Homeland Fusion Center Censors Net Political Comments - Yet Again

by Scrivener | June 7, 2010 at 05:32 am
1721 views | 1 Recommendation | 75 comments

  Mid-Atlantic States MAGLOCLEN fusion center -- "A serial violator of constitutional rights."


GET POLITICAL w/ VIC LIVINGSTON


Move over, Red China:  the U.S. government imposes censorship on internet political speech of extrajudicially "targeted individuals" -- among them, persons deemed by ideologue bureaucrats and their "information systems" defense contractors to be "dissidents" or "enemies of the state."

This journalist's latest case in point:

Over the weekend, this journalist attempted to post a comment to Jake Tapper's "Political Punch" blog on ABCNews.com. The subject: the pending appointment of a retired Air Force general and spymaster as the new director of national intelligence.  Each time, at least as seen over my internet connection, it appeared that the comment was duly posted. But the comment went missing when I returned to the site some time later. I re-posted, and the process repeated itself -- an on-screen message stated that the comment was posted, but when I refreshed the page later, it was gone.

What happened? I have demonstrated by a preponderance of evidence that my internet connection is being intercepted in real time, with my internet data stream re-directed to computers under the control of a patently unconstitutional surveillance and censorship regime apparently directed out of the MAGLOCLEN fusion center -- which apparently operates a unit dedicated to the surveillance and malicious persecution of so-called political "activists."

As I posted my comment to what I thought was ABCnews.com, my browser task bar showed a strange URL, or web address -- "a.abcnews.com." The structure of this apparently fake URL is similar to what appears in my task bar when I attempt to post a comment to The New York Times web site; my task bar shows data being received from "graphics8.nytimes.com." If I try to post a comment to The New York Daily News' website, I see this in my browser task bar: "assets.nydailynews.com." In the case of The Washington Post, the fake URLS include "media3.washingtonpost.com" and "media10.washingtonpost.com."

THESE URLS APPARENTLY ARE COUNTERFEIT SITES INVENTED BY OPERATIVES OF THIS ROGUE FUSION CENTER CENSORSHIP PROGRAM.

The re-direction of web traffic to the computers of this warrantless surveillance and censorship regime enables so-called "man in the middle" or "catch and release" attacks -- the target's internet comments can be withheld for review; released intact, after some delay (what could be considered a "prior restraint," and thus, unconstitutional, according to a U.S. Supreme Court decision); or censored outright.

Appparently, only so-called "targeted individuals" are subject to this ham-fisted government censorship regime. And it doesn't take much to be "targeted." According to former NSA analyst Russell Tice, virtually all mainstream media journalists are targets of government surveillance.

MAGLOCLEN (Mid-Atlantic Great Lakes Organized Crime Law Enforcement Network) is the fusion center that covers most Mid-Atlantic States, including the District of Columbia, the nation's capital. My personal experiences indicate that this organization is a serial violator of the constitutional and human rights of thousands of Americans under its purview -- a criminal Gestapo-like apparatus operating under the cover of a law enforcement agency.

I have written numerous articles about this censorship regimen, with detailed accounts of how it works.

http://nowpublic.com/world/u-s-govt-censors-net-political-speech-targeted-americans
http://nowpublic.com/world/how-u-s-spy-ops-censor-web-political-speech

And still, the blatant censorship continues, unabated.

The counterfeiting and re-direction of websites and web traffic opens the door to the frightening possibility that innocent Americans are being extrajudicially denied their constitutional rights, including the right of due process -- and that rogue agents could easily entrap, or frame, a "target" by presenting false evidence of computer crime. The actions of this fusion center regime invalidate the "science" of computer forensics; if computer data is being counterfeited, and web traffic re-directed and data "massaged" by operatives of law enforcement, any computer forensic evidence must be regarded as suspect.

It is obvious that the Obama administration has failed to protect the constitutional rights of Americans who are subject to abuses of power by the network of some 70 Homeland Security- administered multi-agency fusion centers, whose primary mission supposedly is to protect the nation against the threat of terrorists and criminals.

