want me to publish it at NP.  I posted it twice, and it just sits there and says, "You must put a title."  I was going to email it at Yahoo, and I got a message that YAHOO HAD CLOSED DOWN!  Can you believe such desperation?  It is not that they are containing the news about the USDOJ Ethics Leader - WP carried that this afternoon.  They just don't want to allow what I have to add to the news.  I finally broke through at Yahoo, but no luck at NP.  But you can see it anyway - Just go to Mary Neal's Sharebook at Care2.  http://www.care2.com/c2c/share/sharebook/513396753

 

0
jumpingone

If this was a court case with sale,s verses gun accidents then the answer is simple  gun get into the hands of children

0
Karl Gotthardt - albertacowpoke

As a Canadian I see it this way.  As long as the right and left are at each other.s throat without actually engaging in a constructive debate, nothing will ever move forward.  Despite the comments on Hannity, O.Reilly and Limbaugh, all have the opportunity to point out any inaccuracies.  Despite not believing all they say, I find them entertaining.  The way to combat them is to find left wing hosts that are equally entertaining.  It all boils down to who can win the listening or viewing audience and therefore the advertisers. 

George Bush wasn.t perfect, but I sincerely believe that he did what he thought right for America.  He did have to deal with 911 and really only lost popularity over his war in Iraq. You may disagree, and that.s your right.  On the same token Obama has been in the office for 80 days now.  If I have any criticism of his administration, it is that he is moving to fast to implement all of his agenda.  Some of it has been signalled during his campaign some of it done on the fly.  My concern is that haste is waste and that being the President should not be a popularity contest.  There is a lot going on out there with the Economy, Iraq, Afghanistan and terrorist threats in general.  All of these issues, require careful and thoughtful action and none of them can be solved by reacting but by thoughtful planning. 

All this to say, America wake up, you can.t keep bashing each other and hope to succeed.

By the way did anybody see the lates video by EMINEM mocking Sarah Palin.  Is that right? Barney Franks attack on that students question was quite entertaining too, when he was asked What responsibility, if any, do you accept, for the finacial meltdown.

0
Amy Judd

As per the author's request, I am closing this comment thread.

NowPublic on Facebook

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

everchanging
First Flagged at 8:14 AM, Apr 8, 2009 by everchanging
These members have powered this story:

Related Stories

Recommendations (101)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from