So who is protecting American citizens from the criminal actions of these fusion centers and their "information systems" defense contractors?

Thus far, the answer appears to be -- nobody.

***

HOMELAND FUSION CENTER MICROWAVE CELL TOWER WEAPON SYSTEM SILENTLY ASSAULTS, TORTURES, IMPAIRS 'TARGETED' AMERICANS: VETERAN JOURNALIST

• "Dissidents" and "undesirables" also targeted by multi-agency "program" for financial sabotage, community-based, police-protected vigilante stalking and harassment, and ideologically-driven censorship -- a genocidal purge.


All of those cell towers you see all over America are NOT all for phone calls.

Some of them are TORTURE TOWERS -- part of a nationwide microwave/laser radio frequency "directed energy weapon" system that is being used by operatives of the multi-agency Homeland Security-run "fusion center" network to silently torture, impair, and physically and neurologically degrade the functioning and well-being of extrajudicially, unjustly '"targeted" citizens...

And apparently, this precision-targeted domestic weapon system being used to attack and harm U.S. citizens has been deployed WITHOUT THE CONSENT OF CONGRESS or high state officials.

• When will President Obama stop the human and civil rights atrocities of a multi-agency fusion center shadow government?

WHEN WILL CONGRESS INVESTIGATE EXTRAJUDICIAL TORTURE IN AMERICA?

BUCKS COUNTY, PA: "Mid-Atlantic States (including D.C.) Centcom of a Fusion Center Gestapo."

http://nowpublic.com/world/u-s-silently-tortures-americans-cell-tower-microwaves
http://nowpublic.com/world/gestapo-usa-govt-funded-vigilante-network-terrorizes-america

OR NowPublic.com/scrivener

Vic Livingston is on Facebook (when he's not being censored by a Homeland fusion center surveillance-censorship regime).

Advertisement
recommend Sign In or Join to post comments
1
Scrivener

Today  when I tried to access the blog of the editor of my local paper, The Bucks County Courier-Times, by clicking on a link next to her picture, the URL was re-directed to this apparently fake address:

www1.phillyburbs.com/opinions/blogs/courier_blogs/pat_walker.html

...and I received a full-page "404" notice stating "The page cannot be found."

Later, I tried again -- and I noted that the editor's link -- and her picture -- had gone MISSING from the web page.  So I typed in the URL (without the extraneous "1") and again I was re-directed to the link as typed above.

So I tried a link to another Courier-Times blog, one I had accessed earlier today.  This time, I got re-directed to ANOTHER address starting with "www.1.phillyburbs.com" again AGAIN I get the 404 message, "The page cannot be found."

THIS IS CENSORSHIP, apparently emanating from operatives of the MAGLOCLEN fusion center -- as I stated, a serial violator of the constitutional rights of this and untold thousands of other extrajudicially, unjustly and unconstitutionally "targeted" Americans.

Will some real reader please post the link to this article to Ms. Walker's blog, along with this explanatory post?  You will be helping to defeat a blatantly illegal and unconstitutional fusion center- based censorship regime...

2
batvette

Broken links =/= Government censorship regime.

1
batvette

BTW your comment posted fine! You aren't being censored, though sometimes we can only wish you were.

 

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2010/05/exclusive-president-obama-to-replace-director-of-national-intelligence-dennis-blair/comments/page/3/#comments

 

Well?

1
Scrivener

"www1.phillyburbs.com" = spoofed (faked) web address.

The real address does not include a "1" after "www."  As any 12-year-old computer wiz knows, you don't have to put the "www" in the browser -- so why does that "1" pop up?  Because the lame government operative censorship regime is so incompetently transparent -- except to YOU, apparently.

Now why would that be?  Don't answer -- you may incriminate yourself.

1
Anonymously Given

The reason for the "1" or "2" (I usually start with "2" when I subdivide my sites) is that multiple servers may be used to service one "main web site" domain.  In order to differentiate the secondary servers from the main one, the secondary ones are typically given numerical suffixes such as Batvette describes.  The servers may be "virtual", or "url rewrites", or a number of other things, but they are used to break up the functionality of the site. 

1
Anonymously Given

I noticed that you are apt to say that the subdomain my.nowpublic.com does not exist - and I suspect that you are using the whois tool to make such a determination - since you have indicated usage of the tool in previous messages.  You will need something a little savvier (well, basically different functionality) than the whois tool to find the domain - as the subdomain info is typically listed only in the DNS servers relevant to the domain in question.  You should find the "DiG" tool - sometimes available as part of a "DNS utilities" package - and supplied with the main DNS server type that supports the net (BIND) ... which is probably available on the Mac OSX systems, but not by default.   Then, in a terminal, you can issue "dig my.nowpublic.com and get your answer.";; ANSWER SECTION:my.nowpublic.com.    86130    IN    A    67.15.102.66

1
Anonymously Given

Of course, if your connection has been piggybacked, and you have been redirected into a clandestine black hole CDN, then disregard everything I just wrote.

1
Scrivener

I disregarded it the first time I read it. See below.

1
Scrivener

Yeah, multiple servers -- one for the real website, the others for the covert government spoofed or faked websites controlled by government operative computers.  So your psy ops response is partly accurate -- "virtual" because they are spoofed copies, subject to manipulation or censorship of content.  "Break up the functionality of the site" -- again, so true, in a literal sense.

2
batvette

Why don't you just admit that you don't know anything about network protocol or the internet in general? How many people have told you the same thing? Quite a few. Instead of researching it thoroughly you just keep "reporting" these wild stories about your internet being different from everyone else's, with some government fusion agents feeding pages that are just little bit tampered with.

I don't know why NowPublic continues to allow you to post what can only really be called lies at this point. You think I'm some fusion center agent for dogging you about this but I am being targeted by OS/EH myself and you've stated quite a few times you've taken it upon yourself to be our spokesperson- but every time I read something of yours it's either silly, sounds crazy, or contains outright lies- or a combination of all. I cringe when I see this because you seem to be working overtime trying to appear like everything we're trying to impress the public we are not.

0
Kapster

You're right about Scrivener. Even when I was doing some research about what was happening to me, I ignored most of it because the "Scriveners" are all over the internet. What I call the "Tin Foil  Hat Society". They do nothing but hurt our cause. When I say we can stop this, we CAN. We have to take it to the public in a no-nonsensical way, you know, 2+2=4 kind of way. I didn't even want to hear anything about the conspiracy theories and government plots against us. What I found makes sense. The core groups that get the organized stalking started are Con Artists! They enjoy free room & board, vehicles, and they get a kick out of ruining our lives. They can use phony papers and badges (any idiot that can program and operate a punch press in a machine shop can make a badge) to do this. They feed into peoples need to do the "right thing". What's weird, is the people they get to participate with them don't even realize they are being effected, I mean effected not just mentally but physically! This may sound weird to some, but many of you have noticed the puffy eyes and weird skin of some of the perps? It's freaky.

0
Scrivener

"...our cause." What a crock of sh*t.

0
Kapster

Yes, "Our Cause". "Our Cause" is to bring Organized Stalking to the public in a way that makes sense and is factual. Yes- declassified military/government technology is available on the internet for anyone to access. Yes- these harassment devices do work. Yes- there is some involvement from government/law enforcement employees, but not the ones you think. Hmmm, that police/sheriff car that's been showing up around your house? Chances are it's the Mechanic taking the vehicle on a "Test Drive". Who has access to uniforms left in cars and the vehicles themselves? The Mechanics do. I could go on.... Use your eyes and the Zoom feature on your hacked computer

0
Scrivener

You seem to be accusing law enforcement of negligence... is that your intent?

0
Anonymously Given

I am constantly reminded of the Blazing Saddles desert scene, where only after much haggling, the horseback riding stars of the movie realize that they might be able to go around the hill to avoid the solitary toll booth in the middle of the desert.   A single voice propaganda machine is absolutely dependent on the censorship of everything else.  The purveyors of the madness have not forgotten the Blazing Saddles scene either.  They are not at all likely to allow open alternative venues - and mainstream  media is not.   Then what about the net?  Vic says it's a total farcical comedy on par with Blazing Saddles, and I am inclined to agree with him.  What then, of net inspired things such as the "Tea party" movement, and the "Don't Tread on Me" crowd at the John Birch society? 

0
Anonymously Given

I have always been a strict constitutionalist.  Such an opinion would traditionally put me on the "right", and maybe insinuate me into the ranks of the John Birch members.  Coincidentally, I have been insinuated into that organization.  I don't know if it's a reasonable membership to have.   Ironically and unfortunately, the common-man's "right" wing is precisely the tool that is being used to bring about overt fascism.  Ostensibly, and historically,  right wing issues have related more closely to ideas that may have been mouthed by founding fathers - especially as concerns the constitution - and have  certain "free men" and "common sense" appeals.  Unfortunately, that "common sense appeal" is being used against the knee-jerk flag-waving masses - by types of people who have, historically, been considered to be extreme "right" wingers - also known as "reactionist".  Hitler's platform  was considered to be "reactionist".  (Even though he spoke much of socialism as a fraud to buy votes.)

0
Anonymously Given

What then, are we to believe?  Is the current crop of rightist - those who now proclaim that they are the true "Patriots Rising", and who seem to be rabidly stirring the flames of discontent - only another facet of the sly means by which to provoke enough civil unrest with which to justify and apply an ultra-reactionist theme and to put our country on "lock-down" forever?

0
Anonymously Given

"Vic says it's a total farcical comedy on par with Blazing Saddles" - Not exactly a quote - please forgive very liberal use of paraphrase ...

0
Roselime

Haha - I posted to a Broadband forum about my Comcast logs (just want to trace the hacking) and this is what happened:

http://www.justbroadband.org/forum/r24382801-Computer-intrusion-and-Comcast-Logs

Note, I don't need to prove to them that I've been hacked - of course  I have evidence.  I just want to find out where my internet was going through.  I ask a *very simple* question and get some normal answers then I get *perps and/or trolls*  I hope any IT professional who read that topic quickly realized what was going on (and due to the insults  in perp/troll #1's responses I can safely assume that his first answer is probably a lie).

Ahh, if only I were a paranoid crazy lady.  Then I could take a pill and make all the jackbutts go away and I could go on with my happy life.  But apparently it's not that easy.  I think only Nuremberg II will rid us of the problem.

1
batvette


While some of them were kind of rude, what you did was ask for advice and it seemed they in chorus gave it to you- take your computer to an IT expert and have it cleaned- and you refused the advice. In any forum that is an invitation for rude treatment! I know it wasn't what you were asking but I think they answered that, they don't keep logs of that apparantly.

Whether you think your hacking is unusual or not they gave you good advice, you are likely infected with something.

They  called it a prank thread because of the stuff about the internet cafe hacking- which should be impossible to do but if they have something infecting your computer it is conceivable- see their advice was probably sound, that's why they said "wipe it clean and move on."

This is one of those situations where you'd have to convince them OS/EH exists for them to see what you're telling them, and that's not gonna happen and that's also a reason they were rude. Best to not even introduce it to the discussion.

0
roselime not signed in

Hi Batvette - An IT professional will tell me that I'm hacked.   Then they will wipe it clean for $150 or so.   I've "wiped it clean" about 40 times since last year.  The IP is targeted.  I've tried 4 different computers already.  I called Comcast and a guy came over, did absolutely nothing and charged $30.  I'm not saying all of them were trolls but I just felt it's like I have to "prove" I'm hacked when clearly I am (constantly). The internet cafe thing didn't involve my own computer - it was a cafe desktop computer.  First the automatic updates when down and very shortly afterwards the firewall went down.  I told the guy working and he said, "Don't worry about it."  I downloaded a reverse firewall and an Apple mobile device was trying to act as server (it wasn't the Cafe - their server showed up with a different name).  Fortunately I did a printscreen of that to prove I'm not paranoid.  (Not that I would need to prove it to anyone.) Some of them seemed normal but some of them were rude.  If they don't know the answer to the question they should sit there and call me crazy or like the other guy say that I must have done something bad to deserve it.  Anyway, I am hacked - at the library the IPV4 shows library and the IPV6 traceroute shows something (Washington3level or something like that people claim is NSA (but since the internet is rerouted, who's to say that page isn't spoofed).  I have another way of knowing when they can see my internet. I understand deniers, but there's no need to be rude to people. And I don't think all of them were just "deniers."

0
roselime not signed in

Oops - I mean I reformatted with disks - I didn't pay an IT person to wipe it clean for me.   Maybe I could get someone to do it for $50 but if I get hacked again the second I get on the net that's $50 buck down the drain.

1
batvette

You sound like you can reformat fine by yourself, I will say that.

I think you'll have to do that again and employ an extraordinary firewall, still having to tolerate that they can filter things. Without insinuating anything a denier would offer, you still shouldn't get too carried away thinking every weird thing is their work. Obviously some of it is, but don't build upon that looking for things they might be doing as this does their job for them.

I'm sure you've looked but CNET has lots of free security programs in their downloads, maybe an internet privacy program? I will poke around there for the hell of it.  

0
roselime not signed in

Hi Batvette - Thanks for that.  I've had to learn a lot about internet protection.  No, I'm not paranoid - I'm kind of not paranoid considering what I've gone through.  There are ways I know that they have gotten into my machine.  No access to my own firewall rules, new services that I never had before, a poster who responds to whatever I listen to on You Tube, tasks that mysteriously appear in the Task Manager and that even as administrator I have no access to, files whose ownership is unknown, etc. are usually signs that something's wrong.  It would take years to explain everything I've gone through trying to figure out how to block them.  Someone suggested they have the machine pwire and that's how they get in but I'm not sure what that means.

0
Kapster

Ahaha, I thought the same thing. "if only a little Prozac could make this all go away". It won't, though. Just keep your wits about you. Our lives will never be the same again and I fear for my children. There will be a reckoning, another Nuremburg and we need to be there to stand in line and give our testimony. The new Nuremberg will be different, this time there are Willing Volunteers. I've had the rare opportunity to get a glimpse of how this works from the start. They even went so far as to insinuate someone into my life. I trust that our voices will be heard.

0
roselime not signed in

My overt harassment started with severe cyberbulling, hacking, intellectual property theft which they made look as though it were generated from a guy I dated (the patsy/decoy - he was in on it but wasn't generating it).  Upon discovering what OS/EH was I realized that I'd had the problem for years.  My particular story involves constant social engineering - some of my friendships, almost everything related to academia, even some relationships.  I wonder why certain people chose to be part of this - I think most of them were unaware of the extreme harassment that I was undergoing/would undergo and I doubt they know about the electronic harassment part.-------- Some of the engineered people in my life ended up in positions having to do with the experimental nature of this (as in neurobiology and behavioral psychology).  A lot of times these people served to either harass me or to make false accusations and sometimes to try to corrupt me - there have been constant "entrapment" type scenarios - as if they were testing my ethics or something - or slow me down in my work.  I guess everyone gets their personalized theme.  I think that some of my harassers were coerced or blackmailed, but others simply are deluded into thinking that some good could come out of this, who knows.  (The other harassment has come mostly directly from companies that are defense contractor and there's been some violence that probably came from some unknown elements.  Ever since I "came out" a few months ago about having this problem I've had:  1 tire punctured, 1 tire slashed, interior car lights turned on almost every night for about 2 weeks until the battery finally died, 3 dents to the car (for one of them the internet harassers posted something like "drunk guy hits car and laughs" the next day), a v-shape cut in my car seat, etc.  And this is only the recent vandalism.  I guess if we could find publishers we could try to recoup our money writing some very interesting books.

0
Kapster

Roselime,When my harassment became more overt,  I thought it was my ex's friends doing it. I now realize some of them were involved, because I recognized some of them. Then I found out that he also had a Private Investigator following me - we are in a custody suit. I was so ticked off, I was going to go to the police, governing boards for private investigators, and so forth. Of course I was talked out of it by my new boyfriend, who turned out to be a perp. If I HAD gone to the police then, they would most likely be helping me now.

0
roselime not signed in

Hi Kapster - without giving too many details of own my case I can say that maybe they would have helped, maybe they wouldn't.  There's a lot of stonewalling.  I'm not anti-police in any way - sometimes things are out of jurisdiction for them, sometimes they won't get involved if it's an intel matter (and apparently some targeting is along those lines), sometimes there are run arounds and delays that cost a lot of time, money and energy.  I've had some "fake" police call me (and that doesn't get investigated though I had a report on it).   I still wouldn't discourage anyone from going to the police for anything that can be reported because at least you can have a paper trail (assuming that your police reports don't have serious and constant errors on them).

0
Kapster

Thanks. The police here know something is going on, I know they do, maybe even WHAT is happening, and they don't seem to like it much. They're  pulling over perp cars left and right. One was pulled over right in front of my office because of something on the license plate - it was a newer blue Corvette. When these guys come to town, they get noticed,  especially by the cops. Our  law  enforcement in San Diego County has worked hard to get a handle on the crime and gang problems and have done a pretty decent job of it, given what it is.  I will go to the different agencies and file reports and take whatever I have with me. We can make people aware of what is going  on, you know. But, we need to put it in a way that the public will understand. Scrivener's way is obviously not working, he puts all of us in the Schizo category. Here's one way I got the heavy drive-by perp activity to slow down around my apartment:  I put up signs in a couple of my windows. "YouTube: GSWatchdog", "Raven1.Net". These are 2 accessible websites that make sense. These websites say, "Hey! This is Happening in Your Neighborhood! Wake Up! You Could Be Next". To get the word out, keep it simple, stick to the facts and what is happening to you and how you feel. You and Batvette do an excellent job of bringing credibility. But, we are preaching to the choir right now, as long as we confine our stories to blog sites. We need to get the story out to the mainstream, and it will take more than 1 of us to do it. Who knows, maybe there is a panel of government perps just sitting around, observing our harassment, saying, "Dang, Guys! This Stuff Does Work!".

0
Roselime

Hi Kapster - my net goes down when I try to post certain things in other places.  I think there's a few things that can make us more credible/get some attention to the problem.  Accusations are now being pursued against Guantanamo detainees torture/non consensual experimentation - some are even linking this to MK Ultra.  I happen to believe that my situation started that way.  MK Ultra was mostly *not* about Manchurian Candidates/ritual sexual abuse.  Many of the subprojects were related to interrogation and torture.

Another place to look at is the availability of DEWs.  Even police departments have them now.  Look at what kind of portable DEWs exist, who has access to them etc.  It's not as exotic as when the previous generation of targets were coming out.

Third, well, there's something with the internet thing that I get harassed if I say.  Just think about recent internet kinds of problems.  Also, there are some who would remove the internet completely.  Anyway, the internet thing could help us know something about what's going on.

I think those are the ways to go. There are other things to - but remaining credible (in Eleanor White's words) is important.  My harassers would have me believe that this is about aliens, the end of the world, and every other kind of bizarre theory.  They seem to think that there is something "good" to this but they are "delusional."  Allen L. Barker's essays really helpful.  Here is one:  http://www.raven1.net/excuses.htm

I've seen other people lay the blame on certain "gangs" - but this is too systemic to be a "gang" thing.  And if gang wars were going on with DEWs I would imagine the government wouldn't turn its back on us.

What is NowPublic?

NowPublic lets people work together to cover news events around the world.

Find out more

Crowd Power

Anonymous
First Flagged at 10:21 PM, Dec 5, 2010 by Anonymous (not verified)

Related Stories

Recommendations (1)

Most recently recommended by:
 

closeSign in to NowPublic

is reporting from